ISSUE-119: Specify "not tracking" or "None"
Specify "not tracking" or "None"
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)
- Raised by:
- Thomas Lowenthal
- Opened on:
- 2012-01-26
- Description:
- Note change proposal: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_No_Tracking
The spec only defines a few standards of tracking, but doesn't have a specification for "not tracking at all". There are some sites which would like to be able to say not just "I meet the 3rd part definintion", but "I don't do any tracking at all". Let's create a specification for "absolutely not tracking" so that sites which want to meet this really high standard have a clear bar to point to. - Related Actions Items:
- ACTION-110 on Ninja Marnau to Write proposal text for what it means to "not track" - due 2012-02-10, pending review
- Related emails:
- Batch closing of obsolete issues (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2014-06-03)
- TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V01) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-10-09)
- Compliance document updates for review before next WD publication (was CVS WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts) (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-09-28)
- Re: June Change proposal: Not tracking (Issue - 119) (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-06-26)
- Agenda for May 22 call (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-05-21)
- issue and action cleanup proposals (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-05-15)
- Re: Issue-119 TSV "N" value (from singer@apple.com on 2013-04-18)
- Issue-119 TSV "N" value (from david@appnexus.com on 2013-04-17)
- Re: action-307, issue-119, absolutely not tracking (from ed@felten.com on 2012-11-08)
- Re: action-307, issue-119, absolutely not tracking (from Brooks.Dobbs@kbmg.com on 2012-11-08)
- Re: action-307, issue-119, absolutely not tracking (from singer@apple.com on 2012-11-08)
- Re: action-307, issue-119, absolutely not tracking (from ed@felten.com on 2012-11-08)
- Re: action-307, issue-119, absolutely not tracking (from singer@apple.com on 2012-11-08)
- Re: action-307, issue-119, absolutely not tracking (from Brooks.Dobbs@kbmg.com on 2012-11-08)
- Re: action-307, issue-119, absolutely not tracking (from singer@apple.com on 2012-11-08)
- Re: action-307, issue-119, absolutely not tracking (from Brooks.Dobbs@kbmg.com on 2012-11-08)
- Re: action-307, issue-119, absolutely not tracking (from singer@apple.com on 2012-11-08)
- Re: action-307, issue-119, absolutely not tracking (from david@networkadvertising.org on 2012-11-08)
- Re: action-307, issue-119, absolutely not tracking (from singer@apple.com on 2012-11-07)
- Re: action-307, issue-119, absolutely not tracking (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-11-07)
- action-307, issue-119, absolutely not tracking (from singer@apple.com on 2012-11-07)
- Agenda for 26 September 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-09-25)
- RE: Proposed agenda for Amsterdam F2F on October 03-05, 2012 (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-09-23)
- Proposed agenda for Amsterdam F2F on October 03-05, 2012 (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2012-09-21)
- Re: Agenda for 12 September 2012 call (from CPedigo@online-publishers.org on 2012-09-12)
- Agenda for 12 September 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-09-11)
- Re: Agenda for 5 September 2012 call (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-09-04)
- Re: Agenda for 5 September 2012 call (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-09-04)
- Re: Agenda for 5 September 2012 call (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-09-04)
- Re: Agenda for 5 September 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-09-04)
- FW: Agenda for 5 September 2012 call (from Brooks.Dobbs@kbmg.com on 2012-09-04)
- Agenda for 5 September 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-09-04)
- Agenda for 22 August 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-08-21)
- agenda for 8 August 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-08-07)
- Re: agenda for 1 August 2012 call (from ifette@google.com on 2012-08-01)
- Re: agenda for 1 August 2012 call (from david@networkadvertising.org on 2012-08-01)
- agenda for 1 August 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-07-31)
- Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to 'not track' (ISSUE-119) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-02-22)
- Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to 'not track' (ISSUE-119) (from singer@apple.com on 2012-02-22)
- Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to 'not track' (ISSUE-119) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-20)
- Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to 'not track' (ISSUE-119) (from ggieron@adtruth.com on 2012-02-19)
- RE: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to 'not track' (ISSUE-119) (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2012-02-19)
- Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to 'not track' (ISSUE-119) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-19)
- RE: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to 'not track' (ISSUE-119) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-19)
- Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to 'not track' (ISSUE-119) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-19)
- RE: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to 'not track' (ISSUE-119) (from julespol@futureofprivacy.org on 2012-02-18)
- Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to 'not track' (ISSUE-119) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-16)
- RE: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to 'not track' (ISSUE-119) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-02-16)
- RE: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to 'not track' (ISSUE-119) (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2012-02-16)
- Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to 'not track' (ISSUE-119) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-02-16)
- Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to 'not track' (ISSUE-119) (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-02-15)
- RE: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to 'not track' (ISSUE-119) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-02-15)
- RE: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to 'not track' (ISSUE-119) (from CPedigo@online-publishers.org on 2012-02-14)
- Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to 'not track' (ISSUE-119) (from npdoty@w3.org on 2012-02-13)
- Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to 'not track' (ISSUE-119) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-13)
- Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to 'not track' (ISSUE-119) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-13)
- Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to 'not track' (ISSUE-119) (from npdoty@w3.org on 2012-02-13)
- Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to 'not track' (ISSUE-119) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-13)
- Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to 'not track' (ISSUE-119) (from npdoty@w3.org on 2012-02-13)
- Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to 'not track' (ISSUE-119) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-13)
- RE: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to 'not track' (ISSUE-119) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-13)
- Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to 'not track' (ISSUE-119) (from nmarnau@datenschutzzentrum.de on 2012-02-13)
- RE: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to 'not track' (ISSUE-119) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-13)
- ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to 'not track' (ISSUE-119) (from nmarnau@datenschutzzentrum.de on 2012-02-13)
- Re: ACTION-86: Write a clarification of dnt:c to apply to never-tracked resources (from npdoty@w3.org on 2012-02-07)
- Re: ACTION-86: Write a clarification of dnt:c to apply to never-tracked resources (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-02-07)
- ACTION-86: Write a clarification of dnt:c to apply to never-tracked resources (from npdoty@w3.org on 2012-02-01)
Related notes:
During issue cleanup, marked pending review stable. (Under current TPE, there is an "N" response value, but no need for a separate absolutely-not definition.)
Nick Doty, 29 May 2013, 02:15:47This has been satisfied by the decision on ISSUE-5.
Roy Fielding, 13 Mar 2014, 07:37:41As we are approaching Last Call with the TPE spec
Ninja Marnau, 9 Apr 2014, 15:21:55Display change log