Agenda RDF-WG telecon 22 June 2011

Wednesdays at 11am US Eastern time for 75 minutes
  17:00 Paris/Berlin/A'dam; 16:00 London)
Telephone US: +1.617.761.6200
  SIP: zakim@voip.w3.org
  UK: +44.203.318.0479
  FR: +33.4.26.46.79.03
Zakim code: 73394
IRC channel: #rdf-wg on irc.w3.org on port 6665
Zakim instructions:  http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html
RRSAgent instructions: http://www.w3.org/2002/03/RRSAgent
Scribe list: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Scribes

Admin

• Chair: Guus Schreiber
• Scribe: Pat Hayes
• Alternate: TBA

PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 15 June telecon:

   http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2011-06-15

Action item review:

   http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/pendingreview
   http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/open

Graphs

Relevant issues currently in the tracker, provisionally organized in three groups:

Graph terminology

SPARQL/RDF WG Meeting regarding graph terminology: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Jun/0147.html

Relevant issues:

ISSUE-14 What is a named graph and what should we call it?

ISSUE-38 graph-vocabulary: What new vocabulary should be added to RDF to talk about graphs?

ISSUE-29 default-graph: Do we support SPARQL's notion of "default graph"?

ISSUE-30 sparql datasets: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?

Graph concepts & semantics

ISSUE-15 What is the relationship between the IRI and the triples in a dataset/quad-syntax/etc

ISSUE-17 Graph merge: How are RDF datasets to be merged?

ISSUE-21 Shared Node-IDs: Can Node-IDs be shared between parts of a quad/multigraph format?

ISSUE-22 empty-graphs: Does multigraph syntax need to support empty graphs?

ISSUE-31 multigraph syntax needed: Do we produce a standard (REC) syntax for conveying multiple graphs?

ISSUE-32 naming g-snaps: Can we identify both g-boxes and g-snaps?

ISSUE-33 subgraphs: Do we provide a way to refer to sub-graphs and/or individual triples?

ISSUE-35 rdf:Graph?: Should there be an rdf:Graph construct, or something like that?

Graph syntax

ISSUE-5 Graph Literals: Should we define Graph Literal datatypes?

ISSUE-23 multigraph-media-types: Does going from single-graph to multi-graph require new format and new media types?

ISSUE-28 g-text nesting: Do we need syntactic nesting of graphs (g-texts) as in N3?

SPARQL coordination

SPARQL Last Call: see message from Lee: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011May/0192.html

Progress on WG review?

Repercussions of ISSUE-12 resolution (status update)

AOB