ISSUE-31: Do we produce a standard (REC) syntax for conveying multiple graphs?
multigraph syntax needed
Do we produce a standard (REC) syntax for conveying multiple graphs?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- RDF Graphs
- Raised by:
- Richard Cyganiak
- Opened on:
- 2011-04-13
- Description:
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: minutes for 22 April teleconference (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-05-22)
- Re: minutes for 22 April teleconference (from ivan@w3.org on 2013-05-22)
- ISSUE-31: Do we produce a standard (REC) syntax for conveying multiple graphs? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-04-13)
Related notes:
RESOLVED: We will produce a W3C Recommendation for a dataset syntax, similar to TriG and to SPARQL's named graph syntax. This does not preclude recommending a syntax like n-quads.
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2012-10-03#resolution_2
Display change log
