ISSUE-28: Do we need syntactic nesting of graphs (g-texts) as in N3?

g-text nesting

Do we need syntactic nesting of graphs (g-texts) as in N3?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
RDF Graphs
Raised by:
Richard Cyganiak
Opened on:
2011-04-13
Description:
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2012-05-23#resolution_7

RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-28 ("Do we need syntactic nesting of graphs (g-texts) as in N3?"), saying No, we do not -- the use cases presented to the WG can be addressed without, and making syntactic nesting pay off would require additional logic machinery that's beyond this WG's timeframe ←
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: ISSUE-28 (was: Re: Draft agenda / final one in a few hours late) (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2012-05-24)
  2. Re: ISSUE-28 (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2012-05-23)
  3. Re: ISSUE-28 (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-05-23)
  4. Re: Draft agenda / final one in a few hours late (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2012-05-23)
  5. Re: ISSUE-28 (was: Re: Draft agenda / final one in a few hours late) (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-05-23)
  6. Re: ISSUE-28 (was: Re: Draft agenda / final one in a few hours late) (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2012-05-23)
  7. Re: ISSUE-28 (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2012-05-23)
  8. ISSUE-28 (was: Re: Draft agenda / final one in a few hours late) (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2012-05-23)
  9. Re: ISSUE-28 - two readings? (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-05-23)
  10. Re: ISSUE-28 - two readings? (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2012-05-23)
  11. Re: ISSUE-28 - two readings? (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2012-05-23)
  12. Re: Making progress on graphs (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2012-05-23)
  13. ISSUE-28 - two readings? (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-05-23)
  14. Re: Making progress on graphs (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2012-05-22)
  15. Re: Draft agenda / final one in a few hours late (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2012-05-22)
  16. Re: Making progress on graphs (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2012-05-22)
  17. Re: Making progress on graphs (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2012-05-22)
  18. Re: Making progress on graphs (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2012-05-22)
  19. Re: Making progress on graphs (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2012-05-22)
  20. Re: Making progress on graphs (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2012-05-21)
  21. Re: Making progress on graphs (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2012-05-21)
  22. Re: Making progress on graphs (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2012-05-18)
  23. Re: Making progress on graphs (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2012-05-18)
  24. Re: Making progress on graphs (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-05-17)
  25. Re: Making progress on graphs (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2012-05-17)
  26. Re: Making progress on graphs (from alexhall@revelytix.com on 2012-05-16)
  27. Re: Sandro's Formal Objection (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-05-16)
  28. Re: Sandro's Formal Objection (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2012-05-16)
  29. Re: Making progress on graphs (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2012-05-16)
  30. Sandro's Formal Objection (from danbri@danbri.org on 2012-05-16)
  31. Re: Making progress on graphs (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2012-05-16)
  32. Re: Making progress on graphs (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2012-05-16)
  33. Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2012-05-16)
  34. Re: Making progress on graphs (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-05-16)
  35. Re: Making progress on graphs (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2012-05-16)
  36. Re: Making progress on graphs (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2012-05-15)
  37. Re: Making progress on graphs (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-05-15)
  38. Re: Making progress on graphs (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2012-05-15)
  39. Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2012-05-15)
  40. Re: Making progress on graphs (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-05-14)
  41. Re: Making progress on graphs (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2012-05-14)
  42. Re: Making progress on graphs (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2012-05-14)
  43. Re: Making progress on graphs (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-05-14)
  44. Re: Making progress on graphs (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2012-05-14)
  45. Re: Making progress on graphs (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2012-05-14)
  46. Re: Making progress on graphs (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-05-14)
  47. Re: Making progress on graphs (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-05-14)
  48. Re: Making progress on graphs (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-05-13)
  49. Re: Making progress on graphs (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-05-13)
  50. Re: Making progress on graphs (from antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr on 2012-05-13)
  51. Re: Making progress on graphs (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2012-05-13)
  52. Re: Making progress on graphs (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-05-13)
  53. Re: Making progress on graphs (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2012-05-13)
  54. Re: Making progress on graphs (from kidehen@openlinksw.com on 2012-05-13)
  55. Re: Making progress on graphs (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-05-13)
  56. Re: Making progress on graphs (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-05-13)
  57. Making progress on graphs (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2012-05-13)
  58. ISSUE-28: Do we need syntactic nesting of graphs (g-texts) as in N3? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-04-13)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log ATOM feed

Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, Chair, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Staff Contacts
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 28.html,v 1.1 2014-07-09 12:17:59 carine Exp $