ISSUE-41: Which language codes should we use?
language-codes
Which language codes should we use?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Core FPWD
- Raised by:
- Matt Womer
- Opened on:
- 2011-05-11
- Description:
- From: leigh.klotz@xerox.com
Date: Fri May 06 18:51:47 2011
Archived: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-poiwg/2011May/0025.html
[[
Both xml:lang and MARC alpha 3 language codes are used. You should pick
one. xml:lang is easier to refer to normatively, because ISO
publication normative references can be problematic for implementors due
to cost. Perhaps Martin Duerst has a comment on this.
]]
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- RE: Agenda May 19, 2011 (from karl.seiler@navteq.com on 2011-05-19)
- Re: Agenda May 19, 2011 (from cperey@perey.com on 2011-05-18)
- Agenda May 19, 2011 (from Andrew.Braun@sonyericsson.com on 2011-05-18)
- Minutes POI Teleconference 12 May 2011 (from mdw@w3.org on 2011-05-12)
- ISSUE-41 (language-codes): Which language codes should we use? [Core FPWD] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-05-11)
Related notes:
As Leigh mentioned, xml:lang is easier to refer to, and so has been chosen.
Display change log
