ISSUE-34: Resolving differences in relationships between POIs linked via a relative relationship?
relationship-clashes
Resolving differences in relationships between POIs linked via a relative relationship?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Core FPWD
- Raised by:
- Matt Womer
- Opened on:
- 2011-05-11
- Description:
- From: roBman@mob-labs.com
Date: Thu May 05 00:02:25 2011
Archived: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-poiwg/2011May/0021.html
[[
With the Relationship primitive...are these just goals? What happens if
the actual extents/models for the two POIs don't agree with the defined
Relationship. e.g. it's set to contained-within but when the models are
projected this isn't the case.
]]
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Agenda June 2, 2011 (from ahill@gatech.edu on 2011-06-01)
- ISSUE-34 (relationship-clashes): Resolving differences in relationships between POIs linked via a relative relationship? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-05-11)
Related notes:
Within the relationship tag we'll put a note saying that the relationship information trumps the location information if they disagree. That is "contained-within" trumps coordinates that may indicate it is outside.
This is based on the idea that if the relationship is explicitly established then it's probably a known fact, vs coordinates may lose precision when transposed between systems.
Display change log
