See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 28 July 2009
<scribe> Scribe: mphillip
Minutes of last call: http://www.w3.org/2009/07/14-soap-jms-minutes.html
<eric> http://www.w3.org/2009/07/21-soap-jms-minutes.html
<eric> Ooops - wrong link in the agenda - that's the updated link to the agenda from the last meeting.
no objections to minutes
no problem with agenda
Actions: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/open
<scribe> No progress on action 32
Ditto, actions 68, 91, 93
close action-94
<trackbot> ACTION-94 to reword the protocol-2024 proposal closed
Message posted for action 94 - closed subject to review
Eric: has started created issues,
work still in progress
... for action 95
Amy: Sent note to list re: action 96 - does not believe FAQ questions on URI are relevant to W3C FAQ - will start answering questions on wiki
close action-96
<trackbot> ACTION-96 Formulate further FAQ questions closed
Eric: No status on action 97
Phil: Wiki page reviewed, no further FAQ questions for the moment - any new ones will be added to the wiki as they occur
close action-98
<trackbot> ACTION-98 Formulate further FAQ questions closed
Eric: The FAQ page has been edited to add an initial structure and the questions have been added, and preliminary answers put in by Phil
cloase action-99
close action-99
<trackbot> ACTION-99 Edit the FAQ page to add a general structure to the Wiki closed
Phil: Not all FAQ questions answered!
Eric: Has been in touch with Dongbo representing Oracle and hopes to get sign-off
Peter: No update from Progress
Mark: Positive news from IBM counsel - should be able to approve with a note to the public list tomorrow
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues
Eric: 5 issues raised so far
Issue4 relates to action 94 - will review on this call
Eric: We will wait until Derek
and Peter are on the call before we officially open the
issues
... Next week we will review the issues, and see if we can
accept the proposals (documented in the issues) to resolve
them
no issues open yet
Phil: Process question on Wiki: We don't need action items to make changes do we?
Eric: No it's not normative
Phil: If anyone would like to suggest alternative wording for answers then they are welcome
Eric: It uses mediawiki so there is a discussion page which we can use instead of holding discussions via email, or we can just amend the page... for instance adding links to the spec. where appropriate
Mark: Will review the page and add / enhance answers where I can
Eric: We should plan to have a
time when we review the FAQ page more formally and all
explicitly approve the content. Until then, we should all feel
empowered to edit the page
... Would also encourage you to get colleagues to look at the
spec. and wiki and make suggestions
... Other editors can be added to the page if necessary
No updates
None
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found Scribe: mphillip Inferring ScribeNick: mphillip WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: Actions Amy Mark Peter Phil SW_RIF Team_ WS_SOAP-JM active eric joined soap-jms trackbot wf You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy Regrets: Derek Peter Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Jul/0027.html Found Date: 28 Jul 2009 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2009/07/28-soap-jms-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]