w3c/wbs-design
or
by mail to sysreq
.
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: team-wcag-act-surveys@w3.org,maryjom@us.ibm.com,wilco.fiers@deque.com
This questionnaire was open from 2019-11-19 to 2019-12-05.
8 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results |
Responder | Instructions |
---|---|
Detlev Fischer | |
Wilco Fiers | |
Charu Pandhi | |
Romain Deltour | |
Jonathan Avila | |
Kathy Eng | |
Mary Jo Mueller | |
Kasper Isager Dalsgarð |
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
Yes | 5 |
No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. | |
I don't know. My questions are documented below. | 2 |
(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)
Responder | Consistency with ACT Rules Format | Comments |
---|---|---|
Detlev Fischer | I don't know. My questions are documented below. | The applicability section says that "iframe and object elements are not applicable "to then say that a wrong lang attribute ma ystill create problems. Thi smay be slightly confusing. If it can cause probles, why is it not applcable? Because it RARELY causes problems? Because it is difficult to set the correct language on embedded content? |
Wilco Fiers | Yes | |
Charu Pandhi | I don't know. My questions are documented below. | Understand iframe or embedded objects are inapplicable for this rule. The note says an incorrect lang attribute on them could still cause a problem, if so can we clarify why? Will there be another rule to test that? and also maybe add a test case to that extent may help. |
Romain Deltour | Yes | |
Jonathan Avila | ||
Kathy Eng | Yes | |
Mary Jo Mueller | Yes | |
Kasper Isager Dalsgarð | Yes |
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
Yes | 6 |
No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. | |
I don't know. My questions are documented below. | 1 |
(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)
Responder | Rule assumptions | Comments |
---|---|---|
Detlev Fischer | Yes | |
Wilco Fiers | Yes | |
Charu Pandhi | Yes | |
Romain Deltour | I don't know. My questions are documented below. | I don't understand what is meant by: "This rule doesn't test if the attribute is needed to comply to WCAG." |
Jonathan Avila | ||
Kathy Eng | Yes | |
Mary Jo Mueller | Yes | |
Kasper Isager Dalsgarð | Yes |
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
Yes | 3 |
No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. | 1 |
I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below. | 3 |
(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)
Responder | Implementation data | Comments |
---|---|---|
Detlev Fischer | I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below. | |
Wilco Fiers | Yes | |
Charu Pandhi | Yes | |
Romain Deltour | I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below. | (I'm not sure what the ACT TF is expected to review here) |
Jonathan Avila | ||
Kathy Eng | No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. | Failed example 2 (https://act-rules.github.io/rules/bf051a#failed-example-2) should not fail since "This rule checks that the lang attribute of the root element of an HTML page has a valid primary language subtag." The lang attribute value has a valid primary language subtag, but a syntactically invalid region subtag. <html lang="en-US-GB"></html> |
Mary Jo Mueller | I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below. | |
Kasper Isager Dalsgarð | Yes |
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
Yes | 5 |
No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. | |
I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below. | 2 |
(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)
Responder | Consistent with WCAG | Comments |
---|---|---|
Detlev Fischer | I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below. | |
Wilco Fiers | Yes | |
Charu Pandhi | Yes | |
Romain Deltour | I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below. | This rule essentially checks that: - the lang attribute is syntactically correct - the primary language subtag is well-known Question 1: Is it assumed or well known that invalid sub tags *after the primary language subtag* are causing accessibility issues ? (e.g. is "en-US-GB" really going to cause accessibility issues?) Question 2: What about grandfathered tags (e.g. `i-lux`, `i-navajo`)? My understanding is that they're allowed, but maybe this should be made explicit in the "valid language subtag" definition. |
Jonathan Avila | ||
Kathy Eng | Yes | |
Mary Jo Mueller | Yes | |
Kasper Isager Dalsgarð | Yes |
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
Yes there are open issues that need to be resolved. I have listed them below. | 2 |
Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published. | 1 |
No, there are no open issues. | 3 |
(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)
Responder | Remaining open issues | Comments |
---|---|---|
Detlev Fischer | ||
Wilco Fiers | No, there are no open issues. | |
Charu Pandhi | Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published. | |
Romain Deltour | Yes there are open issues that need to be resolved. I have listed them below. | Depending if the TF sees my comment above (survey question 5) as real issues. |
Jonathan Avila | ||
Kathy Eng | No, there are no open issues. | |
Mary Jo Mueller | Yes there are open issues that need to be resolved. I have listed them below. | Looks like Trusted Tester has implementation data for this rule submitted in issue 1045. |
Kasper Isager Dalsgarð | No, there are no open issues. |
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
Yes, I have questions or concerns, described below. | 2 |
No, I have no further questions or concerns. | 5 |
(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)
Responder | Other questions or concerns | Comments |
---|---|---|
Detlev Fischer | See above | |
Wilco Fiers | No, I have no further questions or concerns. | |
Charu Pandhi | No, I have no further questions or concerns. | |
Romain Deltour | No, I have no further questions or concerns. | |
Jonathan Avila | Yes, I have questions or concerns, described below. | Not holding up this rule -- but I did log a comment indicating that this rule is very heavy. This test along requires 9k of file size just to test the 9k sub language codes. While this isn't an issue for many checker -- for checkers that are dynamic and run live this can be very heavy. |
Kathy Eng | No, I have no further questions or concerns. | |
Mary Jo Mueller | Yes, I have questions or concerns, described below. | Agree with others' concerns about the sub-language. Since this rule is to check the validity/existence of a primary language tag it shouldn't check for sub-language. |
Kasper Isager Dalsgarð | No, I have no further questions or concerns. |
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
Yes, it is ready to publish as-is. | 1 |
Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. | 5 |
No, it is not ready to publish and the reason is documented below. | 1 |
(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)
Responder | Readiness for publishing | Comments |
---|---|---|
Detlev Fischer | Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. | Possibly clarify the note to make it explicit that iframe / object lang attr are excluded, and why. |
Wilco Fiers | Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. | I created a PR for this, minor changes, but I think they should happen: https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/pull/1036 |
Charu Pandhi | Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. | The reasons listed in #1 |
Romain Deltour | Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. | Depending if the TF sees my comment above (survey question 5) as real issues. |
Jonathan Avila | ||
Kathy Eng | No, it is not ready to publish and the reason is documented below. | see response to #4 re: Failed example 2 |
Mary Jo Mueller | Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. | Address concerns over sub-language. Include Trusted Tester test data. |
Kasper Isager Dalsgarð | Yes, it is ready to publish as-is. |
The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:
Send an email to all the non-responders.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
w3c/wbs-design
or
by mail to sysreq
.