W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire ACT TF - Rule Review: Button has an accessible name

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: team-wcag-act-surveys@w3.org,maryjom@us.ibm.com,wilco.fiers@deque.com

This questionnaire was open from 2020-05-06 to 2020-05-14.

5 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Instructions
  2. Consistency with ACT Rules Format
  3. Rule assumptions
  4. Implementation data
  5. Consistent with WCAG
  6. Remaining open issues
  7. Other questions or concerns
  8. Readiness for publishing

1. Instructions

Review the rule Button has an accessible name and answer the questions in this survey. This rule has been reviewed before and Issue 451 details the comments from the previous survey and their resolutions. If there are issues with the rule, you may either open an issue in GitHub or provide details in the entry fields for the applicable question.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results

Details

Responder Instructions
Trevor Bostic
Wilco Fiers
Mary Jo Mueller
Daniel Montalvo
Kathy Eng

2. Consistency with ACT Rules Format

Does the rule follow the ACT Rules Format 1.0?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes 5
No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below.
I don't know. My questions are documented below.

Details

Responder Consistency with ACT Rules FormatComments
Trevor Bostic Yes
Wilco Fiers Yes
Mary Jo Mueller Yes
Daniel Montalvo Yes
Kathy Eng Yes

3. Rule assumptions

Are the assumptions acceptable?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes 5
No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below.
I don't know. My questions are documented below.

Details

Responder Rule assumptionsComments
Trevor Bostic Yes
Wilco Fiers Yes
Mary Jo Mueller Yes
Daniel Montalvo Yes
Kathy Eng Yes

4. Implementation data

Is the implementation data correct?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes 2
No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. 3
I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below.

Details

Responder Implementation dataComments
Trevor Bostic Yes
Wilco Fiers No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. Most implementations are incomplete, the one that isn't is a partial implementation.
Mary Jo Mueller No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. As previously noted, there aren't any fully complete implementations that are also consistent with the rule.
Daniel Montalvo No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below.
Kathy Eng Yes

5. Consistent with WCAG

Is the rule consistent with existing WCAG documents?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes 5
No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below.
I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below.

Details

Responder Consistent with WCAGComments
Trevor Bostic Yes
Wilco Fiers Yes
Mary Jo Mueller Yes
Daniel Montalvo Yes
Kathy Eng Yes

6. Remaining open issues

Are there any remaining open issues for this rule that were opened prior to this review?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes there are open issues that need to be resolved. I have listed them below. 1
Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published. 1
No, there are no open issues. 3

Details

Responder Remaining open issuesComments
Trevor Bostic No, there are no open issues.
Wilco Fiers No, there are no open issues.
Mary Jo Mueller No, there are no open issues.
Daniel Montalvo Yes there are open issues that need to be resolved. I have listed them below. Not exactly issues but implementations need to be updated for this rule to be published.
Kathy Eng Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published. Consider renaming the "has acc name" rules to Button "has non-empty acc name" - #1220 (https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/issues/1220)

7. Other questions or concerns

Do you have any further questions or concerns about this rule?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes, I have questions or concerns, described below. 1
No, I have no further questions or concerns. 4

Details

Responder Other questions or concernsComments
Trevor Bostic No, I have no further questions or concerns.
Wilco Fiers No, I have no further questions or concerns.
Mary Jo Mueller No, I have no further questions or concerns.
Daniel Montalvo No, I have no further questions or concerns.
Kathy Eng Yes, I have questions or concerns, described below. More implementations would be nice. At the time of review, there was one that is partially consistent. Perhaps remove the Nos from the list.

8. Readiness for publishing

Do you think this rule is ready to be published?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes, it is ready to publish as-is. 2
Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. 3
No, it is not ready to publish and the reason is documented below.

Details

Responder Readiness for publishingComments
Trevor Bostic Yes, it is ready to publish as-is.
Wilco Fiers Yes, it is ready to publish as-is. I'm reasonably comfortable with this rule as is, although updated implementations would be good.
Mary Jo Mueller Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. I believe one of the qualifications for publishing is to have one full implementation. We don't yet have proof of that. Once that is done the rule can publish. So I guess that is a conditional approval since the rule itself doesn't require any changes. Hopefully we can just mark this as ready to be sent to the AG WG and the implementations will be ready before they actually go to them for their review.
Daniel Montalvo Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. Yes, as soon as one implementation is complete.
Kathy Eng Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. implementations

More details on responses

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Katie Haritos-Shea
  2. David MacDonald
  3. Romain Deltour
  4. Detlev Fischer
  5. Chris Loiselle
  6. Jonathan Avila
  7. Rachael Bradley Montgomery
  8. Charles Adams
  9. Todd Libby
  10. Thomas Brunet
  11. Catherine Droege
  12. Suji Sreerama
  13. Shane Dittmar
  14. Nayan Padrai

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.