W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire ACT TF - Rule Review: Link has non-empty accessible name

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: team-wcag-act-surveys@w3.org,maryjom@us.ibm.com,wilco.fiers@deque.com

This questionnaire was open from 2020-06-15 to 2020-07-03.

6 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Instructions
  2. Consistency with ACT Rules Format
  3. Rule assumptions
  4. Implementation data
  5. Consistent with WCAG
  6. Remaining open issues
  7. Other questions or concerns
  8. Readiness for publishing

1. Instructions

Review the rule Link has accessible non-empty name and answer the questions in this survey. This rule has been updated due to feedback addressed from Issue #439.

If there are issues with the rule, you may either open an issue in GitHub or provide details in the entry fields for the applicable question.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results

Details

Responder Instructions
Wilco Fiers
Kathy Eng
Kasper Isager Dalsgarð
Detlev Fischer
Mary Jo Mueller
Charu Pandhi

2. Consistency with ACT Rules Format

Does the rule follow the ACT Rules Format 1.0?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes 6
No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below.
I don't know. My questions are documented below.

Details

Responder Consistency with ACT Rules FormatComments
Wilco Fiers Yes
Kathy Eng Yes
Kasper Isager Dalsgarð Yes
Detlev Fischer Yes
Mary Jo Mueller Yes
Charu Pandhi Yes

3. Rule assumptions

Are the assumptions acceptable?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes 6
No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below.
I don't know. My questions are documented below.

Details

Responder Rule assumptionsComments
Wilco Fiers Yes
Kathy Eng Yes
Kasper Isager Dalsgarð Yes
Detlev Fischer Yes
Mary Jo Mueller Yes
Charu Pandhi Yes

4. Implementation data

Is the implementation data correct?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes 5
No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below.
I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below. 1

Details

Responder Implementation dataComments
Wilco Fiers Yes
Kathy Eng Yes Would be better if the 3 incomplete implementations had fewer "untested" results.
Kasper Isager Dalsgarð Yes
Detlev Fischer Yes
Mary Jo Mueller Yes
Charu Pandhi I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below. The failed example 3 needs to be removed. There is a PR

5. Consistent with WCAG

Is the rule consistent with existing WCAG documents?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes 6
No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below.
I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below.

Details

Responder Consistent with WCAGComments
Wilco Fiers Yes
Kathy Eng Yes
Kasper Isager Dalsgarð Yes
Detlev Fischer Yes
Mary Jo Mueller Yes
Charu Pandhi Yes

6. Remaining open issues

Are there any remaining open issues for this rule that were opened prior to this review?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes there are open issues that need to be resolved. I have listed them below. 2
Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published. 2
No, there are no open issues. 2

Details

Responder Remaining open issuesComments
Wilco Fiers No, there are no open issues.
Kathy Eng Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published. https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/issues/1353, but maybe this is already closed?
Kasper Isager Dalsgarð Yes there are open issues that need to be resolved. I have listed them below. https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/issues/1353 which is solved by https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/pull/1360.
Detlev Fischer No, there are no open issues.
Mary Jo Mueller Yes there are open issues that need to be resolved. I have listed them below. Since there's already a PR in place for issue #1353 about removing Example 3, I think we can just accept the PR and call this ready to publish.
Charu Pandhi Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published. As there is a PR on the open issue to resolve

7. Other questions or concerns

Do you have any further questions or concerns about this rule?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes, I have questions or concerns, described below.
No, I have no further questions or concerns. 6

Details

Responder Other questions or concernsComments
Wilco Fiers No, I have no further questions or concerns.
Kathy Eng No, I have no further questions or concerns.
Kasper Isager Dalsgarð No, I have no further questions or concerns.
Detlev Fischer No, I have no further questions or concerns.
Mary Jo Mueller No, I have no further questions or concerns.
Charu Pandhi No, I have no further questions or concerns.

8. Readiness for publishing

Do you think this rule is ready to be published?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes, it is ready to publish as-is. 2
Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. 4
No, it is not ready to publish and the reason is documented below.

Details

Responder Readiness for publishingComments
Wilco Fiers Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. I created a PR for it here:
https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/pull/1355

It's a pretty minor change, shouldn't hold up publishing.
Kathy Eng Yes, it is ready to publish as-is.
Kasper Isager Dalsgarð Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/pull/1360 needs to be merged.
Detlev Fischer Yes, it is ready to publish as-is.
Mary Jo Mueller Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. I say, incorporate PR 1355 and call it ready for the AG WG to review. ;)
Charu Pandhi Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes.

More details on responses

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Katie Haritos-Shea
  2. David MacDonald
  3. Romain Deltour
  4. Chris Loiselle
  5. Jonathan Avila
  6. Rachael Bradley Montgomery
  7. Charles Adams
  8. Daniel Montalvo
  9. Todd Libby
  10. Thomas Brunet
  11. Catherine Droege
  12. Suji Sreerama
  13. Shane Dittmar
  14. Nayan Padrai

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.