W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire ACT TF - Rule Review: meta element has no refresh delay

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: team-wcag-act-surveys@w3.org,maryjom@us.ibm.com,wilco.fiers@deque.com

This questionnaire was open from 2020-11-11 to 2020-12-03.

5 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Instructions
  2. Consistency with ACT Rules Format
  3. Rule assumptions
  4. Implementation data
  5. Consistent with accessibility requirements
  6. Remaining open issues
  7. Other questions or concerns
  8. Rule is up-to-date
  9. Readiness for publishing

1. Instructions

Review the rule meta element has no refresh delay and answer the questions in this survey.

If there are issues with the rule, you may either open an issue in GitHub or provide details in the entry fields for the applicable question.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results

Details

Responder Instructions
Wilco Fiers
Detlev Fischer
Kathy Eng
Trevor Bostic
Mary Jo Mueller

2. Consistency with ACT Rules Format

Does the rule follow the ACT Rules Format 1.0?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes 5
No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below.
I don't know. My questions are documented below.

Details

Responder Consistency with ACT Rules FormatComments
Wilco Fiers Yes
Detlev Fischer Yes
Kathy Eng Yes
Trevor Bostic Yes
Mary Jo Mueller Yes

3. Rule assumptions

Are the assumptions acceptable?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes 5
No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below.
I don't know. My questions are documented below.

Details

Responder Rule assumptionsComments
Wilco Fiers Yes
Detlev Fischer Yes
Kathy Eng Yes
Trevor Bostic Yes
Mary Jo Mueller Yes

4. Implementation data

Is the implementation data correct?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes 4
No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below.
I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below. 1

Details

Responder Implementation dataComments
Wilco Fiers Yes
Detlev Fischer Yes
Kathy Eng Yes
Trevor Bostic I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below. For the inapplicable section, would it be helpful to add a bit more detail to the description on why the content is invalidd instead of repeating "content attribute is invalid and therefore inapplicable"
Mary Jo Mueller Yes

5. Consistent with accessibility requirements

Is the rule consistent with existing accessibility standards (e.g. WCAG, ARIA, etc.)?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes 5
No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below.
I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below.

Details

Responder Consistent with accessibility requirementsComments
Wilco Fiers Yes
Detlev Fischer Yes
Kathy Eng Yes
Trevor Bostic Yes Saying yes, since it does a good job explaining under which circumstances some examples satisfy (or not) specific criteria. I am wondering if we should include something like the last sentence of the background as a note in the expectation to make it more prominent.
Mary Jo Mueller Yes

6. Remaining open issues

Are there any remaining open issues for this rule that were opened prior to this review?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes there are open issues that need to be resolved. I have listed them below.
Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published. 3
No, there are no open issues. 2

Details

Responder Remaining open issuesComments
Wilco Fiers Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published. this one https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/issues/1115
Detlev Fischer No, there are no open issues.
Kathy Eng Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published. https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/issues/1115
Trevor Bostic No, there are no open issues.
Mary Jo Mueller Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published. Issue 1115 meta element with delay=0 and no redirect causes infinite loop in browser

7. Other questions or concerns

Do you have any further questions or concerns about this rule?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes, I have questions or concerns, described below. 1
No, I have no further questions or concerns. 4

Details

Responder Other questions or concernsComments
Wilco Fiers Yes, I have questions or concerns, described below. It is unclear what in accessibility support works different in different browsers. Would be useful to include that.
Detlev Fischer No, I have no further questions or concerns.
Kathy Eng No, I have no further questions or concerns.
Trevor Bostic No, I have no further questions or concerns.
Mary Jo Mueller No, I have no further questions or concerns.

8. Rule is up-to-date

Is the rule up to date? If so, the accessibility support should still be relevant, it should follow the recommended writing style, and use up to date links.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes, all information is up-to-date. 3
No, it needs the following changes. 2
I don't know, but I have the following concerns.

Details

Responder Rule is up-to-dateComments
Wilco Fiers No, it needs the following changes. The format is somewhat outdated. The applicability uses actual HTML instead of a more precise description using elements and attribute values, making it unclear whether case sensitivity applies.

In expectation "time" is used, and then defined in a note. Notes should not be used to define content.

The assumption can be phrased more clearly, and should not refer to a rule as a test.
Detlev Fischer Yes, all information is up-to-date.
Kathy Eng Yes, all information is up-to-date.
Trevor Bostic Yes, all information is up-to-date.
Mary Jo Mueller No, it needs the following changes. Agree with Wilco's comments.

9. Readiness for publishing

Do you think this rule is ready to be published?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes, it is ready to publish as-is. 2
Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. 3
No, it is not ready to publish and the reason is documented below.

Details

Responder Readiness for publishingComments
Wilco Fiers Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. Just needs some editorial work.
Detlev Fischer Yes, it is ready to publish as-is.
Kathy Eng Yes, it is ready to publish as-is.
Trevor Bostic Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. Possible changes to test case descriptions
Mary Jo Mueller Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. Fix some of those editorial issues brought up and this will be ready to go.

More details on responses

  • Wilco Fiers: last responded on 12, November 2020 at 13:51 (UTC)
  • Detlev Fischer: last responded on 2, December 2020 at 18:06 (UTC)
  • Kathy Eng: last responded on 3, December 2020 at 00:45 (UTC)
  • Trevor Bostic: last responded on 3, December 2020 at 13:32 (UTC)
  • Mary Jo Mueller: last responded on 3, December 2020 at 14:06 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Katie Haritos-Shea
  2. David MacDonald
  3. Romain Deltour
  4. Chris Loiselle
  5. Jonathan Avila
  6. Rachael Bradley Montgomery
  7. Charles Adams
  8. Daniel Montalvo
  9. Todd Libby
  10. Thomas Brunet
  11. Catherine Droege
  12. Suji Sreerama
  13. Shane Dittmar
  14. Nayan Padrai

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.