W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire Thorough review and CFC for publication

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody.

This questionnaire was open from 2018-06-12 to 2018-06-14.

6 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

Review changes made for Pull Request 217
ACT Rules Format 1.0 Working Draft

1. Review changes made for Pull Request 217

Review the new edits made in pull request 217 to resolve Issue 208 - Ensure Comparable Results and Issue 202 - Accessibility Requirements. If you wish to read the changes in the context of the full spec, read the editor's draft ACT Rules Format 1.0 (12 June).

Should pull request 217 be merged?

Summary

Choice	All responders
Choice	Results
Yes	3
Yes, with suggestions for improvements in the comments of the pull request.	3
No. I have left reasons for my objection in the comments of the pull request.

Details

Responder	Review changes made for Pull Request 217	Comments
Romain Deltour	Yes
Jey Nandakumar	Yes, with suggestions for improvements in the comments of the pull request.
Wilco Fiers	Yes
Charu Pandhi	Yes
Anne Thyme Nørregaard	Yes, with suggestions for improvements in the comments of the pull request.
Mary Jo Mueller	Yes, with suggestions for improvements in the comments of the pull request.

2. ACT Rules Format 1.0 Working Draft

Please review the current editor's draft of the ACT Rules Format 1.0 (12 June) for its readiness for publication for public review. Once our task force approves, we'll take the draft to the AG WG for their approval to publish.

Is the ACT Rules Format 1.0 draft ready to publish for wider review?

Summary

Choice	All responders
Choice	Results
Yes, the draft is ready for publication as-is.	5
Yes, the draft is ready for publication, with the edits/changes proposed in a GitHub issue or in the comments below.	1
No, the draft is not ready for publication for the reasons documented in a GitHub issue or in the comments below.

Details

Responder	ACT Rules Format 1.0 Working Draft	Comments
Romain Deltour	Yes, the draft is ready for publication as-is.
Jey Nandakumar	Yes, the draft is ready for publication as-is.
Wilco Fiers	Yes, the draft is ready for publication as-is.
Charu Pandhi	Yes, the draft is ready for publication as-is.	Good work, thanks everyone.
Anne Thyme Nørregaard	Yes, the draft is ready for publication as-is.
Mary Jo Mueller	Yes, the draft is ready for publication, with the edits/changes proposed in a GitHub issue or in the comments below.