w3c/wbs-design or
by mail to sysreq.
W3C
Site Navigation
Nearby
Results of Questionnaire ACT TF - Rule Review: Image filename is accessible name for image
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: team-wcag-act-surveys@w3.org,maryjom@us.ibm.com,wilco.fiers@deque.com
This questionnaire was open from 2020-09-09 to 2020-09-24.
5 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
- Instructions
- Consistency with ACT Rules Format
- Rule assumptions
- Implementation data
- Consistent with WCAG
- Remaining open issues
- Other questions or concerns
- Readiness for publishing
1. Instructions
Review the rule Image filename is accessible name for image that was updated to address previous review comments in Issue 447. Answer the questions in this survey.
If there are issues with the rule, you may either open an issue in GitHub or provide details in the entry fields for the applicable question.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results |
Details
| Responder | Instructions |
|---|---|
| Wilco Fiers | |
| Trevor Bostic | |
| Levon Spradlin | |
| Mary Jo Mueller | |
| Kathy Eng |
2. Consistency with ACT Rules Format
Does the rule follow the ACT Rules Format 1.0?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes | 5 |
| No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. | |
| I don't know. My questions are documented below. |
Details
| Responder | Consistency with ACT Rules Format | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Wilco Fiers | Yes | |
| Trevor Bostic | Yes | |
| Levon Spradlin | Yes | |
| Mary Jo Mueller | Yes | |
| Kathy Eng | Yes |
3. Rule assumptions
Are the assumptions acceptable?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes | 4 |
| No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. | |
| I don't know. My questions are documented below. | 1 |
Details
| Responder | Rule assumptions | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Wilco Fiers | Yes | |
| Trevor Bostic | Yes | |
| Levon Spradlin | Yes | |
| Mary Jo Mueller | I don't know. My questions are documented below. | Not sure why the rule would need to be able to determine the language of the test target. The rule couldn't automatically checking the validity of the text alternative. A manual rule that actually checks the text and makes the determination of whether it is a good text alternative would definitely need to be able to determine the languge. |
| Kathy Eng | Yes |
4. Implementation data
Is the implementation data correct?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes | 5 |
| No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. | |
| I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below. |
Details
| Responder | Implementation data | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Wilco Fiers | Yes | |
| Trevor Bostic | Yes | |
| Levon Spradlin | Yes | |
| Mary Jo Mueller | Yes | |
| Kathy Eng | Yes |
5. Consistent with WCAG
Is the rule consistent with existing WCAG documents?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes | 4 |
| No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. | |
| I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below. | 1 |
Details
| Responder | Consistent with WCAG | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Wilco Fiers | Yes | |
| Trevor Bostic | Yes | |
| Levon Spradlin | Yes | |
| Mary Jo Mueller | Yes | Since there is text to say that human checking of the file name is also required, I'm ok with it. It is odd, however as one could think this is passing a noted WCAG failure technique (F30). |
| Kathy Eng | I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below. | An image's accessible name is not required to be the image's filename to meet SC 1.1.1. I think a rule "image has descriptive accessible name" could have a passing example where the filename is the accessible name, but I question this as a rule itself. Perhaps changing the name of the rule would help - Image's accessible name of filename is descriptive? Still a rule for such an edge case seems unnecessary. |
6. Remaining open issues
Are there any remaining open issues for this rule that were opened prior to this review?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes there are open issues that need to be resolved. I have listed them below. | |
| Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published. | |
| No, there are no open issues. | 5 |
Details
| Responder | Remaining open issues | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Wilco Fiers | No, there are no open issues. | |
| Trevor Bostic | No, there are no open issues. | |
| Levon Spradlin | No, there are no open issues. | |
| Mary Jo Mueller | No, there are no open issues. | |
| Kathy Eng | No, there are no open issues. |
7. Other questions or concerns
Do you have any further questions or concerns about this rule?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes, I have questions or concerns, described below. | 1 |
| No, I have no further questions or concerns. | 4 |
Details
| Responder | Other questions or concerns | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Wilco Fiers | No, I have no further questions or concerns. | |
| Trevor Bostic | No, I have no further questions or concerns. | |
| Levon Spradlin | No, I have no further questions or concerns. | |
| Mary Jo Mueller | No, I have no further questions or concerns. | |
| Kathy Eng | Yes, I have questions or concerns, described below. | I don't think a manual test processes should be required to implement this rule. Trusted Tester does not check the filename when evaluating accessible name. |
8. Readiness for publishing
Do you think this rule is ready to be published?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes, it is ready to publish as-is. | 2 |
| Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. | 1 |
| No, it is not ready to publish and the reason is documented below. | 1 |
(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)
Details
| Responder | Readiness for publishing | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Wilco Fiers | Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. | I opened this PR to move one of the notes: https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/pull/1449 |
| Trevor Bostic | Yes, it is ready to publish as-is. | |
| Levon Spradlin | Yes, it is ready to publish as-is. | |
| Mary Jo Mueller | I don't know. This rule would require a combination of automatic and manual test to obtain the expected test results. | |
| Kathy Eng | No, it is not ready to publish and the reason is documented below. | see previous responses |
More details on responses
Non-responders
The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:
- Katie Haritos-Shea
- David MacDonald
- Romain Deltour
- Detlev Fischer
- Chris Loiselle
- Jonathan Avila
- Rachael Bradley Montgomery
- Charles Adams
- Daniel Montalvo
- Todd Libby
- Thomas Brunet
- Catherine Droege
- Suji Sreerama
- Shane Dittmar
- Nayan Padrai
Send an email to all the non-responders.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
Report issues
on GitHub project