W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire ACT TF - Rule Review: Image has non-empty accessible name

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: team-wcag-act-surveys@w3.org,maryjom@us.ibm.com,wilco.fiers@deque.com

This questionnaire was open from 2020-08-06 to 2020-08-20.

6 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Instructions
  2. Consistency with ACT Rules Format
  3. Rule assumptions
  4. Implementation data
  5. Consistent with accessibility requirements
  6. Remaining open issues
  7. Other questions or concerns
  8. Readiness for publishing

1. Instructions

Review the rule Image has non-empty accessible name and answer the questions in this survey. This rule has been updated due to comments documented in Issue #465 If there are issues with the rule, either open an issue in GitHub or provide details in the entry fields for the applicable question.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results

Details

Responder Instructions
Wilco Fiers
Detlev Fischer
Daniel Montalvo
Mary Jo Mueller
Trevor Bostic
Kathy Eng

2. Consistency with ACT Rules Format

Does the rule follow the ACT Rules Format 1.0?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes 6
No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below.
I don't know. My questions are documented below.

Details

Responder Consistency with ACT Rules FormatComments
Wilco Fiers Yes
Detlev Fischer Yes
Daniel Montalvo Yes
Mary Jo Mueller Yes
Trevor Bostic Yes
Kathy Eng Yes

3. Rule assumptions

Are the assumptions acceptable?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes 6
No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below.
I don't know. My questions are documented below.

Details

Responder Rule assumptionsComments
Wilco Fiers Yes
Detlev Fischer Yes
Daniel Montalvo Yes
Mary Jo Mueller Yes
Trevor Bostic Yes
Kathy Eng Yes

4. Implementation data

Is the implementation data correct?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes 5
No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. 1
I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below.

Details

Responder Implementation dataComments
Wilco Fiers Yes
Detlev Fischer Yes
Daniel Montalvo Yes
Mary Jo Mueller Yes
Trevor Bostic Yes
Kathy Eng No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. Failed Ex 1 - remove "because it is missing an empty alt attribute." There is no alt attribute in the code.

5. Consistent with accessibility requirements

Is the rule consistent with existing accessibility requirements (e.g. WCAG, ARIA, etc.)?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes 6
No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below.
I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below.

Details

Responder Consistent with accessibility requirementsComments
Wilco Fiers Yes
Detlev Fischer Yes
Daniel Montalvo Yes
Mary Jo Mueller Yes
Trevor Bostic Yes
Kathy Eng Yes

6. Remaining open issues

Are there any remaining open issues for this rule that were opened prior to this review?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes there are open issues that need to be resolved. I have listed them below.
Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published. 4
No, there are no open issues. 2

Details

Responder Remaining open issuesComments
Wilco Fiers Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published.
Detlev Fischer No, there are no open issues.
Daniel Montalvo Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published.
Mary Jo Mueller Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published.
Trevor Bostic No, there are no open issues.
Kathy Eng Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published.

7. Other questions or concerns

Do you have any further questions or concerns about this rule?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes, I have questions or concerns, described below.
No, I have no further questions or concerns. 6

Details

Responder Other questions or concernsComments
Wilco Fiers No, I have no further questions or concerns. Issue #1165 references the rule, but I don't think it's particularly relevant.
Detlev Fischer No, I have no further questions or concerns.
Daniel Montalvo No, I have no further questions or concerns.
Mary Jo Mueller No, I have no further questions or concerns.
Trevor Bostic No, I have no further questions or concerns.
Kathy Eng No, I have no further questions or concerns.

8. Readiness for publishing

Do you think this rule is ready to be published?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes, it is ready to publish as-is. 5
Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. 1
No, it is not ready to publish and the reason is documented below.

Details

Responder Readiness for publishingComments
Wilco Fiers Yes, it is ready to publish as-is.
Detlev Fischer Yes, it is ready to publish as-is.
Daniel Montalvo Yes, it is ready to publish as-is.
Mary Jo Mueller Yes, it is ready to publish as-is.
Trevor Bostic Yes, it is ready to publish as-is.
Kathy Eng Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. previous comment on #4

More details on responses

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Katie Haritos-Shea
  2. David MacDonald
  3. Romain Deltour
  4. Chris Loiselle
  5. Jonathan Avila
  6. Rachael Bradley Montgomery
  7. Charles Adams
  8. Todd Libby
  9. Thomas Brunet
  10. Catherine Droege
  11. Suji Sreerama
  12. Shane Dittmar
  13. Nayan Padrai

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.