w3c/wbs-design or
by mail to sysreq.
W3C
Site Navigation
Nearby
Results of Questionnaire ACT TF - Rule Review: Form control has non-empty accessible name
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: team-wcag-act-surveys@w3.org,maryjom@us.ibm.com,wilco.fiers@deque.com
This questionnaire was open from 2020-07-23 to 2020-08-06.
6 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
- Instructions
- Consistency with ACT Rules Format
- Rule assumptions
- Implementation data
- Consistent with WCAG
- Remaining open issues
- Other questions or concerns
- Readiness for publishing
1. Instructions
The rule Form control has non-empty accessible name was updated to resolve the comments raised in the previous survey. (See Issue 432)
Review the updated rule and answer the questions in this survey. If there are issues with the rule, please open an issue in GitHub or provide details in the entry fields for the applicable question.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results |
Details
| Responder | Instructions |
|---|---|
| Wilco Fiers | |
| Trevor Bostic | |
| Kathy Eng | |
| Charu Pandhi | |
| Mary Jo Mueller | |
| Detlev Fischer |
2. Consistency with ACT Rules Format
Does the rule follow the ACT Rules Format 1.0?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes | 6 |
| No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. | |
| I don't know. My questions are documented below. |
Details
| Responder | Consistency with ACT Rules Format | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Wilco Fiers | Yes | |
| Trevor Bostic | Yes | |
| Kathy Eng | Yes | |
| Charu Pandhi | Yes | |
| Mary Jo Mueller | Yes | |
| Detlev Fischer | Yes |
3. Rule assumptions
Are the assumptions acceptable?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes | 5 |
| No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. | |
| I don't know. My questions are documented below. | 1 |
Details
| Responder | Rule assumptions | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Wilco Fiers | Yes | |
| Trevor Bostic | Yes | |
| Kathy Eng | Yes | |
| Charu Pandhi | Yes | |
| Mary Jo Mueller | Yes | |
| Detlev Fischer | I don't know. My questions are documented below. | If it is true, as stated, that „...depending on this, some elements can have one of the applicable semantic roles and fail this rule with some technology but users of other technologies would not experience any accessibility issue.“ can this rule be applied without qualification by accessibility baseline? But I guess if some users do not experience an issue the general rule is still sound. |
4. Implementation data
Is the implementation data correct?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes | 6 |
| No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. | |
| I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below. |
Details
| Responder | Implementation data | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Wilco Fiers | Yes | |
| Trevor Bostic | Yes | |
| Kathy Eng | Yes | |
| Charu Pandhi | Yes | |
| Mary Jo Mueller | Yes | |
| Detlev Fischer | Yes |
5. Consistent with WCAG
Is the rule consistent with existing WCAG documents?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes | 6 |
| No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. | |
| I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below. |
Details
| Responder | Consistent with WCAG | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Wilco Fiers | Yes | |
| Trevor Bostic | Yes | |
| Kathy Eng | Yes | |
| Charu Pandhi | Yes | |
| Mary Jo Mueller | Yes | |
| Detlev Fischer | Yes |
6. Remaining open issues
Are there any remaining open issues for this rule that were opened prior to this review?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes there are open issues that need to be resolved. I have listed them below. | 2 |
| Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published. | 3 |
| No, there are no open issues. | 1 |
Details
| Responder | Remaining open issues | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Wilco Fiers | Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published. | The following issues exists for this rule. I don't think these need to be addressed for this rule to move forward: https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/issues/1374 https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/issues/1405 |
| Trevor Bostic | No, there are no open issues. | |
| Kathy Eng | Yes there are open issues that need to be resolved. I have listed them below. | https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/issues/1374 - why isn't button included in applicability? |
| Charu Pandhi | Yes there are open issues that need to be resolved. I have listed them below. | Open issue to add button and menuitem will need significant change to the applicability and implementation data, so not sure if that needs to be resolved before publishing |
| Mary Jo Mueller | Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published. | As noted by others, but I don't think the need for additional info should block the initial publication. Once those issues are resolved and reviewed we can publish an update to the rule. |
| Detlev Fischer | Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published. | See above. |
7. Other questions or concerns
Do you have any further questions or concerns about this rule?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes, I have questions or concerns, described below. | 1 |
| No, I have no further questions or concerns. | 5 |
Details
| Responder | Other questions or concerns | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Wilco Fiers | No, I have no further questions or concerns. | |
| Trevor Bostic | No, I have no further questions or concerns. | |
| Kathy Eng | No, I have no further questions or concerns. | |
| Charu Pandhi | No, I have no further questions or concerns. | |
| Mary Jo Mueller | No, I have no further questions or concerns. | |
| Detlev Fischer | Yes, I have questions or concerns, described below. | See above. |
8. Readiness for publishing
Do you think this rule is ready to be published?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes, it is ready to publish as-is. | 5 |
| Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. | 1 |
| No, it is not ready to publish and the reason is documented below. |
Details
| Responder | Readiness for publishing | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Wilco Fiers | Yes, it is ready to publish as-is. | |
| Trevor Bostic | Yes, it is ready to publish as-is. | |
| Kathy Eng | Yes, it is ready to publish as-is. | |
| Charu Pandhi | Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. | Resolve open issue 1374 |
| Mary Jo Mueller | Yes, it is ready to publish as-is. | Handle the open issues after initial publication of the rule. Nothing in this is "wrong" per se. Just incomplete cases. |
| Detlev Fischer | Yes, it is ready to publish as-is. |
More details on responses
Non-responders
The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:
- Katie Haritos-Shea
- David MacDonald
- Romain Deltour
- Chris Loiselle
- Jonathan Avila
- Rachael Bradley Montgomery
- Charles Adams
- Daniel Montalvo
- Todd Libby
- Thomas Brunet
- Catherine Droege
- Suji Sreerama
- Shane Dittmar
- Nayan Padrai
Send an email to all the non-responders.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
Report issues
on GitHub project