W3C

Results of Questionnaire WCAG2ICT - Review draft updates to Text / Command line / Terminal Emulator sections

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: maryjom@us.ibm.com

This questionnaire was open from 2023-07-11 to 2023-07-19.

5 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Review proposal for Text / Command-line / Terminal Applications and Interfaces
  2. Review proposal for Background on Text / Command-line / Terminal Applications and Interfaces

1. Review proposal for Text / Command-line / Terminal Applications and Interfaces

Please review the proposed update to the Text / Command-line / Terminal Applications and Interfaces section and indicate its readiness to incorporate into the editor's draft. The changes are indicated in Pull Request 172.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Incorporate the draft content, as-is. 2
Incorporate the draft content, with changes. 3
Something else. Please suggest alternative content.

Details

Responder Review proposal for Text / Command-line / Terminal Applications and InterfacesComments
Mary Jo Mueller Incorporate the draft content, as-is. IMO, these changes are minimal. If we want to do a more sweeping update to this section, we can log issues and come back to it for the next working draft.
Phil Day Incorporate the draft content, as-is.
Mike Pluke Incorporate the draft content, with changes. OK apart from a small edit. To me, the first sentence of the third paragraph reads ambiguously, because of the lack of a preposition between the words "provided" and "users". Although it is obvious to me that it actually means "provided to users" someone could read it as "provided by users". To avoid any possible ambiguity, I suggest inserting the word "to" so that it reads:

"With the exception of closed environments, assistive technology support in today’s text applications differs markedly from that provided **to** users in earlier days."

Loïc Martínez Normand Incorporate the draft content, with changes. I agree with Mike's editorial change. Everything else is fine for me.
Mitchell Evan Incorporate the draft content, with changes. (1) Editorial: https://github.com/w3c/wcag2ict/pull/172/files/93b4132e2e0fe70491902dbd163177ac0d2a6f72#r1268874636
(2) Substantive edit (for consistency with our prior edit in the Appendix): https://github.com/w3c/wcag2ict/pull/172/files/93b4132e2e0fe70491902dbd163177ac0d2a6f72#r1268875805
(3) Substantive edit: https://github.com/w3c/wcag2ict/pull/172/files/93b4132e2e0fe70491902dbd163177ac0d2a6f72#r1268869557
(4) Editorial: https://github.com/w3c/wcag2ict/pull/172/files/93b4132e2e0fe70491902dbd163177ac0d2a6f72#r1268870840
(5) Editorial: https://github.com/w3c/wcag2ict/pull/172/files/93b4132e2e0fe70491902dbd163177ac0d2a6f72#r1268872994
(6) Editorial: https://github.com/w3c/wcag2ict/pull/172/files/93b4132e2e0fe70491902dbd163177ac0d2a6f72#r1268873720

2. Review proposal for Background on Text / Command-line / Terminal Applications and Interfaces

Please review the proposed update to the Background on Text / Command-line / Terminal Applications and Interfaces section and indicate its readiness to incorporate into the editor's draft. The changes are indicated in Pull Request 172.

Note, this is a first pass of updates. The sub-group is drafting per-SC details to the sub-section Applying WCAG 2.2 to Text Applications, but this content isn't ready for review yet.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Incorporate the draft content, as-is. 4
Incorporate the draft content, with changes. 1
Something else. Please suggest alternative content.

Details

Responder Review proposal for Background on Text / Command-line / Terminal Applications and InterfacesComments
Mary Jo Mueller Incorporate the draft content, as-is. Same reason as previous question.
Phil Day Incorporate the draft content, as-is.
Mike Pluke Incorporate the draft content, as-is.
Loïc Martínez Normand Incorporate the draft content, as-is. No issues found.
Mitchell Evan Incorporate the draft content, with changes. Editorial changes: https://github.com/w3c/wcag2ict/pull/172#pullrequestreview-1538350063

(Sorry, for some reason GitHub's automatic diff is not highlighting these edits very well.)

More details on responses

  • Mary Jo Mueller: last responded on 18, July 2023 at 20:33 (UTC)
  • Phil Day: last responded on 19, July 2023 at 09:58 (UTC)
  • Mike Pluke: last responded on 19, July 2023 at 10:16 (UTC)
  • Loïc Martínez Normand: last responded on 19, July 2023 at 13:54 (UTC)
  • Mitchell Evan: last responded on 20, July 2023 at 03:33 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Gregg Vanderheiden
  2. Shadi Abou-Zahra
  3. Bruce Bailey
  4. Chris Loiselle
  5. Sam Ogami
  6. Charles Adams
  7. Daniel Montalvo
  8. Fernanda Bonnin
  9. Shawn Thompson
  10. Olivia Hogan-Stark
  11. Laura Miller
  12. Anastasia Lanz
  13. Devanshu Chandra
  14. Bryan Trogdon
  15. Thorsten Katzmann
  16. Tony Holland
  17. Kent Boucher

Send an email to all the non-responders.


Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire