w3c/wbs-design or
by mail to sysreq.
W3C
Site Navigation
Nearby
Results of Questionnaire WCAG2ICT - Review editor's notes
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: maryjom@us.ibm.com
This questionnaire was open from 2024-05-13 to 2024-05-16.
6 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
- Review editor's note in Status of this Document section
- Review editor's note in Comparison with the 2013 WCAG2ICT Note section
- Review editor's note in Key Terms section
- Review editor's note in Comments on Closed Functionality section
- Review editor's note in Comments by Guideline and Success Criterion section
- Review editor's note in Applying SC 1.4.10 Reflow... section
- Review editor's note in Applying SC 4.1.1 Parsing... section
- Review editor's note in Comments on Definitions in WCAG 2 Glossary section
- Review editor's note in Applying "CSS Pixel" to... glossary section
- Review editor's note in SC Problematic for Closed Functionality section
- Review editor's note in Participants in the AG WG that actively reviewed and contributed section
- Do any other sections need editor's notes?
1. Review editor's note in Status of this Document section
This survey will take us through all of the editor's notes that are in the editor's draft. Each question covers one note.
Review the editor's note in the Status of this Document section.
Indicate whether the note is OK, as is. If edits are needed, provide the detailed edits in the survey or in a PR.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Editor's note is OK, as-is. | 6 |
| Editor's note is OK, with edits. (Provide detailed edits in the survey.) | |
| The editor's note needs major rework. (Provide detailed edits in the survey.) | |
| Something else. (Provide your detailed alternate proposal.) |
Details
| Responder | Review editor's note in Status of this Document section | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Bruce Bailey | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Phil Day | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Chris Loiselle | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Mike Pluke | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Loïc Martínez Normand | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Olivia Hogan-Stark | Editor's note is OK, as-is. |
2. Review editor's note in Comparison with the 2013 WCAG2ICT Note section
Review the editor's note in the Comparison with the 2013 WCAG2ICT Note section.
Indicate whether the note is OK, as is. If edits are needed, provide the detailed edits in the survey or in a PR.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Editor's note is OK, as-is. | 6 |
| Editor's note is OK, with edits. (Provide detailed edits in the survey.) | |
| The editor's note needs major rework. (Provide detailed edits in the survey.) | |
| Something else. (Provide your detailed alternate proposal.) |
Details
| Responder | Review editor's note in Comparison with the 2013 WCAG2ICT Note section | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Bruce Bailey | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Phil Day | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Chris Loiselle | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Mike Pluke | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Loïc Martínez Normand | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Olivia Hogan-Stark | Editor's note is OK, as-is. |
3. Review editor's note in Key Terms section
Review the editor's note in the Key Terms section.
Indicate whether the note is OK, as is. If edits are needed, provide the detailed edits in the survey or in a PR.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Editor's note is OK, as-is. | 5 |
| Editor's note is OK, with edits. (Provide detailed edits in the survey.) | 1 |
| The editor's note needs major rework. (Provide detailed edits in the survey.) | |
| Something else. (Provide your detailed alternate proposal.) |
Details
| Responder | Review editor's note in Key Terms section | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Bruce Bailey | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Phil Day | Editor's note is OK, with edits. (Provide detailed edits in the survey.) | Link to closed functionality didn't work for me #closed-functionality-as-used-in-WCAG2ICT Should it be #closed-functionality instead? |
| Chris Loiselle | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Mike Pluke | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Loïc Martínez Normand | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | Comment to Phil: the link worked for me. |
| Olivia Hogan-Stark | Editor's note is OK, as-is. |
4. Review editor's note in Comments on Closed Functionality section
Review the editor's note in the Comments on Closed Functionality section.
Indicate whether the note is OK, as is. If edits are needed, provide the detailed edits in the survey or in a PR.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Editor's note is OK, as-is. | 6 |
| Editor's note is OK, with edits. (Provide detailed edits in the survey.) | |
| The editor's note needs major rework. (Provide detailed edits in the survey.) | |
| Something else. (Provide your detailed alternate proposal.) |
Details
| Responder | Review editor's note in Comments on Closed Functionality section | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Bruce Bailey | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Phil Day | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Chris Loiselle | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Mike Pluke | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Loïc Martínez Normand | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Olivia Hogan-Stark | Editor's note is OK, as-is. |
5. Review editor's note in Comments by Guideline and Success Criterion section
Review the editor's note in the Comments by Guideline and Success Criterion section.
Indicate whether the note is OK, as is. If edits are needed, provide the detailed edits in the survey or a PR.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Editor's note is OK, as-is. | 6 |
| Editor's note is OK, with edits. (Provide detailed edits in the survey.) | |
| The editor's note needs major rework. (Provide detailed edits in the survey.) | |
| Something else. (Provide your detailed alternate proposal.) |
Details
| Responder | Review editor's note in Comments by Guideline and Success Criterion section | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Bruce Bailey | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Phil Day | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Chris Loiselle | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Mike Pluke | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Loïc Martínez Normand | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Olivia Hogan-Stark | Editor's note is OK, as-is. |
6. Review editor's note in Applying SC 1.4.10 Reflow... section
Review the editor's note in the Applying SC 1.4.10 Reflow to Non-Web Documents and Software section.
Indicate whether the note is OK, as is. If edits are needed, provide the detailed edits in the survey or in a PR.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Editor's note is OK, as-is. | 6 |
| Editor's note is OK, with edits. (Provide detailed edits in the survey.) | |
| The editor's note needs major rework. (Provide detailed edits in the survey.) | |
| Something else. (Provide your detailed alternate proposal.) |
Details
| Responder | Review editor's note in Applying SC 1.4.10 Reflow... section | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Bruce Bailey | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Phil Day | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Chris Loiselle | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Mike Pluke | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Loïc Martínez Normand | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Olivia Hogan-Stark | Editor's note is OK, as-is. |
7. Review editor's note in Applying SC 4.1.1 Parsing... section
Review the editor's note in the Applying SC 4.1.1 Parsing to Non-Web Documents and Software section.
Indicate whether the note is OK, as is. If edits are needed, provide the detailed edits in the survey or in a PR.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Editor's note is OK, as-is. | 6 |
| Editor's note is OK, with edits. (Provide detailed edits in the survey.) | |
| The editor's note needs major rework. (Provide detailed edits in the survey.) | |
| Something else. (Provide your detailed alternate proposal.) |
Details
| Responder | Review editor's note in Applying SC 4.1.1 Parsing... section | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Bruce Bailey | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Phil Day | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Chris Loiselle | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Mike Pluke | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Loïc Martínez Normand | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Olivia Hogan-Stark | Editor's note is OK, as-is. |
8. Review editor's note in Comments on Definitions in WCAG 2 Glossary section
Review the editor's note in the Comments on Definitions in WCAG 2 Glossary section.
Indicate whether the note is OK, as is. If edits are needed, provide the detailed edits in the survey or in a PR.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Editor's note is OK, as-is. | 6 |
| Editor's note is OK, with edits. (Provide detailed edits in the survey.) | |
| The editor's note needs major rework. (Provide detailed edits in the survey.) | |
| Something else. (Provide your detailed alternate proposal.) |
Details
| Responder | Review editor's note in Comments on Definitions in WCAG 2 Glossary section | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Bruce Bailey | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Phil Day | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Chris Loiselle | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Mike Pluke | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Loïc Martínez Normand | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Olivia Hogan-Stark | Editor's note is OK, as-is. |
9. Review editor's note in Applying "CSS Pixel" to... glossary section
Review the editor's note in the Applying "CSS pixel" to Non-Web Documents and Software section.
Indicate whether the note is OK, as is. If edits are needed, provide the detailed edits in the survey or in a PR.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Editor's note is OK, as-is. | 6 |
| Editor's note is OK, with edits. (Provide detailed edits in the survey.) | |
| The editor's note needs major rework. (Provide detailed edits in the survey.) | |
| Something else. (Provide your detailed alternate proposal.) |
Details
| Responder | Review editor's note in Applying "CSS Pixel" to... glossary section | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Bruce Bailey | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Phil Day | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Chris Loiselle | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Mike Pluke | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Loïc Martínez Normand | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Olivia Hogan-Stark | Editor's note is OK, as-is. |
10. Review editor's note in SC Problematic for Closed Functionality section
Review the editor's note in the SC Problematic for Closed Functionality section.
Indicate whether the note is OK, as is. If edits are needed, provide the detailed edits in the survey or in a PR.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Editor's note is OK, as-is. | 6 |
| Editor's note is OK, with edits. (Provide detailed edits in the survey.) | |
| The editor's note needs major rework. (Provide detailed edits in the survey.) | |
| Something else. (Provide your detailed alternate proposal.) |
Details
| Responder | Review editor's note in SC Problematic for Closed Functionality section | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Bruce Bailey | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Phil Day | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Chris Loiselle | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Mike Pluke | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Loïc Martínez Normand | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Olivia Hogan-Stark | Editor's note is OK, as-is. |
11. Review editor's note in Participants in the AG WG that actively reviewed and contributed section
Review the editor's note in the Participants in the AG Working Group that Actively Reviewed and Contributed section.
Indicate whether the note is OK, as is. If edits are needed, provide the detailed edits in the survey or in a PR.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Editor's note is OK, as-is. | 6 |
| Editor's note is OK, with edits. (Provide detailed edits in the survey.) | |
| The editor's note needs major rework. (Provide detailed edits in the survey.) | |
| Something else. (Provide your detailed alternate proposal.) |
Details
| Responder | Review editor's note in Participants in the AG WG that actively reviewed and contributed section | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Bruce Bailey | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Phil Day | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Chris Loiselle | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Mike Pluke | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Loïc Martínez Normand | Editor's note is OK, as-is. | |
| Olivia Hogan-Stark | Editor's note is OK, as-is. |
12. Do any other sections need editor's notes?
If you think there are other sections that need editor's notes, indicate where and provide a proposal in the survey or in a PR.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| No other editor's notes are needed. | 6 |
| Additional editor's notes are needed. List what section(s) and what the proposed note would be either in the survey or in a PR. |
Details
| Responder | Do any other sections need editor's notes? | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Bruce Bailey | No other editor's notes are needed. | |
| Phil Day | No other editor's notes are needed. | |
| Chris Loiselle | No other editor's notes are needed. | |
| Mike Pluke | No other editor's notes are needed. | |
| Loïc Martínez Normand | No other editor's notes are needed. | |
| Olivia Hogan-Stark | No other editor's notes are needed. |
More details on responses
- Bruce Bailey: last responded on 14, May 2024 at 22:05 (UTC)
- Phil Day: last responded on 15, May 2024 at 07:13 (UTC)
- Chris Loiselle: last responded on 15, May 2024 at 16:48 (UTC)
- Mike Pluke: last responded on 15, May 2024 at 18:13 (UTC)
- Loïc Martínez Normand: last responded on 15, May 2024 at 19:00 (UTC)
- Olivia Hogan-Stark: last responded on 15, May 2024 at 21:02 (UTC)
Non-responders
The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:
- Gregg Vanderheiden
- Shadi Abou-Zahra
- Mary Jo Mueller
- Sam Ogami
- Mitchell Evan
- Charles Adams
- Daniel Montalvo
- Fernanda Bonnin
- Shawn Thompson
- Laura Miller
- Anastasia Lanz
- Devanshu Chandra
- Bryan Trogdon
- Thorsten Katzmann
- Tony Holland
- Kent Boucher
Send an email to all the non-responders.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
Report issues
on GitHub project