Read and understand the old public comment in Issue 5: Difference of Mobile OS usage(iOS, Android) - 4.1.2: Name, Role, Value

NOTE: The reference to 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value in the title and initial question is a red herring, as the issue is not really about that SC, but is about 2.5.1 Pointer Gestures, as the comment thread reveals.

Review the draft answer for issue 5.

Indicate whether the proposed answer is sufficient and note any potential edits or alternate proposals.

Summary

Details

Read and understand the public comment in Issue 6 - Does dragging blur platform and author considerations?. This issue is closely related to the recent AG WG review comment for 2.5.7 Dragging Movements. The proposed WCAG2ICT change to address both issues is found in Issue 284 and the changes would apply to the 3 SC where the content "interprets pointer actions".

Once the above text is approved by the TF, I propose that the following answer is added to Issue 6 with a link to the guidance for the 3 SC where these notes apply. This would have to be done after we merge the notes into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft.

Proposed answer to Issue 6

Mike, you raise a good point regarding the need for a separation of responsibilities between the author, user agent, and platform software. WCAG2ICT has developed guidance for non-web contexts in the notes to address the concern. This same guidance is provided for other success criteria that also interpret pointer actions, namely 2.5.1 Pointer Gestures and 2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation. The notes read:

NOTE: This requirement applies to [user agents and other software applications that interpret] pointer actions (i.e. this does not apply to actions that are required to operate the [underlying platform software] or assistive technology).

NOTE: This requirement also applies to [platform software] that interprets pointer actions. This does not apply to actions that are required to operate the assistive technology.

Indicate whether the proposed content change and draft issue answer are sufficient and note any potential edits or alternate proposals.

Summary

Details

Read and understand the public comment in Issue 77: including WCAG supplements and Making Content Usable for People with Cognitive and Learning Disabilities and the draft answer for issue 77. The exact text changes are found in Pull Request 287 which you can read in-context in the 2nd paragraph of the Document Overview section.

Indicate whether the proposed content change and issue answer are sufficient and note any potential edits or alternate proposals.

Summary

Details

Read and understand the public comment in Issue 229 - 2.3 Document and the draft answer for issue 229 which proposes an edit to Note 4 in the WCAG2ICT definition of the key term "document".

Indicate whether the proposed content change and issue answer are sufficient and note any potential edits or alternate proposals.

Summary

Details

Read and understand the public comment in Issue 261 - "Sets of software" replacement for "Sets of web pages" and the draft answer for issue 261 which proposes to make no change to WCAG2ICT.

Indicate whether the proposed answer is sufficient and note any potential edits or alternate proposals.

Summary

Details

Read and understand the AG WG comment thread on Issue 268 - AG WG Review: 2.5.7 Dragging Movements WCAG2ICT guidance and the proposed changes in Issue 284 that would apply to all of the SC that "interpret pointer actions" (2.5.7 Dragging Movements, 2.5.1 Pointer Gestures, and 2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation.)

Indicate whether the changes proposed are sufficient and note any potential edits or alternate proposals.

Summary

Details