W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire WCAG2ICT-Review of SC 1.4.11 readiness to incorporate into editors draft

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: maryjom@us.ibm.com

This questionnaire was open from 2023-01-31 to 2023-02-16.

11 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

Review of proposal for Success Criterion 1.4.11 Non-text Contrast

1. Review of proposal for Success Criterion 1.4.11 Non-text Contrast

Review the draft proposal for the section Additional Guidance When Applying Success Criterion 1.4.11 to Non-Web Documents and Software and indicate if you agree with the proposal. Note any suggested edits for improvement and/or reasoning in the comments field.

Summary

Choice	All responders
Choice	Results
The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.	7
The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with some changes.	3
The proposal isn't ready to incorporate yet.	1

Details

Responder	Review of proposal for Success Criterion 1.4.11 Non-text Contrast	Comments
Loïc Martínez Normand	The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.
Bruce Bailey	The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.
Mary Jo Mueller	The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with some changes.	Need to also add in the WCAG 2.2 term "state" into the section titled, "Glossary Items that Apply to All Technologies" since no WCAG2ICT interpretation is needed. (See definition at https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/#dfn-states)
Phil Day	The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.
Mike Pluke	The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.
Fernanda Bonnin	The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.
Devanshu Chandra	The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.
Chris Loiselle	The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.
Mitchell Evan	The proposal isn't ready to incorporate yet.	(1) Testers often wonder how to determine "modified by the author" when they don't have access to application source code. I propose a note: https://github.com/w3c/wcag2ict/issues/82#issuecomment-1432009449 (2) Is any other change needed to address issue #94? https://github.com/w3c/wcag2ict/issues/94
Laura Miller	The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with some changes.	Noting that I'm answering after Mitchell's comments and I agree a note would be helpful.
Sam Ogami	The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with some changes.	Adding a note about when exposed. In closed systems, how could the contrast be tested if the evaluator cannot access the color values?