w3c/wbs-design
or
by mail to sysreq
.
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: maryjom@us.ibm.com
This questionnaire was open from 2023-11-02 to 2023-11-08.
10 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
Review the draft proposal for Applying SC 2.4.11 Focus Not Obscured (Minimum) to Non-Web Documents and Software. Indicate whether this proposal is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft and note any desired changes.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
The proposed content is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, as-is. | 10 |
The proposed content is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, with the following changes. | |
The proposal isn't ready yet. |
Responder | Review of proposed content for 2.4.11 Focus Not Obscured (Minimum) | Comments |
---|---|---|
Gregg Vanderheiden | The proposed content is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, as-is. | |
Phil Day | The proposed content is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, as-is. | |
Olivia Hogan-Stark | The proposed content is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, as-is. | |
Fernanda Bonnin | The proposed content is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, as-is. | |
Sam Ogami | The proposed content is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, as-is. | |
Loïc Martínez Normand | The proposed content is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, as-is. | |
Mike Pluke | The proposed content is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, as-is. | |
Bruce Bailey | The proposed content is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, as-is. | |
Mary Jo Mueller | The proposed content is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, as-is. | |
Laura Miller | The proposed content is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, as-is. |
Is a bullet needed in the SC Problematic for Closed Functionality section for 2.4.11 Focus Not Obscured (Minimum)? If so, please suggest the text.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
No bullet needed. Applies, as written, to closed functionality software. | 10 |
Bullet needed in the SC problematic for closed functionality section. Explain. |
Responder | 2.4.11 Focus Not Obscured (Minimum) relevance to SC problematic for Closed Functionality | Comments |
---|---|---|
Gregg Vanderheiden | No bullet needed. Applies, as written, to closed functionality software. | |
Phil Day | No bullet needed. Applies, as written, to closed functionality software. | |
Olivia Hogan-Stark | No bullet needed. Applies, as written, to closed functionality software. | |
Fernanda Bonnin | No bullet needed. Applies, as written, to closed functionality software. | |
Sam Ogami | No bullet needed. Applies, as written, to closed functionality software. | |
Loïc Martínez Normand | No bullet needed. Applies, as written, to closed functionality software. | |
Mike Pluke | No bullet needed. Applies, as written, to closed functionality software. | |
Bruce Bailey | No bullet needed. Applies, as written, to closed functionality software. | |
Mary Jo Mueller | No bullet needed. Applies, as written, to closed functionality software. | |
Laura Miller | No bullet needed. Applies, as written, to closed functionality software. |
The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:
Send an email to all the non-responders.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
w3c/wbs-design
or
by mail to sysreq
.