W3C

Results of Questionnaire WCAG2ICT-SC 2.4.11 Focus Not Obscured (Minimum) draft review

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: maryjom@us.ibm.com

This questionnaire was open from 2023-11-02 to 2023-11-08.

10 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Review of proposed content for 2.4.11 Focus Not Obscured (Minimum)
  2. 2.4.11 Focus Not Obscured (Minimum) relevance to SC problematic for Closed Functionality

1. Review of proposed content for 2.4.11 Focus Not Obscured (Minimum)

Review the draft proposal for Applying SC 2.4.11 Focus Not Obscured (Minimum) to Non-Web Documents and Software. Indicate whether this proposal is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft and note any desired changes.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
The proposed content is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, as-is. 10
The proposed content is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, with the following changes.
The proposal isn't ready yet.

Details

Responder Review of proposed content for 2.4.11 Focus Not Obscured (Minimum)Comments
Gregg Vanderheiden The proposed content is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, as-is.
Phil Day The proposed content is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, as-is.
Olivia Hogan-Stark The proposed content is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, as-is.
Fernanda Bonnin The proposed content is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, as-is.
Sam Ogami The proposed content is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, as-is.
Loïc Martínez Normand The proposed content is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, as-is.
Mike Pluke The proposed content is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, as-is.
Bruce Bailey The proposed content is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, as-is.
Mary Jo Mueller The proposed content is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, as-is.
Laura Miller The proposed content is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, as-is.

2. 2.4.11 Focus Not Obscured (Minimum) relevance to SC problematic for Closed Functionality

Is a bullet needed in the SC Problematic for Closed Functionality section for 2.4.11 Focus Not Obscured (Minimum)? If so, please suggest the text.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
No bullet needed. Applies, as written, to closed functionality software. 10
Bullet needed in the SC problematic for closed functionality section. Explain.

Details

Responder 2.4.11 Focus Not Obscured (Minimum) relevance to SC problematic for Closed FunctionalityComments
Gregg Vanderheiden No bullet needed. Applies, as written, to closed functionality software.
Phil Day No bullet needed. Applies, as written, to closed functionality software.
Olivia Hogan-Stark No bullet needed. Applies, as written, to closed functionality software.
Fernanda Bonnin No bullet needed. Applies, as written, to closed functionality software.
Sam Ogami No bullet needed. Applies, as written, to closed functionality software.
Loïc Martínez Normand No bullet needed. Applies, as written, to closed functionality software.
Mike Pluke No bullet needed. Applies, as written, to closed functionality software.
Bruce Bailey No bullet needed. Applies, as written, to closed functionality software.
Mary Jo Mueller No bullet needed. Applies, as written, to closed functionality software.
Laura Miller No bullet needed. Applies, as written, to closed functionality software.

More details on responses

  • Gregg Vanderheiden: last responded on 6, November 2023 at 04:06 (UTC)
  • Phil Day: last responded on 6, November 2023 at 14:21 (UTC)
  • Olivia Hogan-Stark: last responded on 6, November 2023 at 15:03 (UTC)
  • Fernanda Bonnin: last responded on 6, November 2023 at 21:44 (UTC)
  • Sam Ogami: last responded on 6, November 2023 at 22:08 (UTC)
  • Loïc Martínez Normand: last responded on 8, November 2023 at 17:04 (UTC)
  • Mike Pluke: last responded on 8, November 2023 at 18:52 (UTC)
  • Bruce Bailey: last responded on 8, November 2023 at 22:26 (UTC)
  • Mary Jo Mueller: last responded on 8, November 2023 at 22:58 (UTC)
  • Laura Miller: last responded on 9, November 2023 at 01:21 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Shadi Abou-Zahra
  2. Chris Loiselle
  3. Mitchell Evan
  4. Charles Adams
  5. Daniel Montalvo
  6. Shawn Thompson
  7. Anastasia Lanz
  8. Devanshu Chandra
  9. Bryan Trogdon
  10. Thorsten Katzmann
  11. Tony Holland
  12. Kent Boucher

Send an email to all the non-responders.


Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire