W3C

Results of Questionnaire WCAG2ICT-Review of Key Terms and Glossary Items Used Only in AAA Success Criteria sections

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: maryjom@us.ibm.com

This questionnaire was open from 2023-02-22 to 2023-03-02.

7 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Review of proposal for Key Terms section
  2. Review of proposal for Glossary Items Used only in AAA Success Criteria

1. Review of proposal for Key Terms section

Review the draft proposal for the section Key Terms and indicate if you agree with the proposal. Most of the changes were to fix links and clean up formatting, though a few edits were made. See Pull Request 111 for details of the changes made. Note any suggested edits for improvement and/or reasoning in the comments field.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is. 3
The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with some changes. 4
The proposal isn't ready to incorporate yet.

Details

Responder Review of proposal for Key Terms sectionComments
Mary Jo Mueller The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.
Phil Day The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with some changes. Key Terms: possible typo in line 2 of the main verbiage.
Change 'In addition, the glossary term “Web page” ' to 'In addition, the glossary term “web page” '

The number of separate notes in "document" and "set of software programs" makes both sections rather cumbersome to read. Would it be acceptable to combine some of these notes together?
Devanshu Chandra The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.
Sam Ogami The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.
Loïc Martínez Normand The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with some changes. - The note of the definition of content (non-web content) (2.2) has strange formatting.
- The first sentence of the fourth note of "document" (2.3) can be simplified by removing the text "when so collected together". I think it is unclear and unnecessary.
- The second sentence of the example of set of documents (2.4) can be rewritten for better clarity: "The table of contents is repeated at the beginning of each file to enable navigation to the other parts".
Mike Pluke The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with some changes. Whereas I sympathise with Phil Day's concerns about having so many separate notes for documents and set of software programs, each note represents a unique issue related to the interpretation of these concepts and it keeps things clean and simple to keep each note separate as they are in the proposed text.

I agree with Loïc's two proposals for simplifying and clarifying the proposed text.
Bruce Bailey The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with some changes. +1 to Loic's suggestions.

2. Review of proposal for Glossary Items Used only in AAA Success Criteria

Review the draft proposal for the section Glossary Items Used Only in AAA Success Criteria. The changes were simply to add in 3 new WCAG 2.2 terms to the list and update the editor's note to reflect changes done, our approach to definitions, and what is to come. See Pull Request 107 for details of the changes made. Indicate if you agree with the proposal and note any suggested edits for improvement and/or reasoning in the comments field.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is. 7
The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with some changes.
The proposal isn't ready to incorporate yet.

Details

Responder Review of proposal for Glossary Items Used only in AAA Success CriteriaComments
Mary Jo Mueller The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.
Phil Day The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.
Devanshu Chandra The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.
Sam Ogami The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.
Loïc Martínez Normand The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.
Mike Pluke The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.
Bruce Bailey The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.

More details on responses

  • Mary Jo Mueller: last responded on 22, February 2023 at 15:47 (UTC)
  • Phil Day: last responded on 24, February 2023 at 11:52 (UTC)
  • Devanshu Chandra: last responded on 28, February 2023 at 15:53 (UTC)
  • Sam Ogami: last responded on 28, February 2023 at 17:59 (UTC)
  • Loïc Martínez Normand: last responded on 1, March 2023 at 18:41 (UTC)
  • Mike Pluke: last responded on 2, March 2023 at 11:17 (UTC)
  • Bruce Bailey: last responded on 2, March 2023 at 14:29 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Gregg Vanderheiden
  2. Shadi Abou-Zahra
  3. Chris Loiselle
  4. Mitchell Evan
  5. Charles Adams
  6. Daniel Montalvo
  7. Fernanda Bonnin
  8. Shawn Thompson
  9. Olivia Hogan-Stark
  10. Laura Miller
  11. Anastasia Lanz
  12. Bryan Trogdon
  13. Thorsten Katzmann
  14. Tony Holland
  15. Kent Boucher

Send an email to all the non-responders.


Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire