W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire WCAG2ICT - Review proposed key term 'closed functionality'

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: maryjom@us.ibm.com

This questionnaire was open from 2023-07-27 to 2023-08-02.

6 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Review draft definition 'closed functionality'
  2. Explore the concept of 'partially closed'

1. Review draft definition 'closed functionality'

Review the proposed new key term and examples for 'closed functionality' and indicate the readiness to incorporate into the pull request updating closed functionality content.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Can be incorporated, as-is 6
Can be incorporated, with changes
Is not ready to incorporate, for the following reasons

Details

Responder Review draft definition 'closed functionality'
Chris Loiselle Can be incorporated, as-is
Fernanda Bonnin Can be incorporated, as-is
Phil Day Can be incorporated, as-is
Loïc Martínez Normand Can be incorporated, as-is
Devanshu Chandra Can be incorporated, as-is
Mike Pluke Can be incorporated, as-is

2. Explore the concept of 'partially closed'

Some technologies may incorporate fully functioning AT built-in (e.g. a fully functioning screen reader), but the built-in AT does not cover all types of AT (e.g. may not allow attachment of a switch or braille display). Is there any need to bring up the topic or describe "partially closed functionality" technology?

Use the entry field to support your answer. If you think additional information is desired, propose content and provide examples.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes, 'partially closed' needs to be covered in WCAG2ICT 2
No, 'partially closed' doesn't need to be covered in WCAG2ICT 4

Details

Responder Explore the concept of 'partially closed'
Chris Loiselle No, 'partially closed' doesn't need to be covered in WCAG2ICT
Fernanda Bonnin Yes, 'partially closed' needs to be covered in WCAG2ICT
Phil Day No, 'partially closed' doesn't need to be covered in WCAG2ICT
Loïc Martínez Normand No, 'partially closed' doesn't need to be covered in WCAG2ICT
Devanshu Chandra Yes, 'partially closed' needs to be covered in WCAG2ICT
Mike Pluke No, 'partially closed' doesn't need to be covered in WCAG2ICT

More details on responses

  • Chris Loiselle: last responded on 1, August 2023 at 11:55 (UTC)
  • Fernanda Bonnin: last responded on 1, August 2023 at 21:07 (UTC)
  • Phil Day: last responded on 2, August 2023 at 15:07 (UTC)
  • Loïc Martínez Normand: last responded on 2, August 2023 at 16:19 (UTC)
  • Devanshu Chandra: last responded on 2, August 2023 at 18:08 (UTC)
  • Mike Pluke: last responded on 2, August 2023 at 19:48 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Gregg Vanderheiden
  2. Shadi Abou-Zahra
  3. Bruce Bailey
  4. Mary Jo Mueller
  5. Sam Ogami
  6. Mitchell Evan
  7. Charles Adams
  8. Daniel Montalvo
  9. Shawn Thompson
  10. Olivia Hogan-Stark
  11. Laura Miller
  12. Anastasia Lanz
  13. Bryan Trogdon
  14. Thorsten Katzmann
  15. Tony Holland
  16. Kent Boucher

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.