W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire WCAG2ICT-SC 4.1.3 Status Messages readiness to incorporate into editors draft

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: maryjom@us.ibm.com

This questionnaire was open from 2023-03-20 to 2023-03-29.

6 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Review of proposal for Success Criterion 4.1.3 Status Messages

1. Review of proposal for Success Criterion 4.1.3 Status Messages

The draft proposal for the section Guidance When Applying Success Criterion 4.1.3 to Non-Web Documents and Software l and indicate if you think this is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft. Read the comments and [proposed edits from Mary Jo](https://github.com/w3c/wcag2ict/issues/122#issuecomment-1476397129). Note any suggestions for improvement and/or reasoning in the comments field.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.
The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with the changes noted in Mary Jo's comment. 4
The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with some additional changes. 2
The proposal isn't ready to incorporate yet.

Details

Responder Review of proposal for Success Criterion 4.1.3 Status MessagesComments
Mary Jo Mueller The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with the changes noted in Mary Jo's comment.
Mike Pluke The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with the changes noted in Mary Jo's comment.
Fernanda Bonnin The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with some additional changes. agree on adding the changes in Mary Jo's comment, however wondering if the note is sufficient to cover non-markup languages too, or if the S.C. text should include options: "In content implemented using markup languages, or that supports status messages notifications"
Phil Day The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with the changes noted in Mary Jo's comment.
Loïc Martínez Normand The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with the changes noted in Mary Jo's comment.
Mitchell Evan The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with some additional changes. Ready to incorporate with (1) Mary Jo's comment of March 20; (2) Fernanda's proposed addition, "or that supports status message notifications"; and (3) the typo fixes note in https://github.com/w3c/wcag2ict/issues/122#issuecomment-1489169376

More details on responses

  • Mary Jo Mueller: last responded on 21, March 2023 at 20:04 (UTC)
  • Mike Pluke: last responded on 22, March 2023 at 10:44 (UTC)
  • Fernanda Bonnin: last responded on 22, March 2023 at 15:24 (UTC)
  • Phil Day: last responded on 29, March 2023 at 08:54 (UTC)
  • Loïc Martínez Normand: last responded on 29, March 2023 at 14:15 (UTC)
  • Mitchell Evan: last responded on 29, March 2023 at 19:23 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Gregg Vanderheiden
  2. Shadi Abou-Zahra
  3. Bruce Bailey
  4. Chris Loiselle
  5. Sam Ogami
  6. Charles Adams
  7. Daniel Montalvo
  8. Shawn Thompson
  9. Olivia Hogan-Stark
  10. Laura Miller
  11. Anastasia Lanz
  12. Devanshu Chandra
  13. Bryan Trogdon
  14. Thorsten Katzmann
  15. Tony Holland
  16. Kent Boucher

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.