W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire WCAG2ICT-Review of SC 1.4.13 readiness to incorporate into editors draft

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: maryjom@us.ibm.com

This questionnaire was open from 2023-02-20 to 2023-03-02.

10 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

Review of proposal for Success Criterion 1.4.13 Content on Hover or Focus

1. Review of proposal for Success Criterion 1.4.13 Content on Hover or Focus

Review the draft proposal for the section Additional Guidance When Applying Success Criterion 1.4.13 to Non-Web Documents and Software and indicate if you agree with the proposal. Note any suggested edits for improvement and/or reasoning in the comments field.

Summary

Choice	All responders
Choice	Results
The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.	1
The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with some changes.	8
The proposal isn't ready to incorporate yet.	1

Details

Responder	Review of proposal for Success Criterion 1.4.13 Content on Hover or Focus	Comments
Mitchell Evan	The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with some changes.	With these edits: https://github.com/w3c/wcag2ict/issues/108#issuecomment-1438179798
Phil Day	The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with some changes.	Changes as per comments - operating system or platform software.
Fernanda Bonnin	The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with some changes.	+1 on the comments on operating system not covering all cases minor editorial: number the notes: note 1, note 2
Devanshu Chandra	The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.
Sam Ogami	The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with some changes.	Agree with pday1 to make change in Note from OS to "operating system or platform software"
Loïc Martínez Normand	The proposal isn't ready to incorporate yet.	As I've commented in GitHub [1], I think that we need to use "platform software" and to be explicit about term substitutions. In that comment I've made a detailed proposal, that I think that needs to be reviewed before incorporating 1.4.13 into WCAG2ICT editor's draft. [1] https://github.com/w3c/wcag2ict/issues/108#issuecomment-1450303951
Mary Jo Mueller	The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with some changes.	I like Loïc's proposed edits without the parenthetic additions, though I think we should use consistent verbiage to the rest of the document when talking about the substitutions. We are able to style the substitutions so it's more obvious. If there are no other major issues that others find, we could potentially move to accept this updated version. What I've added to the issue is a combination of the comments with my edits for consistency which can be found at this link: https://github.com/w3c/wcag2ict/issues/108#issuecomment-1450423068 To Fernanda's point. Unfortunately, with the current markdown/styling options we cannot number the notes in WCAG2ICT. We have a div style of "note" which adds the box, and adds in the text "NOTE" without numbering.
Mike Pluke	The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with some changes.	I agree with the changes proposed by Loïc - including the parenthetical qualifications that make it clear when user agent should be used and when platform software should be used. Without these it sounds like they are alternatives that apply to both documents and software, which they are not. For EN 301 549 we separate requirements for documents and software. We will of course only use one term in each section.
Shadi Abou-Zahra	The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with some changes.	As the initial editor, I agree with the edits suggested by Loic and several people on GitHub and by Mary Jo's capture in that thread.
Bruce Bailey	The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with some changes.	+1 to edits in survey