W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire WCAG2ICT-Abstract and Comparison sections readiness to incorporate into editor's draft

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: maryjom@us.ibm.com

This questionnaire was open from 2023-02-05 to 2023-02-16.

8 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Review of proposal for the Abstract
  2. Review of proposal for the Comparison with the 2013 WCAG2ICT

1. Review of proposal for the Abstract

Review the draft proposed updates to the Abstract section. If you want to view the exact changes made (old content vs. new), see pull request 87 and indicate if you agree with the proposal. Note any suggested edits for improvement and/or reasoning in the comments field.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is. 7
The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with some changes. 1
The proposal isn't ready to incorporate yet.

Details

Responder Review of proposal for the AbstractComments
Fernanda Bonnin The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.
Devanshu Chandra The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.
Chris Loiselle The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.
Mary Jo Mueller The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.
Loïc Martínez Normand The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.
Mitchell Evan The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with some changes. The proposal contains this sentence: "This document is a draft update to the working group note." If this sentence is not mandatory for such Notes then I suggest removing it. It appears to be redundant to the metadata of the document, e.g. "W3C Editor's Draft" and the information under "More details about this document." https://w3c.github.io/wcag2ict/
Laura Miller The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.
Sam Ogami The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.

2. Review of proposal for the Comparison with the 2013 WCAG2ICT

Review the draft proposed updates to the Comparison with the 2013 WCAG2ICT section. If you want to view the exact changes made (old content vs. new), see pull request 93 and indicate if you agree with the proposal. Note any suggested edits for improvement and/or reasoning in the comments field.

Note: The thought is to update this section with the newly added SC's each time the AG WG reviews the document. A final update will occur right before the document goes out for public review as a First Public Working Draft.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is. 7
The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with some changes. 1
The proposal isn't ready to incorporate yet.

Details

Responder Review of proposal for the Comparison with the 2013 WCAG2ICTComments
Fernanda Bonnin The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor' draft with some changes. the links PR 93 refers to resolve but don't seem to have the updated content
Devanshu Chandra The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.
Chris Loiselle The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.
Mary Jo Mueller The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is. Regarding Fernanda's comment. The only links that don't resolve to updated content are to 2.1.4 Character Key Shortcuts and the keyboard shortcut definition. Since those were incorporated by a different branch of the code (that wasn't merged yet) at the same time as this section was being developed, this branch didn't have that content. Once this is approved and merged, all of the content will be there and the links can be rechecked that they work.
Loïc Martínez Normand The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.
Mitchell Evan The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.
Laura Miller The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.
Sam Ogami The proposal can be incorporated into the WCAG2ICT editor's draft as-is.

More details on responses

  • Fernanda Bonnin: last responded on 13, February 2023 at 18:07 (UTC)
  • Devanshu Chandra: last responded on 13, February 2023 at 19:48 (UTC)
  • Chris Loiselle: last responded on 14, February 2023 at 14:30 (UTC)
  • Mary Jo Mueller: last responded on 14, February 2023 at 17:24 (UTC)
  • Loïc Martínez Normand: last responded on 15, February 2023 at 15:26 (UTC)
  • Mitchell Evan: last responded on 15, February 2023 at 19:30 (UTC)
  • Laura Miller: last responded on 16, February 2023 at 14:38 (UTC)
  • Sam Ogami: last responded on 16, February 2023 at 15:44 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Gregg Vanderheiden
  2. Shadi Abou-Zahra
  3. Bruce Bailey
  4. Mike Pluke
  5. Charles Adams
  6. Daniel Montalvo
  7. Shawn Thompson
  8. Olivia Hogan-Stark
  9. Anastasia Lanz
  10. Bryan Trogdon
  11. Thorsten Katzmann
  12. Tony Holland
  13. Kent Boucher

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.