w3c/wbs-design or
by mail to sysreq.
W3C
Site Navigation
Nearby
Results of Questionnaire EOWG Review: Business Case slides
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: shawn@w3.org
This questionnaire was open from 2011-06-25 to 2011-08-17.
15 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
- Support for publishing the slides and instruction page
- Comments on the Slides
- Which version of the slides are you commenting on?
- Comments on the Instructions page
1. Support for publishing the slides and instruction page
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I support publishing them as is | 11 |
| I support publishing them; however, I suggest the changes in the comments section below (for editors' discretion now or for a later revision) | 3 |
| I support publishing them only with the changes indicated as [important to be addressed before publication] in the comments section below | 1 |
| I do not support publishing them because of the comments indicated as [important to be addressed before publication] in the comments section below | |
| I abstain (not vote) |
Details
| Responder | Support for publishing the slides and instruction page |
|---|---|
| Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo | I support publishing them as is |
| Liam McGee | I support publishing them as is |
| Vicki Menezes Miller | I support publishing them as is |
| Jennifer Sutton | I support publishing them as is |
| Shadi Abou-Zahra | I support publishing them only with the changes indicated as [important to be addressed before publication] in the comments section below |
| Wayne Dick | I support publishing them as is |
| Sharron Rush | I support publishing them as is |
| Helle Bjarnø | I support publishing them as is |
| Denis Boudreau | I support publishing them; however, I suggest the changes in the comments section below (for editors' discretion now or for a later revision) |
| Cliff Tyllick | I support publishing them; however, I suggest the changes in the comments section below (for editors' discretion now or for a later revision) |
| Char James-Tanny | I support publishing them as is |
| Ian Pouncey | I support publishing them as is |
| Sylvie Duchateau | I support publishing them as is |
| Andrew Arch | I support publishing them; however, I suggest the changes in the comments section below (for editors' discretion now or for a later revision) |
| Jason Bell | I support publishing them as is |
2. Comments on the Slides
For the ppt slides themselves -- remember to include priority, location, suggested revision, and rationale for each comment.)
Details
| Responder | Comments on the Slides |
|---|---|
| Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo | |
| Liam McGee | |
| Vicki Menezes Miller | 1. Graphic "Money tree" It's much better now that the squiggle has gone and it has been reduced in size. Thanks |
| Jennifer Sutton | The only odd thing I noticed is that the language seeme to change within the first "todo" slide, but since I presume that'll eventually be deleted, it shouldn't be a problem. It seemed to switch to UK English. Let me know if you need the words, but I don't imagine you will. No need to comment on this comment which pertains to Slide One of the PPT. |
| Shadi Abou-Zahra | # [important] slide 5: I'm a bit unsure about the implications of this definition for accessibility -- is it *about* or does it *benefit* people with and without disabilities? This seems more of a definition for inclusion rather than for accessibility. # [editors discretion] slide 3: consider using "in this presentation ..." rather than "for the next @@ minutes ..." because people may want to use these slides for presentations of different lengths. # [editors discretion] slide 14: consider a different separator because it is already the title of the entire slideset, and consider reducing the (over)use of "smart business" throughout (slides 3, 5, 14, and 35 -- maybe remove from slide 3 too?) |
| Wayne Dick | The money tree is too green, but that's just me. The slides are really good. They give the presenter plenty to build on. I could use those slides with comfort. I enlarged the notes and they are good. |
| Sharron Rush | |
| Helle Bjarnø | |
| Denis Boudreau | I think it's very good as it is now and I feel confident it could be published as is. Revert slide no5 to the july 23rd version. |
| Cliff Tyllick | Although I have not seen the 23 July version, I understand the thoughts others have expressed about its superiority to this version. I feel comfortable supporting the publication of that version of the slides. |
| Char James-Tanny | |
| Ian Pouncey | We should be on the look out for a (real!) business quote for slide 5, but I am happy for it to be published as is. Also be aware that pictures of technology (such as the phone on slide 19) age quickly, if possible this should be reviewed and updated regularly (editors discretion only, doesn't need group review). |
| Sylvie Duchateau | |
| Andrew Arch | Slide 10 - Ageing Population Notes say "However, it is derived from the following real data" Consider adding the country/region this data applies to, and the source Slide 34 - Your Own Business Case reconsider right justified bullets - harder to read than left-justification |
| Jason Bell |
3. Which version of the slides are you commenting on?
summary | by responder | by choice
The version is on the title slide (currently 3) after "Status":
Status: Draft Updated 00 Month 2011
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| date not listed here, put in comments below | |
| early July | |
| 21 July 2011 | 3 |
| 25 July 2011 | 5 |
| 29 July 2011 | 5 |
| 12 August 2011 |
(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Which version of the slides are you commenting on? | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo | ||
| Liam McGee | ||
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Jennifer Sutton |
|
|
| Shadi Abou-Zahra |
|
|
| Wayne Dick |
|
These notes are a good collection of slides to start a lecture. There is sufficient material to prevent starting from scratch, and enough room to add your own material. I strongly support the document. |
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Helle Bjarnø |
|
|
| Denis Boudreau |
|
Revert slide 5 to 23rd version |
| Cliff Tyllick |
|
This is a much-improved presentation. I support publishing it. |
| Char James-Tanny |
|
|
| Ian Pouncey |
|
|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Andrew Arch |
|
|
| Jason Bell |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| date not listed here, put in comments below | |
| early July | |
| 21 July 2011 |
|
| 25 July 2011 |
|
| 29 July 2011 |
|
| 12 August 2011 |
4. Comments on the Instructions page
For the Instructions page -- remember to include priority, location, suggested revision, and rationale for each comment.)
Details
| Responder | Comments on the Instructions page |
|---|---|
| Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo | |
| Liam McGee | |
| Vicki Menezes Miller | |
| Jennifer Sutton | |
| Shadi Abou-Zahra | # [important] intro: only publish when HTML version is available # [important] intro: PPT version now significantly more than 8MB # [important] permission and reference: we are on 2011 already... ;) # [editors discretion] advice for presenters: consider removing "We might add to this page a list of presentations that other people developed based on this one" for now until we have discussed and agreed to a transparent set of criteria for linking to such presentations *from this page*. # [editors discretion] throughout: can we reduce the amount of advice, some of which is already redundant with the "Presentations" page? Just seems too long... |
| Wayne Dick | |
| Sharron Rush | |
| Helle Bjarnø | |
| Denis Boudreau | I think it's very good as it is now, feel confident it could be published as is. It is helpful enough for anyone who knows what he or she is talking about. |
| Cliff Tyllick | |
| Char James-Tanny | |
| Ian Pouncey | |
| Sylvie Duchateau | |
| Andrew Arch | |
| Jason Bell |
More details on responses
- Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo: last responded on 15, July 2011 at 12:34 (UTC)
- Liam McGee: last responded on 15, July 2011 at 14:29 (UTC)
- Vicki Menezes Miller: last responded on 21, July 2011 at 19:57 (UTC)
- Jennifer Sutton: last responded on 22, July 2011 at 00:00 (UTC)
- Shadi Abou-Zahra: last responded on 27, July 2011 at 22:37 (UTC)
- Wayne Dick: last responded on 29, July 2011 at 08:16 (UTC)
- Sharron Rush: last responded on 29, July 2011 at 11:09 (UTC)
- Helle Bjarnø: last responded on 29, July 2011 at 11:34 (UTC)
- Denis Boudreau: last responded on 29, July 2011 at 12:58 (UTC)
- Cliff Tyllick: last responded on 29, July 2011 at 13:03 (UTC)
- Char James-Tanny: last responded on 29, July 2011 at 20:05 (UTC)
- Ian Pouncey: last responded on 30, July 2011 at 12:18 (UTC)
- Sylvie Duchateau: last responded on 1, August 2011 at 08:35 (UTC)
- Andrew Arch: last responded on 1, August 2011 at 12:11 (UTC)
- Jason Bell: last responded on 4, August 2011 at 15:55 (UTC)
Everybody has responded to this questionnaire.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
Report issues
on GitHub project