W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire EOWG Publication Approval – The Business Case for Digital Accessibility

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: shawn@w3.org

This questionnaire was open from 2018-10-29 to 2018-11-09.

12 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Approval to publish the revised version of the Business Case

1. Approval to publish the revised version of the Business Case

summary | by responder | by choice

The Business Case has been revised, updated, and re-written. Please review the narrative, the annotated bibliography, and the diff version to confirm your satisfaction with the changes. Then please indicate your position on the publication of the new version.

Note: title now refers to "Digital" rather than "Web" accessibility and the ROI rationale has been integrated into the intro paragraph now called "Is there a busienss case for accessibility?"

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I agree with the changes and approve publication. 9
I'm OK with publication as is; please consider my comments in GitHub(or below) for Editors' discretion. 2
I will approve publication only after my comments in GitHub (or below) are addressed.
I need more time, and will complete the review by the date in the Comments field below.
I abstain and accept the decision of the group.
fyi, I added some comments in GitHub to consider for later iterations.

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Approval to publish the revised version of the Business Case Comments
Amanda Mace
  • I agree with the changes and approve publication.
Eric Eggert
  • I agree with the changes and approve publication.
 Bravo!
Lewis Phillips
  • I agree with the changes and approve publication.
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I agree with the changes and approve publication.
 Great work - well done! The tweaks in the first heading "Is there a business case..." and ensuing paragraphs made a big difference!
Sharron Rush
  • I agree with the changes and approve publication.
Laura Keen
  • I agree with the changes and approve publication.
Brent Bakken
  • I agree with the changes and approve publication.
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I'm OK with publication as is; please consider my comments in GitHub(or below) for Editors' discretion.
 Comments sent by email, just noticed the github link now :(
Shawn Lawton Henry It looks like some of the previous comments are still issues. I haven't had a chance to look through them. If others don't beat me to it, I will by 12 November.
Howard Kramer
  • I'm OK with publication as is; please consider my comments in GitHub(or below) for Editors' discretion.
 I still think that this is a great resource. As before, I find it engaging and interesting. In fact, I plan to demonstrate it as a useful resource for courses on digital accessibility next week at the AHG conference. As I've said in previous feedback, the bibliographic feature of the resource makes it an excellent resource to use in the classroom and serves as an index to other articles that would be very relevant in a course or anyone wanting to learn more in this area.
I only saw 2 things that I thought could warrant change. One was the sentence between the Apple and Google case study: "Innovation from voice interactions at Apple and elsewhere have contributed to the abundance of personal digital assistants now found in many homes and offices. Today millions of people use these devices, regardless of ability." It seemed to not fit in with the flow of the piece but this was not a major issue.

I should also mention that this would be a great resource for someone from a company or organization trying to justify the business case for accessibility.

The other very minor grammatical thing I noticed was that "transcript" should be plural in the following sentence: "the new inbound links to transcript accounted for an increase of 3.89%"
Andrew Arch
  • I agree with the changes and approve publication.
Norah Sinclair
  • I agree with the changes and approve publication.
 I'm glad to see this valuable resource will soon be published!

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I agree with the changes and approve publication.
  • Amanda Mace
  • Eric Eggert
  • Lewis Phillips
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Sharron Rush
  • Laura Keen
  • Brent Bakken
  • Andrew Arch
  • Norah Sinclair
I'm OK with publication as is; please consider my comments in GitHub(or below) for Editors' discretion.
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Howard Kramer
I will approve publication only after my comments in GitHub (or below) are addressed.
I need more time, and will complete the review by the date in the Comments field below.
I abstain and accept the decision of the group.
fyi, I added some comments in GitHub to consider for later iterations.

More details on responses

  • Amanda Mace: last responded on 30, October 2018 at 03:10 (UTC)
  • Eric Eggert: last responded on 30, October 2018 at 08:23 (UTC)
  • Lewis Phillips: last responded on 31, October 2018 at 13:02 (UTC)
  • Vicki Menezes Miller: last responded on 31, October 2018 at 23:01 (UTC)
  • Sharron Rush: last responded on 2, November 2018 at 11:35 (UTC)
  • Laura Keen: last responded on 2, November 2018 at 11:45 (UTC)
  • Brent Bakken: last responded on 2, November 2018 at 21:06 (UTC)
  • Sylvie Duchateau: last responded on 5, November 2018 at 10:39 (UTC)
  • Shawn Lawton Henry: last responded on 7, November 2018 at 13:04 (UTC)
  • Howard Kramer: last responded on 8, November 2018 at 02:08 (UTC)
  • Andrew Arch: last responded on 8, November 2018 at 11:55 (UTC)
  • Norah Sinclair: last responded on 8, November 2018 at 17:51 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Eric Velleman
  2. Shadi Abou-Zahra
  3. Kazuhito Kidachi
  4. Jedi Lin
  5. David Sloan
  6. Mary Jo Mueller
  7. Reinaldo Ferraz
  8. Bill Kasdorf
  9. Cristina Mussinelli
  10. Kevin White
  11. Kevin Rydberg
  12. Ahmath Bamba MBACKE
  13. Adina Halter
  14. Denis Boudreau
  15. Sarah Pulis
  16. Bill Tyler
  17. Gregorio Pellegrino
  18. Ruoxi Ran
  19. Jennifer Chadwick
  20. Sean Kelly
  21. Muhammad Saleem
  22. Sarah Lewthwaite
  23. Daniel Montalvo
  24. Mark Palmer
  25. Jade Matos Carew
  26. Sonsoles López Pernas
  27. Greta Krafsig
  28. Jason McKee
  29. Jayne Schurick
  30. Billie Johnston
  31. Michele Williams
  32. Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
  33. Brian Elton
  34. Julianna Rowsell
  35. Tabitha Mahoney
  36. Fred Edora
  37. Rabab Gomaa
  38. Marcelo Paiva
  39. Eloisa Guerrero
  40. Leonard Beasley
  41. Frankie Wolf
  42. Supriya Makude
  43. Aleksandar Cindrikj
  44. Angela Young

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.