w3c/wbs-design
or
by mail to sysreq
.
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: shawn@w3.org
This questionnaire was open from 2018-10-29 to 2018-11-09.
12 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
summary | by responder | by choice
The Business Case has been revised, updated, and re-written. Please review the narrative, the annotated bibliography, and the diff version to confirm your satisfaction with the changes. Then please indicate your position on the publication of the new version.
Note: title now refers to "Digital" rather than "Web" accessibility and the ROI rationale has been integrated into the intro paragraph now called "Is there a busienss case for accessibility?"
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
I agree with the changes and approve publication. | 9 |
I'm OK with publication as is; please consider my comments in GitHub(or below) for Editors' discretion. | 2 |
I will approve publication only after my comments in GitHub (or below) are addressed. | |
I need more time, and will complete the review by the date in the Comments field below. | |
I abstain and accept the decision of the group. | |
fyi, I added some comments in GitHub to consider for later iterations. |
(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)
Skip to view by choice.
Responder | Approval to publish the revised version of the Business Case | Comments |
---|---|---|
Amanda Mace |
|
|
Eric Eggert |
|
Bravo! |
Lewis Phillips |
|
|
Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
Great work - well done! The tweaks in the first heading "Is there a business case..." and ensuing paragraphs made a big difference! |
Sharron Rush |
|
|
Laura Keen |
|
|
Brent Bakken |
|
|
Sylvie Duchateau |
|
Comments sent by email, just noticed the github link now :( |
Shawn Lawton Henry | It looks like some of the previous comments are still issues. I haven't had a chance to look through them. If others don't beat me to it, I will by 12 November. | |
Howard Kramer |
|
I still think that this is a great resource. As before, I find it engaging and interesting. In fact, I plan to demonstrate it as a useful resource for courses on digital accessibility next week at the AHG conference. As I've said in previous feedback, the bibliographic feature of the resource makes it an excellent resource to use in the classroom and serves as an index to other articles that would be very relevant in a course or anyone wanting to learn more in this area. I only saw 2 things that I thought could warrant change. One was the sentence between the Apple and Google case study: "Innovation from voice interactions at Apple and elsewhere have contributed to the abundance of personal digital assistants now found in many homes and offices. Today millions of people use these devices, regardless of ability." It seemed to not fit in with the flow of the piece but this was not a major issue. I should also mention that this would be a great resource for someone from a company or organization trying to justify the business case for accessibility. The other very minor grammatical thing I noticed was that "transcript" should be plural in the following sentence: "the new inbound links to transcript accounted for an increase of 3.89%" |
Andrew Arch |
|
|
Norah Sinclair |
|
I'm glad to see this valuable resource will soon be published! |
Choice | Responders |
---|---|
I agree with the changes and approve publication. |
|
I'm OK with publication as is; please consider my comments in GitHub(or below) for Editors' discretion. |
|
I will approve publication only after my comments in GitHub (or below) are addressed. | |
I need more time, and will complete the review by the date in the Comments field below. | |
I abstain and accept the decision of the group. | |
fyi, I added some comments in GitHub to consider for later iterations. |
The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:
Send an email to all the non-responders.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
w3c/wbs-design
or
by mail to sysreq
.