W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire Intro to Accessibility Revision - Thorough Review and Approval to Publish

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: shawn@w3.org

This questionnaire was open from 2018-01-19 to 2018-01-30.

21 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Intro to Accessibility Revision

1. Intro to Accessibility Revision

summary | by responder | by choice

Please thoroughly review this revision, and indicate your comments and position on publication.

Note: We have made changes as comments came in. All changes since the opening of this survey are documented here: Changes since 18 January (wiki), so you can review them without having to go over the entire document.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I approve publication. I have no comments. 11
I'm OK with publication as is; please consider my [ED] comments in GitHub (or below) for Editors' discretion. 8
I will approve publication only after my [!!] comments in GitHub (or below) are addressed.
I need more time, and will complete the review by the date in the Comments field below.
I abstain and accept the decision of the group. 1
fyi, I added some [later] comments in GitHub to consider for later iterations.

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Intro to Accessibility RevisionComments
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I approve publication. I have no comments.
 Very nice - well done.
Laura Keen
  • I approve publication. I have no comments.
Brent Bakken Looks good! Issue is editor's discretion about Page Contents.
Jes Pulido
  • I approve publication. I have no comments.
Stéphane Deschamps
  • I approve publication. I have no comments.
Chris O'Brien Nice work, everyone.
Judy Brewer Please ping me during meeting discussion if you'd like to discuss my comments at:
https://github.com/w3c/wai-intro-accessibility/issues/20
None of the checkboxes above exactly match the intent of my vote. I could be convinced to a different point of view through discussion, and am not a regular part of the approval process, but this seems like an important resource and I have a strong concern on this that I hope can be addressed. Thanks.
Sharron Rush
  • I approve publication. I have no comments.
Matthew Putland
  • I approve publication. I have no comments.
Amanda Mace
  • I approve publication. I have no comments.
Vivienne Conway
  • I approve publication. I have no comments.
Denis Boudreau
  • I abstain and accept the decision of the group.
Kris Anne Kinney
Norah Sinclair
  • I approve publication. I have no comments.
Andrew Arch Looking excellent - just a couple of suggestions:
1. the link to the 7-min video (Web Accessibility Perspectives Video) might be better as a link to the perspectives landing page so people can dip in and out of the different shorter videos?
2. consider "Web accessibility is required by law in some countries" (rather than "... in some cases")
Sylvie Duchateau
Eric Eggert See GitHub pull request, comments
Robert Jolly
  • I approve publication. I have no comments.
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I approve publication. I have no comments.
 [Editor]
Howard Kramer
Shadi Abou-Zahra This document is absolutely great, and I'm very happy with it. The following suggestions are totally for Editors' discretion:

Is the "Introduction" section really necessary? It seems to merely repeat what is in the immediately following section "Accessibility in Context". Also, if the "Introduction" section is removed, do we need the *heading* "Accessibility in Context"? Might be nice to dive right into the content - seems more engaging.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I approve publication. I have no comments.
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Laura Keen
  • Jes Pulido
  • Stéphane Deschamps
  • Sharron Rush
  • Matthew Putland
  • Amanda Mace
  • Vivienne Conway
  • Norah Sinclair
  • Robert Jolly
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
I'm OK with publication as is; please consider my [ED] comments in GitHub (or below) for Editors' discretion.
  • Brent Bakken
  • Chris O'Brien
  • Kris Anne Kinney
  • Andrew Arch
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Eric Eggert
  • Howard Kramer
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra
I will approve publication only after my [!!] comments in GitHub (or below) are addressed.
I need more time, and will complete the review by the date in the Comments field below.
I abstain and accept the decision of the group.
  • Denis Boudreau
fyi, I added some [later] comments in GitHub to consider for later iterations.

More details on responses

  • Vicki Menezes Miller: last responded on 23, January 2018 at 06:39 (UTC)
  • Laura Keen: last responded on 23, January 2018 at 13:19 (UTC)
  • Brent Bakken: last responded on 23, January 2018 at 15:26 (UTC)
  • Jes Pulido: last responded on 24, January 2018 at 15:15 (UTC)
  • Stéphane Deschamps: last responded on 25, January 2018 at 16:42 (UTC)
  • Chris O'Brien: last responded on 25, January 2018 at 20:07 (UTC)
  • Judy Brewer: last responded on 26, January 2018 at 06:57 (UTC)
  • Sharron Rush: last responded on 26, January 2018 at 13:18 (UTC)
  • Matthew Putland: last responded on 29, January 2018 at 03:30 (UTC)
  • Amanda Mace: last responded on 29, January 2018 at 08:07 (UTC)
  • Vivienne Conway: last responded on 29, January 2018 at 08:45 (UTC)
  • Denis Boudreau: last responded on 29, January 2018 at 13:29 (UTC)
  • Kris Anne Kinney: last responded on 29, January 2018 at 14:06 (UTC)
  • Norah Sinclair: last responded on 29, January 2018 at 20:40 (UTC)
  • Andrew Arch: last responded on 30, January 2018 at 04:29 (UTC)
  • Sylvie Duchateau: last responded on 30, January 2018 at 10:42 (UTC)
  • Eric Eggert: last responded on 30, January 2018 at 15:06 (UTC)
  • Robert Jolly: last responded on 30, January 2018 at 18:12 (UTC)
  • Shawn Lawton Henry: last responded on 30, January 2018 at 18:20 (UTC)
  • Howard Kramer: last responded on 31, January 2018 at 00:15 (UTC)
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra: last responded on 31, January 2018 at 12:40 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Eric Velleman
  2. Kazuhito Kidachi
  3. Jedi Lin
  4. David Sloan
  5. Mary Jo Mueller
  6. Reinaldo Ferraz
  7. Bill Kasdorf
  8. Cristina Mussinelli
  9. Kevin White
  10. Kevin Rydberg
  11. Adina Halter
  12. Sarah Pulis
  13. Bill Tyler
  14. Gregorio Pellegrino
  15. Ruoxi Ran
  16. Jennifer Chadwick
  17. Sean Kelly
  18. Muhammad Saleem
  19. Sarah Lewthwaite
  20. Daniel Montalvo
  21. Mark Palmer
  22. Jade Matos Carew
  23. Sonsoles López Pernas
  24. Greta Krafsig
  25. Jason McKee
  26. Jayne Schurick
  27. Billie Johnston
  28. Michele Williams
  29. Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
  30. Brian Elton
  31. Julianna Rowsell
  32. Tabitha Mahoney
  33. Fred Edora
  34. Rabab Gomaa
  35. Marcelo Paiva
  36. Eloisa Guerrero
  37. Leonard Beasley
  38. Frankie Wolf
  39. Supriya Makude
  40. Aleksandar Cindrikj
  41. Angela Young

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.