w3c/wbs-design or
by mail to sysreq.
W3C
Site Navigation
Nearby
Results of Questionnaire EOWG Weekly Survey - 30 October 2015
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: shawn@w3.org,shadi+EOsurvey@w3.org
This questionnaire was open from 2015-10-30 to 2015-11-05.
10 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
- Resolutions of 30 October
- Planning: Categories
- Planning: Initiate activities
- Planning: Plan activities
- Planning: Implement activities
- Planning: Monitor activities
1. Resolutions of 30 October
summary | by responder | by choice
Please read the 30 October EOWG teleconference meeting minutes. Indicate your approval or concerns with the resolution(s) passed at that meeting. The summary and the link to the full minutes is on the 2015 Minutes wiki page.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them! | 7 |
| I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed. | 3 |
| I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the Resolutions, and I explain them below. | |
| I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box. |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Resolutions of 30 October | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| George Heake |
|
|
| David Berman |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Anna Belle Leiserson |
|
|
| Brent Bakken |
|
|
| James Green |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
|
| Kevin White |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
|
| Sharron Rush |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them! |
|
| I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed. |
|
| I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the Resolutions, and I explain them below. | |
| I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box. |
2. Planning: Categories
summary | by responder | by choice
This question relates to the Planning Categories document. This captures all the sections within the Planning Roadmap resource and activities important to undertake in that phase of the project or programme.
Please consider the high level categories being used; Initiate, Plan, Implement, Monitor. Are there any big gaps? Do the categories work for splitting out planning activities? Is the terminology understandable?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I reviewed them and have added my comments below. | 3 |
| I reviewed them and have no additional comments to apply. | 6 |
| I will review them by the date in the comment section below. | |
| I didn't get to them; I will pass on commenting on it and accept the decisions of the Group. | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Planning: Categories | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| George Heake |
|
I don't believe there are any gaps between the categories. I think they overlap well. They will work well in splitting out the planning activities. The terminology is a strong part of the document. It is suitable for a wide audience. And words like weaving and momentum fit in well with the project management models such as AGILE, SCRUM etc. |
| David Berman |
|
I think that mechanically all of the categories are there. However I am concerned that in many if not most organizations, especially those without regulatory pressure, we may be missing sufficient steps that will result in the important internal marketing / communications strategy focus in order to build the buy-in that will be required to secure all the resources and commitment required. |
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Anna Belle Leiserson |
|
|
| Brent Bakken |
|
I like these categories as they are closely aligned to Project Management Professional framework. I think they are comprehensive. |
| James Green |
|
I added my comments in Github Issue #3 https://github.com/w3c/wai-dynamic-planning/issues/3 because I had a screenshot to share. The text of the issue was: In reviewing the roadmap (btw I agree it's not a roadmap per #2) I was struck by the sheer number of words on the screen. It's sooo many words, I'm concerned that we'll lose users if they have to concentrate that hard before they even get to a specific activity. I suggest we reduce each activity down to about 2 words so they can be skimmed easily and on the sub-pages, give them icons as well. Below, you can see that I modified the activities under Initiate per my suggestion so you can compare their readability/skimmability to the other unmodified items. Below that, you can see how my suggestion could further benefit skimming and choosing over the current wording on the sub-pages. |
| Howard Kramer |
|
|
| Kevin White |
|
[Document author] |
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
|
| Sharron Rush |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I reviewed them and have added my comments below. |
|
| I reviewed them and have no additional comments to apply. |
|
| I will review them by the date in the comment section below. | |
| I didn't get to them; I will pass on commenting on it and accept the decisions of the Group. |
|
3. Planning: Initiate activities
summary | by responder | by choice
This question relates to the Intitate activities within the Planning Roadmap.
Please consider the activities. Are there any additional activities that might help? Are any of the activities too broad, too narrow? Are any of the activities much more important than others? Should any of these activities be in other categories?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I reviewed them and have added my comments below. | 4 |
| I reviewed them and have no additional comments to apply. | 3 |
| I will review them by the date in the comment section below. | 1 |
| I didn't get to them; I will pass on commenting on it and accept the decisions of the Group. | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Planning: Initiate activities | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| George Heake |
|
|
| David Berman |
|
I think it would be valuable to stress the importance of getting sign off amongst all stakeholders for precise measurement objectives, so everyone will provide the same answer to this question "How will we all know when we've succeeded in meeting or exceeding our accessibility goals?" |
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
Currently: Obtain support for accessibility activities Suggestion: Obtain key stakeholder support for accessibility activities or Secure key stakeholder buy-in for accessibility activities Just to emphasise the importance of key stakeholder buy-in |
| Anna Belle Leiserson |
|
|
| Brent Bakken |
|
I think it would be good to add an activity to "Create Measurable Objectives" just after the activity of identifying accessibility goals. It is easier to talk about and sell accessibility if you can explain the objectives and how the organization will know they are successfully implementing them. |
| James Green |
|
I suggest renaming them as follows: Get Familiar Make Baseline Set Goals Business Case Get Support Spread the Word |
| Howard Kramer |
|
|
| Kevin White |
|
[Document author] |
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
|
| Sharron Rush |
|
10 Nov |
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I reviewed them and have added my comments below. |
|
| I reviewed them and have no additional comments to apply. |
|
| I will review them by the date in the comment section below. |
|
| I didn't get to them; I will pass on commenting on it and accept the decisions of the Group. |
|
4. Planning: Plan activities
summary | by responder | by choice
This question relates to the Plan activities within the Planning Roadmap.
Please consider the activities. Are there any additional activities that might help? Are any of the activities too broad, too narrow? Are any of the activities much more important than others? Should any of these activities be in other categories?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I reviewed them and have added my comments below. | 4 |
| I reviewed them and have no additional comments to apply. | 3 |
| I will review them by the date in the comment section below. | 1 |
| I didn't get to them; I will pass on commenting on it and accept the decisions of the Group. | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Planning: Plan activities | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| George Heake |
|
|
| David Berman |
|
I like what is there very much. My chief concern is that, in my experience, for accessibility to be sustainable it has to be part of the larger product plan. So rather than assume the development on a plan for accessibility, in many cases it will be better to only "integrate accessibility into wider" policies, libraries, plans, budgets, strategies... I realize this is touched upon here; however it may deserve amplification. |
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Anna Belle Leiserson |
|
I wonder about breaking out training? It's mentioned in the assign budget, and perhaps that's enough. |
| Brent Bakken |
|
Change "Assign Budget" to "Develop and Assign Budget" Move "Identifying Important Roles" under "Develop and Assign Budget". A lot of the activities above, such as reviewing sites and resources will help establish what roles are needed and who will own those roles. |
| James Green |
|
If the group agrees with my suggestion to rename them with shorter titles (and/or add icons), I'd be happy to draft suggestions for all activities under the other 3 categories as I did with Initiate (see screenshot on https://github.com/w3c/wai-dynamic-planning/issues/3). |
| Howard Kramer |
|
|
| Kevin White |
|
[Document author] |
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
|
| Sharron Rush |
|
10 Nov |
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I reviewed them and have added my comments below. |
|
| I reviewed them and have no additional comments to apply. |
|
| I will review them by the date in the comment section below. |
|
| I didn't get to them; I will pass on commenting on it and accept the decisions of the Group. |
|
5. Planning: Implement activities
summary | by responder | by choice
This question relates to the Implement activities within the Planning Roadmap.
Please consider the activities. Are there any additional activities that might help? Are any of the activities too broad, too narrow? Are any of the activities much more important than others? Should any of these activities be in other categories?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I reviewed them and have added my comments below. | 4 |
| I reviewed them and have no additional comments to apply. | 3 |
| I will review them by the date in the comment section below. | 1 |
| I didn't get to them; I will pass on commenting on it and accept the decisions of the Group. | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Planning: Implement activities | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| George Heake |
|
This might be more appropriate for when we drill down further, but a mention of User Acceptance Testing (UAT) to incorporate accessibility testing etc., could be useful. |
| David Berman |
|
I'm thinking perhaps we should go as far as suggesting clauses for procurement. |
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Anna Belle Leiserson |
|
|
| Brent Bakken |
|
What does everyone think about adding "Give Recognition and Rewards" as an activity to motivate and reward those that are carrying out accessibility efforts. This is key in project management and can create a positive culture and frankly more awareness in general for accessibility development. In the "Share Experience and Knowledge" activity, can we add the concept of reporting progress back up to leadership? This is key to continue to gain buy-in and continued support since accessibility does not have a "project complete" phase. |
| James Green |
|
If the group agrees with my suggestion to rename them with shorter titles (and/or add icons), I'd be happy to draft suggestions for all activities under the other 3 categories as I did with Initiate (see screenshot on https://github.com/w3c/wai-dynamic-planning/issues/3). |
| Howard Kramer |
|
|
| Kevin White |
|
[Document author] |
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
|
| Sharron Rush |
|
10 Nov |
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I reviewed them and have added my comments below. |
|
| I reviewed them and have no additional comments to apply. |
|
| I will review them by the date in the comment section below. |
|
| I didn't get to them; I will pass on commenting on it and accept the decisions of the Group. |
|
6. Planning: Monitor activities
summary | by responder | by choice
This question relates to the Monitor activities within the Planning Roadmap.
Please consider the activities. Are there any additional activities that might help? Are any of the activities too broad, too narrow? Are any of the activities much more important than others? Should any of these activities be in other categories?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I reviewed them and have added my comments below. | 1 |
| I reviewed them and have no additional comments to apply. | 5 |
| I will review them by the date in the comment section below. | 1 |
| I didn't get to them; I will pass on commenting on it and accept the decisions of the Group. | 2 |
(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Planning: Monitor activities | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| George Heake |
|
|
| David Berman |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Anna Belle Leiserson |
|
|
| Brent Bakken |
|
Add "Measure Progress Against Objectives" to determine if adequate progress is being made or additional direction or change is required at any stage of implementation. In the "Identify areas for improvement" activity, add language that takes them to the next step of implementing changes that where identified for improvement. In other words, what are they going to do with what was identified. |
| James Green | If the group agrees with my suggestion to rename them with shorter titles (and maybe icons), I'd be happy to draft suggestions for all activities under the other 3 categories as I did with Initiate (see screenshot on https://github.com/w3c/wai-dynamic-planning/issues/3). | |
| Howard Kramer |
|
|
| Kevin White |
|
[Document author] |
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
|
| Sharron Rush |
|
10 Nov |
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I reviewed them and have added my comments below. |
|
| I reviewed them and have no additional comments to apply. |
|
| I will review them by the date in the comment section below. |
|
| I didn't get to them; I will pass on commenting on it and accept the decisions of the Group. |
|
More details on responses
- George Heake: last responded on 3, November 2015 at 15:14 (UTC)
- David Berman: last responded on 4, November 2015 at 00:51 (UTC)
- Vicki Menezes Miller: last responded on 4, November 2015 at 20:31 (UTC)
- Anna Belle Leiserson: last responded on 4, November 2015 at 22:41 (UTC)
- Brent Bakken: last responded on 4, November 2015 at 23:00 (UTC)
- James Green: last responded on 5, November 2015 at 02:39 (UTC)
- Howard Kramer: last responded on 5, November 2015 at 05:17 (UTC)
- Kevin White: last responded on 5, November 2015 at 09:24 (UTC)
- Shawn Lawton Henry: last responded on 5, November 2015 at 14:37 (UTC)
- Sharron Rush: last responded on 5, November 2015 at 23:58 (UTC)
Non-responders
The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:
- Eric Velleman
- Andrew Arch
- Shadi Abou-Zahra
- Sylvie Duchateau
- Kazuhito Kidachi
- Jedi Lin
- David Sloan
- Mary Jo Mueller
- Reinaldo Ferraz
- Bill Kasdorf
- Cristina Mussinelli
- Kevin Rydberg
- Adina Halter
- Denis Boudreau
- Laura Keen
- Sarah Pulis
- Bill Tyler
- Gregorio Pellegrino
- Ruoxi Ran
- Jennifer Chadwick
- Sean Kelly
- Muhammad Saleem
- Sarah Lewthwaite
- Daniel Montalvo
- Mark Palmer
- Jade Matos Carew
- Sonsoles López Pernas
- Greta Krafsig
- Jason McKee
- Jayne Schurick
- Billie Johnston
- Michele Williams
- Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
- Brian Elton
- Julianna Rowsell
- Tabitha Mahoney
- Fred Edora
- Rabab Gomaa
- Marcelo Paiva
- Eloisa Guerrero
- Leonard Beasley
- Frankie Wolf
- Supriya Makude
- Aleksandar Cindrikj
- Angela Young
Send an email to all the non-responders.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
Report issues
on GitHub project