w3c/wbs-design or
by mail to sysreq.
W3C
Site Navigation
Nearby
Results of Questionnaire EOWG Publication Approval – Minor Revisions and Copy Edits
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: shawn@w3.org
This questionnaire was open from 2018-02-16 to 2018-02-27.
15 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
- About this survey
- Essential Components of Web Accessibility - Changes Approval
- Make Presentations Accessible to All - Changes Approval
- Involving Users in Web Projects - Changes Approval
- Involving Users in Evaluating - Changes Approval
1. About this survey
Nic and Shawn have made some copy edits and minor revisions to several EOWG Resources. The resources in this survey are ready for EOWG review and approval to publish.
There are 4 resources. Most have only copy edits or a couple minor changes.
Please review the few changes listed in the survey questions. That will take most people less than 30 minutes.
You do not need to review all the copy edits if you don't want to.
Please note that we are eager to call these versions publishable, and we welcome comments for later revisions.
Details
| Responder | About this survey |
|---|---|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | |
| Denis Boudreau | |
| Laura Keen | |
| Sharron Rush | |
| Kris Anne Kinney | |
| Vicki Menezes Miller | |
| Eric Eggert | Unfortunately, I’m unable to commit the time to review the documents. I did skim over some of the changes and was OK with them. |
| Chris O'Brien | |
| Sylvie Duchateau | |
| Matthew Putland | |
| Robert Jolly | |
| Brent Bakken | |
| Amanda Mace | |
| Howard Kramer | |
| Norah Sinclair |
2. Essential Components of Web Accessibility - Changes Approval
summary | by responder | by choice
"Essential Components of Web Accessibility" has been updated, as detailed below. Please review the changes to confirm your satisfaction with the changes, and to approve its publication.
There are a few minor changes:
- Changed one sentence in the Summary: "This page... It provides the foundation for understanding the different accessibility standards develop by the W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)."
- Changed heading "Guidelines for Different Components" to "Guidelines and Other Standards"
- Changed "guidelines" to "standards" in one place.
- Added bullet on ARIA.
GitHub issues have been addressed.
- Essential Components... - Revised version
- Essential Components... - Differences from published version (Word file)
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I approve publication. | 9 |
| I'm OK with publication as is; please consider my [ED] comments in GitHub (or below) for Editors' discretion now or later. | 4 |
| I will approve publication only after my [!!] comments in GitHub (or below) are addressed. | 1 |
| I need more time, and will complete the review by the date in the Comments field below. | |
| I abstain and accept the decision of the group. | 1 |
| fyi, I added some [later] comments in GitHub to consider for later iterations. |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Essential Components of Web Accessibility - Changes Approval | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
|
| Denis Boudreau |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
In the summary: Should "develop" be "developed" |
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Kris Anne Kinney |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
Could the link "described below" maybe be extended to include the abbreviations of the guidelines to make the link more meaningful, i.e., instead of "described below" modify to "WCAG, ATAG, and UAAG, described below". |
| Eric Eggert |
|
|
| Chris O'Brien |
|
|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Matthew Putland |
|
|
| Robert Jolly |
|
|
| Brent Bakken |
|
|
| Amanda Mace |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
I would add "also" to "It [also] provides the foundation ..." To me it reads strangely without it. |
| Norah Sinclair |
|
1. typo: missing develop missing "ed" ...It provides the foundation for understanding the different accessibility standards develop by the W3C Web |
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I approve publication. |
|
| I'm OK with publication as is; please consider my [ED] comments in GitHub (or below) for Editors' discretion now or later. |
|
| I will approve publication only after my [!!] comments in GitHub (or below) are addressed. |
|
| I need more time, and will complete the review by the date in the Comments field below. | |
| I abstain and accept the decision of the group. |
|
| fyi, I added some [later] comments in GitHub to consider for later iterations. |
3. Make Presentations Accessible to All - Changes Approval
summary | by responder | by choice
"How to Make Your Presentations Accessible to All" has been updated, as detailed below. Please review the changes to confirm your satisfaction with the changes, and to approve its publication.
There is 1 substantive change:
from: "Electronic formats such as HTML (that is, web page format) and RTF are often the most flexible to meet different people's needs."
to: "Word processing formats are often the most flexible to meet different people’s needs."
Here it is in context: Provide Accessible Material and Media section.
All other changes are non-substantive copyedits.
- Make Presentations Accessible... - Revised version
- Make Presentations Accessible... - Differences from published version (Word file)
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I approve publication. | 14 |
| I'm OK with publication as is; please consider my [ED] comments in GitHub (or below) for Editors' discretion now or later. | |
| I will approve publication only after my [!!] comments in GitHub (or below) are addressed. | |
| I need more time, and will complete the review by the date in the Comments field below. | |
| I abstain and accept the decision of the group. | 1 |
| fyi, I added some [later] comments in GitHub to consider for later iterations. |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Make Presentations Accessible to All - Changes Approval | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
|
| Denis Boudreau |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Kris Anne Kinney |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Eric Eggert |
|
|
| Chris O'Brien |
|
|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Matthew Putland |
|
|
| Robert Jolly |
|
|
| Brent Bakken |
|
|
| Amanda Mace |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
|
| Norah Sinclair |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I approve publication. |
|
| I'm OK with publication as is; please consider my [ED] comments in GitHub (or below) for Editors' discretion now or later. | |
| I will approve publication only after my [!!] comments in GitHub (or below) are addressed. | |
| I need more time, and will complete the review by the date in the Comments field below. | |
| I abstain and accept the decision of the group. |
|
| fyi, I added some [later] comments in GitHub to consider for later iterations. |
4. Involving Users in Web Projects - Changes Approval
summary | by responder | by choice
"Involving Users in Web Projects for Better, Easier Accessibility" has been updated.
There are no substantive changes. All changes are non-substantive copy edits.
- Involving Users in Projects... - Revised version
- Involving Users in Projects... - Differences from published version (Word file)
(Note: "{.termref}" in the Word Diff is markdown that is not displayed in the rendered page.)
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I approve publication. | 11 |
| I'm OK with publication as is; please consider my [ED] comments in GitHub (or below) for Editors' discretion now or later. | 2 |
| I will approve publication only after my [!!] comments in GitHub (or below) are addressed. | 1 |
| I need more time, and will complete the review by the date in the Comments field below. | |
| I abstain and accept the decision of the group. | 1 |
| fyi, I added some [later] comments in GitHub to consider for later iterations. |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Involving Users in Web Projects - Changes Approval | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
|
| Denis Boudreau |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
adaptive strategies{#strategies} and assistive technologies{.termref}. spacing issues before the opening bracket ? |
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Kris Anne Kinney |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
Several times, there is {.termref} is mentioned. Is it an error? |
| Eric Eggert |
|
|
| Chris O'Brien |
|
|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Matthew Putland |
|
|
| Robert Jolly |
|
|
| Brent Bakken |
|
I noticed that there is a "Caution" sentence highlighted in yellow. Are we applying that to the finished page or is that just part of the preview in GitHub? |
| Amanda Mace |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
|
| Norah Sinclair |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I approve publication. |
|
| I'm OK with publication as is; please consider my [ED] comments in GitHub (or below) for Editors' discretion now or later. |
|
| I will approve publication only after my [!!] comments in GitHub (or below) are addressed. |
|
| I need more time, and will complete the review by the date in the Comments field below. | |
| I abstain and accept the decision of the group. |
|
| fyi, I added some [later] comments in GitHub to consider for later iterations. |
5. Involving Users in Evaluating - Changes Approval
summary | by responder | by choice
"Involving Users in Evaluating Web Accessibility" has been updated.
There are no substantive changes. All changes are non-substantive copy edits.
- Involving Users in Evaluating... - Revised version
- Involving Users in Evaluating... - Differences from published version (Word file)
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I approve publication. | 14 |
| I'm OK with publication as is; please consider my [ED] comments in GitHub (or below) for Editors' discretion now or later. | |
| I will approve publication only after my [!!] comments in GitHub (or below) are addressed. | |
| I need more time, and will complete the review by the date in the Comments field below. | |
| I abstain and accept the decision of the group. | 1 |
| fyi, I added some [later] comments in GitHub to consider for later iterations. |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Involving Users in Evaluating - Changes Approval | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
|
| Denis Boudreau |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Kris Anne Kinney |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Eric Eggert |
|
|
| Chris O'Brien |
|
|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Matthew Putland |
|
|
| Robert Jolly |
|
|
| Brent Bakken |
|
Same highlighting of the Caution statement. Same question as Q4 comment box. |
| Amanda Mace |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
|
| Norah Sinclair |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I approve publication. |
|
| I'm OK with publication as is; please consider my [ED] comments in GitHub (or below) for Editors' discretion now or later. | |
| I will approve publication only after my [!!] comments in GitHub (or below) are addressed. | |
| I need more time, and will complete the review by the date in the Comments field below. | |
| I abstain and accept the decision of the group. |
|
| fyi, I added some [later] comments in GitHub to consider for later iterations. |
More details on responses
- Shawn Lawton Henry: last responded on 21, February 2018 at 01:25 (UTC)
- Denis Boudreau: last responded on 21, February 2018 at 03:07 (UTC)
- Laura Keen: last responded on 21, February 2018 at 14:02 (UTC)
- Sharron Rush: last responded on 21, February 2018 at 14:59 (UTC)
- Kris Anne Kinney: last responded on 21, February 2018 at 21:05 (UTC)
- Vicki Menezes Miller: last responded on 22, February 2018 at 08:45 (UTC)
- Eric Eggert: last responded on 22, February 2018 at 16:38 (UTC)
- Chris O'Brien: last responded on 23, February 2018 at 04:23 (UTC)
- Sylvie Duchateau: last responded on 23, February 2018 at 10:35 (UTC)
- Matthew Putland: last responded on 26, February 2018 at 07:15 (UTC)
- Robert Jolly: last responded on 26, February 2018 at 17:50 (UTC)
- Brent Bakken: last responded on 26, February 2018 at 23:05 (UTC)
- Amanda Mace: last responded on 26, February 2018 at 23:29 (UTC)
- Howard Kramer: last responded on 28, February 2018 at 01:34 (UTC)
- Norah Sinclair: last responded on 28, February 2018 at 03:34 (UTC)
Non-responders
The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:
- Eric Velleman
- Andrew Arch
- Shadi Abou-Zahra
- Kazuhito Kidachi
- Jedi Lin
- David Sloan
- Mary Jo Mueller
- Reinaldo Ferraz
- Bill Kasdorf
- Cristina Mussinelli
- Kevin White
- Kevin Rydberg
- Ahmath Bamba MBACKE
- Adina Halter
- Sarah Pulis
- Bill Tyler
- Gregorio Pellegrino
- Ruoxi Ran
- Jennifer Chadwick
- Sean Kelly
- Muhammad Saleem
- Sarah Lewthwaite
- Daniel Montalvo
- Mark Palmer
- Jade Matos Carew
- Sonsoles López Pernas
- Greta Krafsig
- Jason McKee
- Jayne Schurick
- Billie Johnston
- Michele Williams
- Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
- Brian Elton
- Julianna Rowsell
- Tabitha Mahoney
- Fred Edora
- Rabab Gomaa
- Marcelo Paiva
- Eloisa Guerrero
- Leonard Beasley
- Frankie Wolf
- Supriya Makude
- Aleksandar Cindrikj
- Angela Young
Send an email to all the non-responders.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
Report issues
on GitHub project