W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire EOWG Weekly Survey - 04 March 2016

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: shawn@w3.org,shadi+EOsurvey@w3.org

This questionnaire was open from 2016-03-04 to 2016-03-09.

8 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Resolution of 04 March 2016
  2. Showcase Examples with Videos
  3. Name that showcase with video resource!
  4. [AUICL]: Accessible UI Components List – Add Themes category
  5. [AUICL]: Accessible UI Components List – Add Snippets or Demos category
  6. [AUICL]: Accessible UI Components List – Remove “Templates” category
  7. [AUICL]: Accessible UI Components List – Submit a UI Component

1. Resolution of 04 March 2016

summary | by responder | by choice

Please read the 04 March EOWG teleconference meeting minutes or summary. Indicate your approval or concerns with the resolution(s) passed at that meeting.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with it! 5
I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolution as passed. 4
I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the Resolution and I explain them below.
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box.

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Resolution of 04 March 2016Comments
Andrew Arch
  • I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolution as passed.
Brent Bakken
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with it!
Eric Eggert
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with it!
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolution as passed.
James Green
  • I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolution as passed.
Susan Hewitt
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with it!
Sharron Rush
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with it!
Howard Kramer
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with it!
  • I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolution as passed.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with it!
  • Brent Bakken
  • Eric Eggert
  • Susan Hewitt
  • Sharron Rush
  • Howard Kramer
I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolution as passed.
  • Andrew Arch
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
  • James Green
  • Howard Kramer
I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the Resolution and I explain them below.
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box.

2. Showcase Examples with Videos

At this stage, we have finalized the visuals and general tenor of all video scripts. However, there is still some room to refine the narration as long as it does not change the meaning or impact the visuals. That is, only purely editorial, word-smithing, and copy-editing is welcome.

Please review All video scripts (1-10) and add any comments in GitHub as new issues. If you are not comfortable with GitHub, please add your comments below.

Please note specifically the following aspects in your review:

  • Issue 47 - Main point coming through clearly?
  • Issue 41 - Separation between need and want?
  • Issue 109 - Catch (last) phrase catchy enough?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I reviewed it and have no comments on the narration! 2
I am pretty happy with the revised narration but suggest you to consider my comment (at the discretion of the Task Force). Suggestion only, not a show stopper - in GitHub or below. 4
I do have a *strong* (showstopping) objection and have commented in GitHub or below. 1
I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on the document and accept the decisions of the Group.

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder Showcase Examples with Videos
Andrew Arch
Brent Bakken I am pretty happy with the revised narration but suggest you to consider my comment (at the discretion of the Task Force). Suggestion only, not a show stopper - in GitHub or below. Added a comment to Issue 109. Mild comment, okay with group decision.
Eric Eggert I reviewed it and have no comments on the narration!
Shawn Lawton Henry I am pretty happy with the revised narration but suggest you to consider my comment (at the discretion of the Task Force). Suggestion only, not a show stopper - in GitHub or below. I reviewed and commented on the issues linked above.

I did not get to a thorough review of all of the scripts. I'd need more time.
James Green I am pretty happy with the revised narration but suggest you to consider my comment (at the discretion of the Task Force). Suggestion only, not a show stopper - in GitHub or below. I submitted https://github.com/w3c/wai-showcase-examples/pull/121, https://github.com/w3c/wai-showcase-examples/issues/122, and added my thoughts to https://github.com/w3c/wai-showcase-examples/issues/109.
Susan Hewitt I am pretty happy with the revised narration but suggest you to consider my comment (at the discretion of the Task Force). Suggestion only, not a show stopper - in GitHub or below. My comments in Github on Issue 109 are important but I'm not the only one chiming in. I'm sure the TF will consider everyone's comments.
Sharron Rush I do have a *strong* (showstopping) objection and have commented in GitHub or below. Catch phrase must be short, memorable and repeated, don't think we are there yet.
Howard Kramer I reviewed it and have no comments on the narration!

3. Name that showcase with video resource!

summary | by responder | by choice

'Showcase Examples with Video' is what we have used to reference this resource. However, it is more than just video. Consider that this asset is a series of vignettes about the impact and benefits of web accessibility with accompanying text and links to other resources. Please read the resource title discussion in the minutes of 04 March and add your suggestions or ideas in GitHub or below. Feel free to open a new issue or add to the existing issue disussing the resource URL and title: What to link to - issue #8 Thanks!

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I submitted to GitHub 3
I included comments below. 1
I am out of ideas and have nothing to add at this time. Send me a list of titles and let me vote. 3

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Name that showcase with video resource!Comments
Andrew Arch
Brent Bakken
  • I submitted to GitHub
Eric Eggert
  • I am out of ideas and have nothing to add at this time. Send me a list of titles and let me vote.
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I submitted to GitHub
James Green
  • I am out of ideas and have nothing to add at this time. Send me a list of titles and let me vote.
Susan Hewitt
  • I am out of ideas and have nothing to add at this time. Send me a list of titles and let me vote.
Sharron Rush
  • I submitted to GitHub
 I submitted ideas in an earlier survey and am looking for something along the lines of "Web Accessibility - what it is, why it matters"
Howard Kramer
  • I included comments below.
 I still like "Experience Web Accessibility in Action" or
"Web Accessibility in ACTION: Benefits and Impacts"

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I submitted to GitHub
  • Brent Bakken
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
  • Sharron Rush
I included comments below.
  • Howard Kramer
I am out of ideas and have nothing to add at this time. Send me a list of titles and let me vote.
  • Eric Eggert
  • James Green
  • Susan Hewitt

4. [AUICL]: Accessible UI Components List – Add Themes category

summary | by responder | by choice

Thanks to the volunteers a wide range of UI Components are getting submitted. Thanks for that!

A few questions have come up around the data organization, mainly about where to put Themes for content management systems. Just to recap, currently we have the following three categories (or buckets) to sort UI components into:

  • Widgets
  • Templates
  • Frameworks

Proposal: Add Themes.

Rationale: Themes are tied to CMS solutions. They are more complex than templates which are more static.

Considerations:

  • Some CMS vendors provide theme directories on their own.
  • Some vendors also mark or tag accessible themes in their directories (for example WordPress).
  • Most commercial theme platforms/markets do not mark or feature themes that are accessible.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I support adding “Themes”. 5
I don’t support think we should add “Themes” for the reasons outlined below. 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder [AUICL]: Accessible UI Components List – Add Themes categoryComments
Andrew Arch
  • I support adding “Themes”.
Brent Bakken
  • I support adding “Themes”.
 Support Editors discretion here.
Eric Eggert [Editor]
Shawn Lawton Henry
James Green
  • I support adding “Themes”.
Susan Hewitt
  • I don’t support think we should add “Themes” for the reasons outlined below.
 I don't think this category would have enough resources to justify it, partly for the reasons listed above.
Sharron Rush
  • I support adding “Themes”.
Howard Kramer
  • I support adding “Themes”.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I support adding “Themes”.
  • Andrew Arch
  • Brent Bakken
  • James Green
  • Sharron Rush
  • Howard Kramer
I don’t support think we should add “Themes” for the reasons outlined below.
  • Susan Hewitt

5. [AUICL]: Accessible UI Components List – Add Snippets or Demos category

summary | by responder | by choice

Regardless of the changes above, there are some other considerations:

What shall we do with small examples of code that are beneficial to learn how to make some specific things accessible. For example, on blog posts and codepen.io there are some nice accessibility approaches that can’t be clearly placed in one of the categories (Widgets, Frameworks, Templates or Themes) in the tool right now.

Proposal: Add a category “Snippets” or “Demos”.

Rationale: Sometimes one just needs a hint or an example to learn how to implement a technique. This category can be useful to find examples and would also lower the barrier for entry as those examples are much easier to create than full-fledged widgets and can also be specific to a certain problem.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I support adding such a category. I’d prefer the name “Snippets”. 4
I support adding such a category. I’d prefer the name “Demos”.
I support adding such a category. I don’t have a name preference. 2
I don’t support adding the category, see comments below.

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder [AUICL]: Accessible UI Components List – Add Snippets or Demos categoryComments
Andrew Arch
  • I support adding such a category. I don’t have a name preference.
 I like "snippets" but suspect it won't translate well
Brent Bakken
  • I support adding such a category. I’d prefer the name “Snippets”.
 I have a mild preference to using the term Snippets over Demos.
Eric Eggert [Editor]
Shawn Lawton Henry
James Green
  • I support adding such a category. I’d prefer the name “Snippets”.
Susan Hewitt
  • I support adding such a category. I’d prefer the name “Snippets”.
Sharron Rush
  • I support adding such a category. I don’t have a name preference.
Howard Kramer
  • I support adding such a category. I’d prefer the name “Snippets”.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I support adding such a category. I’d prefer the name “Snippets”.
  • Brent Bakken
  • James Green
  • Susan Hewitt
  • Howard Kramer
I support adding such a category. I’d prefer the name “Demos”.
I support adding such a category. I don’t have a name preference.
  • Andrew Arch
  • Sharron Rush
I don’t support adding the category, see comments below.

6. [AUICL]: Accessible UI Components List – Remove “Templates” category

summary | by responder | by choice

While researching UI Components, it quickly became apparent that there are few that identify themselves as templates. templates are usually part of themes or frameworks nowadays or used as a intermediate deliverable while producing (a theme for) a website

Proposal: Remove “Templates”.

Rationale: Templates seem to sit in-between themes and frameworks but the term seems not to be used often anymore. They are mostly very simple frameworks.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I support removing Templates. 6
I don’t support removing Templates.

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder [AUICL]: Accessible UI Components List – Remove “Templates” category
Andrew Arch
  • I support removing Templates.
Brent Bakken
  • I support removing Templates.
 Support Editors discretion here.
Eric Eggert [Editor]
Shawn Lawton Henry
James Green
  • I support removing Templates.
Susan Hewitt
  • I support removing Templates.
Sharron Rush
  • I support removing Templates.
Howard Kramer
  • I support removing Templates.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I support removing Templates.
  • Andrew Arch
  • Brent Bakken
  • James Green
  • Susan Hewitt
  • Sharron Rush
  • Howard Kramer
I don’t support removing Templates.

7. [AUICL]: Accessible UI Components List – Submit a UI Component

summary | by responder | by choice

The participation of individuals has been incredibly valuable for the development of the resource. If you haven’t had a chance to look into it, watch this “how to submit” video (password: eowgnow). (I have exported the video with a louder volume.)

Then head over to the Accessible UI Components List and submit a component. You need to login with your W3C account.

Please note below if you have any thoughts or run into any problems while submitting.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I did submit a component.Find my observations below! 3
I didn’t get to it yet, but I expect to get to it by [indicate date below]. 3

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder [AUICL]: Accessible UI Components List – Submit a UI ComponentComments
Andrew Arch
Brent Bakken
  • I didn’t get to it yet, but I expect to get to it by [indicate date below].
 I have watched the video and will try to submit a component by 11 March.
Eric Eggert
  • I did submit a component.
    Find my observations below!
 [Editor]
Shawn Lawton Henry
James Green
  • I didn’t get to it yet, but I expect to get to it by [indicate date below].
 March 18
Susan Hewitt
  • I didn’t get to it yet, but I expect to get to it by [indicate date below].
 Before CSUN
Sharron Rush
  • I did submit a component.
    Find my observations below!
 At the time, I was unable to add a new vendor - that seems to have been fixed, thanks.
Howard Kramer
  • I did submit a component.
    Find my observations below!

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I did submit a component.Find my observations below!
  • Eric Eggert
  • Sharron Rush
  • Howard Kramer
I didn’t get to it yet, but I expect to get to it by [indicate date below].
  • Brent Bakken
  • James Green
  • Susan Hewitt

More details on responses

  • Andrew Arch: last responded on 7, March 2016 at 04:31 (UTC)
  • Brent Bakken: last responded on 8, March 2016 at 23:56 (UTC)
  • Eric Eggert: last responded on 9, March 2016 at 13:18 (UTC)
  • Shawn Lawton Henry: last responded on 10, March 2016 at 00:55 (UTC)
  • James Green: last responded on 10, March 2016 at 03:14 (UTC)
  • Susan Hewitt: last responded on 10, March 2016 at 04:17 (UTC)
  • Sharron Rush: last responded on 10, March 2016 at 04:29 (UTC)
  • Howard Kramer: last responded on 10, March 2016 at 05:38 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Eric Velleman
  2. Shadi Abou-Zahra
  3. Sylvie Duchateau
  4. Kazuhito Kidachi
  5. Jedi Lin
  6. David Sloan
  7. Mary Jo Mueller
  8. Vicki Menezes Miller
  9. Reinaldo Ferraz
  10. Bill Kasdorf
  11. Cristina Mussinelli
  12. Kevin White
  13. Kevin Rydberg
  14. Ahmath Bamba MBACKE
  15. Adina Halter
  16. Denis Boudreau
  17. Laura Keen
  18. Sarah Pulis
  19. Bill Tyler
  20. Gregorio Pellegrino
  21. Ruoxi Ran
  22. Jennifer Chadwick
  23. Sean Kelly
  24. Muhammad Saleem
  25. Sarah Lewthwaite
  26. Daniel Montalvo
  27. Mark Palmer
  28. Jade Matos Carew
  29. Sonsoles López Pernas
  30. Greta Krafsig
  31. Jason McKee
  32. Jayne Schurick
  33. Billie Johnston
  34. Michele Williams
  35. Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
  36. Brian Elton
  37. Julianna Rowsell
  38. Tabitha Mahoney
  39. Fred Edora
  40. Rabab Gomaa
  41. Marcelo Paiva
  42. Eloisa Guerrero
  43. Leonard Beasley
  44. Frankie Wolf
  45. Supriya Makude
  46. Aleksandar Cindrikj
  47. Angela Young

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.