W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire Update to rule writing & publication process

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody.

This questionnaire was open from 2021-03-25 to 2021-03-30.

9 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. About this Review
  2. ACT Publication steps
  3. Public feedback
  4. Anual Review
  5. Other comments

1. About this Review

Please take time to review the updated ACT Publication Process. Did you:

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I reviewed it thoroughly. 3
I skimmed it. 4
I didn't get to it. I abstain (not vote). Accept the decision of the group. 2

Details

Responder About this ReviewComment
Mary Jo Mueller I reviewed it thoroughly.
Rachael Bradley Montgomery I reviewed it thoroughly.
Sarah Horton I didn't get to it. I abstain (not vote). Accept the decision of the group.
Michael Gower I didn't get to it. I abstain (not vote). Accept the decision of the group. Mary Jo reviewed this material on behalf of IBM.
Michael Cooper I reviewed it thoroughly. "the author is free to merge the pull request" - change to "an editor can merge the pull request" - I think the practice of allowing merges into the main branch should restricted to a few people with elevated access, as is becoming a norm in many W3C repositories.
Alastair Campbell I skimmed it. From the changes, I concluded that:
- Creating rules is becoming a more shared, wider thing between TF & CG (and possibly anyone can create a proposal/draft?).
- Refining the (partly github) workflow for creating new rules.
- Adds call for implementation.
- Adds annual review
John Foliot I skimmed it.
Gundula Niemann I skimmed it. I reviewed the first half thoroughly.
Laura Carlson I skimmed it.

2. ACT Publication steps

Please review the update to the ACT rule publication process section. Do you have any suggested changes you want to see?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Looks good, no changes to suggest 3
I have a suggestion for editor's discretion entered below. 3
I have a strong suggestion and do not approve the section without this change, entered below

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder ACT Publication stepsComments
Mary Jo Mueller I have a suggestion for editor's discretion entered below. Simply editorial changes. I added comments to the PR.
Rachael Bradley Montgomery I have a suggestion for editor's discretion entered below. The new text refers people not in the taskforce to speak to the facilitators. I expected a light process of what happens after that to be included since these individuals were addressed in the previous version.
Sarah Horton
Michael Gower
Michael Cooper This looks like the same content as the previous question, formatted differently. I did not look closely for diffs.
Alastair Campbell Looks good, no changes to suggest
John Foliot Looks good, no changes to suggest
Gundula Niemann I have a suggestion for editor's discretion entered below. The timeframe for the review should depend on the impact of the change, which is not identical to the number of rules affected.
Laura Carlson Looks good, no changes to suggest

3. Public feedback

Please review the update to the Public Feedback section. Do you have any suggested changes you want to see?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Looks good, no changes to suggest 5
I have a suggestion for editor's discretion entered below.
I have a strong suggestion and do not approve the section without this change, entered below

(4 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder Public feedbackComments
Mary Jo Mueller Looks good, no changes to suggest
Rachael Bradley Montgomery Looks good, no changes to suggest
Sarah Horton
Michael Gower
Michael Cooper This looks like the same content as the previous question, formatted differently. I did not look closely for diffs.
Alastair Campbell Looks good, no changes to suggest
John Foliot Looks good, no changes to suggest
Gundula Niemann
Laura Carlson Looks good, no changes to suggest

4. Anual Review

Please review the update to the Annual Review section. Do you have any suggested changes you want to see?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Looks good, no changes to suggest 5
I have a suggestion for editor's discretion entered below. 1
I have a strong suggestion and do not approve the section without this change, entered below

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder Anual ReviewComments
Mary Jo Mueller Looks good, no changes to suggest
Rachael Bradley Montgomery Looks good, no changes to suggest
Sarah Horton
Michael Gower
Michael Cooper This looks like the same content as the previous question, formatted differently. I did not look closely for diffs.

Note annual review is a commitment that can be difficult to keep. Does the TF / CG have a plan to ensure it can deliver on this, especially as the ruleset grows?
Alastair Campbell Looks good, no changes to suggest
John Foliot Looks good, no changes to suggest
Gundula Niemann I have a suggestion for editor's discretion entered below. It's merely a question:
Does the liaison decide on his/her own whether or not needs to be updated?
I feel this is not symmetric to that a proposed change needs to be approved by three independent reviewers to go to the next step.
Shouldn't the decision that no change is needed also be approved?
Laura Carlson Looks good, no changes to suggest

5. Other comments

Do you have any other comments or suggested changes you want to see?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Looks good, no changes to suggest 4
I have a suggestion for editor's discretion entered below. 1
I have a strong suggestion and do not approve the section without this change, entered below

(4 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder Other commentsComments
Mary Jo Mueller Looks good, no changes to suggest
Rachael Bradley Montgomery I have a suggestion for editor's discretion entered below. I am slightly concerned that there is no process to move to consensus over an objection. While this is needed only very rarely and should be used extremely sparingly I think it is an important part of the consensus process that isn't built in here.
Sarah Horton
Michael Gower
Michael Cooper
Alastair Campbell Looks good, no changes to suggest
John Foliot Looks good, no changes to suggest
Gundula Niemann
Laura Carlson Looks good, no changes to suggest

More details on responses

  • Mary Jo Mueller: last responded on 29, March 2021 at 18:39 (UTC)
  • Rachael Bradley Montgomery: last responded on 30, March 2021 at 10:53 (UTC)
  • Sarah Horton: last responded on 30, March 2021 at 12:49 (UTC)
  • Michael Gower: last responded on 30, March 2021 at 13:24 (UTC)
  • Michael Cooper: last responded on 30, March 2021 at 14:26 (UTC)
  • Alastair Campbell: last responded on 30, March 2021 at 14:42 (UTC)
  • John Foliot: last responded on 30, March 2021 at 14:53 (UTC)
  • Gundula Niemann: last responded on 30, March 2021 at 15:09 (UTC)
  • Laura Carlson: last responded on 30, March 2021 at 15:10 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Gregg Vanderheiden
  2. Chris Wilson
  3. Lisa Seeman-Horwitz
  4. Janina Sajka
  5. Shawn Lawton Henry
  6. Katie Haritos-Shea
  7. Shadi Abou-Zahra
  8. Chus Garcia
  9. Steve Faulkner
  10. Patrick Lauke
  11. David MacDonald
  12. Gez Lemon
  13. Makoto Ueki
  14. Peter Korn
  15. Preety Kumar
  16. Bruce Bailey
  17. Georgios Grigoriadis
  18. Stefan Schnabel
  19. Romain Deltour
  20. Chris Blouch
  21. Jedi Lin
  22. Jeanne F Spellman
  23. Wilco Fiers
  24. Kimberly Patch
  25. Glenda Sims
  26. Ian Pouncey
  27. Léonie Watson
  28. David Sloan
  29. John Kirkwood
  30. Detlev Fischer
  31. Reinaldo Ferraz
  32. Matt Garrish
  33. Mike Gifford
  34. Loïc Martínez Normand
  35. Mike Pluke
  36. Justine Pascalides
  37. Chris Loiselle
  38. Tzviya Siegman
  39. Jan McSorley
  40. Sailesh Panchang
  41. Cristina Mussinelli
  42. Jonathan Avila
  43. John Rochford
  44. Sujasree Kurapati
  45. Jatin Vaishnav
  46. Sam Ogami
  47. Kevin White
  48. E.A. Draffan
  49. Paul Bohman
  50. JaEun Jemma Ku
  51. 骅 杨
  52. Victoria Clark
  53. Avneesh Singh
  54. Mitchell Evan
  55. biao liu
  56. Scott McCormack
  57. Denis Boudreau
  58. Francis Storr
  59. Rick Johnson
  60. David Swallow
  61. Aparna Pasi
  62. Gregorio Pellegrino
  63. Melanie Philipp
  64. Jake Abma
  65. Nicole Windmann
  66. Oliver Keim
  67. Ruoxi Ran
  68. Wendy Reid
  69. Scott O'Hara
  70. Charles Adams
  71. Muhammad Saleem
  72. Amani Ali
  73. Trevor Bostic
  74. Jamie Herrera
  75. Shinya Takami
  76. Karen Herr
  77. Kathy Eng
  78. Cybele Sack
  79. Audrey Maniez
  80. Jennifer Delisi
  81. Arthur Soroken
  82. Daniel Bjorge
  83. Kai Recke
  84. David Fazio
  85. Daniel Montalvo
  86. Mario Chacón-Rivas
  87. Michael Gilbert
  88. Caryn Pagel
  89. Achraf Othman
  90. Helen Burge
  91. Fernanda Bonnin
  92. Jared Batterman
  93. Raja Kushalnagar
  94. Jan Williams
  95. Todd Libby
  96. Isabel Holdsworth
  97. Julia Chen
  98. Marcos Franco Murillo
  99. Yutaka Suzuki
  100. Azlan Cuttilan
  101. Jennifer Strickland
  102. Joe Humbert
  103. Ben Tillyer
  104. Charu Pandhi
  105. Poornima Badhan Subramanian
  106. Alain Vagner
  107. Roberto Scano
  108. Rain Breaw Michaels
  109. Kun Zhang
  110. Jaunita George
  111. Regina Sanchez
  112. Shawn Thompson
  113. Thomas Brunet
  114. Kenny Dunsin
  115. Jen Goulden
  116. Mike Beganyi
  117. Ronny Hendriks
  118. Breixo Pastoriza Barcia
  119. Olivia Hogan-Stark
  120. Rashmi Katakwar
  121. Julie Rawe
  122. Duff Johnson
  123. Laura Miller
  124. Will Creedle
  125. Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
  126. Marie Csanady
  127. Meenakshi Das
  128. Perrin Anto
  129. Stephanie Louraine
  130. Rachele DiTullio
  131. Jan Jaap de Groot
  132. Rebecca Monteleone
  133. Ian Kersey
  134. Peter Bossley
  135. Anastasia Lanz
  136. Michael Keane
  137. Chiara De Martin
  138. Giacomo Petri
  139. Andrew Barakat
  140. Devanshu Chandra
  141. Xiao (Helen) Zhou
  142. Bryan Trogdon
  143. Mary Ann (MJ) Jawili
  144. 禹佳 陶
  145. 锦澄 王
  146. Stephen James
  147. Jay Mullen
  148. Thorsten Katzmann
  149. Tony Holland
  150. Kent Boucher
  151. Abbey Davis
  152. Phil Day
  153. Julia Kim
  154. Michelle Lana
  155. David Williams
  156. Mikayla Thompson
  157. Catherine Droege
  158. James Edwards
  159. Eric Hind
  160. Quintin Balsdon
  161. Mario Batušić
  162. David Cox
  163. Sazzad Mahamud
  164. Katy Brickley
  165. Kimberly Sarabia
  166. Corey Hinshaw
  167. Ashley Firth
  168. Daniel Harper-Wain
  169. Kiara Stewart
  170. DJ Chase
  171. Suji Sreerama
  172. Lori Oakley
  173. David Middleton
  174. Alyssa Priddy
  175. Young Choi
  176. Nichole Bui
  177. Julie Romanowski
  178. Eloisa Guerrero
  179. Daniel Henderson-Ede
  180. George Kuan
  181. YAPING LIN
  182. Justin Wilson
  183. Tiffany Burtin
  184. Shane Dittmar
  185. Nayan Padrai
  186. Niamh Kelly
  187. Matt Argomaniz Matthew Argomaniz
  188. Frankie Wolf
  189. Kimberly McGee
  190. Ahson Rana
  191. Carolina Crespo
  192. humor927 humor927
  193. Samantha McDaniel
  194. Matthäus Rojek
  195. Phong Tony Le
  196. Bram Janssens
  197. Graham Ritchie
  198. Aleksandar Cindrikj
  199. Jeroen Hulscher
  200. Alina Vayntrub
  201. Marco Sabidussi
  202. John Toles
  203. Jeanne Erickson Cooley
  204. Theo Hale
  205. Gert-Jan Vercauteren
  206. Karla Rubiano
  207. Aashutosh K
  208. Hidde de Vries
  209. Julian Kittelson-Aldred
  210. Roland Buss
  211. Aditya Surendranath
  212. Avon Kuo
  213. Elizabeth Patrick
  214. Nat Tarnoff
  215. Filippo Zorzi
  216. Mike Pedersen
  217. Rachael Yomtoob
  218. Oliver Habersetzer

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.