W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire Update to rule writing & publication process

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody.

This questionnaire was open from 2021-03-25 to 2021-03-30.

9 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. About this Review
  2. ACT Publication steps
  3. Public feedback
  4. Anual Review
  5. Other comments

1. About this Review

Please take time to review the updated ACT Publication Process. Did you:

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I reviewed it thoroughly. 3
I skimmed it. 4
I didn't get to it. I abstain (not vote). Accept the decision of the group. 2

Details

Responder About this ReviewComment
Mary Jo Mueller I reviewed it thoroughly.
Rachael Bradley Montgomery I reviewed it thoroughly.
Sarah Horton I didn't get to it. I abstain (not vote). Accept the decision of the group.
Michael Gower I didn't get to it. I abstain (not vote). Accept the decision of the group. Mary Jo reviewed this material on behalf of IBM.
Michael Cooper I reviewed it thoroughly. "the author is free to merge the pull request" - change to "an editor can merge the pull request" - I think the practice of allowing merges into the main branch should restricted to a few people with elevated access, as is becoming a norm in many W3C repositories.
Alastair Campbell I skimmed it. From the changes, I concluded that:
- Creating rules is becoming a more shared, wider thing between TF & CG (and possibly anyone can create a proposal/draft?).
- Refining the (partly github) workflow for creating new rules.
- Adds call for implementation.
- Adds annual review
John Foliot I skimmed it.
Gundula Niemann I skimmed it. I reviewed the first half thoroughly.
Laura Carlson I skimmed it.

2. ACT Publication steps

Please review the update to the ACT rule publication process section. Do you have any suggested changes you want to see?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Looks good, no changes to suggest 3
I have a suggestion for editor's discretion entered below. 3
I have a strong suggestion and do not approve the section without this change, entered below

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder ACT Publication stepsComments
Mary Jo Mueller I have a suggestion for editor's discretion entered below. Simply editorial changes. I added comments to the PR.
Rachael Bradley Montgomery I have a suggestion for editor's discretion entered below. The new text refers people not in the taskforce to speak to the facilitators. I expected a light process of what happens after that to be included since these individuals were addressed in the previous version.
Sarah Horton
Michael Gower
Michael Cooper This looks like the same content as the previous question, formatted differently. I did not look closely for diffs.
Alastair Campbell Looks good, no changes to suggest
John Foliot Looks good, no changes to suggest
Gundula Niemann I have a suggestion for editor's discretion entered below. The timeframe for the review should depend on the impact of the change, which is not identical to the number of rules affected.
Laura Carlson Looks good, no changes to suggest

3. Public feedback

Please review the update to the Public Feedback section. Do you have any suggested changes you want to see?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Looks good, no changes to suggest 5
I have a suggestion for editor's discretion entered below.
I have a strong suggestion and do not approve the section without this change, entered below

(4 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder Public feedbackComments
Mary Jo Mueller Looks good, no changes to suggest
Rachael Bradley Montgomery Looks good, no changes to suggest
Sarah Horton
Michael Gower
Michael Cooper This looks like the same content as the previous question, formatted differently. I did not look closely for diffs.
Alastair Campbell Looks good, no changes to suggest
John Foliot Looks good, no changes to suggest
Gundula Niemann
Laura Carlson Looks good, no changes to suggest

4. Anual Review

Please review the update to the Annual Review section. Do you have any suggested changes you want to see?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Looks good, no changes to suggest 5
I have a suggestion for editor's discretion entered below. 1
I have a strong suggestion and do not approve the section without this change, entered below

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder Anual ReviewComments
Mary Jo Mueller Looks good, no changes to suggest
Rachael Bradley Montgomery Looks good, no changes to suggest
Sarah Horton
Michael Gower
Michael Cooper This looks like the same content as the previous question, formatted differently. I did not look closely for diffs.

Note annual review is a commitment that can be difficult to keep. Does the TF / CG have a plan to ensure it can deliver on this, especially as the ruleset grows?
Alastair Campbell Looks good, no changes to suggest
John Foliot Looks good, no changes to suggest
Gundula Niemann I have a suggestion for editor's discretion entered below. It's merely a question:
Does the liaison decide on his/her own whether or not needs to be updated?
I feel this is not symmetric to that a proposed change needs to be approved by three independent reviewers to go to the next step.
Shouldn't the decision that no change is needed also be approved?
Laura Carlson Looks good, no changes to suggest

5. Other comments

Do you have any other comments or suggested changes you want to see?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Looks good, no changes to suggest 4
I have a suggestion for editor's discretion entered below. 1
I have a strong suggestion and do not approve the section without this change, entered below

(4 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder Other commentsComments
Mary Jo Mueller Looks good, no changes to suggest
Rachael Bradley Montgomery I have a suggestion for editor's discretion entered below. I am slightly concerned that there is no process to move to consensus over an objection. While this is needed only very rarely and should be used extremely sparingly I think it is an important part of the consensus process that isn't built in here.
Sarah Horton
Michael Gower
Michael Cooper
Alastair Campbell Looks good, no changes to suggest
John Foliot Looks good, no changes to suggest
Gundula Niemann
Laura Carlson Looks good, no changes to suggest

More details on responses

  • Mary Jo Mueller: last responded on 29, March 2021 at 18:39 (UTC)
  • Rachael Bradley Montgomery: last responded on 30, March 2021 at 10:53 (UTC)
  • Sarah Horton: last responded on 30, March 2021 at 12:49 (UTC)
  • Michael Gower: last responded on 30, March 2021 at 13:24 (UTC)
  • Michael Cooper: last responded on 30, March 2021 at 14:26 (UTC)
  • Alastair Campbell: last responded on 30, March 2021 at 14:42 (UTC)
  • John Foliot: last responded on 30, March 2021 at 14:53 (UTC)
  • Gundula Niemann: last responded on 30, March 2021 at 15:09 (UTC)
  • Laura Carlson: last responded on 30, March 2021 at 15:10 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Gregg Vanderheiden
  2. Chris Wilson
  3. Lisa Seeman-Horwitz
  4. Janina Sajka
  5. Shawn Lawton Henry
  6. Katie Haritos-Shea
  7. Shadi Abou-Zahra
  8. Chus Garcia
  9. Steve Faulkner
  10. Patrick Lauke
  11. David MacDonald
  12. Gez Lemon
  13. Makoto Ueki
  14. Peter Korn
  15. Preety Kumar
  16. Bruce Bailey
  17. Georgios Grigoriadis
  18. Stefan Schnabel
  19. Romain Deltour
  20. Chris Blouch
  21. Jedi Lin
  22. Jeanne F Spellman
  23. Wilco Fiers
  24. Kimberly Patch
  25. Glenda Sims
  26. Ian Pouncey
  27. Léonie Watson
  28. David Sloan
  29. Peter Heery
  30. John Kirkwood
  31. Detlev Fischer
  32. Reinaldo Ferraz
  33. Matt Garrish
  34. Mike Gifford
  35. Loïc Martínez Normand
  36. Mike Pluke
  37. Justine Pascalides
  38. Chris Loiselle
  39. Tzviya Siegman
  40. Jan McSorley
  41. Sailesh Panchang
  42. Cristina Mussinelli
  43. Jonathan Avila
  44. John Rochford
  45. Sujasree Kurapati
  46. Jatin Vaishnav
  47. Sam Ogami
  48. Kevin White
  49. E.A. Draffan
  50. Paul Bohman
  51. JaEun Jemma Ku
  52. 骅 杨
  53. Victoria Clark
  54. Avneesh Singh
  55. Mitchell Evan
  56. biao liu
  57. Scott McCormack
  58. Francis Storr
  59. Rick Johnson
  60. David Swallow
  61. Aparna Pasi
  62. Gregorio Pellegrino
  63. Melanie Philipp
  64. Jake Abma
  65. Nicole Windmann
  66. Oliver Keim
  67. Ruoxi Ran
  68. Wendy Reid
  69. Scott O'Hara
  70. Charles Adams
  71. Muhammad Saleem
  72. Amani Ali
  73. Trevor Bostic
  74. Jamie Herrera
  75. Shinya Takami
  76. Karen Herr
  77. Kathy Eng
  78. Cybele Sack
  79. Audrey Maniez
  80. Jennifer Delisi
  81. Arthur Soroken
  82. Daniel Bjorge
  83. Kai Recke
  84. David Fazio
  85. Daniel Montalvo
  86. Mario Chacón-Rivas
  87. Michael Gilbert
  88. Caryn Pagel
  89. Achraf Othman
  90. Helen Burge
  91. Fernanda Bonnin
  92. Christina Adams
  93. Jared Batterman
  94. Raja Kushalnagar
  95. Jan Williams
  96. Todd Libby
  97. Isabel Holdsworth
  98. Julia Chen
  99. Marcos Franco Murillo
  100. Yutaka Suzuki
  101. Azlan Cuttilan
  102. Jennifer Strickland
  103. Joe Humbert
  104. Ben Tillyer
  105. Charu Pandhi
  106. Poornima Badhan Subramanian
  107. Alain Vagner
  108. Roberto Scano
  109. Rain Breaw Michaels
  110. Kun Zhang
  111. Jaunita George
  112. Regina Sanchez
  113. Shawn Thompson
  114. Thomas Brunet
  115. Kenny Dunsin
  116. Jen Goulden
  117. Mike Beganyi
  118. Ronny Hendriks
  119. Olivia Hogan-Stark
  120. Rashmi Katakwar
  121. Julie Rawe
  122. Duff Johnson
  123. Laura Miller
  124. Will Creedle
  125. Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
  126. Marie Csanady
  127. Meenakshi Das
  128. Perrin Anto
  129. Rachele DiTullio
  130. Jan Jaap de Groot
  131. Rebecca Monteleone
  132. Ian Kersey
  133. Peter Bossley
  134. Anastasia Lanz
  135. Michael Keane
  136. Chiara De Martin
  137. Giacomo Petri
  138. Andrew Barakat
  139. Devanshu Chandra
  140. Xiao (Helen) Zhou
  141. Joe Lamyman
  142. Bryan Trogdon
  143. Mary Ann (MJ) Jawili
  144. 禹佳 陶
  145. 锦澄 王
  146. Stephen James
  147. Jay Mullen
  148. Thorsten Katzmann
  149. Tony Holland
  150. Kent Boucher
  151. Abbey Davis
  152. Phil Day
  153. Julia Kim
  154. Michelle Lana
  155. David Williams
  156. Mikayla Thompson
  157. Catherine Droege
  158. James Edwards
  159. Eric Hind
  160. Quintin Balsdon
  161. Mario Batušić
  162. David Cox
  163. Sazzad Mahamud
  164. Katy Brickley
  165. Kimberly Sarabia
  166. Corey Hinshaw
  167. Ashley Firth
  168. Daniel Harper-Wain
  169. Kiara Stewart
  170. DJ Chase
  171. Suji Sreerama
  172. Lori Oakley
  173. David Middleton
  174. Alyssa Priddy
  175. Young Choi
  176. Nichole Bui
  177. Julie Romanowski
  178. Eloisa Guerrero
  179. George Kuan
  180. YAPING LIN
  181. Justin Wilson
  182. Leonard Beasley
  183. Tiffany Burtin
  184. Shane Dittmar
  185. Nayan Padrai
  186. Niamh Kelly
  187. Matt Argomaniz Matthew Argomaniz
  188. Frankie Wolf
  189. Kimberly McGee
  190. Ahson Rana
  191. Carolina Crespo
  192. humor927 humor927
  193. Samantha McDaniel
  194. Matthäus Rojek
  195. Phong Tony Le
  196. Bram Janssens
  197. Graham Ritchie
  198. Aleksandar Cindrikj
  199. Jeroen Hulscher
  200. Alina Vayntrub
  201. Marco Sabidussi
  202. John Toles
  203. Jeanne Erickson Cooley
  204. Theo Hale
  205. Gert-Jan Vercauteren
  206. Karla Rubiano
  207. Aashutosh K
  208. Hidde de Vries
  209. Julian Kittelson-Aldred
  210. Roland Buss
  211. Aditya Surendranath
  212. Avon Kuo
  213. Elizabeth Patrick
  214. Tj Squires
  215. Nat Tarnoff
  216. Illai Zeevi
  217. Filippo Zorzi
  218. Gleidson Ramos
  219. Mike Pedersen
  220. Rachael Yomtoob
  221. Oliver Habersetzer
  222. Irfan Mukhtar
  223. Sage Keriazes

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.