W3C

Results of Questionnaire Community Group Priorities for 2023 - 2024

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: Suzanne.Taylor@ThingsEntertainment.net,maud.stiernet@alittleliningcomes.com

This questionnaire was open from 2023-03-29 to 2023-05-24.

6 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Question: Which of the following are most important or priorities from your perspective?

1. Question: Which of the following are most important or priorities from your perspective?

Please rate the following to help shape what the Accessibility for Children Community Group will focus on in the next 12 months. If two items are of equal interest/priority for you or your organization, you can give them the same rating.

(The group will likely work on multiple items at once.)

Mark the items that are most important to you with 9, and the items that are least important to you with 1. And use the other numbers for items in between.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
123456789No opinion
A. Write a stand-alone guide to making content/products accessible for children with disabilities, similar to COGA's document 2 1 1 1 1
B. Polish/Complete a version of the White Paper 1 1 1 1 2
C. Create a resource similar to: Older Users Section from Education and Outreach Web Accessibility Initiative 1 1 1 2 1
D. WCAG 2.x gap analysis ( as a list of missing sub-success criteria) to inform WCAG 3 and/or be a temporary stand alone note until WCAG 3 addresses more of children’s needs 2 1 2 1
E. White paper focusing on the necessity for addressing unmet learning/information needs for the cost-optimal evolution of online resources User Participation is essential (see also: Miraculous Intersections & 3 laws of Feedback) 1 1 2 1 1
F. Research and document what AT is being used in low resource environments. 1 1 2 2
G. Research and raise awareness about adult attitudes toward AT and how that impacts children 1 2 1 1 1
H. Create a collection of graphics illustrating key concepts and relationships (for example, how accessibility guidelines are related to other guidelines that impact children) 1 1 1 1 1 1
I. Create a set of materials for presenters (internal and external) to use when presenting on accessibility for children (could adapt some of our TPAC materials) 2 1 1 1 1
J. Create a survey similar to WebAIM’s Screen Reader Survey, but focused on children’s use of AT. (or otherwise collaborate toward this end if we find a group to collaborate with) 1 1 1 2 1
K. Create a mechanism for looping organizations like Save the Children (or alliances of such organizations) into W3C document review 2 3 1
L. Help connect companies (e.g. AT companies) with funding opportunities for projects that advance accessibility for children 2 4
M. Provide suggested project outlines and resources to encourage students, researchers, hackathon participants, makers and others to work toward greater accessibility for children. 3 2 1
N. Establish “Ethics of Interface,” encouraging designers to see healthiness of participation in human learning as the top priority https://forhumanity.center/ (offers free classes) “Future of Interface” initiative 1 1 3 1
O. Continue to evangelize the need for special consideration for Accessibility for Children within W3C 1 1 2 1 1
P. Evangelize the need for special consideration for Accessibility for Children among accessibility specialists in general 1 1 2 2
Q. Create a presentation on alternatives to captions for AGWG (accessibility guidelines working group) 3 2 1
R. Create a joint working subgroup of 2 community groups: Silver (which works with AGWG [accessibility guidelines working group]) and our group, to directly write content for WCAG 3 2 1 1 1 1
S. Design for a prototype system that would give learners both a mechanism and reinforcement for flagging unmet learning/information needs 1 2 1 1 1
T. Create a browser, AT or browser extension that implements WAI-Adapt 1 2 2 1
U. Advocacy through Social Media (more accounts, better design, more posts, etc) 2 1 1 1 1
V. Present at Conferences 1 1 3 1
W. Host a Workshop designed to establish an “Ethics of Interface” in which the healthiness of participation and human learning is the priority 3 3

Averages:

Choices All responders:
Value
A. Write a stand-alone guide to making content/products accessible for children with disabilities, similar to COGA's document6.80
B. Polish/Complete a version of the White Paper6.25
C. Create a resource similar to: Older Users Section from Education and Outreach Web Accessibility Initiative6.40
D. WCAG 2.x gap analysis ( as a list of missing sub-success criteria) to inform WCAG 3 and/or be a temporary stand alone note until WCAG 3 addresses more of children’s needs7.00
E. White paper focusing on the necessity for addressing unmet learning/information needs for the cost-optimal evolution of online resources User Participation is essential (see also: Miraculous Intersections & 3 laws of Feedback) 6.40
F. Research and document what AT is being used in low resource environments.6.50
G. Research and raise awareness about adult attitudes toward AT and how that impacts children5.50
H. Create a collection of graphics illustrating key concepts and relationships (for example, how accessibility guidelines are related to other guidelines that impact children) 5.80
I. Create a set of materials for presenters (internal and external) to use when presenting on accessibility for children (could adapt some of our TPAC materials)6.00
J. Create a survey similar to WebAIM’s Screen Reader Survey, but focused on children’s use of AT. (or otherwise collaborate toward this end if we find a group to collaborate with)6.33
K. Create a mechanism for looping organizations like Save the Children (or alliances of such organizations) into W3C document review6.50
L. Help connect companies (e.g. AT companies) with funding opportunities for projects that advance accessibility for children6.33
M. Provide suggested project outlines and resources to encourage students, researchers, hackathon participants, makers and others to work toward greater accessibility for children.5.80
N. Establish “Ethics of Interface,” encouraging designers to see healthiness of participation in human learning as the top priority https://forhumanity.center/ (offers free classes) “Future of Interface” initiative 8.40
O. Continue to evangelize the need for special consideration for Accessibility for Children within W3C7.00
P. Evangelize the need for special consideration for Accessibility for Children among accessibility specialists in general6.83
Q. Create a presentation on alternatives to captions for AGWG (accessibility guidelines working group)5.40
R. Create a joint working subgroup of 2 community groups: Silver (which works with AGWG [accessibility guidelines working group]) and our group, to directly write content for WCAG 36.67
S. Design for a prototype system that would give learners both a mechanism and reinforcement for flagging unmet learning/information needs 6.80
T. Create a browser, AT or browser extension that implements WAI-Adapt4.80
U. Advocacy through Social Media (more accounts, better design, more posts, etc)5.80
V. Present at Conferences6.80
W. Host a Workshop designed to establish an “Ethics of Interface” in which the healthiness of participation and human learning is the priority7.00

Details

Responder A. Write a stand-alone guide to making content/products accessible for children with disabilities, similar to COGA's documentB. Polish/Complete a version of the White PaperC. Create a resource similar to: Older Users Section from Education and Outreach Web Accessibility InitiativeD. WCAG 2.x gap analysis ( as a list of missing sub-success criteria) to inform WCAG 3 and/or be a temporary stand alone note until WCAG 3 addresses more of children’s needsE. White paper focusing on the necessity for addressing unmet learning/information needs for the cost-optimal evolution of online resources User Participation is essential (see also: Miraculous Intersections & 3 laws of Feedback) F. Research and document what AT is being used in low resource environments.G. Research and raise awareness about adult attitudes toward AT and how that impacts childrenH. Create a collection of graphics illustrating key concepts and relationships (for example, how accessibility guidelines are related to other guidelines that impact children) I. Create a set of materials for presenters (internal and external) to use when presenting on accessibility for children (could adapt some of our TPAC materials)J. Create a survey similar to WebAIM’s Screen Reader Survey, but focused on children’s use of AT. (or otherwise collaborate toward this end if we find a group to collaborate with)K. Create a mechanism for looping organizations like Save the Children (or alliances of such organizations) into W3C document reviewL. Help connect companies (e.g. AT companies) with funding opportunities for projects that advance accessibility for childrenM. Provide suggested project outlines and resources to encourage students, researchers, hackathon participants, makers and others to work toward greater accessibility for children.N. Establish “Ethics of Interface,” encouraging designers to see healthiness of participation in human learning as the top priority https://forhumanity.center/ (offers free classes) “Future of Interface” initiative O. Continue to evangelize the need for special consideration for Accessibility for Children within W3CP. Evangelize the need for special consideration for Accessibility for Children among accessibility specialists in generalQ. Create a presentation on alternatives to captions for AGWG (accessibility guidelines working group)R. Create a joint working subgroup of 2 community groups: Silver (which works with AGWG [accessibility guidelines working group]) and our group, to directly write content for WCAG 3S. Design for a prototype system that would give learners both a mechanism and reinforcement for flagging unmet learning/information needs T. Create a browser, AT or browser extension that implements WAI-AdaptU. Advocacy through Social Media (more accounts, better design, more posts, etc)V. Present at ConferencesW. Host a Workshop designed to establish an “Ethics of Interface” in which the healthiness of participation and human learning is the priorityComments
David Boulton 5 6 4 7 9 4 4 5 4 5 7 5 5 9 5 5 5 5 8 4 5 8 8 This recent post uses a video of Jordan Peterson speaking about the importance of reading and teaching reading to make the case that the existing paradigms of reading (Science of Reading) should be superseded by a model based on learning to read online words. Changing how the internet supports the process of learning to read is not only relevant to children with "special needs" it's relevant to 10 times (ish) as many children. https://learningstewards.org/jordan-peterson-reading/
Maud Stiernet 7 9 9 8 7 6 5 8 9 7 7 7 5 8 7 6 5 9 6 4 4 8 8
Suzanne Taylor 5 3 3 6 6 9 8 6 6 9 8 7 7 9 6 8 6 5 9 7 4 4 6
Jan McSorley No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion 7 5 3 No opinion No opinion 4 5 7 No opinion 9 7 7 No opinion 8 No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion 8 I feel bad voting on priorities at a time when my availability to help with these efforts is going to be very limited. I will be in a very intense front-end development program from May 8th - November 17th and will do my best to attend meetings, but it is very unlikely that I will be able to contribute in a substantive way until after the program is finished.
Robert Dolan 9 7 9 8 3 6 4 7 7 7 7 5 7 7 8 7 6 6 5 2 7 6 6
Shira Goldberg 8 No opinion 7 6 No opinion 9 9 3 4 6 5 7 5 No opinion 9 8 5 7 6 7 9 8 6

More details on responses

  • David Boulton: last responded on 30, March 2023 at 13:11 (UTC)
  • Maud Stiernet: last responded on 11, April 2023 at 08:37 (UTC)
  • Suzanne Taylor: last responded on 12, April 2023 at 16:39 (UTC)
  • Jan McSorley: last responded on 27, April 2023 at 22:05 (UTC)
  • Robert Dolan: last responded on 11, May 2023 at 09:41 (UTC)
  • Shira Goldberg: last responded on 22, May 2023 at 16:23 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Shawn Lawton Henry
  2. Markku Hakkinen
  3. Bev Corwin
  4. Madeleine Rothberg
  5. Oana Galbenu
  6. Mishra Gaurav
  7. Kris Anne Kinney
  8. Muhammad Saleem
  9. Rachel Yager
  10. Caidin Riley
  11. Kelsey Hall
  12. Evert Achterstraat
  13. Roy Mlofton
  14. alissa gray
  15. Killian Downing
  16. Rhonda Churchill
  17. Valentina Kirinić
  18. Allison Johnson
  19. Melissa Malzkuhn
  20. Jeffrey Mendez
  21. ChiaraCielo Longobardi
  22. Shahaf Levi
  23. Danielle Guzman-Orth
  24. Fátima Baña
  25. Alexis Polanco
  26. Emeline Brulé
  27. Rebecca Politis
  28. Sindhura Jaladhanki
  29. Alena Fraser
  30. Morgan Gralla
  31. Daniel Ndungu
  32. Fred Edora
  33. Jennifer Ramirez
  34. Sebastian Vyaene
  35. Milena Risi

Send an email to all the non-responders.


Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire