ISSUE-30: Different blank node identifier than was defined in mapping

different blank node identifier

Different blank node identifier than was defined in mapping

State:

CLOSED

Product:

R2RML

Raised by:

David McNeil

Opened on:

2011-03-07

Description:

Clarify in the spec that it is acceptable for an implementation to produce triples with blank node identifiers that are different than that defined by the mapping. i.e. the user cannot anticipate the specific blank node identifier that will be used for a given resource.

I believe this is a necessary as a result of re-allocating blank node identifiers to preserve the distinction between blank nodes with the same identifier created in different graphs.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: Attempted to address blank node issue in R2RML draft (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2011-03-21)
2. Re: Attempted to address blank node issue in R2RML draft (from rscanlon@revelytix.com on 2011-03-15)
3. Attempted to address blank node issue in R2RML draft (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2011-03-15)
4. Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-15 meeting 1600 UTC (from bvillazon@fi.upm.es on 2011-03-15)
5. Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-15 meeting 1600 UTC (from juanfederico@gmail.com on 2011-03-15)
6. Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-15 meeting 1600 UTC (from marcelo.arenas1@gmail.com on 2011-03-15)
7. RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-15 meeting 1600 UTC (from michael.hausenblas@deri.org on 2011-03-15)
8. R2RML: publishing the second draft (from souripriya.das@oracle.com on 2011-03-14)
9. ISSUE-30 (different blank node identifier): Different blank node identifier than was defined in mapping [R2RML] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-03-07)

Related notes:

Display change log