W3C

Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 2: Adjuncts

W3C Working Draft 3 August 2005

This version:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-wsdl20-adjuncts-20050803
Latest version:
http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20-adjuncts
Previous versions:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-wsdl20-adjuncts-20050510
Editors:
Roberto Chinnici, Sun Microsystems
Hugo Haas, W3C
Amy Lewis, TIBCO
Jean-Jacques Moreau, Canon
David Orchard, BEA Systems
Sanjiva Weerawarana

This document is also available in these non-normative formats: PDF, PostScript, XML, and plain text.


Abstract

WSDL is an XML format for describing network services as a set of endpoints operating on messages containing either document-oriented or procedure-oriented information. Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 2: Adjuncts defines predefined extensions for use in WSDL 2.0:

This specification depends on WSDL Version 2.0 [WSDL 2.0 Core Language].

Status of this Document

This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at http://www.w3.org/TR/.

This is the W3C Last Call Working Draft of Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 2: Adjuncts. It has been produced by the Web Services Description Working Group, which is part of the W3C Web Services Activity. If the feedback is positive, the Working Group plans to submit this specification for consideration as a W3C Candidate Recommendation.

This Working Draft addresses all the comments received during the first Last Call review period on the WSDL 2.0 drafts. Another Last Call Working Draft resulting from the merge of the previous drafts of WSDL 2.0 Part 2 and 3 is being published as substantive changes were made to the documents as a result of this review. The detailed disposition of the comments received can be found in the first Last Call issues list.

The Working Group would like to add a defaulting rule for one-way message exchange patterns in the SOAP 1.2 binding defined in section 5.11.3 Default Binding Rules (see editorial note) before it publishes a Candidate Recommendation of this document if a SOAP 1.2 one-way message exchange pattern becomes available. Feedback is welcome on this topic.

Comments on this document are to be sent to the public public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org mailing list (public archive) until 19 September 2005.

A diff-marked version against the previous version of this document is available. For a detailed list of changes since the last publication of this document, please refer to appendix C. Part 2 Change Log. Issues about this document are documented in the new Last Call issues list maintained by the Working Group. A list of formal objections against the set of WSDL 2.0 Working Drafts is also available.

Publication as a Working Draft does not imply endorsement by the W3C Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress.

This document has been produced under the 24 January 2002 Current Patent Practice as amended by the W3C Patent Policy Transition Procedure. Patent disclosures relevant to this specification may be found on the Working Group's patent disclosure page. An individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual believes contains Essential Claim(s) with respect to this specification should disclose the information in accordance with section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy.


Short Table of Contents

1. Introduction
2. Predefined Message Exchange Patterns
3. Predefined Extensions
4. Predefined Operation Styles
5. WSDL SOAP Binding Extension
6. WSDL HTTP Binding Extension
7. References
A. Acknowledgements (Non-Normative)
B. Component Summary (Non-Normative)
C. Part 2 Change Log (Non-Normative)


Table of Contents

1. Introduction
    1.1 Notational Conventions
2. Predefined Message Exchange Patterns
    2.1 Template for Message Exchange Patterns
        2.1.1 Pattern Name
    2.2 Fault Propagation Rules
        2.2.1 Fault Replaces Message
        2.2.2 Message Triggers Fault
        2.2.3 No Faults
    2.3 Message Exchange Patterns
        2.3.1 In-Only
        2.3.2 Robust In-Only
        2.3.3 In-Out
        2.3.4 In-Optional-Out
        2.3.5 Out-Only
        2.3.6 Robust Out-Only
        2.3.7 Out-In
        2.3.8 Out-Optional-In
    2.4 Security Considerations
3. Predefined Extensions
    3.1 Operation safety
        3.1.1 Relationship to WSDL Component Model
        3.1.2 XML Representation
        3.1.3 Mapping from XML Representation to Component Properties
4. Predefined Operation Styles
    4.1 RPC Style
        4.1.1 wrpc:signature Extension
        4.1.2 XML Representation of the wrpc:signature Extension
        4.1.3 wrpc:signature Extension Mapping To Properties of an Interface Operation component
    4.2 IRI Style
    4.3 Multipart style
5. WSDL SOAP Binding Extension
    5.1 XML Syntax Summary (Non-Normative)
    5.2 Identifying the use of the SOAP Binding
    5.3 Default Binding Rules
    5.4 Specifying the SOAP Version
        5.4.1 Description
        5.4.2 Relationship to WSDL Component Model
        5.4.3 XML Representation
        5.4.4 Mapping from XML Representation to Component properties
    5.5 Specifying the SOAP Underlying Protocol
        5.5.1 Description
        5.5.2 Relationship to WSDL Component Model
        5.5.3 XML Representation
        5.5.4 Mapping from XML Representation to Component Properties
    5.6 Specifying the Default SOAP MEP
        5.6.1 Description
        5.6.2 Relationship to WSDL Component Model
        5.6.3 XML Representation
    5.7 Binding Faults
        5.7.1 Description
        5.7.2 Relationship to WSDL Component Model
        5.7.3 XML Representation
        5.7.4 Mapping XML Representation to Component Properties
    5.8 Binding Operations
        5.8.1 Description
        5.8.2 Relationship to WSDL Component Model
        5.8.3 XML Representation
        5.8.4 Mapping from XML Representation to Component Properties
    5.9 Declaring SOAP Modules
        5.9.1 Description
        5.9.2 Relationship to WSDL Component Model
        5.9.3 SOAP Module component
        5.9.4 XML Representation
        5.9.5 Mapping from XML Representation to Component Properties
        5.9.6 IRI Identification Of A SOAP Module component
    5.10 Declaring SOAP Header Blocks
        5.10.1 Description
        5.10.2 Relationship to WSDL Component Model
        5.10.3 SOAP Header Block component
        5.10.4 XML Representation
        5.10.5 Mapping XML Representation to Component Properties
        5.10.6 IRI Identification Of A SOAP Header Block component
    5.11 WSDL SOAP 1.2 Binding
        5.11.1 Identifying a WSDL SOAP 1.2 Binding
        5.11.2 Description
        5.11.3 Default Binding Rules
    5.12 Conformance
6. WSDL HTTP Binding Extension
    6.1 Identifying the use of the HTTP Binding
    6.2 HTTP Syntax Summary (Non-Normative)
    6.3 Default Binding Rules
    6.4 Specifying the HTTP Version
        6.4.1 Description
        6.4.2 Relationship to WSDL Component Model
        6.4.3 XML Representation
        6.4.4 Mapping from XML Representation to Component Properties
    6.5 Specifying the Default HTTP Method
        6.5.1 Description
        6.5.2 Relationship to WSDL Component Model
        6.5.3 XML Representation
    6.6 Binding Operations
        6.6.1 Description
        6.6.2 Relationship to WSDL Component Model
        6.6.3 XML Representation
        6.6.4 Mapping from XML Representation to Component Properties
    6.7 Declaring HTTP Headers
        6.7.1 Description
        6.7.2 Relationship to WSDL Component Model
        6.7.3 HTTP Header component
        6.7.4 XML Representation
        6.7.5 Mapping from XML Representation to Component Properties
        6.7.6 IRI Identification Of A HTTP Header component
    6.8 Specifying HTTP Error Code and Reason for Faults
        6.8.1 Description
        6.8.2 Relationship to WSDL Component Model
        6.8.3 XML Representation
        6.8.4 Mapping from XML Representation to Component Properties
    6.9 Serialization Format of Instance Data
        6.9.1 Serialization as application/x-www-form-urlencoded
            6.9.1.1 Case of elements cited in the {http location} property
            6.9.1.2 Case elements NOT cited in the {http location} property
                6.9.1.2.1 Serialization in the request IRI
                6.9.1.2.2 Serialization in the message body
        6.9.2 Serialization as application/xml
        6.9.3 Serialization as multipart/form-data
    6.10 Specifying the Transfer Coding
        6.10.1 Description
        6.10.2 Relationship to WSDL Component Model
        6.10.3 XML Representation
        6.10.4 Mapping from XML Representation to Component Properties
    6.11 Specifying the Use of HTTP Cookies
        6.11.1 Description
        6.11.2 Relationship to WSDL Component Model
        6.11.3 XML Representation
        6.11.4 Mapping from XML Representation to Component Properties
    6.12 Specifying HTTP Access Authentication
        6.12.1 Description
        6.12.2 Relationship to WSDL Component Model
        6.12.3 XML Representation
        6.12.4 Mapping from XML Representation to Component Properties
    6.13 Conformance
7. References
    7.1 Normative References
    7.2 Informative References

Appendices

A. Acknowledgements (Non-Normative)
B. Component Summary (Non-Normative)
C. Part 2 Change Log (Non-Normative)
    C.1 WSDL 2.0 Extensions Change Log
    C.2 WSDL 2.0 Bindings Change Log


1. Introduction

The Web Services Description Language WSDL Version 2.0 (WSDL) [WSDL 2.0 Core Language] defines an XML language for describing network services as collections of communication endpoints capable of exchanging messages. WSDL service definitions provide documentation for distributed systems and serve as a recipe for automating the details involved in applications communication. This document defines extensions for the WSDL 2.0 language:

WSDL 2.0 Primer [WSDL 2.0 Primer] is a non-normative document intended to provide an easily understandable tutorial on the features of the WSDL Version 2.0 specifications.

The Core Language [WSDL 2.0 Core Language] of the WSDL 2.0 specification describes the core elements of the WSDL language.

1.1 Notational Conventions

The keywords "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC2119 [IETF RFC 2119].

This specification uses a number of namespace prefixes throughout; they are listed in Table 1-1. Note that the choice of any namespace prefix is arbitrary and not semantically significant (see [XML Information Set]).


Table 1-1. Prefixes and Namespaces used in this specification
Prefix Namespace Notes
wsdl "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl" A normative XML Schema [XML Schema Structures], [XML Schema Datatypes] document for the "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl" namespace can be found at http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl.
wsdl-x "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl-extensions" A normative XML Schema [XML Schema Structures], [XML Schema Datatypes] document for the "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl-extensions" namespace can be found at http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl-extensions.
wsoap "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/soap" A normative XML Schema [XML Schema Structures], [XML Schema Datatypes] document for the "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/soap" namespace can be found at http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/soap.
whttp "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/http" A normative XML Schema [XML Schema Structures], [XML Schema Datatypes] document for the "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/http" namespace can be found at http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/http.
xs "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" Defined in the W3C XML Schema specification [XML Schema Structures], [XML Schema Datatypes].

Namespace names of the general form "http://example.org/..." and "http://example.com/..." represent application or context-dependent URIs [IETF RFC 3986].

All parts of this specification are normative, with the EXCEPTION of pseudo-schemas, examples, and sections explicitly marked as "Non-Normative". Pseudo-schemas are provided for each component, before the description of this component. They provide visual help for the XML [XML 1.0] serialization.

2. Predefined Message Exchange Patterns

A node is an agent (section 2.3.2.2 Agent of the Web Services Architecture [Web Services Architecture]) that can transmit and/or receive message(s) described in WSDL description(s) and process them.

Note:

A node may be accessible via more than one physical address or transport.

Web Services Description Language (WSDL) message exchange patterns (hereafter simply 'patterns') define the sequence and of abstract messages listed in an operation. Message exchange patterns also define which other nodes send messages to, and receive messages from, the service implementing the operation. WSDL message exchange patterns describe the interaction at the abstract (interface) level, which may be distinct from the pattern used by the underlying protocol binding (e.g. SOAP Message Exchange Patterns; section 5.11.3 Default Binding Rules contains the default binding rules for the selection of a SOAP 1.2 message exchange pattern based on the WSDL message exchange pattern in use for the SOAP binding extension defined in this specification in section 5. WSDL SOAP Binding Extension).

By design, WSDL message exchange patterns abstract out specific message types. Patterns identify placeholders for messages, and placeholders are associated with specific message types by the operation using the pattern.

Unless explicitly stated otherwise, WSDL message exchange patterns also abstract out binding-specific information like timing between messages, whether the pattern is synchronous or asynchronous, and whether the message are sent over a single or multiple channels.

Like interfaces and operations, WSDL message exchange patterns do not exhaustively describe the set of messages exchanged between a service and other nodes; by some prior agreement, another node and/or the service may send other messages (to each other or to other nodes) that are not described by the pattern. For instance, even though a pattern may define a single message sent from a service to one other node, the Web Service may multicast that message to other nodes.

To maximize reuse, WSDL message exchange patterns identify a minimal contract between other parties and Web Services, and contain only information that is relevant to both the Web Service and another party.

This specification defines several message exchange patterns for use with WSDL Version 2.0 Part 1: Core Language [WSDL 2.0 Core Language].

2.1 Template for Message Exchange Patterns

New Message Exchange Patterns may be defined by any organization able and willing to do so. It is recommended that the patterns use the general template provided here, after examination of existing predefined patterns.

2.1.1 Pattern Name

This pattern consists of [number] message[s, in order] as follows:

[enumeration, specifying, for each message] A[n optional] message:

  1. indicated by a Interface Message Reference component whose {message label} is "[label]" and direction is "[direction]"

  2. [received from|sent to] ['some' if first mention] node [node identifier]

This pattern uses the rule [fault ruleset reference].

An operation using this message exchange pattern has a {message exchange pattern} property with the value "[pattern IRI]".

Note: In the template, the bracketed items indicate a replacement operation. Substitute the correct terms for each bracketed item.

Note: the "received from" and "sent to" are always from the point of view of the service, and participating nodes other than the service are implicitly identified as the originators of or destinations for messages in the exchange.

2.2 Fault Propagation Rules

WSDL patterns specify their fault propagation model using standard rulesets to indicate where faults may occur. The most common patterns for fault propagation are defined here, and referenced by patterns later in the document. "Propagation" is defined as a best-effort attempt to transmit the fault message to its designated recipient.

WSDL patterns specify propagation of faults, not their generation. Nodes which generate a fault MUST attempt to propagate the faults in accordance with the governing ruleset, but it is understood that any delivery of a network message is best effort, not guaranteed. The rulesets establish the direction of the fault message and the fault recipient, they do not provide reliability or other delivery guarantees. When a fault is generated, the generating node MUST attempt to propagate the fault, and MUST do so in the direction and to the recipient specified by the ruleset. However, extensions or binding extensions MAY modify these rulesets. For example, WS-Addressing [WSA 1.0 Core] defines a "FaultTo" address for messages, which is used in lieu of the recipient nominated by the ruleset.

Generation of a fault, regardless of ruleset, terminates the exchange.

Binding extensions, features, or extension specifications may override the semantics of a fault propagation ruleset, but this practice is strongly discouraged.

2.2.1 Fault Replaces Message

Any message after the first in the pattern MAY be replaced with a fault message, which MUST have identical direction. The fault message MUST be delivered to the same target node as the message it replaces, unless otherwise specified by an extension or binding extension. If there is no path to this node, the fault MUST be discarded.

2.2.2 Message Triggers Fault

Any message, including the first in the pattern, MAY trigger a fault message, which MUST have opposite direction. The fault message MUST be delivered to the originator of the triggering message, unless otherwise specified by an extension of binding extension. Any node MAY propagate a fault message, and MUST not do so more than once for each triggering message. If there is no path to the originator, the fault MUST be discarded.

2.2.3 No Faults

No faults may be propagated.

2.3 Message Exchange Patterns

WSDL patterns are described in terms of the WSDL component model, specifically the Interface Message Reference and Interface Fault Reference components.

2.3.1 In-Only

This pattern consists of exactly one message as follows:

  1. A message:

This pattern uses the rule 2.2.3 No Faults.

An operation using this message exchange pattern has a {message exchange pattern} property with the value "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/in-only".

2.3.2 Robust In-Only

This pattern consists of exactly one message as follows:

  1. A message:

This pattern uses the rule 2.2.2 Message Triggers Fault.

An operation using this message exchange pattern has a {message exchange pattern} property with the value "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/robust-in-only".

2.3.3 In-Out

This pattern consists of exactly two messages, in order, as follows:

  1. A message:

  2. A message:

This pattern uses the rule 2.2.1 Fault Replaces Message.

An operation using this message exchange pattern has a {message exchange pattern} property with the value "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/in-out".

2.3.4 In-Optional-Out

This pattern consists of one or two messages, in order, as follows:

  1. A message:

  2. An optional message:

This pattern uses the rule 2.2.2 Message Triggers Fault.

An operation using this message exchange pattern has a {message exchange pattern} property with the value "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/in-opt-out".

2.3.5 Out-Only

This pattern consists of exactly one message as follows:

  1. A message:

This pattern uses the rule 2.2.3 No Faults.

An operation using this message exchange pattern has a {message exchange pattern} property with the value "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/out-only".

2.3.6 Robust Out-Only

This pattern consists of exactly one message as follows:

  1. message:

This pattern uses the rule 2.2.2 Message Triggers Fault.

An operation using this message exchange pattern has a {message exchange pattern} property with the value "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/robust-out-only".

2.3.7 Out-In

This pattern consists of exactly two messages, in order, as follows:

  1. A message:

  2. A message:

This pattern uses the rule 2.2.1 Fault Replaces Message.

An operation using this message exchange pattern has a {message exchange pattern} property with the value "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/out-in".

2.3.8 Out-Optional-In

This pattern consists of one or two messages, in order, as follows:

  1. A message:

  2. An optional message:

This pattern uses the rule 2.2.2 Message Triggers Fault.

An operation using this message exchange pattern has a {message exchange pattern} property with the value "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/out-opt-in".

2.4 Security Considerations

Note that many of the message exchange patterns defined above describe responses to an initial message (either a normal response message or a fault.)

Such responses may be used in attempts to disrupt, attack, or map a network, host, or services. When such responses are directed to an address other than that originating the initial message, the source of an attack may be obscured, or blame laid on a third party, or may enable or exacerbate denial-of-service attacks.

Security mechanisms addressing such attacks may prevent the delivery of response messages to the receiving node. Conformance to the message exchange pattern is measured prior to the application of these security mechanisms.

3. Predefined Extensions

3.1 Operation safety

This section defines an extension to WSDL 2.0 [WSDL 2.0 Core Language] which allows to mark an operation as a safe interaction, as defined in section 3.4. Safe Interactions of [Web Architecture].

This extension MAY be used for setting defaults in bindings, such as in an HTTP binding per this specification (see 6.6.4 Mapping from XML Representation to Component Properties).

3.1.1 Relationship to WSDL Component Model

The safety extension adds the following property to the Interface Operation component model (as defined in [WSDL 2.0 Core Language]):

  • {safety} REQUIRED. An xs:boolean indicating whether the operation is asserted to be safe for users of the described service to invoke. If this property is "false", then no assertion has been made about the safety of the operation, thus the operation MAY or MAY NOT be safe. However, an operation SHOULD be marked safe if it meets the criteria for a safe interaction defined in Section 3.5 of [Web Architecture].

3.1.2 XML Representation

<description>
 <interface>
   <operation name="xs:NCName" pattern="xs:anyURI"
              wsdlx:safe="xs:boolean"? >
  </operation>
 </interface>
</description>

The XML representation for the safety extension is an attribute information item with the following Infoset properties:

  • An OPTIONAL safe attribute information item with the following Infoset properties:

    • A [local name] of safe

    • A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl-extensions"

    • A type of xs:boolean

3.1.3 Mapping from XML Representation to Component Properties

See Table 3-1.


Table 3-1. Mapping from XML Representation to Interface Operation component Extension Properties
Property Value
{safety} The actual value of the safe attribute information item, if present, otherwise the value "false".

4. Predefined Operation Styles

This section defines operation styles used by serialization formats to place constraints on Interface Operations bound.

4.1 RPC Style

The RPC style is selected by assigning to an Interface Operation component's {style} property the value "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/style/rpc".

In order to conform with the specification for the RPC style, an Interface Operation component MUST obey the constraints listed below. Furthermore, if the wrpc:signature extension is used, the corresponding attribute information item MUST be valid according to the schema for the extension and additionally MUST obey the constraints listed in 4.1.1 wrpc:signature Extension and 4.1.2 XML Representation of the wrpc:signature Extension.

The RPC style MUST NOT be used for Interface Operation components whose {message exchange pattern} property has a value other than "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/in-only" or "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/in-out".

The RPC style places restrictions for Remote Procedure Call-types of interactions. When this value is used, the associated messages MUST conform to the rules below, described using XML Schema [XML Schema Structures]. Note that operations containing messages described by other type systems may also indicate use of the RPC style, as long as they are constructed in such a way as to follow these rules.

If the Interface Operation component uses a {message exchange pattern} for which there is no output element, i.e. "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/in-only", then the conditions stated below that refer to output elements MUST be considered to be implicitly satisfied.

  • The content model of input and output {element declaration} elements MUST be defined using a complex type that contains a sequence from XML Schema.

  • The input sequence MUST only contain elements and element wildcards. It MUST NOT contain other structures such as xs:choice. The input sequence MUST NOT contain more than one element wildcard. The element wildcard, if present, MUST appear after any elements.

  • The output sequence MUST only contain elements. It MUST NOT contain other structures such as xs:choice.

  • The sequence MUST contain only local element children. Note that these child elements MAY contain the following attributes: nillable, minOccurs and maxOccurs.

  • The local name of input element's QName MUST be the same as the Interface Operation component's name.

  • Input and output elements MUST both be in the same namespace.

  • The complex type that defines the body of an input or an output element MUST NOT contain any local attributes. Extension attributes are allowed for purposes of managing the message infrastructure (e.g. adding identifiers to facilitate digitally signing the contents of the message). They must not be considered as part of the application data that is conveyed by the message. Therefore, they are never included in an RPC signature (see 4.1.1 wrpc:signature Extension).

  • If elements with the same qualified name appear as children of both the input and output elements, then they MUST both be declared using the same named type.

  • The input or output sequence MUST NOT contain multiple children elements declared with the same name.

4.1.1 wrpc:signature Extension

The wrpc:signature extension attribute information item MAY be used in conjunction with the RPC style to describe the exact signature of the function represented by an operation that uses the RPC style.

When present, the wrpc:signature extension contributes the following property to the Interface Operation component it is applied to:

  • {rpc signature} REQUIRED. A list of pairs (q, t) whose first component is of type xs:QName and whose second component is of type xs:token. Values for the second component MUST be chosen among the following four: "#in", "#out", "#inout" "#return".

The value of the {rpc signature} property MUST satisfy the following conditions:

  • The value of the first component of each pair (q, t) MUST be unique within the list.

  • For each child element of the input and output messages of the operation, a pair (q, t) whose first component q is equal to the qualified name of that element MUST be present in the list, with the caveat that elements that appear with cardinality greater than one MUST be treated as a single element.

  • For each pair (q, #in), there MUST be a child element of the input element with a name of q and there MUST NOT be a child element of the output element with the same name.

  • For each pair (q, #out), there MUST be a child element of the output element with a name of q and there MUST NOT be a child element of the input element with the same name.

  • For each pair (q, #inout), there MUST be a child element of the input element with a name of q and there MUST be a child element of the output element with the same name. Furthermore, those two elements MUST have the same type.

  • For each pair (q, #return), there MUST be a child element of the output element with a name of q and there MUST NOT be a child element of the input element with the same name.

The function signature defined by a wrpc:signature extension is determined as follows:

  1. Start with the value of the {rpc signature} property, a (possibly empty) list of pairs of this form:

        [(q0, t0), (q1, t1), ...]

  2. Filter the elements of this list into two lists, the first one (L1) comprising pairs whose t component is one of {#in, #out, #inout}, the second (L2) pairs whose t component is #return. During the composition of L1 and L2, the relative order of members in the original list MUST be preserved.

    For ease of visualization, let's denote the two lists as

        (L1)    [(a0, u0), (a1, u1),...]

    and

        (L2)    [(r0, #return), (r1, #return),...]

    respectively.

  3. Then, if the input sequence ends with an element wildcard, the formal signature of the function is

        f([d0] a0, [d1] a1, ..., rest) => (r0, r1, ...)

    where rest is a formal parameter representing the elements in the input message matched by the element wildcard.

    Otherwise the formal signature of the function is

        f([d0] a0, [d1] a1, ...) => (r0, r1, ...)

    i.e.

    • the list of formal arguments to the function is [a0, a1, ...];

    • the direction d of each formal argument a is one of [in], [out], [inout], determined according to the value of its corresponding u token;

    • the list of formal return parameters of the function is [r0, r1, ...];

    • each formal argument and formal return parameter is typed according to the type of the child element identified by it (unique per the conditions given above).

Note:

The wrpc:signature extension allows the specification of multiple return values for an operation. Several popular programming languages support multiple return values for a function. Moreover, for languages who do not, the burden on implementors should be small, as typically multiple return values will be mapped to a single return value of a structure type (or its closest language-specific equivalent).

4.1.2 XML Representation of the wrpc:signature Extension

The XML representation for the RPC signature extension is an attribute information item with the following Infoset properties:

  • A [local name] of signature

  • A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/rpc"

The type of the name attribute information item is a list type whose item type is the union of the xs:QName type and the subtype of the xs:token type restricted to the following four values: "#in", "#out", "#inout", "#return". See Example 4-1 for a definition of this type.

Additionally, each even-numbered item (0, 2, 4, ...) in the list MUST be of type xs:QName and each odd-numbered item (1, 3, 5, ...) in the list MUST be of the subtype of xs:token described in the previous paragraph.

Example 4-1. Definition of the wrpc:signature extension

<xs:attribute name="signature" type="wrpc:signatureType"/>

<xs:simpleType name="signatureType">
  <xs:list itemType="wrpc:signatureItemType"/>
</xs:simpleType>

<xs:simpleType name="signatureItemType">
  <xs:union memberTypes="wrpc:directionToken xs:QName"/>
</xs:simpleType>

<xs:simpleType name="directionToken">
  <xs:restriction base="xs:token">
    <xs:enumeration value="#in"/>
    <xs:enumeration value="#out"/>
    <xs:enumeration value="#inout"/>
    <xs:enumeration value="#return"/>
  </xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
          
           

4.1.3 wrpc:signature Extension Mapping To Properties of an Interface Operation component

A wrpc:signature extension attribute information item is mapped to the following property of the Interface Operation component defined by its [owner].


Table 4-1. Mapping of a wrpc:signature Extension to Interface Operation component Properties
Property Value
{rpc signature} A list of (xs:QName, xs:token) pairs formed by grouping the items present in the actual value of the wrpc:signature attribute information item in the order in which they appear there.

4.2 IRI Style

The IRI style may be used for Interface Operation components using a message exchange pattern with an initial message.

The IRI style is selected by assigning the Interface Operation component's {style} property the value "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/style/iri".

Use of this value indicates that XML Schema [XML Schema Structures] was used to define the schema of the {element declaration} property of the Interface Message Reference component of the Interface Operation component corresponding to the initial message of the message exchange pattern. This schema MUST adhere to the rules below:

  • The content model of this element is defined using a complex type that contains a sequence from XML Schema.

  • The sequence MUST only contain elements. It MUST NOT contain other structures such as xs:choice.

  • The sequence MUST contain only local element children. These child elements MAY contain the nillable attribute, and the attributes minOccurs and maxOccurs MUST have a value 0 or 1.

  • The localPart of the element's QName MUST be the same as the Interface Operation component's name.

  • The complex type that defines the body of the element or its children elements MUST NOT contain any attributes.

  • The sequence MUST NOT contain multiple children elements declared with the same local name.

  • If the children elements of the sequence are defined using an XML Schema type, they MUST derive from xs:simpleType, and MUST NOT be of the type or derive from xs:QName, xs:NOTATION, xs:hexBinary or xs:base64Binary.

4.3 Multipart style

The Multipart style may be used for Interface Operation components using a message exchange pattern with an initial message.

The Multipart style is selected by assigning the Interface Operation component's {style} property the value "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/style/multipart".

Use of this value indicates that XML Schema [XML Schema Structures] was used to define the schema of the {element declaration} property of the Interface Message Reference component of the Interface Operation component corresponding to the initial message of the message exchange pattern. This schema MUST adhere to the rules below:

  • The content model of this element is defined using a complex type that contains a sequence from XML Schema.

  • The sequence MUST only contain elements. It MUST NOT contain other structures such as xs:choice.

  • The sequence MUST contain only local element children. These child elements MAY contain the nillable attribute, and the attributes minOccurs and maxOccurs MUST have a value 1.

  • The localPart of the element's QName MUST be the same as the Interface Operation component's name.

  • The complex type that defines the body of the element or its children elements MUST NOT contain any attributes.

  • The sequence MUST NOT contain multiple children element declared with the same local name.

5. WSDL SOAP Binding Extension

The SOAP binding extension described in this section is SOAP version independent ("1.2" as well as other versions) and an extension for [WSDL 2.0 Core Language] to enable Web Services applications to use SOAP. This binding extension extends WSDL 2.0 by adding properties to the Binding component as defined in [WSDL 2.0 Core Language]. In addition, an XML Infoset representation for these additional properties is provided, along with a mapping from that representation to the various component properties.

As allowed in [WSDL 2.0 Core Language], a Binding component MAY exist without indicating a specific Interface component that it applies to. In this case, there MUST NOT be any Binding Operation or Binding Fault components present in the Binding component.

The SOAP binding extension is designed with the objective of minimizing what needs to be explicitly declared for common cases. This is achieved by defining a set of default rules which apply for all Interface Operation components of an Interface component, unless specifically overidden on a per Interface Operation basis. Thus, if a given Interface Operation component is not referred to specifically, then all the default rules apply for that component. That is, per the requirements of [WSDL 2.0 Core Language], all operations of an Interface component are bound according to this binding extension.

Notice that there are no default binding rules defined for Interface Fault components by this binding extension, as no reasonable default is applicable to all cases. Thus, if a given Interface component has any Interface Fault components, then such Interface components MUST be bound via Binding components which indicate a specific interface and contain as many Binding Fault components as there are Interface Fault components in the Interface component.

A subset of the HTTP properties specified in the HTTP binding extension defined in section 6. WSDL HTTP Binding Extension may be expressed in a SOAP binding when the SOAP binding uses HTTP as the underlying protocol, for example, when the value of the {soap underlying protocol} property of the Binding component is "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindings/HTTP/". The properties that are allowed are the ones that describe the underlying protocol:

5.1 XML Syntax Summary (Non-Normative)

<description>
  <binding name="xs:NCName" interface="xs:QName"?
           type="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/soap"
           whttp:version="xs:string"??
           whttp:transferCodingDefault="xs:string"??
           wsoap:version="xs:string"?
           wsoap:protocol="xs:anyURI"
           wsoap:mepDefault="xs:anyURI"? >
    <documentation />*

    <wsoap:module ref="xs:anyURI" required="xs:boolean"? >
      <documentation />*
    </wsoap:module>*
    
    <fault ref="xs:QName"
           wsoap:code="union of xs:QName, xs:token"?
           wsoap:subcodes="list of xs:QName"? >

      <documentation />*

      <wsoap:module ... />*
      <wsoap:header element="xs:QName" mustUnderstand="xs:boolean"?>
        <documentation />*
      </wsoap:header>*
      <whttp:header ... />*??

      [ <feature /> | <property /> ]*
    </fault>*

    <operation ref="xs:QName" 
               whttp:location="xs:anyURI"??
               whttp:transferCodingDefault="xs:string"?? >
               wsoap:mep="xs:anyURI"?
               wsoap:action="xs:anyURI"? >

      <documentation />*

      <wsoap:module ... />*

      <input messageLabel="xs:NCName"?
             whttp:transferCoding="xs:string"?? >
        <documentation />*
        <wsoap:module ... />*
        <wsoap:header ... />*
        <whttp:header ... />*??
        [ <feature /> | <property /> ]*
      </input>*

      <output messageLabel="xs:NCName"?
             whttp:transferCoding="xs:string"?? >
        <documentation />*
        <wsoap:module ... />*
        <wsoap:header ... />*
        <whttp:header ... />*??
        [ <feature /> | <property /> ]*
      </output>*

      <infault ref="xs:QName"
                  messageLabel="xs:NCName"?
                  whttp:transferCoding="xs:string"?? >
        <documentation />*
        <wsoap:module ... />*
        [ <feature /> | <property /> ]*
      </infault>*

      <outfault ref="xs:QName"
                   messageLabel="xs:NCName"?
                   whttp:transferCoding="xs:string"?? >
        <documentation />*
        <wsoap:module ... />*
        [ <feature /> | <property /> ]*
      </outfault>*

      [ <feature /> | <property /> ]*

    </operation>*

    [ <feature /> | <property /> ]*

  </binding>

  <service>
    <endpoint name="xs:NCName" binding="xs:QName" address="xs:anyURI"?
              whttp:authenticationType="xs:string"?? 
              whttp:authenticationRealm="xs:string"?? >
      <documentation />*
      [ <feature /> | <property /> ]*
    </endpoint>
    [ <feature /> | <property /> ]*
  </service>
</description>

Note:

The double question marks ("??") after the attributes in the whttp namespace indicates that those optional attributes only make sense when the SOAP binding uses HTTP as the underlying protocol, for example, when the value of the wsoap:protocol attribute is "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindings/HTTP/".

5.2 Identifying the use of the SOAP Binding

A Binding component (defined in [WSDL 2.0 Core Language]) is identified as a SOAP binding by assigning the value "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/soap" to the {type} property of the Binding component.

5.3 Default Binding Rules

  • Payload Construction. When formulating the SOAP envelope to be transmitted the contents of the payload (i.e., the contents of the SOAP Body element information item of the SOAP envelope) MUST be what is defined by the corresponding Interface Message Reference component. This is subject to optimization by a feature that is in use which may affect serialization, such as MTOM [SOAP Message Transmission Optimization Mechanism]. The following default binding rules MUST be adhered to:

    Note:

    This SOAP binding extension only allows one single element in SOAP body.

  • SOAP Header Construction. If the {soap headers} property as defined in section 5.10 Declaring SOAP Header Blocks exists and is not empty in a Binding Message Reference or Binding Fault component, element information item conforming to the element declaration of a SOAP Header Block component's {element} property, in the {soap headers} property, MUST be turned into a SOAP header block for the corresponding message.

    And, if the SOAP Header Block component's {mustUnderstand} property is present and its value is "true", that particular SOAP header block should be marked with a mustUnderstand attribute information item with a value of "true" or "1" as per the SOAP specification.

    SOAP header blocks other than the ones declared in the {soap headers} property may be present at run-time, such as the SOAP header blocks resulting from SOAP modules declared as explained in section 5.9 Declaring SOAP Modules.

5.4 Specifying the SOAP Version

5.4.1 Description

Every SOAP binding MUST indicate what version of SOAP is in use for the operations of the interface that this binding applies to.

By default, SOAP 1.2 [SOAP 1.2 Part 1: Messaging Framework] is used.

5.4.2 Relationship to WSDL Component Model

The SOAP protocol specification adds the following property to the WSDL component model (as defined in [WSDL 2.0 Core Language]):

5.4.3 XML Representation

<description>
  <binding  name="xs:NCName" interface="xs:QName"? type="xs:anyURI"
            wsoap:version="xs:string"? >
    ...
  </binding>
</description>

The XML representation for specifying the SOAP version is an optional attribute information item with the following Infoset properties:

  • A [local name] of version

  • A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/soap"

  • A type of xs:string

5.4.4 Mapping from XML Representation to Component properties

See Table 5-1.


Table 5-1. Mapping from XML Representation to Binding component Extension Properties
Property Value
{soap version} The actual value of the wsoap:version attribute information item if present, otherwise "1.2".

5.5 Specifying the SOAP Underlying Protocol

5.5.1 Description

Every SOAP binding MUST indicate what underlying protocol is in use.

5.5.2 Relationship to WSDL Component Model

The SOAP protocol specification adds the following property to the WSDL component model (as defined in [WSDL 2.0 Core Language]):

5.5.3 XML Representation

<description>
  <binding  name="xs:NCName" interface="xs:QName"? type="xs:anyURI"
            wsoap:protocol="xs:anyURI" >
    ...
  </binding>
</description>

The XML representation for specifying the SOAP protocol is a REQUIRED attribute information item with the following Infoset properties:

  • A [local name] of protocol

  • A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/soap"

  • A type of xs:anyURI

5.5.4 Mapping from XML Representation to Component Properties

See Table 5-2.


Table 5-2. Mapping from XML Representation to Binding component Extension Properties
Property Value
{soap underlying protocol} The actual value of the wsoap:protocol attribute information item.

5.6 Specifying the Default SOAP MEP

5.6.1 Description

Every Binding Operation component of a SOAP binding MUST indicate the SOAP Message Exchange Pattern (MEP) to be used for that operation. This binding extension specification allows the user to indicate a default SOAP MEP to be used for all Binding Operation components of this Binding component.

5.6.2 Relationship to WSDL Component Model

The default SOAP MEP specification is a syntactic convenience and does not affect the underlying component model.

5.6.3 XML Representation

<description>
  <binding  name="xs:NCName" interface="xs:QName"? type="xs:anyURI"
            wsoap:protocol="xs:anyURI"
            wsoap:mepDefault="xs:anyURI ?" >
    ...
  </binding>
</description>

The XML representation for specifying the default SOAP MEP is an OPTIONAL attribute information item with the following Infoset properties:

  • A [local name] of mepDefault

  • A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/soap"

  • A type of xs:anyURI

5.7 Binding Faults

5.7.1 Description

For every Interface Fault component contained in an Interface component, a mapping to a SOAP Fault must be described. This binding extension specification allows the user to indicate the SOAP fault code and subcodes that are transmitted for a given Interface Fault component.

5.7.2 Relationship to WSDL Component Model

The SOAP Fault binding extension adds the following properties to the WSDL component model (as defined in [WSDL 2.0 Core Language]):

  • {soap fault code} OPTIONAL. A xs:QName, to the Binding Fault component. The value of this property identifies a possible SOAP fault for the operations in scope. If this property is empty, no assertion is made about the value of the SOAP fault code.

  • {soap fault subcodes} OPTIONAL. A list of xs:QName, to the Binding Fault component. The value of this property identifies one or more subcodes for this SOAP fault.

5.7.3 XML Representation

<description>
  <binding >
    <fault ref="xs:QName"
           wsoap:code="union of xs:QName, xs:token"?
           wsoap:subcodes="list of xs:QName"? >
      <documentation />*
      [ <feature /> | <property /> ]*
    </fault>*
  </binding>
</description>

The XML representation for binding a SOAP Fault are two attribute information items with the following Infoset properties:

  • wsoap:code OPTIONAL attribute information item

    • A [local name] of code

    • A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/soap"

    • A type of union of xs:QName and xs:token where the allowed token value is "#any"

  • wsoap:subcodes OPTIONAL attribute information item

    • A [local name] of subcodes

    • A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/soap"

    • A type of list of xs:QNames

5.7.4 Mapping XML Representation to Component Properties

See Table 5-3.


Table 5-3. Mapping from XML Representation to SOAP Fault component Properties
Property Value
{soap fault code} The actual value of the code attribute information item if present and if its value is not "#any"; otherwise empty.
{soap fault subcodes} The actual value of the subcodes attribute information item, if present; otherwise empty.

5.8 Binding Operations

5.8.1 Description

For every Interface Operation component contained in an Interface component, in addition to the default binding rules (for SOAP 1.2, see 5.11.3 Default Binding Rules), there may be additional binding information to be specified. This binding extension specification allows the user to indicate the SOAP Message Exchange Pattern (MEP) and a value for the SOAP Action Feature on a per-operation basis.

5.8.2 Relationship to WSDL Component Model

The SOAP Operation binding extension specification adds the following property to the WSDL component model (as defined in [WSDL 2.0 Core Language]):

  • {soap mep} REQUIRED. A xs:anyURI, which is an absolute IRI as defined by [IETF RFC 3987], to the Binding Operation component. The value of this property identifies the SOAP Message Exchange Pattern (MEP) for this specific operation. If no specific value is assigned, then the value assigned by the default rules apply (for SOAP 1.2, see 5.11.3 Default Binding Rules). It is an error for this property to not have a value (which MAY happen if the default rules are not applicable).

  • {soap action} OPTIONAL. A xs:anyURI, which is an absolute IRI as defined by [IETF RFC 3987], to the Binding Operation component. The value of this property identifies the value of the SOAP Action Feature (as defined for this specific operation), as specified in the binding rules of bindings to specific versions of SOAP (see 5.11.3 Default Binding Rules for the SOAP 1.2 binding when the value of the {soap version} property of the Binding component is "1.2").

5.8.3 XML Representation

<description>
  <binding >
    <operation ref="xs:QName" 
               wsoap:mep="xs:anyURI"?
               wsoap:action="xs:anyURI"? >
    </operation>
  </binding>
</description>

The XML representation for binding an Operation are two attribute information items with the following Infoset properties:

  • wsoap:mep OPTIONAL attribute information item

    • A [local name] of mep

    • A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/soap"

    • A type of xs:anyURI

  • wsoap:action OPTIONAL attribute information item

    • A [local name] of action

    • A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/soap"

    • A type of xs:anyURI

5.8.4 Mapping from XML Representation to Component Properties

See Table 5-4.


Table 5-4. Mapping from XML Representation to SOAP Operation Component Properties
Property Value
{soap mep} The actual value of the wsoap:mep attribute information item, if present. If not, the actual value of the wsoap:mepDefault attribute information item of the parent wsdl:binding element information item, if present. If not the value as defined by the default SOAP binding rules (for SOAP 1.2, see 5.11.3 Default Binding Rules), if applicable.
{soap action} The actual value of the action attribute information item, if any; otherwise empty.

5.9 Declaring SOAP Modules

5.9.1 Description

In SOAP, it is permissible for specification interaction to engage one or more additional features (typically implemented as one or more SOAP header blocks), as defined by SOAP Modules (see [SOAP 1.2 Part 1: Messaging Framework]). This binding extension specification allows users to indicate which SOAP Modules are in use across an entire binding, on a per operation basis or on a per message basis.

5.9.2 Relationship to WSDL Component Model

The SOAP Module component adds the following property to the WSDL component model (as defined in [WSDL 2.0 Core Language]):

The SOAP modules applicable for a particular operation of any service consists of all modules specified in the input or output Binding Message Reference components, the infault or outfault Binding Fault Reference components, those specified within the Binding Fault components, those specified within the Binding Operation components and those specified within the Binding component. If any module is declared in multiple components, then the requiredness of that module is defined by the closest declaration, where closeness is defined by whether it is specified directly at the Binding Message Reference component or Binding Fault Reference component level, the Binding Fault level or the Binding Operation component level or the Binding component level, respectively.

5.9.3 SOAP Module component

The SOAP Module component identifies a SOAP module that is in use.

The properties of the SOAP Module component are as follows:

  • {ref} REQUIRED. A xs:anyURI, which is an absolute IRI as defined by [IETF RFC 3987]. The value of this property identifies the specific SOAP module that is in use.

  • {required} REQUIRED. A xs:boolean indicating if the SOAP module is required.

5.9.4 XML Representation

<description>
  <binding >
    <wsoap:module ref="anyURI"
                  required="boolean"? >
      <documentation ... />*
    </wsoap:module>
    <fault>
      <wsoap:module ... />*
    </fault>
    <operation>
      <wsoap:module ... />*
      <input>
        <wsoap:module ... />*
      </input>
      <output>
        <wsoap:module ... />*
      </output>
      <infault>
        <wsoap:module ... />*
      </infault>
      <outfault>
        <wsoap:module ... />*
      </outfault>
    </operation>
  </binding>
</description>

The XML representation for a SOAP Module component is an element information item with the following Infoset properties:

  • A [local name] of module

  • A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/soap"

  • One or more attribute information items amongst its [attributes] as follows:

    • A REQUIRED ref attribute information item with the following Infoset properties:

      • A [local name] of ref

      • A [namespace name] which has no value

      • A type of xs:anyURI

    • An OPTIONAL required attribute information item with the following Infoset properties:

      • A [local name] of required

      • A [namespace name] which has no value

      • A type of xs:boolean

    • Zero or more namespace qualified attribute information items. The [namespace name] of such attribute information items MUST NOT be "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl" and MUST NOT be "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/soap".

  • Zero or more element information item amongst its [children], in order, as follows:

    1. Zero or more documentation element information items as defined in [WSDL 2.0 Core Language].

    2. Zero or more namespace-qualified element information items amongst its [children]. The [namespace name] of such element information items MUST NOT be "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl" and MUST NOT be "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/soap".

5.9.5 Mapping from XML Representation to Component Properties

See Table 5-5.


Table 5-5. Mapping from XML Representation to SOAP Module component Properties
Property Value
{soap modules} The set of SOAP Module components corresponding to all the module element information item in the [children] of the binding , operation , fault , input , output , infault , outfault element information items, if any.
{ref} The actual value of the ref attribute information item.
{required} The actual value of the required attribute information item if present, otherwise "false".

5.9.6 IRI Identification Of A SOAP Module component

WSDL Version 2.0 Part 1: Core Language [WSDL 2.0 Core Language] defines a fragment identifier syntax for identifying components of a WSDL 2.0 document.

A SOAP Module component can be identified using the wsdl.extension XPointer Framework scheme:

wsdl.extension(http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/soap, wsoap.module(parent/ref))

  1. parent is the component identifier for the component under which the SOAP Module component is declared, as specified in WSDL Version 2.0 Part 1: Core Language.

  2. ref is the value of the {ref} property of the component.

5.10 Declaring SOAP Header Blocks

5.10.1 Description

SOAP allows the use of header blocks in the header part of the message. This binding extension allows users to declare the SOAP header blocks in use on a per message ond on a per fault basis.

5.10.2 Relationship to WSDL Component Model

The SOAP Header Blocks binding extension specification adds the following property to the WSDL component model (as defined in [WSDL 2.0 Core Language]):

5.10.3 SOAP Header Block component

A SOAP Header Block component describes an abstract piece of header data (message headers) that is associated with the exchange of messages between the communicating parties. The presence of a SOAP Header Block component in a WSDL description indicates that the service supports headers and MAY require a Web service consumer/client that interacts with the service to use the described header. Zero or more such headers may be used.

The properties of the SOAP Header Block component are as follows:

  • {element} REQUIRED. A xs:QName, a reference to an XML element declaration in the {element declarations} property of the Description component. This element represents a SOAP header block.

  • {mustUnderstand} REQUIRED. A xs:boolean. When its value is "true", the SOAP header block MUST be decorated with a SOAP mustUnderstand attribute information item with a value of "true"; if so, it is an error for the XML element declaration referenced by the {element} property not to allow this SOAP mustUnderstand attribute information item. Otherwise, no additional constraint is placed on the presence and value of a SOAP mustUnderstand attribute information item.

5.10.4 XML Representation

<description>
  <binding name="xs:NCName" type="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/soap" >
    <fault ref="xs:QName" >
      <wsoap:header element="xs:QName" mustUnderstand="xs:boolean"?>
        <documentation />*
      </wsoap:header>*
      ...
    </fault>*
    <operation ref="xs:QName" >
      <input messageLabel="xs:NCName"?>
        <wsoap:header ... />*
        ...
      </input>*
      <output messageLabel="xs:NCName"?>
        <wsoap:header ... />*
        ...
      </output>*
    </operation>*
  </binding>
</description>

The XML representation for a SOAP Header Block component is an element information item with the following Infoset properties:

  • A [local name] of header

  • A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/soap"

  • One or more attribute information items amongst its [attributes] as follows:

    • A REQUIRED element attribute information item with the following Infoset properties:

      • A [local name] of element

      • A [namespace name] which has no value

      • A type of xs:QName

    • An OPTIONAL mustUnderstand attribute information item with the following Infoset properties:

      • A [local name] of mustUnderstand

      • A [namespace name] which has no value

      • A type of xs:boolean

    • Zero or more namespace qualified attribute information items. The [namespace name] of such attribute information items MUST NOT be "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl" and MUST NOT be "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/soap".

  • Zero or more element information item amongst its [children], in order, as follows:

    1. Zero or more documentation element information items as defined in [WSDL 2.0 Core Language].

    2. Zero or more namespace-qualified element information items amongst its [children]. The [namespace name] of such element information items MUST NOT be "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl" and MUST NOT be "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/soap".

5.10.5 Mapping XML Representation to Component Properties

See Table 5-6.


Table 5-6. Mapping from XML Representation to SOAP Header Block component Properties
Property Value
{soap headers} The set of SOAP Header Block components corresponding to all the header element information item in the [children] of the fault , input or output element information item, if any.
{element} The element declaration from the {element declarations} resolved to by the value of the element attribute information item. It is an error for the element attribute information item to have a value and that value does not resolve to a global element declaration from the {element declarations} property of the Description component.
{mustUnderstand} The actual value of the mustUnderstand attribute information item if present, otherwise "false".

5.10.6 IRI Identification Of A SOAP Header Block component

WSDL Version 2.0 Part 1: Core Language [WSDL 2.0 Core Language] defines a fragment identifier syntax for identifying components of a WSDL 2.0 document.

A SOAP Header Block component can be identified using the wsdl.extension XPointer Framework scheme:

wsdl.extension(http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/soap, wsoap.header(parent/namespace#name))

  1. parent is the component identifier for the component under which the SOAP Header Block component is declared, as specified in WSDL Version 2.0 Part 1: Core Language.

  2. namespace is the {element} property value's namespace URI.

  3. name is the {element} property value's local name.

5.11 WSDL SOAP 1.2 Binding

5.11.1 Identifying a WSDL SOAP 1.2 Binding

A WSDL SOAP Binding is identified as a SOAP 1.2 binding by assigning the value "1.2" to the {soap version} property of the Binding component.

5.11.2 Description

The WSDL SOAP 1.2 binding extension defined in this section is an extension of the 5. WSDL SOAP Binding Extension to enable Web Service applications to use SOAP 1.2 [SOAP 1.2 Part 1: Messaging Framework].

The WSDL SOAP 1.2 binding extension supports the SOAP 1.2 HTTP binding defined by the [SOAP 1.2 Part 2: Adjuncts] specification. This is indicated by assigning the URI "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindings/HTTP/" (as defined by [SOAP 1.2 Part 2: Adjuncts]) to the {soap underlying protocol} property. Other values MAY be used for this property in conjunction with the SOAP 1.2 binding extension defined by this specification provided that the semantics of such protocols are consistent with this binding extension.

Default rules in section 5.11.3 Default Binding Rules define the relationship between SOAP message exchange patterns defined in [SOAP 1.2 Part 2: Adjuncts] and WSDL message exchange patterns defined in 2. Predefined Message Exchange Patterns.

When the SOAP Message Exchange Pattern is the SOAP 1.2 Response MEP and the underlying protocol is HTTP, the Binding Operation may use the {http location} property defined in 6.6 Binding Operations. When such a location is specified, the Endpoint component also follows the rules for constructing the address from the {address} property and the {http location} property values.

5.11.3 Default Binding Rules

These default binding rules are applicable to SOAP 1.2 bindings.

  • SOAP Action Feature. If a value for the {soap action} property of a Binding Operation component has NOT been specified then the SOAP Action Feature (see [SOAP 1.2 Part 2: Adjuncts]) has NO value assigned by the Binding component. Otherwise, the value of the {soap action} property of a Binding Operation component is the value of the SOAP Action Feature for all messages of the corresponding Interface Operation component.

  • SOAP MEP Selection. If the Interface Operation component's {message exchange pattern} property has the value "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/in-out", then the default value of the {soap mep} property for the corresponding Binding Operation component is "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/request-response/" identifying the SOAP Request-Response Message Exchange Pattern as defined in [SOAP 1.2 Part 2: Adjuncts]. If the Interface Operation component has any other value for the {message exchange pattern} property, then no default value is defined for the {soap mep} property of the corresponding Binding Operation component.

    Editorial note: One-way MEP defaulting  
    The Web Services Description Working Group would like to add a rule here defaulting to a standardized SOAP 1.2 one-way MEP for one-way operations if one becomes available. Feedback is sought on this topic.
  • HTTP Method Selection. This default binding rule is applicable when the value of the {soap underlying protocol} property of the Binding component is "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindings/HTTP/". If the {soap mep} property of the Binding Operation component has the value "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/request-response/" then the default value of the {http method} property is "POST". If the {soap mep} property of the Binding Operation component has the value "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/soap-response/" then the default value of the {http method} property is "GET".

  • HTTP IRI Generation. This default binding rule is applicable when the value of the {soap underlying protocol} property of the Binding component is "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindings/HTTP/". If the {soap mep} property of the Binding Operation component has the value "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/soap-response/" then the IRI to execute the HTTP GET against MUST be generated using the HTTP binding extension's rules for generating a IRI for HTTP GET (see 6.9.1 Serialization as application/x-www-form-urlencoded ). The input serialization format of x-www-form-urlencoded is the only supported serialization format for HTTP GET in the SOAP Response Message Exchange Pattern.

    Editorial note: Input serialization for HTTP GET in SOAP HTTP binding  
    Use of a different input serialization format requires introduction of either a new MEP or a new binding. The Working Group considered the limitations of the x-www-form-urlencoded serialization format (see points #2 and #3 of Binding message content to IRI analysis). It decided that the limitations of the serialization format, which could potentia