W3C

XSL Transformations (XSLT)
Version 2.0

W3C Working Draft 16 August 2002

This version:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-xslt20-20020816/
Latest version:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/
Previous versions:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-xslt20-20020430/
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-xslt20-20011220/
Editor:
Michael Kay (Software AG) <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>

Abstract

This specification defines the syntax and semantics of XSLT 2.0, which is a language for transforming XML documents into other XML documents.

XSLT 2.0 is designed to be used in conjunction with XPath 2.0, which is defined in [XPath 2.0].

Status of this document

This document is a working draft of XSLT 2.0. It is published in order to provide the XSLT user community with a progress report on the evolving language specification and the outstanding issues that remain to be decided. Changes since the second published Working Draft (published on 30 April 2002) are indicated by background highlighting (green for modified text, yellow for new text), or in the case of deleted text, by strikethrough. A summary of the changes is included at [K.2.4 Changes since the April 2002 draft]. The most significant change is the addition of an instruction, xsl:analyze-string, to match text against a regular expression. This is designed to facilitate applications of XSLT that add XML markup to documents whose structure is implicit in the text, using conventions such as comma-separated values.

This remains a draft document and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use W3C Working Drafts as reference material or to cite them as other than "work in progress". While prototype implementations are encouraged, users and vendors are advised that this working draft cannot be regarded as a stable specification.

XSLT 2.0 is a revised version of the XSLT 1.0 Recommendation [XSLT 1.0] published on 16 November 1999. The changes made in this document are intended to meet the requirements for XSLT 1.1 and XSLT 2.0 described in [XSLT 1.1] and [XSLT 2.0 Requirements] and to incorporate fixes for errors that have been detected in XSLT 1.0. A summary of the changes since XSLT 1.0 is included in [K Changes from XSLT 1.0].

XSLT 2.0 is designed to be used together with XPath 2.0, which has been developed by the W3C XSL Working Group in collaboration with the XML Query Working Group. The current specification of XPath 2.0 can be found in [XPath 2.0].

NOTE: This specification supersedes XSLT 1.1, which was never developed beyond the Working Draft stage.

Comments on this specification may be sent to public-qt-comments@w3.org; archives of the comments are available. Archives of comments on earlier versions of the specification can be found at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xsl-editors/. Public discussion of XSL, including XSL Transformations, takes place on the XSL-List mailing list.

The English version of this specification is the only normative version. However, for translations of this document, see http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/translations.html.

A list of current W3C Recommendations and other technical documents can be found at http://www.w3.org/TR/.

This specification has been produced as part of the W3C Style activity.

Patent disclosures relevant to this specification may be found on the XSL Working Group's patent disclosure page at http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/Disclosures.html.

Table of contents

1 Introduction
    1.1 What is XSLT?
    1.2 What's new in XSLT 2.0?
2 Concepts
    2.1 Terminology
    2.2 Notation
    2.3 Initiating a Transformation
    2.4 Executing a Transformation
        2.4.1 Push Processing
        2.4.2 Pull Processing
        2.4.3 Content Constructors
    2.5 Maintaining Position: the Focus
    2.6 Parsing and Serialization
    2.7 Extensibility
    2.8 Stylesheets and Schemas
    2.9 Error Handling
3 Stylesheet Structure
    3.1 XSLT Namespace
    3.2 XSLT Media Type
    3.3 Standard Attributes
    3.4 Stylesheet Element
        3.4.1 User-defined Data Elements
    3.5 Simplified Stylesheet Modules
    3.6 Backwards-Compatible Processing
    3.7 Forwards-Compatible Processing
    3.8 Combining Stylesheet Modules
        3.8.1 Stylesheet Inclusion
        3.8.2 Stylesheet Import
    3.9 Embedded Stylesheet Modules
    3.10 Importing Schema Components
4 Data Model
    4.1 Parentless Nodes
    4.2 Document Node Children
    4.3 Unparsed Entities
    4.4 Whitespace Stripping
    4.5 Namespace Fixup
    4.6 Disable Output Escaping
    4.7 External Objects
5 Syntactic Constructs
    5.1 Qualified Names
    5.2 Expressions
    5.3 Patterns
    5.4 Unprefixed Names in Expressions and Patterns
    5.5 Attribute Value Templates
    5.6 Content Constructors
6 Template Rules
    6.1 Defining Template Rules
    6.2 Applying Template Rules
    6.3 Conflict Resolution for Template Rules
    6.4 Modes
    6.5 Built-in Template Rules
    6.6 Overriding Template Rules
7 Repetition
8 Conditional Processing
    8.1 Conditional Processing with xsl:if
    8.2 Conditional Processing with xsl:choose
9 Variables and Parameters
    9.1 Values of Variables and Parameters
    9.2 Temporary Trees
    9.3 Global Variables and Parameters
    9.4 Circular Definitions
    9.5 Local Variables and Parameters
    9.6 Range Variables
10 Callable Components
    10.1 Named Templates
        10.1.1 Passing Parameters to Templates
    10.2 Named Attribute Sets
    10.3 Stylesheet Functions
        10.3.1 Defining a Stylesheet Function
        10.3.2 Returning the Result
11 Creating New Nodes
    11.1 Literal Result Elements
        11.1.1 Setting the Type Annotation for Literal Result Elements
        11.1.2 Attribute Nodes for Literal Result Elements
        11.1.3 Namespace Nodes for Literal Result Elements
        11.1.4 Namespace Aliasing
    11.2 Creating Element Nodes using xsl:element
        11.2.1 Setting the Type Annotation for a Constructed Element Node
    11.3 Creating Attribute Nodes using xsl:attribute
        11.3.1 Setting the Type Annotation for a Constructed Attribute Node
    11.4 Creating Text Nodes
        11.4.1 Literal Text Nodes
        11.4.2 Creating Text Nodes using xsl:text
    11.5 Creating Processing Instructions
    11.6 Creating Namespace Nodes
    11.7 Creating Comments
    11.8 Copying Nodes from the Source Tree to the Result Tree
        11.8.1 Shallow Copy
        11.8.2 Deep Copy
    11.9 Generating Text with xsl:value-of
12 Numbering
    12.1 Formatting a Supplied Number
    12.2 Numbering based on Position in a Document
    12.3 Number to String Conversion Attributes
13 Sorting
    13.1 Collating Sequences
    13.2 The xsl:sort Element
    13.3 Using Unnamed Sort Specifications
    13.4 Using Named Sort Specifications
        13.4.1 Declaring a Named Sort Specification
        13.4.2 Sorting Using a Named Sort Specification
14 Grouping
    14.1 The Current Group
    14.2 The xsl:for-each-group Element
    14.3 Examples of Grouping
15 Regular Expressions
    15.1 Examples of Regular Expression Matching
16 Additional Functions
    16.1 Multiple Source Documents
    16.2 Reading Text Files
    16.3 Keys
        16.3.1 The xsl:key Declaration
        16.3.2 The key Function
    16.4 Number Formatting
        16.4.1 Defining a Decimal Format
        16.4.2 Processing the Picture String
        16.4.3 Analysing the Picture String
        16.4.4 Formatting the Number
    16.5 Miscellaneous Additional Functions
        16.5.1 current()
        16.5.2 unparsed-entity-uri()
        16.5.3 unparsed-entity-public-id()
        16.5.4 generate-id()
        16.5.5 system-property()
17 Messages
18 Extensibility and Fallback
    18.1 Extension Functions
        18.1.1 Testing Availability of Functions
        18.1.2 Calling Extension Functions
        18.1.3 External Objects
    18.2 Extension Instructions
        18.2.1 Designating an Extension Namespace
        18.2.2 Testing Availability of Instructions
        18.2.3 Fallback
19 Result Trees
    19.1 The Principal Result Tree
    19.2 Secondary Result Trees
20 Serialization
    20.1 XML Output Method
    20.2 XHTML Output Method
    20.3 HTML Output Method
    20.4 Text Output Method
    20.5 Disabling Output Escaping
21 Conformance

Appendices

A References
    A.1 Normative References
    A.2 Other References
B Glossary (Non-Normative)
C Element Syntax Summary (Non-Normative)
D Summary of Error Conditions (Non-Normative)
E Checklist of Implementation-Defined Features (Non-Normative)
F Schema for XSLT Stylesheets (Non-Normative)
G Representation of Lexical XML Constructs (Non-Normative)
H Acknowledgements (Non-Normative)
I Checklist of Requirements (Non-Normative)
J Summary of Issues (Non-Normative)
    J.1 Open Issues
    J.2 Decided Issues
    J.3 Closed Issues
K Changes from XSLT 1.0 (Non-Normative)
    K.1 Incompatible Changes
        K.1.1 XSLT 2.0 Backwards Compatibility
        K.1.2 XPath 2.0 Backwards Compatibility
        K.1.3 Compatibility in the Presence of a Schema
    K.2 Changes since XSLT 1.0
        K.2.1 Pervasive changes
        K.2.2 Major Features
        K.2.3 Minor Changes
        K.2.4 Changes since the April 2002 draft

1 Introduction

1.1 What is XSLT?

This specification defines the syntax and semantics of the XSLT 2.0 language. A transformation in the XSLT language is expressed in the form of a stylesheet, whose syntax is well-formed XML [XML] conforming to the Namespaces in XML Recommendation [XML Names]. A stylesheet generally includes elements that are defined by XSLT as well as elements that are not defined by XSLT. XSLT-defined elements are distinguished by use of the XML namespace http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform (see [3.1 XSLT Namespace]), which is referred to in this specification as the XSLT namespace. Thus this specification is a definition of the syntax and semantics of the XSLT namespace.

The term stylesheet reflects the fact that one of the important roles of XSLT is to add styling information to an XML source document, by transforming it into a document consisting of XSL formatting objects (see [XSL Formatting Objects]), or into another presentation-oriented format such as HTML, XHTML, or SVG. However, XSLT is used for a wide range of XML-to-XML transformation tasks, not exclusively for formatting and presentation applications.

A transformation expressed in XSLT describes rules for transforming one or more source trees into one or more result trees. The transformation is achieved by a set of template rules. A template rule associates a pattern, which matches nodes in the source document, with a content constructor, which can be evaluated to produce part of a result tree. The structure of the result trees can be completely different from the structure of the source trees. In constructing a result tree, nodes from the source trees can be filtered and reordered, and arbitrary structure can be added. This mechanism allows a stylesheet to be applicable to a wide class of documents that have similar source tree structures.

Ed. Note: The term "source tree" is used rather casually throughout this specification, and is not properly defined. Usually it is referring to the tree that contains the context node.

A stylesheet may consist of several stylesheet modules, contained in different XML documents. For a given transformation, one of these functions as the principal stylesheet module. The complete stylesheet is assembled by finding the stylesheet modules referenced directly or indirectly from the principal stylesheet module using xsl:include and xsl:import elements: see [3.8.1 Stylesheet Inclusion] and [3.8.2 Stylesheet Import].

1.2 What's new in XSLT 2.0?

XSLT 1.0 was published in November 1999, and version 2.0 represents a significant increase in the capability of the language. A detailed list of changes is included in [K Changes from XSLT 1.0]. XSLT 2.0 has been developed in parallel with XPath 2.0 (see [XPath 2.0]), so the changes to XPath must be considered alongside the changes to XSLT.

2 Concepts

2.1 Terminology

For a full glossary of terms, see [B Glossary].

The software responsible for transforming a source document into a result document is referred to as the processor. This is sometimes expanded to XSLT processor to avoid any confusion with other processors, for example an XML processor. A specific product that performs the functions of an XSLT processor is referred to as an implementation.

In this specification the words must, must not, should, should not, may, required, and recommended are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

In this specification, the term implementation-defined refers to a feature where the implementation is allowed some flexibility, and where the choices made by the implementation should be described in the vendor's documentation.

The term implementation-dependent refers to a feature where the behavior may vary from one implementation to another, and where the vendor is not expected to provide a full specification of the behavior. (This might apply, for example, to limits on the size of source documents that can be transformed.)

In all cases where this specification leaves the behavior implementation-defined or implementation-dependent, the implementation has the option of providing mechanisms that allow the user to influence the behavior.

Paragraphs labelled as NOTEs or described as examples are non-normative.

2.2 Notation

In this document the specification of each XSLT-defined element type is preceded by a summary of its syntax in the form of a model for elements of that element type. A full list of all these specifications can be found in [C Element Syntax Summary]. The meaning of syntax summary notation is as follows:

 

The following example illustrates the notation.

<!-- Category: instruction -->
<xsl:example-element
  select = sequence-expression
  debug = { "yes" | "no" }>
  <!-- Content: ((xsl:variable | xsl:param)*, xsl:result) -->
</xsl:example-element>

This example defines a (non-existent) element xsl:example-element. The element is classified as an instruction. It takes a mandatory select attribute, whose value is an XPath expression, and an optional debug attribute, whose value must be either yes or no; the curly braces indicate that the value can be defined as an attribute value template, allowing a value such as debug="{$debug}", where the variable debug is evaluated to yield "yes" or "no" at run-time.

The content of an xsl:example-element instruction is defined to be a sequence of zero or more xsl:variable and xsl:param elements, followed by an xsl:result element.

 

[ERR001] A static error is signaled if an XSLT-defined element is used in a context where it is not permitted, if a required attribute is omitted, or if the content of the element does not correspond to the content that is allowed for the element. [ERR002] It is a static error if an attribute (other than an attribute written using curly braces in a position where an attribute value template is permitted) contains a value that is not one of the permitted values for that attribute. [ERR003] It is a dynamic error if the effective value of an attribute written using curly braces, in a position where an attribute value template is permitted, is a value that is not one of the permitted values for that attribute.

Special rules apply if the construct appears in part of the stylesheet that is processed with forwards-compatible behavior: see [3.7 Forwards-Compatible Processing].

Ed. Note: This working draft includes an XML Schema for XSLT stylesheet modules: see [F Schema for XSLT Stylesheets]. This makes the notation explained in this section somewhat redundant. Future drafts may replace the notation described here with extracts of the relevant definitions from the schema.

2.3 Initiating a Transformation

This document does not specify any application programming interfaces or other interfaces for initiating a transformation. This section, however, describes the information that must be supplied when a transformation is initiated.

Implementations may allow an transformation to run as two or more phases, for example parsing, compilation and execution. Such a distinction is outside the scope of this specification, which treats transformation as a single process controlled using a set of stylesheet modules, supplied in the form of XML documents.

The following information is supplied to execute a transformation:

  • An identification of the stylesheet module that is to act as the principal stylesheet module for the transformation. The complete stylesheet is assembled by expanding the xsl:import and xsl:include declarations in the principal stylesheet module, as described in [3.8.1 Stylesheet Inclusion] and [3.8.2 Stylesheet Import]

  • A set (possibly empty) of values for stylesheet parameters (see [9.3 Global Variables and Parameters]). These values are available for use within expressions in the stylesheet.

  • A set of nodes (possibly empty) that forms the initial input sequence. These nodes (which will often be document nodes, but may in principle be any kind of node, from the same or different documents) are available at any time during the transformation as the result of the input function described in [Functions and Operators].

  • A node that acts as the initial context node for the transformation. This node is accessible within the stylesheet as the initial value of the XPath expressions . and self::node(), as described in [2.5 Maintaining Position: the Focus]. If no initial context node is supplied explicitly, then the stylesheet is invoked with an initial context node in the form of a document node with no children.

    NOTE: It is not necessary for the initial context node to be a member of the initial input sequence, but in a simple transformation of a single document, it is convenient to set both the initial input sequence and the initial context node to the document node of the source document to be transformed.
  • Optionally, the name of a named template which is to be executed as the entry point to the transformation. This template must exist within the stylesheet. If no named template is supplied, then the transformation starts with the template rule that best matches the initial context node, according to the rules defined in [6.3 Conflict Resolution for Template Rules].

[ERR004] It is a dynamic error if the invocation of the stylesheet specifies an template name that does not match the expanded-QName of a named template defined in the stylesheet.

Issue 113 (global-variables-in-call-mode): It's not obvious what the context should be for evaluating global variables when a transformation is initiated by calling a named template. The solution adopted for the moment is to say that there must be an initial context node; this will be supplied as an empty document node if no other initial context node is forthcoming.

Parameters passed to the transformation by the client application are matched against global stylesheet parameters (see [9.3 Global Variables and Parameters]), not against the local parameters declared within the first template to be executed. All local parameters within the first template to be executed will take their default values.

A stylesheet can process further source documents in addition to those supplied when the transformation is invoked. These additional documents can be loaded using the functions document or collection described in [Functions and Operators], or they can be supplied as stylesheet parameters (see [9.3 Global Variables and Parameters]), or as the result of an extension function (see [18.1 Extension Functions]

NOTE: Sometimes it is useful to write an XSLT stylesheet that does not require input from any source document. However, the semantics of the language require that an initial context node is always present. Implementors may provide a mechanism that supplies a default initial context node, perhaps just a document node with no children, as the initial context node to be used in the absence of any other source document.

2.4 Executing a Transformation

The XSLT instructions used to control a transformation can be divided into two groups: push processing instructions, which use template rules to define the processing associated with different nodes in the source tree, and pull processing instructions, which allow the selection and processing of source tree nodes to be described together. These two groups of instructions are described in the following sections.

2.4.1 Push Processing

A stylesheet generally contains a set of template rules. A template rule has two parts: a pattern which is matched against nodes in the source tree and a content constructor which is evaluated to create new nodes that are written to a result tree.

A template rule that is selected to process a particular node in the source tree will generally write one or more nodes to the result tree, and will frequently use the xsl:apply-templates instruction to select other nodes in the source tree (often, but not invariably, the original node's children) for processing. Each of these selected nodes is processed by searching the stylesheet for a matching template rule. Sometimes all the selected nodes will be processed by the same template rule, but in general different nodes will be processed by different template rules. Either way, the chosen template rules are evaluated and the process repeats itself, typically resulting in a recursive traversal of the source tree.

Because the template rule that is written to process one node in the tree has no knowledge of which rules will be chosen to process the nodes that it selects, push processing allows a stylesheet to be applicable to a wide class of documents that have similar source tree structures.

When stylesheet execution starts, a document node is implicitly created for the result tree. Frequently, the first action of the stylesheet is to find the template rule that matches the document node of a source tree. The content constructor of this template rule then creates the children of the new document node. By the time evaluation of this content constructor is complete, these children will typically each act as the parent of further result nodes, so a complete tree is constructed.

In the process of finding a template rule to process a particular node, more than one template rule may have a pattern that matches the node. However, only one template rule will be applied. The method for deciding which template rule to apply is described in [6.3 Conflict Resolution for Template Rules]. If there is no template rule that matches the node, a built-in template rule is used (see [6.5 Built-in Template Rules]).

 

For example, suppose the source tree contains the structure below:

<doc>
  <item>1</item>
  <item>2</item>
  <item>3</item>
</doc>

If the context node is the doc element, and the xsl:apply-templates instruction is evaluated with the attribute select="*", then the input sequence will contain the three item elements. Suppose the template rule that matches an item element has the following form:

<xsl:template match="item">
<li><xsl:value-of select="."/></li>
</xsl:template>

This template rule will be evaluated once for each item element in the input sequence, and in each case it will return a new li element, which in turn will contain a single text node. The result of the xsl:apply-templates instruction will therefore be a sequence of three li elements. The following XML fragment will be generated:

  <li>1</li>
  <li>2</li>
  <li>3</li>

This fragment will be added to the result tree at the point where the doc element was being processed.

 

Very often, the template rule that matches one element in the source tree will contain an xsl:apply-templates instruction selecting the children of that element as the input sequence for processing. In this situation, each child node will be processed to create a subtree, and these subtrees will be added as children of the element produced by the parent template rule. The structure of the result tree will then correspond directly to the structure of the source tree.

 

For example, suppose that the doc element in the previous example is processed using the template rule below:

<xsl:template match="doc">
<ol><xsl:apply-templates select="*"/></ol>
</xsl:template>

Then the result of processing the doc element will be the following result tree:

<ol>
  <li>1</li>
  <li>2</li>
  <li>3</li>
</ol>
 

2.4.2 Pull Processing

A single template rule by itself has considerable power. It can create structures of arbitrary complexity; it can pull string values out of arbitrary locations in the source tree; and it can generate structures that are repeated according to the occurrence of nodes in the source tree.

A stylesheet that uses the pull processing technique is written to navigate explicitly around the source tree, accessing data from wherever it appears in order to construct nodes in the result tree. A number of XSLT instructions are provided to assist pull processing: notably xsl:for-each, xsl:choose, xsl:if, and xsl:call-template.

For simple transformations where the structure of the result tree is independent of the structure of the source tree, a stylesheet can often consist of only a single literal result element, containing a content constructor which functions as a template for building the complete result tree. Transformations on XML documents that represent data with a regular and predictable structure (for example, data extracted from a relational database) are often of this kind. XSLT allows a simplified syntax for such stylesheets (see [3.5 Simplified Stylesheet Modules]).

2.4.3 Content Constructors

Whether the stylesheet is written to use push processing or pull processing, nodes in the result tree are always generated using content constructors.

A content constructor is evaluated for a particular node in the source tree, to create part of the result tree. A content constructor can contain elements (called literal result elements) and text nodes that specify part of the result structure directly. A content constructor can also contain elements from the XSLT namespace that are instructions for creating parts of the result tree.

When a content constructor is evaluated, each instruction is evaluated to produce a sequence of zero or more nodes; the result of the content constructor as a whole is a sequence of nodes formed by concatenating the results of each of the instructions and literal results nodes that it contains, in the order that they appear in the content constructor. The resulting nodes are typically attached as children to an element or document node constructed by the instruction that contains the content constructor, thus forming a tree. During this process, adjacent text nodes will be merged into a single text node. When a content constructor is evaluated to create new nodes, the tree to which these nodes are added is referred to as the current result tree. When the transformation is initiated, a result tree is created, and becomes the current result tree. This tree is referred to as the principal result tree. Various XSLT instructions (including xsl:variable and xsl:result-document) establish a new current result tree for the nodes created by the content constructor that they contain.

The elements occurring within a content constructor are classified as being either literal result elements or instructions. If the element is in the XSLT namespace, or in a namespace designated as an extension namespace, then it is an instruction. Otherwise, it is a literal result element.

Instructions that select nodes from the source document, or that derive information from these nodes for inclusion in the result document, always access the source tree by means of an Expression in the XPath language, described in [XPath 2.0]. A stylesheet written to use XSLT 2.0 will contain expressions whose syntax and semantics are defined by XPath 2.0 (but see also [3.6 Backwards-Compatible Processing] and [3.7 Forwards-Compatible Processing]).

2.5 Maintaining Position: the Focus

When a content constructor is evaluated, the processor keeps track of which nodes are being processed by means of a set of implicit variables referred to collectively as the focus. More specifically, the focus consists of the following three values:

If the context item is a node (as distinct from an atomic value such as an integer), then it is also referred to as the context node. The context node is not an independent variable, it changes whenever the context item changes. When the context item is an atomic value, there is no context node: its value is an empty sequence. The context node is returned by the XPath expression self::node(), and it is used as the starting node for all relative path expressions.

The current function can be used within any XPath expression to select the item that was supplied as the context item to the XPath expression by the XSLT processor; unlike . this is unaffected by changes to the context item that occur within the XPath expression. The current function is described in [16.5.1 current()].

On completion of an instruction which changes the focus (such as xsl:apply-templates or xsl:for-each), the focus reverts to its previous value.

When a stylesheet function is called, the focus within the body of the function is initially undefined. [ERR005] When the focus is undefined, evaluation of any expression that references the context item, context position, or context size results in a dynamic error. The processor must signal the error.

The description above gives an outline of the way the focus works. Detailed rules for the effect of each instruction are given separately with the description of that instruction. In the absence of specific rules, an instruction uses the same focus as its parent instruction.

Sometimes the focus is based on a single node rather than a sequence. A singleton focus based on a node N has the context item (and therefore the context node) set to N, the context document set to the document containing N, and the context position and context size both set to 1 (one).

In addition to the values that make up the focus, an XSLT processor maintains a number of other internal variables that reflect aspects of the evaluation context. These variables are fully described in the sections of the specification that maintain and use these variables. They are:

As with the focus, these variables are not accessible within a stylesheet function unless they have been initialized within that function.

2.6 Parsing and Serialization

An XSLT stylesheet describes a process that constructs a set of result trees from a set of source trees.

The stylesheet does not describe how a source tree is constructed. Frequently an implementation will operate in conjunction with an XML parser (or more strictly, in the terminology of [XML], an XML processor), to build the source tree from an input XML document. An implementation may also provide an application programming interface allowing the tree to be constructed directly, or allowing it to be supplied in the form of a DOM Document object (see [DOM2]). This is outside the scope of this specification. Users should be aware, however, that since the input to the transformation is a tree conforming to the XPath data model as described in [Data Model], constructs that might exist in the original XML document, or in the DOM, but which are not within the scope of the data model, cannot be processed by the stylesheet and cannot be guaranteed to remain unchanged in the transformation output. Such constructs include CDATA section boundaries, the use of entity references, and the DOCTYPE declaration and internal DTD subset.

A frequent requirement is to output the result tree as an XML document (or in other formats such as HTML). This process is referred to as serialization. Like parsing, serialization is not part of the transformation process, and it is not required that an XSLT processor should be able to perform serialization. However, for pragmatic reasons, this specification describes a declaration (the xsl:output element, see [20 Serialization]) which allows a stylesheet to specify the desired properties of a serialized output file. Implementations that do not serialize the result tree are allowed to ignore this declaration.

Because it is a common requirement to perform a transformation on a document while retaining lexical characteristics such as CDATA section boundaries, entity references, and the like, a non-normative appendix to this specification (see [G Representation of Lexical XML Constructs]) describes a way in which these constructs can be represented within the data model by means of elements in a special namespace. If such a representation is chosen, the tree is transformed in the same way as any other tree. The process of constructing such a tree is something that happens before XSLT transformation starts, and the process of interpreting such a tree and reconstituting the lexical representation is part of the serialization process. Neither of these processes is properly within the scope of XSLT transformation, and therefore, this specification places no requirement on an XSLT processor to support this representation of lexical properties.

2.7 Extensibility

XSLT provides two hooks for extending the language, one hook for extending the set of instruction elements used in content constructors and one hook for extending the set of functions used in XPath expressions. These hooks are both based on XML namespaces: see [18 Extensibility and Fallback] for further details. Extension instructions and extension functions defined according to these rules may be provided by the implementor of the XSLT processor, and the implementor may also provide facilities to allow users to create further extension instructions and extension functions. This specification defines how extension instructions and extension functions are invoked, but the facilities for creating new extension instructions and extension functions are implementation-defined.

2.8 Stylesheets and Schemas

An XSLT stylesheet can make use of information from XML Schemas, as defined in [XML Schema]. An XSLT transformation can take place in the absence of a schema (and, indeed, in the absence of a DTD), but where the source document has undergone schema validity assessment, the XSLT processor has access to the type information associated with individual nodes, not merely to the raw text.

Ed. Note: The XSL Working Group intends to define a conformance level for XSLT processors in which schema processing, and handling of user-defined types, is not a requirement. The precise rules for such a processor (for example, the question of whether it should ignore type-related constructs in the stylesheet or should signal them as an error) have yet to be defined.

There are places within a stylesheet, and within XPath expressions and patterns with a stylesheet, where the names of schema-defined elements, attributes, and named types may appear. For example, it is possible to declare the types expected for the parameters of a function. The element, attribute, and type names that appear in such contexts must either be built-in schema types (for example xs:string or xs:integer), or they must be user-defined types that are made accessible to the XSLT processor by means of an xsl:import-schema declaration: see [3.10 Importing Schema Components].

It is only necessary to import a schema explicitly if its type definitions are mentioned statically in the stylesheet; it is not necessary to import a schema merely because the stylesheet is used to process a source document that has been assessed against that schema. It is possible to make use of the information resulting from schema assessment (for example, the fact that a particular attribute holds a date) even if no schema has been imported by the stylesheet.

Further, importing a schema does not of itself say anything about the type of the source document that the stylesheet is expected to process. The imported type definitions can be used for temporary nodes or for nodes on the result tree just as much as for nodes on the principal source document.

Issue 106 (assert-source-document-type): How should a stylesheet assert the schema type of the source documents that it is designed to process?

A stylesheet can also control the types of nodes that it constructs in a final result tree, or in temporary trees. In the case of temporary trees, this enables the tree to be processed in the same way as a source document that has undergone schema assessment. In the case of a final result tree, it enables the result tree to be passed to further processes (including further XSLT transformations) with its type information intact.

Where a stylesheet author chooses to make assertions about the types of nodes or of variables and parameters, it is possible for an XSLT processor to perform static analysis of the stylesheet (that is, analysis in the absence of any source document). Such analysis may reveal errors that would otherwise not be discovered until the transformation is actually executed. An XSLT processor is not required to perform such static type-checking, and if it does perform such checking, any errors reported are advisory only: the user must be given the option to use the stylesheet even if static analysis has revealed type errors.

Type annotations can be created in nodes of the result tree, or of a temporary tree, in a number of ways. Firstly, it is possible to request validation of the complete tree. Validation may be either strict or lax, and is performed according to the rules defined in [XML Schema]: if validation fails, the transformation fails, but if it succeeds, the element and attribute nodes of the tree will be annotated with the names of the schema-defined types to which these nodes conform, and the typed value of the nodes will be accessible using the data function. Secondly, it is possible to add annotations to individual element and attribute nodes as they are constructed. This is done using the type-annotation attribute of the xsl:element and xsl:attribute instructions, or the xsl:type-annotation attribute of a literal result element. This is permitted only for elements that have simple content. In addition, type annotations may be copied from a source tree to a result tree when using the xsl:copy-of instruction. Type annotations attached to individual nodes in this way will only be retained in the completed tree if the tree construction element (for example, xsl:variable or xsl:result-document) specifies type-information="preserve".

2.9 Error Handling

An error that is detected by examining a stylesheet before execution starts (that is, before the source document and values of stylesheet parameters are available) is referred to as a static error. Errors classified in this specification as static errors must be signaled by all implementations: that is, the processor must indicate that the error is present, and it must not use the stylesheet to produce a result tree. A static error must be signaled even if it occurs in a part of the stylesheet that is never evaluated.

There is an exception to this rule when the stylesheet specifies forwards-compatible behavior (see [3.7 Forwards-Compatible Processing]).

Generally, errors in the structure of the stylesheet, or in the syntax of XPath expressions contained in the stylesheet, are classified as static errors. Where this specification states that an element in the stylesheet must or must not appear in a certain position, or that it must or must not have a particular attribute, or that an attribute must or must not have a value satisfying specified conditions, then any contravention of this rule is a static error unless otherwise specified.

An error that is not detected until a source document is being transformed is referred to as a dynamic error. In many cases, this specification allows dynamic errors to be signaled (by reporting the error condition and terminating execution), but also defines a recovery action that can be taken. It is implementation-defined whether the error is signaled or the recovery action is taken. If the implementation does choose to take recovery action, it must take the recovery action defined in this specification.

When the implementation makes the choice between signaling a dynamic error or recovering, it is not restricted in how it makes the choice; for example, it may provide options that can be set by the user. When an implementation chooses to recover from a dynamic error, it is also allowed to take other action, such as logging a warning message.

Because different implementations may optimize execution of the stylesheet in different ways, the detection of dynamic errors is to some degree implementation-dependent. In cases where an implementation is able to produce the result tree without evaluating a particular construct, the implementation is never required to evaluate that construct solely in order to determine whether doing so causes a dynamic error. For example, if a variable is declared but never referenced, an implementation can choose whether or not to evaluate the variable declaration, which means that if evaluating the variable declaration causes a dynamic error, some implementations will signal this error and others will not.

There are some cases where this specification requires that a construct must not be evaluated: for example, the content of an xsl:if instruction must not be evaluated if the test condition is false. This means that an implementation must not report any dynamic errors that would arise if the construct were evaluated.

An implementation may signal a dynamic error before any source document is available, but only if it can determine that the error would be signaled for every possible source document and every possible set of parameter values. For example, some circularity errors fall into this category: see [9.4 Circular Definitions].

Certain errors are classified as type errors. A type error occurs when the value supplied as input to an operation is of the wrong type for that operation, for example when an integer is supplied to an operation that expects a node. If a type error occurs in an instruction that is actually evaluated, then it must be reported as a dynamic error. An implementation may also, optionally, report a type error as a static error, even if it occurs in part of the stylesheet that is never evaluated, provided it can establish that execution of a particular construct would never succeed.

It is implementation-defined whether type errors are reported statically.

For example, the following construct contains a type error, because 42 is not allowed as an operand of the xsl:apply-templates instruction. An implementation may optionally report this as a static error, even though the offending instruction will never be evaluated, and the type error would therefore never be reported as a dynamic error.

<xsl:if test="false()">
  <xsl:apply-templates select="42"/>
</xsl:if>

If more than one error arises, an implementation is not required to signal any errors other than the first one that it detects. It is implementation-dependent which of the several errors is signaled. This applies both to static errors and to dynamic errors. An implementation is allowed to signal more than one error, but if any errors have been signaled, it must not finish as if the transformation were successful.

When a transformation signals one or more dynamic errors, the final state of any persistent resources updated by the transformation is implementation-dependent. Implementations are not required to restore such resources to their initial state. In particular, where a transformation produces multiple result documents, it is possible that one or more result documents may be written successfully before the transformation terminates, but the application cannot rely on this behavior.

Everything said above about error handling applies equally to errors in evaluating XSLT instructions, and errors in evaluating XPath expressions. Static errors and dynamic errors may occur in both cases.

If a transformation has successfully produced a result tree, it is still possible that errors may occur in serializing the result tree. For example, it may be impossible to serialize the result tree using the encoding selected by the user. Such an error is referred to as a serialization error. As with other aspects of serialization, the handling of serialization errors is implementation-defined: see [20 Serialization].

3 Stylesheet Structure

A stylesheet consists of one or more stylesheet modules, each one forming all or part of a well-formed XML document. There are three kinds of stylesheet module:

A stylesheet module is either a standard stylesheet module or a simplified stylesheet module:

Both forms of stylesheet module (standard and simplified) can exist either as an entire XML document, or embedded as part of another XML document, typically a source document that is to be processed using the stylesheet. An embedded stylesheet module is a stylesheet module that is embedded within another XML document, typically the source document that is being transformed. (see [3.9 Embedded Stylesheet Modules]).

3.1 XSLT Namespace

The XSLT namespace has the URI http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform. It is used to identify elements, attributes, and other names that have a special meaning defined in this specification.

NOTE: The 1999 in the URI indicates the year in which the URI was allocated by the W3C. It does not indicate the version of XSLT being used, which is specified by attributes (see [3.4 Stylesheet Element] and [3.5 Simplified Stylesheet Modules]).

XSLT processors must use the XML namespaces mechanism [XML Names] to recognize elements and attributes from this namespace. Elements from the XSLT namespace are recognized only in the stylesheet and not in the source document. The complete list of XSLT-defined elements is specified in [C Element Syntax Summary]. Implementations must not extend the XSLT namespace with additional elements or attributes. Instead, any extension must be in a separate namespace. Any namespace that is used for additional instruction elements must be identified by means of the extension instruction mechanism specified in [18.2 Extension Instructions].

This specification uses a prefix of xsl: for referring to elements in the XSLT namespace. However, XSLT stylesheets are free to use any prefix, provided that there is a namespace declaration that binds the prefix to the URI of the XSLT namespace.

An element from the XSLT namespace may have any attribute not from the XSLT namespace, provided that the expanded-QName (see [XPath 2.0]) of the attribute has a non-null namespace URI. The presence of such attributes must not change the behavior of XSLT elements and functions defined in this document or in the XPath specification, though they may be used to modify the behavior of extension functions and extension instructions. Thus, an implementation is always free to ignore such attributes, and must ignore such attributes without giving an error if it does not recognize the namespace URI. Such attributes can provide, for example, unique identifiers, optimization hints, or documentation. The set of namespaces that are recognized for such attributes is implementation-defined.

Ed. Note: We refer to a node (or a name) that is not in any namespace as "having a null namespace URI". This is not the terminology of the Namespaces in XML Recommendation, nor of the Data Model.

 

For example, the following code might be used to indicate to a particular implementation that the xsl:message instruction is to ask the user for confirmation before continuing with the transformation:

<xsl:message
    abc:pause="yes"
    xmlns:abc="http://vendor.example.com/xslt/extensions">Phase 1 complete</xsl:message>

Implementations that do not recognize the namespace http://vendor.example.com/xslt/extensions will simply ignore the extra attribute, and evaluate the xsl:message instruction in the normal way.

 

[ERR006] It is a static error for an element from the XSLT namespace to have an attribute whose namespace is either null (i.e. an attribute with an unprefixed name) or the XSLT namespace, other than attributes defined for the element in this document.

NOTE: The conventions used for the names of XSLT elements, attributes and functions are that names are all lower-case, use hyphens to separate words, and use abbreviations only if they already appear in the syntax of a related language such as XML or HTML. Names of types defined in XML Schema however, are regarded as single words and are capitalized exactly as in XML Schema. This sometimes leads to composite function names such as current-dateTime.

The XSLT namespace, together with certain other namespaces recognized by an XSLT processor, are classified as reserved namespaces and may be used only as specified in this and related specifications. The reserved namespaces are those listed below.

Reserved namespaces may be used without restriction to refer to the names of elements and attributes in source documents and result documents. As far as the XSLT processor is concerned, reserved namespaces other than the XSLT namespace may be used without restriction in the names of literal result elements and user-defined data elements, and in the names of attributes of literal result elements or of XSLT instructions: but other processors may impose restrictions or attach special meaning to them. Reserved namespaces must not be used, however, in the names of stylesheet-defined objects such as variables and functions.

[ERR007] It is a static error to use a reserved namespace in the name of a named template, a mode, an attribute set, a key (see [16.3.2 The key Function]), a named sort specification, a decimal-format, a variable or parameter (see [9 Variables and Parameters]), a stylesheet function, or a named output definition.

Implementations may reserve additional namespaces for use by the implementation, provided they follow accepted practice to avoid naming collisions. The set of such namespaces is implementation-defined.

Future versions of this specification may reserve additional namespaces starting with http://www.w3.org/.

3.2 XSLT Media Type

The MIME media types text/xml and application/xml [RFC2376] should be used for XSLT stylesheets. It is possible that a media type will be registered specifically for XSLT stylesheets; if and when it is, that media type may also be used.

Issue 138 (xslt-media-type): We may need to define an XSLT media type after all: see the TAG decision at http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/0129-mime

3.3 Standard Attributes

There are a number of standard attributes that may appear on any XSLT element: specifically version, exclude-prefixes, exclude-result-prefixes, extension-element-prefixes, and default-xpath-namespace.

These attributes may also appear on a literal result element, but in this case, to distinguish them from user-defined attributes, the names of the attributes are in the XSLT namespace. They are thus typically written as xsl:version, xsl:exclude-result-prefixes, exclude-prefixes, xsl:extension-element-prefixes, or xsl:default-xpath-namespace.

It is recommended that these attributes should also be permitted on extension instructions, but this is at the discretion of the implementor of each extension instruction. They may also be permitted on user-defined data elements, though they will only have any useful effect in the case of data elements that are designed to behave like XSLT declarations or instructions.

In the following descriptions, these attributes are referred to generically as [xsl:]version, and so on.

These attributes all affect the element they appear on, and any descendant elements of the element they appear on, together with attributes of those descendant elements. The two forms with and without the XSLT namespace have the same effect; the XSLT namespace is used for the attribute if and only if its parent element is not in the XSLT namespace.

In the case of [xsl:]version and [xsl:]default-xpath-namespace the value can be overridden by a different value for the same attribute appearing on a descendant element. The effective value of the attribute for a particular stylesheet element is determined by the innermost containing element on which the attribute appears.

In the case of [xsl:]exclude-result-prefixes, exclude-prefixes, and [xsl:]extension-element-prefixes the values are cumulative. For these attributes, the value may be given as a whitespace-separated list of namespace prefixes, and the effective value for an element is the combined set of namespace URIs designated by the prefixes that appear in this attribute for that element and any of its ancestor elements. Again, the two forms with and without the XSLT namespace are equivalent.

Because these attributes may appear on any XSLT element, they are not listed in the syntax summary of each individual element. Instead they are listed and described in the description of the xsl:stylesheet and xsl:transform elements only. This reflects the fact that these attributes are often used on the xsl:stylesheet element, in which case they apply to the entire stylesheet module.

Note that the effect of these attributes does not extend to stylesheet modules referenced by xsl:include or xsl:import declarations.

For the detailed effect of each attribute, see the following sections:

Issue 128 (version-on-xsl-output): Allowing version as a standard attribute on any XSL element, to indicate backwards or forwards compatibility resquirements, conflicts with its existing use on the xsl:output element. See also issue 122.

Ed. Note: The XSL Working Group has decided in principle to impose restrictions in the ability to mix different version attributes on different elements in a stylesheet. The form of these restrictions has yet to be decided.

3.4 Stylesheet Element

<xsl:stylesheet
  id = id
  extension-element-prefixes = tokens
  exclude-result-prefixes = tokens
  exclude-prefixes = tokens
  version = number
  default-xpath-namespace = uri>
  <!-- Content: (xsl:import*, top-level-elements) -->
</xsl:stylesheet>

<xsl:transform
  id = id
  extension-element-prefixes = tokens
  exclude-result-prefixes = tokens
  exclude-prefixes = tokens
  version = number
  default-xpath-namespace = uri>
  <!-- Content: (xsl:import*, top-level-elements) -->
</xsl:transform>

A stylesheet module is represented by an xsl:stylesheet element in an XML document. xsl:transform is allowed as a synonym for xsl:stylesheet; everything this specification says about the xsl:stylesheet element applies equally to xsl:transform.

[ERR008] An xsl:stylesheet element must have a version attribute, indicating the version of XSLT that the stylesheet requires. [ERR009] The value of the version attribute must be a number (specifically, it must be a DecimalLiteral as defined in [XPath 2.0].) For this version of XSLT, the value should normally be 2.0. When the value is less than 2.0, backwards-compatible processing behavior is enabled (see [3.6 Backwards-Compatible Processing]). When the value is greater than 2.0, forwards-compatible behavior is enabled (see [3.7 Forwards-Compatible Processing]).

[ERR010] An xsl:stylesheet element must have no text node children, other than text nodes consisting entirely of whitespace.

An element occurring as a child of an xsl:stylesheet element is called a top-level element.

Top-level elements fall into two categories: declarations, and user-defined data elements. Top-level elements whose names are in the XSLT namespace are declarations. Top-level elements in any other namespace are user-defined data elements (see [3.4.1 User-defined Data Elements])

The xsl:stylesheet element may contain the following types of declaration:

If there are xsl:import elements, these must come before any other elements. Apart from this, the child elements of the xsl:stylesheet element may appear in any order. The ordering of these elements does not affect the results of the transformation unless there are conflicting declarations (for example, two template rules with the same priority that match the same node). In general, it is an error for a stylesheet to contain such conflicting declarations, but in some cases the processor is allowed to recover from the error by choosing the declaration that appears last in the stylesheet.

3.4.1 User-defined Data Elements

In addition to declarations, the xsl:stylesheet element may contain any element not from the XSLT namespace, provided that the expanded-QName of the element has a non-null namespace URI. Such elements are referred to as user-defined data elements. [ERR011] It is a static error if the xsl:stylesheet element has a child element having a null namespace URI.

An implementation may attach meaning to user-defined data elements that appear in a namespace controlled by the vendor. The presence of a user-defined data element must not change the behavior of XSLT elements and functions defined in this document; for example, it is not permitted for a user-defined data element to specify that xsl:apply-templates should use different rules to resolve conflicts. Thus, an implementation is always free to ignore user-defined data elements, and must ignore such data elements without giving an error if it does not recognize the namespace URI. The set of namespaces that are recognized for such data elements is implementation-defined.

User-defined data elements can provide, for example,

[ERR012] A user-defined data element must not precede an xsl:import element within a stylesheet module.

3.5 Simplified Stylesheet Modules

A simplified syntax is allowed for a stylesheet module that defines only a single template rule for the document node. The stylesheet module may consist of just a literal result element (see [11.1 Literal Result Elements]) together with its contents. Such a stylesheet is equivalent to a standard stylesheet module whose xsl:stylesheet element contains a template rule containing the literal result element; the template rule has a match pattern of /.

For example:

<html xsl:version="2.0"
      xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
      xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
  <head>
    <title>Expense Report Summary</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Total Amount: <xsl:value-of select="expense-report/total"/></p>
  </body>
</html>

has the same meaning as

<xsl:stylesheet version="2.0"
                xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
                xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<xsl:template match="/">
<html>
  <head>
    <title>Expense Report Summary</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Total Amount: <xsl:value-of select="expense-report/total"/></p>
  </body>
</html>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>

More formally, a simplified stylesheet module is equivalent to the standard stylesheet module that would be generated by applying the following transformation to the simplified stylesheet module, invoking the transformation by calling the named template expand, with the containing literal result element as the context node:

<xsl:stylesheet version="2.0"
                xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">

<xsl:template name="expand">
  <xsl:element name="xsl:stylesheet">
    <xsl:attribute name="version">
      <xsl:value-of select="@xsl:version"/>
    </xsl:attribute>
    <xsl:element name="xsl:template">
      <xsl:attribute name="match">/</xsl:attribute>
      <xsl:copy-of select="."/>
    </xsl:element>
  </xsl:element>
</xsl:template>  

</xsl:stylesheet>

If the outermost element of the simplified stylesheet is not the document element, then in the above transformation the attribute match="/*" must be replaced by a pattern than matches this outermost element. Note that if the element has an ID attribute to enable it to be selected (for example in the fragment identifier of a URI reference), then this ID attribute will be copied to the result document in the same way as other attributes of a literal result element.

[ERR013] A literal result element that is used as the outermost element of a simplified stylesheet module must have an xsl:version attribute. This indicates the version of XSLT that the stylesheet requires. For this version of XSLT, the value should normally be 2.0; the value must be a DecimalLiteral as defined in [XPath 2.0].

Other literal result elements may also have an xsl:version attribute. When the xsl:version attribute is numerically less than 2.0, backwards-compatible processing behavior is enabled (see [3.6 Backwards-Compatible Processing]). When the xsl:version attribute is numerically greater than 2.0, forwards-compatible behavior is enabled (see [3.7 Forwards-Compatible Processing]).

The allowed content of a literal result element when used as a simplified stylesheet is the same as when it occurs within a content constructor. Thus, a literal result element used as the document element of a simplified stylesheet cannot contain declarations.

3.6 Backwards-Compatible Processing

An element enables backwards-compatible behavior for itself, its attributes, its descendants and their attributes if either it has an [xsl:]version attribute (see [3.3 Standard Attributes]) whose value is less than 2.0. An element that has an [xsl:]version attribute whose value is greater than or equal to 2.0 disables backwards-compatible behavior for itself, its attributes, its descendants and their attributes. The compatibility behavior established by an element overrides any compatibility behavior established by an ancestor element.

If an attribute containing an XPath expression is processed with backwards-compatible behavior, then:

Issue 122 (mixing-versions): Mixing version 1.0 and version 2.0 code in the same stylesheet has considerable complications. We probably need to be more restrictive than we are here.

It is implementation-defined whether a particular XSLT 2.0 implementation supports backwards-compatible behavior. [ERR015] If an implementation does not support backwards-compatible behavior, then it is a dynamic error if any element is evaluated that enables backwards-compatible behavior. The processor must signal the error.

3.7 Forwards-Compatible Processing

An element enables forwards-compatible behavior for itself, its attributes, its descendants and their attributes if it has an [xsl:]version attribute (see [3.3 Standard Attributes]) whose value is greater than 2.0. An element that has an [xsl:]version attribute whose value is less than or equal to 2.0 disables forwards-compatible behavior for itself, its attributes, its descendants and their attributes. The compatibility behavior established by an element overrides any compatibility behavior established by an ancestor element.

Within a section of a stylesheet where forwards-compatible behavior is enabled, errors that would normally be static errors are treated instead as dynamic errors. This means that no error is reported unless the construct containing the error is actually evaluated.

This means, for example, that when an element is processed with forwards-compatible behavior:

Thus, any XSLT 2.0 processor must be able to process the following stylesheet without error, although the stylesheet includes elements from the XSLT namespace that are not defined in this specification:

<xsl:stylesheet version="17.0"
                xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
  <xsl:template match="/">
    <xsl:choose>
      <xsl:when test="system-property('xsl:version') >= 17.0">
        <xsl:exciting-new-17.0-feature/>
      </xsl:when>
      <xsl:otherwise>
        <html>
        <head>
          <title>XSLT 17.0 required</title>
        </head>
        <body>
          <p>Sorry, this stylesheet requires XSLT 17.0.</p>
        </body>
        </html>
      </xsl:otherwise>
    </xsl:choose>
  </xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
NOTE: If a stylesheet depends crucially on a declaration introduced by a version of XSLT after 2.0, then the stylesheet can use an xsl:message element with terminate="yes" (see [17 Messages]) to ensure that implementations that conform to an earlier version of XSLT will not silently ignore the declaration.

For example,

<xsl:stylesheet version="18.0"
                xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">

  <xsl:important-new-17.0-declaration/>

  <xsl:template match="/">
    <xsl:choose>
      <xsl:when test="system-property('xsl:version') < 17.0">
        <xsl:message terminate="yes">
          <xsl:text>Sorry, this stylesheet requires XSLT 17.0.</xsl:text>
        </xsl:message>
      </xsl:when>
      <xsl:otherwise>
        ...
      </xsl:otherwise>
    </xsl:choose>
  </xsl:template>
  ...
</xsl:stylesheet>

3.8 Combining Stylesheet Modules

XSLT provides two mechanisms to construct a stylesheet from multiple stylesheet modules:

3.8.1 Stylesheet Inclusion

<!-- Category: declaration -->
<xsl:include
  href = uri-reference />

A stylesheet module may include another stylesheet module using an xsl:include declaration. The xsl:include declaration has an href attribute whose value is a URI reference identifying the stylesheet module to be included. A relative URI is resolved relative to the base URI of the xsl:include declaration (see [Data Model]).

It is implementation-defined whether the URI reference may include a fragment identifier, and if so, what form of fragment identifier is supported. A future version of XSLT may define rules for the use of fragment identifiers in the URI reference, for example by reference to the XPointer specification (see [XPointer]). Note that if the implementation does not support the use of fragment identifiers in the URI reference, then it will not be possible to include an embedded stylesheet module.

The included stylesheet module may be either a standard stylesheet module or a a simplified stylesheet module. It may be a complete XML document, or (if referenced using a suitable fragment identifier) it may be an embedded stylesheet module.

[ERR016] The xsl:include element is allowed only as a top-level element.

A stylesheet level is a collection of stylesheet modules connected using xsl:include declarations: specifically, two stylesheet modules A and B are part of the same stylesheet level if one of them includes the other by means of an xsl:include declaration, or if there is a third stylesheet module C that is in the same stylesheet level as both A and B.

The declarations within a stylesheet level have a total ordering known as declaration order. The order of declarations within a stylesheet level is the same as the document order that would result if each stylesheet module were inserted textually in place of the xsl:include element that references it. In other respects, however, the effect of xsl:include is not equivalent to the effect that would be obtained by textual inclusion.

[ERR017] It is an static error if a stylesheet module directly or indirectly includes itself.

NOTE: It is not intrinsically an error for a stylesheet to include the same module more than once. However, doing so can cause errors because of duplicate definitions. Such multiple inclusions are less obvious when they are indirect. For example, if stylesheet B includes stylesheet A, stylesheet C includes stylesheet A, and stylesheet D includes both stylesheet B and stylesheet C, then A will be included indirectly by D twice. If all of B, C and D are used as independent stylesheets, then the error can be avoided by separating everything in B other than the inclusion of A into a separate stylesheet B' and changing B to contain just inclusions of B' and A, similarly for C, and then changing D to include A, B', C'.

3.8.2 Stylesheet Import

<!-- Category: declaration -->
<xsl:import
  href = uri-reference />

A stylesheet module may import another stylesheet module using an xsl:import declaration. Importing a stylesheet is the same as including it (see [3.8.1 Stylesheet Inclusion]) except that template rules and other declarations in the importing stylesheet take precedence over template rules and declarations in the imported stylesheet; this is described in more detail below. The xsl:import declaration has an href attribute whose value is a URI reference identifying the stylesheet to be imported. A relative URI is resolved relative to the base URI of the xsl:import element (see [Data Model]).

It is implementation-defined whether the URI reference may include a fragment identifier, and if so, what form of fragment identifier is supported. A future version of XSLT may define rules for the use of fragment identifiers in the URI reference, for example by reference to the XPointer specification (see [XPointer]). Note that if the implementation does not support the use of fragment identifiers in the URI reference, then it will not be possible to import an embedded stylesheet module.

The imported stylesheet module may be either a standard stylesheet module or a a simplified stylesheet module. It may be a complete XML document, or (if referenced using a suitable fragment identifier) it may be an embedded stylesheet module.

[ERR018] The xsl:import declaration is allowed only as a top-level element. [ERR019] The xsl:import element children must precede all other element children of an xsl:stylesheet element, including any xsl:include element children and any user-defined data elements.

For example,

<xsl:stylesheet version="2.0"
                xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
  <xsl:import href="article.xsl"/>
  <xsl:import href="bigfont.xsl"/>
  <xsl:attribute-set name="note-style">
    <xsl:attribute name="font-style">italic</xsl:attribute>
  </xsl:attribute-set>
</xsl:stylesheet>

The stylesheet levels making up a stylesheet are treated as forming an import tree. In the import tree, each stylesheet level has one child for each xsl:import declaration that it contains. The ordering of the children is the declaration order of the xsl:import declarations within their stylesheet level. A declaration D in the stylesheet is defined to have lower import precedence than another declaration E if the stylesheet level containing D would be visited before the stylesheet level containing E in a post-order traversal of the import tree (that is, a traversal of the import tree in which a stylesheet level is visited after its children). Two declarations within the same stylesheet level have the same import precedence.

For example, suppose

  • stylesheet module A imports stylesheet modules B and C in that order;

  • stylesheet module B imports stylesheet module D;

  • stylesheet module C imports stylesheet module E.

Then the import tree has the following structure:

         A
         |
     +---+---+
     |       |
     B       C
     |       |
     D       E

The order of import precedence (lowest first) is D, B, E, C, A.

In general, a declaration with higher import precedence takes precedence over a declaration with lower import precedence. This is defined in detail for each kind of declaration.

[ERR020] It is a static error if a stylesheet module directly or indirectly imports itself.

NOTE: The case where a stylesheet with a particular URI is imported in multiple places is not treated specially. The resulting stylesheet will contain multiple declarations that are identical in content but that differ in their import precedence.

3.9 Embedded Stylesheet Modules

A standard stylesheet module is a complete XML document with the xsl:stylesheet element as its document element. However, a stylesheet module may also be embedded in another resource. Two forms of embedding are possible:

To facilitate the second form of embedding, the xsl:stylesheet element is allowed to have an ID attribute that specifies a unique identifier.

NOTE: In order for such an attribute to be used with the XPath id function, it must actually be declared in the DTD or schema as being of type ID. The same requirement typically applies if the identifier is to be used as a fragment identifier in a URI reference.

The following example shows how the xml-stylesheet processing instruction (see [XML Stylesheet]) can be used to allow a source document to contain its own stylesheet. The URI reference uses a relative URI with a fragment identifier to locate the xsl:stylesheet element:

<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xml" href="#style1"?>
<!DOCTYPE doc SYSTEM "doc.dtd">
<doc>
<head>
<xsl:stylesheet id="style1"
                version="2.0"
                xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
                xmlns:fo="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format">
<xsl:import href="doc.xsl"/>
<xsl:template match="id('foo')">
  <fo:block font-weight="bold"><xsl:apply-templates/></fo:block>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="xsl:stylesheet">
  <!-- ignore -->
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
</head>
<body>
<para id="foo">
...
</para>
</body>
</doc>
NOTE: A stylesheet module that is embedded in the document to which it is to be applied or that may be included or imported into a stylesheet that is so embedded typically needs to contain a template rule that specifies that xsl:stylesheet elements are to be ignored.
NOTE: The above example uses the pseudo-attribute type="text/xml" in the xml-stylesheet processing instruction to denote an XSLT stylesheet. This usage was defined provisionally in XSLT 1.0, and is subject to change. In the absence of a registered media type for XSLT stylesheets, some vendors' products have adopted different conventions, notably type="text/xsl".
NOTE: Support for the xml-stylesheet processing instruction is not a requirement for conformance with this Recommendation.

3.10 Importing Schema Components

<!-- Category: declaration -->
<xsl:import-schema
  namespace = uri-reference
  schema-location = uri-reference />

The xsl:import-schema declaration is used to identify schema components (that is, definitions of types) which need to be available statically, that is, before any source document is available. Every type name used statically within the stylesheet other than the built-in type names defined in XML Schema must be defined in an imported schema. The declaration imports the element and attribute declarations and type definitions from the schema, and maps them to types in the XPath data model according to rules defined in [Formal Semantics].

Ed. Note: The relationship of this document to the Formal Semantics needs to be clarified.

The namespace and schema-location attributes are both optional. At least one of them must be present, and it is permissible to supply both.

The namespace attribute indicates that a schema for the given namespace is required by the stylesheet. This information may be enough on its own to enable an implementation to locate the required schema components.

The schema-location attribute gives the URI of a location where a schema document or other resource containing the required definitions may be found. An XSLT processor must have the capability to process an XML Schema that exists at this location in the form of a source XML document; implementations may also be able to access equivalent information held in other forms, for example a compiled XML Schema, or type information expressed using some other schema language.

[ERR021] It is a static error if the processor is not able to locate a schema using the namespace and/or schema-location attributes , or if the document that it locates is neither a valid XML Schema nor any other resource that the implementation can process.

[ERR022] It is a static error if two xsl:import-schema declarations yield multiple definitions for the same named type, even if the definitions are consistent with each other.

The use of a namespace in an xsl:import-schema declaration does not by itself make the namespace available for use in the stylesheet. If names from the namespace are used within the stylesheet, a prefix must be associated with the namespace by means of a namespace declaration, in the normal way.

The precise way in which an implementation uses the namespace and/or schema-location attributes to locate schema definitions is implementation-defined.

Issue 125 (schema-conformance): We need to describe a conformance level that does not require schema support.

4 Data Model

The data model used by XSLT is the XPath 2.0 and XQuery 1.0 data model, as defined in [Data Model], with the additions described in this section. XSLT operates on source, result and stylesheet documents using the same data model.

Some of the sections below describe restrictions to the data model: that is, features of the data model that are never used by XSLT. Some sections describe additions to the data model: that is, information that is required to support XSLT processing, but that is not described in the data model. Other sections describe refinements to the data model, that is,