ISSUE-23: Is 'discontinuous' a better name than 'each-box' in 'background-break'

each-box or discontinuous

Is 'discontinuous' a better name than 'each-box' in 'background-break'

State:

CLOSED

Product:

CSS3 Backgrounds and Borders

Raised by:

Bert Bos

Opened on:

2008-04-04

Description:

The keyword 'each-box' means that background images are sized and positioned in each of the boxes of an element individually: images that do not repeat occur once in every box; images that are resized are resized differently in each of the boxes, etc.

This is contrasted with the keyword 'continuous', which means that all the element's boxes are laid one after the other, the image is tiled and sized over the resulting large area, and then the boxes are put back to where they belong on the page.

Is 'discontinuous' a better keyword than 'each-box'?

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: [css regions] How do regions paginate? (from stearns@adobe.com on 2011-10-20)
2. Re: [css regions] How do regions paginate? (from vhardy@adobe.com on 2011-10-20)
3. Re: [css regions] How do regions paginate? (from stearns@adobe.com on 2011-10-20)
4. Re: [css regions] How do regions paginate? (from vhardy@adobe.com on 2011-10-20)
5. [css3-background] Issues and Proposed Resolutions (from fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net on 2008-05-13)
6. Re: proprietary colors (from dbaron@dbaron.org on 2008-05-12)
7. ISSUE-23 (each-box or discontinuous): Is 'discontinuous' a better name than 'each-box' in 'background-break' [CSS3 Backgrounds and Borders] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-04-04)

Related notes:

Display change log