ISSUE-209: Implementation commitment

Implementation commitment

Raised by:
Richard Ishida
Opened on:
8.5 Directionality, and others

"no implementation commitment is seen for the Directionality data category in ITS 2.0"

It's not at all clear what this means. It could be taken by some to mean that no-one at all is interested in implementing directionality, which is far from true.

Same applies to Ruby section, and presumably others.

[comment not discussed with i18n WG]
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. i18n comments on directionality and ruby - i18n-issue-214 (mlw-lt-track-issue-90), i18n-issue-215 (mlw-lt-track-issue-91), i18n-issue-241 (mlw-lt-track-issue-101) (from on 2013-01-22)
  2. Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD, i18n-ISSUE-209: Implementation commitment (from on 2013-01-16)
  3. I18N-ISSUE-209: Implementation commitment [.prep-ITS-20] (from on 2013-01-16)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log ATOM feed

Addison Phillips <>, Chair, Richard Ishida <>, Fuqiao Xue <>, Atsushi Shimono <>, Staff Contacts
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.326 2018/10/13 17:29:51 vivien Exp $