See also: IRC log
MJ: move the ACT editors meeting and reschedule the regular ACT meeting to Monday 9:00 AM US central time
Wilco: same time but moving to Monday
... will send a seperate email to coordinate the leaders meeting
Wilco: dropped some thoughts on the Test repository, need to figure out what format to use, look at some existing ones that has the most test cases and g from there
<Wilco> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/conformance-testing/wiki/Test_case_repository
Shadi: not seeing much content on the page
MJ: we need to populate this with the content from Auto-WCAG?
Wilco: no Auto-WCAG does not have test case but Vallys, aXe, Level Access, which we can move
<Wilco> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/conformance-testing/wiki/Testing_Resources
MJ: Alistair email has links to test cases
Wilco: will grb that link here
MJ: i added link to Alistair's page
... i have added test procedure from DHS
Wilco: looking if there are examples
... ok the links have code snippets,
... who hosts aria examples?
Shadi: John Gunderson?
... check with Michael how to drag these out from Github
Wilco: will send him an email
... what else is good? is the before and after demo still good?
Shadi: this is real life site like a controlled environment, not test cases
Wilco: Let me think about this
cpandhi: may be add it as additional resource
Shadi: yes that can be done
Wilco: yes we can use it, what other
training material is out there?
... Google released some material
<Wilco> https://webaccessibility.withgoogle.com/course
Shadi: how that would relate to test cases?
Wilco: they usually have best practices and
code snippets
... deque has course work with examples, may be will have to do a doodle
poll
... so did you MJ, Shadi and Charu look at Alistair's mail?
... how about take some time and respond after the meeting
Wilco: thoughts? looking for an efficient way to create this.
Shadi: Quickref, that is interesting, i like the idea
Wilco: can break off based on automated, semi automated and so on
Shadi: yes we can have a swtch in the
quickref
... is there an acceptance criteria? how this relates to test cases and
bench marking?
Wilco: yes that makes sense, the way to do is to every 6 months or twice a year to have a survey and approval?
Shadi: yes that can be additional, but how do we validate that these rules are evaluated and valid
Wilco: We will filter the rules before it goes to AG, and do a bench marking depending on the resources we have for the rules
Shadi: so if we put the bench marking to aside, how do we make it easy for folks who come with a new rule to be valid
Wilco: i suggest we do it with a pull request and the WG can evaluate that based on interpretation
Shadi: i think that is a great approach,
get an agreement with comments
... when a rule comes in, it will be reviewed and then have a survey
Wilco: so yes we will have a paper trail on our agreement
Shadi: as long as we have agreement from the most in the group
Wilco: can come up with some questions
... comformes to our rule format
Shadi: one of the question is to ask, do you approve this rules and intend to implement this rule or have concerns with this rule or do not intend to implement this rule
<Wilco> - Have concerns about the rules - Approve of the rule - Have implemented - Intent to implement
<shadi> +1
<maryjom> +1
Wilco: we can work with the person who
submitted the rule, check out the rule and get the support of the WG
... who is going to lead this
... we have the rules repository, test case repository, benchmark
... Alistair has volunteered to lead the test repository
Shadi: what do you need done, i may have Eric do it
Wilco: i can take one of those, can IBM take one?
Charu: prob Moe, i want to focus on developing the rules
Shadi: do you want to send Eric an email and cc me
Wilco: no i will talk to him first instead
Shadi: The Auto-WCAG, do you have an interface?
Wilco: yes, it is not so great
Shadi: May be after March 19 this can go into Auto-WCAG, do we need a task force?
Wilco: i think the workload will be less, auto-wcag should not be the gate keeper, certailny do not need a task force
Shadi: the reason is community groups are easy to join and we have quite a few
Wilco: They can contribute to rules repository as well as Auto-WCAG WG
Shadi: I am wondering if i should take the
lead, it needs lot of coordinating work
... ok put my name there for this with someone may be
Wilco: ok i will keep that
... The Task force could get disolved once the rules format is done
Shadi: May be we can reuse and bubble up into AG WG
Wilco: a structure like that makes sense
Mary Jo: are we changing the time change next week?
Wilco: good question, yes MJ can you send an email on the time change