See also: IRC log
<r12a> http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open
action-455?
<trackbot> action-455 -- Addison Phillips to Respond to fantasai saying we'll send style info along by next week -- due 2015-07-30 -- CLOSED
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/455
action-445?
<trackbot> action-445 -- Addison Phillips to Check out using a subsetting web font for example chars -- due 2015-06-11 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/445
close action-445
<trackbot> Closed action-445.
action-461?
<trackbot> action-461 -- Richard Ishida to Re-read issue-80 and evaluate whether to reopen as a github issue or not -- due 2015-09-10 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/461
action-476?
<trackbot> action-476 -- Addison Phillips to Write back to media capture saying that we'll continue to work on problem but they can publish in the meantime -- due 2015-10-22 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/476
close action-476
<trackbot> Closed action-476.
close action-480
<trackbot> Closed action-480.
close action-481
<trackbot> Closed action-481.
https://www.w3.org/International/wiki/Review_radar
https://www.w3.org/International/wiki/Project_radar
split out Tibetan LR
<r12a> http://w3c.github.io/tlreq/
richard: rewritten that
document
... waiting for a chinese translation
... can do fwpd then
ruchard: ruby
... there's some discussion between implementers and anne
vk
... implementation of items such as rb and rbc
... vary across browsers
... whatwg didn't help that much
... convergence on html5 definition
... sufficient convergence for webvtt?
richard: bidi
... continuing to talk to implementers about @dir
isolation
... talked to msft
... talked to miles from safari
... koji says chrome will implement if tests exist and other browsers do
... just submitted some tests to the ttwf suite
... anyone to review?
... key item is that bidi expert needed to review
addison: was that your email to winter?
richard: yes
... some tests for rli control and its friends
... anyyone could do it
... look up how reviews are done?
IDN
richard: wiating for david to suggest repo name
<scribe> ACTION: richard: follow up with David S. to get name for repo and set up said repo [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/11/19-i18n-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-482 - Follow up with david s. to get name for repo and set up said repo [on Richard Ishida - due 2015-11-26].
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2015Nov/0014.html
richard: created a whole bunch more tests
<r12a> http://www.w3.org/International/tests/repo/results/encoding-dbl-byte
richard: see above
... big5, euc-jp, euc-kr
... results
... two more to do
... ISO-2022
... and gb18030
... 18030 has a gbk flag
... just write two tests??
... have tests for encoding/decoding that test the
repertoires
... what became clear to me was "big5" wasn't what was formally
defined
... only those codepoints handled by web browsers
... are some big differences
... japanese euc
... can only encode half of the characters you can decode
jis 0208 and jis 0212
scribe: a "good first step" to get browsers doing the same thing
richard: need tests to tests for what happens when things go wrong
jck: kermit did this awhile ago... doyou know frank dacruz
talk about encoding spec in two weeks
richard: went through the
issues
... at tpac with simon
... and again this week
... here's the link
<r12a> http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/openissues/#webvtt1
richard: pulled in some (t)
issues that they came up with
... and the (c) issues I think we can close
<r12a> http://www.w3.org/International/track/issues/436
<scribe> ACTION: addison: review close marked webvtt issues and close if satisfied [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/11/19-i18n-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-483 - Review close marked webvtt issues and close if satisfied [on Addison Phillips - due 2015-11-26].
richard: discussion of ruby model
incomplete
... rb wanted?
... simon mentioned that whatwg doesn't have it
... had a look and don't think it's an issue for rb
... understand not doing rtc or rbrbrbrtrtrt model
addison: I agree with pushing back
<r12a> https://github.com/w3c/presentation-api/issues/218
richard: some concern because
different encodings
... might look weird
... problem might be ideographic characters across
languages
... talked last week, wrote back
... not ideal presentation
... associate language with content when sent
... and that can be used to present
... another person said use accept-language
... but that's really just for saying what you prefer
... not a mechanism for addressing font selection and
such
... wrong tool for the job
addison: it's a lot more work to
do language negotation using a-l and such
... when what we're really doing is allowing a device to send
the language for a given string
... so that it can be displayed as intended
... that's really much simpler
addison: closed almost all open
issues
... take a look