See also: IRC log
LW: We need to clear as many bugs
as possible, either by closing them, moving them to Github if
the part of the spec is handled there, or by assigning them to
the relevant people.
... Adrian Bateman put together this bug breakdown http://github.adrianba.net/webstandards/HTML5-bugs.htm
<SteveF> yes
LW: There are 35 outstanding bugs.
<chaals> s/:(//
LW: Suggest we move to Skype instead of WebX for this call.
SF: It's difficult to actually work on bugs because of the way the spec is generated.
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13550
<chaals> scribe: chaals
SF: The bug should stay open until we can make it happen easily
LW: anything else to do?
RESOLUTION: This is waiting until we can do it easily
<LJWatson> CMN: We'll add a comment to say it's been triaged.
<LJWatson> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13553
<LJWatson> CMN: Will add triage comment.
<LJWatson> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16186
RESOLUTION: 13553 is waiting for the HTML spec to be editable
<LJWatson> CMN: If the target isn't focusable, focus should move to the next focusable element.
<LJWatson> CMN: Will add comment and assign to me.
<LJWatson> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16783
RESOLUTION: 16186
is for chaals to sort out
... 16783 is for Steve to look at when he can edit the
spec.
<LJWatson> SF: Willl look at it and verify the response.
<LJWatson> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18385
<LJWatson> CMN: Is rel=glossary still part of HTML5?
CMN: This is asking for rel="glossary" - is that still valid?
<LJWatson> SF: It's not conforming in HTML5.
<SteveF> http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/links.html#linkTypes
<LJWatson> CMN: Assigned to me.
RESOLUTION: 18385 is for chaals - needs a bunch of pieces to fix
<LJWatson> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19054
SF: Hixie's comment…
<LJWatson> SF: Suggest this could be resolved later.
<LJWatson> CMN: It's a trivial editorial fix.
<LJWatson> CMN: Assigned to me.
<LJWatson> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19159
comment is "waiting for HTML spec to be editable"
<LJWatson> CMN: Adding comment that we'll wait for HTML spec to be editable again.
<LJWatson> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20987
<LJWatson> SF: Will comment that we'll wait for the spec to be editable.
<LJWatson> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20987
<LJWatson> CMN: If there was a header called "TQ", people want to know what TQ stands for.
<LJWatson> LW: Isn't that what abbr is for?
<LJWatson> CMN: No, it's what the title attribute is about. I'll take this one.
<LJWatson> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22050
<LJWatson> LW: This is wider than accessibility.
<LJWatson> CMN: It's editorial.
<LJWatson> SF: It's wider than editorial.
<LJWatson> CMN: We should take accessibility keywords off.
<LJWatson> SF: Ok, done.
<LJWatson> SF: Suggest we won't fix this.
<LJWatson> LW: Do we want to close it?
<LJWatson> SF: Yes.
<LJWatson> CMN: It's probably won't fix for now.
<LJWatson> LW: Agreed.
<LJWatson> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22777
<LJWatson> CMN: Taken that one.
<LJWatson> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22852
<LJWatson> SF: Editorial. I'll take it.
<LJWatson> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22854
<LJWatson> SF: Assigned to me already. Need to wait till spec is editable.
<LJWatson> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23113
<LJWatson> SF: Original bug is marked closed fixed, suggest we do the same here.
<LJWatson> SF: Could ping Silvia?
<LJWatson> SF: Marking it needs info (from Silvia as person who filed bug).
<LJWatson> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23347
<LJWatson> LW: Seems related to keyboard interaction/focus work?
<LJWatson> CMN: Yes. I'll take it.
<LJWatson> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23389
<LJWatson> CMN: Associated with 19159.
<LJWatson> SF: Will link them.
<LJWatson> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23585
<LJWatson> SF: Resolved in WHATWG spec according to Hixie, so will be resolved in W3C spec too.
<LJWatson> LW: Close it?
<LJWatson> CMN: Think we can.
<LJWatson> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23870
<LJWatson> CMN: Web components.
<LJWatson> LW: Should we move it to the WC product?
<LJWatson> CMN: WC isn't handled in Bugzilla. Will assign to me, and move to GH.
<LJWatson> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23871
<LJWatson> CMN: Looks like a feature request.
<LJWatson> CMN: I'll take this one.
<LJWatson> scribenick: LJWatson
<scribe> scribe: LJWatson
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.140 of Date: 2014-11-06 18:16:30 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/apparently not.// FAILED: s/:(// Succeeded: s/:S// Found Scribe: chaals Inferring ScribeNick: chaals Found ScribeNick: LJWatson Found Scribe: LJWatson Inferring ScribeNick: LJWatson Scribes: chaals, LJWatson ScribeNicks: LJWatson, chaals Present: Steve Faulkner LJWatson Chaals Got date from IRC log name: 12 Jun 2015 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2015/06/12-html-a11y-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]