See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 09 April 2015
<LJWatson> scribenick: LJWatson
JS: Items?
https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/open
action-308?
<trackbot> action-308 -- John Foliot to Talk to josh about "discuss hybrid extended/inline case." - expand please -- due 2015-03-02 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/308
JF: Haven't been able to get in touch with Joshue.
action-312?
<trackbot> action-312 -- Léonie Watson to Review bug 27054 and check it's ok -- due 2015-04-02 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/312
LW: It's done, can be closed.
<janina> trackbot, close action-312
<trackbot> Closed action-312.
JS: Doodle poll open for a TF
meet in Europe in June/Jul.
... We need to review work statement that Chaals posted
yesterday, but no CFC.
PC: I ussued the CFC for work statement and CFC procedure to the HTML WG. Don't think you have to wait for anything.
JS: Good.
PC: Thought the TF was going to put out a CFC on the alt texts doc?
JS: Yes, apologies, I dropped the ball on that one.
JS: There will be a meeting in Seattle. Now is the time to co-ordinate/do last minute planning.
PC: Would like to know when the
TF would like to join the Media TF to talk about
transcript.
... Media TF meeting may be finished by Thursday.
JF: Suggest Thurday morning - to give us time to prepare on the Wed, so we don't waste the Media TF's time.
PC: To be safe, I suggest 4pm Wednesday?
JF: Sounds reasonable to me.
+1
PC: I've included all the TF members in my food estimates for Wed and Thu. Guess we should co-ordinate timing for breaks/meals?
CS: Thank you. We're also meeting
Friday, but I can figure that.
... An agenda would be useful, although informal is good.
JS: Useful for remote participation.
CS: Will send out an email.
JS: I had an action to advise the Canvas list about progress, but haven't and it's two weeks old.
RS: Dominic says he has it working, but sent him test results from our failed tests and haven't had a reply.
JS: I will get the action done in the next day or so.
RS: That included hit testing. Firefox was also close, so need to check there too.
PC: Are we confident enough to know whateditorial resources are needed to fix the Level 1 stuff?
RS: There is one tweak we need to make to the draft.
PC: Let's not conflate Last Call publication with getting it perfect.
RS: Ok.
PC: If we're close to
implementation, wouldn't it make sense to start the LC
process?
... I'll take an action to talk to the Canvas
editors.
<scribe> ACTION: Paul Cotton to talk to Canvas editorial/editors about starting the LC process. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/04/09-html-a11y-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-313 - Cotton to talk to canvas editorial/editors about starting the lc process. [on Paul Cotton - due 2015-04-16].
JS: We have a stub. I need to put out the CFC. Apologies, I will get this done.
<paulc> https://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/wg/2015-04-Agenda#Agenda_April_15
<paulc> We will do the transcript item at 4pm on Wed Apr 15 at the Media TF F2F
JS: There is work to look at Web
VTT.
... Don't think we want to work on this on this call.
JF: We need to take a look at it
with the Media sub-team, and that still seems like a good
approach.
... Have n action in PF to look at draft screen capture. It's a
little scary - it seems to be capturing pixels but not DOM
information.
JS: How long on that CFR?
PC: The FPWD was published in November.
JS: They're in LC now, no?
<paulc> http://www.w3.org/TR/webvtt1/
PC: This link indicates FPWD.
<JF_> notes that the FPWD under discussion is related to WebVTT
<paulc> W3C First Public Working Draft 13 November 2014
s/Web VTT FPWD was /FPWD was /
<paulc> Draft Community Group Specification 16 February 2014 http://dev.w3.org/html5/webvtt/e0a5a82bd5be3501e7649a949fcce4c7b83a427c.html
PC: This is being worked on in
the CG and WG at same time, and it seems there is a more recent
doc from the CG.
... Sorry, red herring - the doc is 2014 not 2015.
... Still, a review would be appreciated and the person to
communicate with is David Singer.
JF: Sounds like the Media sub-team should meet - with Web VTT and Transcript on the radar.
JS: Yes.
<paulc> See also Sylvia's work at WebVTT support in browsers
<paulc> http://www.webvtt.org/
PC: You might also look at Silvia's Web VTT support in browsers work.
<paulc> See https://www.w3.org/community/texttracks/2015/02/22/implementation-status/
JF: Will try to find a little time in next week's F2F agenda.
https://specs.webplatform.org/common-panel/bkardell/gh-pages/
<liam> scribenick: liam
LJWatson: from an interaction point of view a lot of similarities between different metaphors
accordians, notebook tabs ,carousels
so this draft looks at coming up with some native elements & attributes.
Right now we're coming up with use cases & requirements
We could use TF help with fleshing those out,, with wider review in a11y and html
JF: in the note i sent out yesterday I'd indicated this was something for the F2F next week
panels and panel sets, kbd interaction/access-keys, and transcripts.
[and possible additional item from Cynthia]
joanie: why is this not a dialogue?
LJWatson: a dialogue appears over the top of existing content where this would be part of a page, not a pop-up
[example use case of message at driving licence centre regarding renewal]
LJWatson: on access keys there's a Wiki page for requirements
Rich: wondering about whether the access element is a non-starter, can we talk about it at the F2F?
<paulc> F2F info: https://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/wg/2015-04-Agenda
<scribe> scribenick: LJWatson
CS: We'll have demos from the
Windows team during the F2F.
... Will send out suggested agenda, but need people to add
other items.
<JF_> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/51wishlist
JF: There's the HTML5.1
wishlist.
... Was looking at media descriptions, believe it may be solved
by aria-describedat.
... Suggest there are things for an agenda next week. For
example Flipnote.
JS: Hold up, we're waiting for feedbac on that so we just need to wait.
JF: Real Time Chat, Web
payments...
... Emotion ML... There are names associated, but no actual
action. Perhaps we should poke?
JS: Ideas for moving them forward would be good.
JF: Suggest agenda time next week to look at the wishlist.
CS: Good idea.
+1
JS: Given the F2F, propose this meeting not happen next week but that people remotely participate in the F2F if they can.
PC: Has anyone arranged for
tele-conference facilities?
... I'll send you the request information. Should be someone on
the team that does it.
JS: Liam and I can make the zakim request.
LQ: Yes, but I'll have to do it today.
JS: What's the agenda time - 9am to 5pm? 6pm?
<liam> I'll request zakim for wed thur fri 9-6 PDT, any preferred code?
CS: 9am to 6pm.
<liam> 8:30-6 OK
LQ: Preferred code?
JS: Participant numbers?
... Guess 8 will be sufficient.
CS: Yes.
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.140 of Date: 2014-11-06 18:16:30 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/from our tests/from our failed tests/ FAILED: s/Web VTT FPWD was /FPWD was / Succeeded: s/JF/Rich/ Succeeded: s/someone:/joanie:/ Succeeded: s/PST/PDT/ Found ScribeNick: LJWatson Found ScribeNick: liam Found ScribeNick: LJWatson Inferring Scribes: LJWatson, liam Scribes: LJWatson, liam ScribeNicks: LJWatson, liam Default Present: paulc, Rich_Schwerdtfeger, IanPouncey, Adrian_Roselli, Joanmarie_Diggs, LJWatson, JF, Liam, Judy, janina, Cynthia_Shelly Present: paulc Rich_Schwerdtfeger IanPouncey Adrian_Roselli Joanmarie_Diggs LJWatson JF Liam Judy janina Cynthia_Shelly Found Date: 09 Apr 2015 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2015/04/09-html-a11y-minutes.html People with action items: cotton paul WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]