roll call

checking attendees ...

<scribe> scribe: fsasaki

action items

https://www.w3.org/International/its/ig/track/actions/open

XLIFF - ITS mapping

david: I have put most of mappings, the simple ones
... the most difficult ones are the ones there we have a mixture of ITS and XLIFF
... e.g. provenance
... I am now just working on provenance
... then mt confidence
... that is intertwined with translation candidates
... provenance is an issue since it is complicated with change tracking module
... then storage size, is profiled for size and restriction module
... frederik promised a profile, need to push him to do that

felix: had a validation discusssion at xml prague
... david: not connected to ITS progress
... need to have yves, jirka, tom to have a look at schematron
... anything to discuss here with yves, on the xliff mapping?

david: on xliff TC there was a consensus not to have an inline attribute corresponding white space handling
... I think it is a good solution. But s.t. to be aware off
... inline handling of white space should be done using normalization + preserve space at structure level
... is the best for interop in xml tool stack
... xml:preserve space is not designed with non wellformed spans elements
... for mt confidence and provenance, functionality is related to XLIFF modules
... we decided not to have new versions of modules unless correcting errors
... consensus within TC is to have profiles in ITS module
... mt confidence not difficult, will take time to elaborate. provenance is more difficult
... original change tracking module does not allow to change track inline elements
... main issue is not enough man power in the mapping

yves: agree with all what david said
... lack of man power is an issue

david: some solutions like local filter just need to be transferred to 2.1 spec, same for external resource + elements within text
... there may be an option not to go for everything, but I would not like the inconsistence if only a part of ITS is in xlff 2.1. we shoudl target complete coverage

freme project

http://freme-project.eu/

david: a good idea to concentrate on 2.1 in freme too

felix: terminology, text analysis are good candidates

david: both feature complete in 2.1 spec, but has not been reviewed so far, if you want to concentreate on these would help freme too

felix: project is about implementation development
... vistaTEC is mainly implementing XLIFF

david: would suggest that you ask to prioritze the categories that you need for freme
... ask XLIFF TC

<dF> I have two AOB items

<dF> 1) CAL track of FEISGILTT

Other topics as usual

http://www.w3.org/TR/mlw-metadata-us-impl/

<dF> 2) where to access Adobe jackrabbit implementation of ITS 2.0

CAL track of FEISGILTT

not many numbers of submission for content analytics

jack rabbit implementation

<dF> https://www.w3.org/International/its/wiki/ITS_Implementations#Apache_Jackrabbit_.28Adobe.29

http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Deliverables#Deliverables_from_external_partners

http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/images/5/5c/D1-subcontract-adobe.pdf

next call

23 march

adjourned

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.140  of Date: 2014-11-06 18:16:30  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/inline/non wellformed spans/
Succeeded: s/modules/module/
Found Scribe: fsasaki
Inferring ScribeNick: fsasaki
Present: fsasaki YvesS david
Regrets: christian Phil Jörg Olaf-Michael
Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its-ig/2015Mar/0000.html
Got date from IRC log name: 02 Mar 2015
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2015/03/02-i18nits-minutes.html
People with action items: