13:57:46 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/11/07-dwbp-irc
RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/11/07-dwbp-irc ←
13:57:54 <phila> RRSAgent, make logs public
Phil Archer: RRSAgent, make logs public ←
13:58:19 <phila> Meeting: DWBP Weekly Telecon 2014-11-07
13:58:23 <phila> Chair: Hadley
13:58:33 <phila> Agenda: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20141107
13:58:42 <phila> regrets: Laufer, Flavio
13:58:51 <phila> zakim, this will be dwbp
Phil Archer: zakim, this will be dwbp ←
13:58:51 <Zakim> ok, phila; I see DATA_DWBP()9:00AM scheduled to start in 2 minutes
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, phila; I see DATA_DWBP()9:00AM scheduled to start in 2 minutes ←
13:58:52 <Zakim> DATA_DWBP()9:00AM has now started
Zakim IRC Bot: DATA_DWBP()9:00AM has now started ←
13:59:00 <Zakim> +Caroline_
Zakim IRC Bot: +Caroline_ ←
13:59:22 <Caroline_> Zakim, Caroline_ has yaso
Caroline Burle: Zakim, Caroline_ has yaso ←
13:59:22 <Zakim> +yaso; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +yaso; got it ←
13:59:32 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
13:59:36 <Zakim> +[IPcaller.a]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller.a] ←
13:59:42 <phila> zakim, ipcaller.a is me
Phil Archer: zakim, ipcaller.a is me ←
13:59:43 <Zakim> +phila; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +phila; got it ←
13:59:46 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> Zakim, IPcaller is me
Joao Almeida: Zakim, IPcaller is me ←
13:59:46 <Zakim> +JoaoPauloAlmeida; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +JoaoPauloAlmeida; got it ←
13:59:56 <phila> Hi everyone
Phil Archer: Hi everyone ←
14:00:07 <Caroline_> Hello!
Caroline Burle: Hello! ←
14:00:10 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> Hi
Joao Almeida: Hi ←
14:00:11 <laufer> Hi Phil
Carlos Laufer: Hi Phil ←
14:00:28 <phila> regrets- laufer
Phil Archer: regrets- laufer ←
14:00:33 <Zakim> +Eric_Kauz
Zakim IRC Bot: +Eric_Kauz ←
14:00:34 <laufer> Sorry, but I will have to leave in the middle of the session
Carlos Laufer: Sorry, but I will have to leave in the middle of the session ←
14:00:42 <Zakim> +lewismc
Zakim IRC Bot: +lewismc ←
14:01:03 <Zakim> + +1.510.384.aaaa
Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.510.384.aaaa ←
14:01:03 <laufer> I have forgotten all this adjustments of time zones...
Carlos Laufer: I have forgotten all this adjustments of time zones... ←
14:01:08 <Zakim> +??P24
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P24 ←
14:01:13 <lewismc> lewismc --> Lewis John McGibbney
Lewis Mcgibbney: lewismc --> Lewis John McGibbney ←
14:01:14 <Zakim> +RiccardoAlbertoni
Zakim IRC Bot: +RiccardoAlbertoni ←
14:01:24 <Zakim> +HadleyBeeman
Zakim IRC Bot: +HadleyBeeman ←
14:01:24 <MTCarrasco> zakim, ??P24 is me
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: zakim, ??P24 is me ←
14:01:26 <Zakim> +MTCarrasco; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +MTCarrasco; got it ←
14:01:34 <RiccardoAlbertoni> hello !
Riccardo Albertoni: hello ! ←
14:02:06 <AdrianoC> Hi, I am on chat only today.
Adriano Pereira: Hi, I am on chat only today. ←
14:03:20 <phila> zakim, who is here?
Phil Archer: zakim, who is here? ←
14:03:20 <Zakim> On the phone I see Caroline_, JoaoPauloAlmeida, phila, Eric_Kauz, lewismc, +1.510.384.aaaa, MTCarrasco, RiccardoAlbertoni, HadleyBeeman
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see Caroline_, JoaoPauloAlmeida, phila, Eric_Kauz, lewismc, +1.510.384.aaaa, MTCarrasco, RiccardoAlbertoni, HadleyBeeman ←
14:03:22 <Zakim> Caroline_ has yaso
Zakim IRC Bot: Caroline_ has yaso ←
14:03:22 <Zakim> On IRC I see MTCarrasco, Eric_Kauz, lewismc, laufer, annette_g, RiccardoAlbertoni, JoaoPauloAlmeida, Caroline_, RRSAgent, Zakim, AdrianoC, yaso, phila, sandro, rhiaro_,
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see MTCarrasco, Eric_Kauz, lewismc, laufer, annette_g, RiccardoAlbertoni, JoaoPauloAlmeida, Caroline_, RRSAgent, Zakim, AdrianoC, yaso, phila, sandro, rhiaro_, ←
14:03:22 <Zakim> ... hadleybeeman, trackbot
Zakim IRC Bot: ... hadleybeeman, trackbot ←
14:03:30 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
14:04:14 <Zakim> +[IPcaller.a]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller.a] ←
14:04:28 <annette_g> I'm the +1.510.384.aaaa
Annette Greiner: I'm the +1.510.384.aaaa ←
14:04:30 <laufer> Zakim, IPcaller.a is me
Carlos Laufer: Zakim, IPcaller.a is me ←
14:04:30 <Zakim> +laufer; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +laufer; got it ←
14:04:50 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> breathing in the mic
Joao Almeida: breathing in the mic ←
14:04:50 <phila> zakim, ipcaller is Antoine
Phil Archer: zakim, ipcaller is Antoine ←
14:04:50 <Zakim> +Antoine; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +Antoine; got it ←
14:05:00 <phila> zakim, who is noisy?
Phil Archer: zakim, who is noisy? ←
14:05:08 <annette_g> Zakim, +1.510.384.aaaa is me
Annette Greiner: Zakim, +1.510.384.aaaa is me ←
14:05:08 <Zakim> +annette_g; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +annette_g; got it ←
14:05:11 <Zakim> phila, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Caroline_ (4%), MTCarrasco (4%), HadleyBeeman (23%), laufer (58%)
Zakim IRC Bot: phila, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Caroline_ (4%), MTCarrasco (4%), HadleyBeeman (23%), laufer (58%) ←
14:05:12 <Caroline_> Zakim, Caroline_ has newton
Caroline Burle: Zakim, Caroline_ has newton ←
14:05:13 <laufer> Zakim, mute me
Carlos Laufer: Zakim, mute me ←
14:05:13 <Zakim> +newton; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +newton; got it ←
14:05:13 <Zakim> +ericstephan
Zakim IRC Bot: +ericstephan ←
14:05:13 <Zakim> laufer should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: laufer should now be muted ←
14:05:32 <ericstephan> Hi Annette! Wow great
Eric Stephan: Hi Annette! Wow great ←
14:06:04 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> the TPAC minutes are terribly littered with names that do not match...
Joao Almeida: the TPAC minutes are terribly littered with names that do not match... ←
14:06:16 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> can these warnings be removed?
Joao Almeida: can these warnings be removed? ←
14:06:41 <phila> JoaoPauloAlmeida, you can also see http://www.w3.org/2014/10/30-dwbp-minutes.html and http://www.w3.org/2014/10/31-dwbp-minutes.html
Phil Archer: JoaoPauloAlmeida, you can also see http://www.w3.org/2014/10/30-dwbp-minutes.html and http://www.w3.org/2014/10/31-dwbp-minutes.html ←
14:06:50 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> thanks Hadley and Phil
Joao Almeida: thanks Hadley and Phil ←
14:07:09 <Caroline_> I may scribe
Caroline Burle: I may scribe ←
14:07:21 <Caroline_> scribe: Caroline_
(Scribe set to Caroline Burle)
14:07:44 <hadleybeeman> http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-10-24
Hadley Beeman: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-10-24 ←
14:08:02 <Caroline_> PROPOSED: approve the minutes http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-10-24
PROPOSED: approve the minutes http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-10-24 ←
14:08:05 <ericstephan> +1
Eric Stephan: +1 ←
14:08:07 <hadleybeeman> +1
Hadley Beeman: +1 ←
14:08:07 <Eric_Kauz> +1
14:08:07 <Caroline_> +1
+1 ←
14:08:09 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> +1
Joao Almeida: +1 ←
14:08:09 <lewismc> +1
Lewis Mcgibbney: +1 ←
14:08:12 <RiccardoAlbertoni> +1
Riccardo Albertoni: +1 ←
14:08:12 <annette_g> +1
Annette Greiner: +1 ←
14:08:21 <newton> +1
Newton Calegari: +1 ←
14:08:28 <phila> +1
Phil Archer: +1 ←
14:08:45 <laufer> +1
Carlos Laufer: +1 ←
14:09:13 <yaso> +1
Yaso Córdova: +1 ←
14:09:14 <Caroline_> RESOLVED: minutes approved
RESOLVED: minutes approved ←
14:09:16 <hadleybeeman> http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-10-30
Hadley Beeman: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-10-30 ←
14:09:33 <Caroline_> RESOLVED: approve the minutes http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-10-24
RESOLVED: approve the minutes http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-10-24 ←
14:10:05 <phila> http://www.w3.org/2014/10/30-dwbp-minutes.html
Phil Archer: http://www.w3.org/2014/10/30-dwbp-minutes.html ←
14:10:15 <Caroline_> phila: you may see the minutes of TPAC http://www.w3.org/2014/10/30-dwbp-minutes.html
Phil Archer: you may see the minutes of TPAC http://www.w3.org/2014/10/30-dwbp-minutes.html ←
14:10:40 <Caroline_> ... although the content is the same of the one we approved
... although the content is the same of the one we approved ←
14:11:08 <Caroline_> PROPOSED: approve the minutes http://www.w3.org/2014/10/30-dwbp-minutes.html
PROPOSED: approve the minutes http://www.w3.org/2014/10/30-dwbp-minutes.html ←
14:11:15 <hadleybeeman> +1
Hadley Beeman: +1 ←
14:11:16 <ericstephan> +1
Eric Stephan: +1 ←
14:11:16 <Caroline_> +1
+1 ←
14:11:17 <newton> +1
Newton Calegari: +1 ←
14:11:21 <annette_g> +1
Annette Greiner: +1 ←
14:11:22 <laufer> +1
Carlos Laufer: +1 ←
14:12:03 <Caroline_> RESOLVED: approve the minutes http://www.w3.org/2014/10/30-dwbp-minutes.html
RESOLVED: approve the minutes http://www.w3.org/2014/10/30-dwbp-minutes.html ←
14:12:04 <phila> +1
Phil Archer: +1 ←
14:12:20 <Eric_Kauz> +1
14:12:27 <Caroline_> PROPOSED: approve the minutes http://www.w3.org/2014/10/31-dwbp-minutes.html
PROPOSED: approve the minutes http://www.w3.org/2014/10/31-dwbp-minutes.html ←
14:12:34 <ericstephan> +1
Eric Stephan: +1 ←
14:12:35 <newton> +1
Newton Calegari: +1 ←
14:12:35 <hadleybeeman> +1
Hadley Beeman: +1 ←
14:12:38 <phila> +1
Phil Archer: +1 ←
14:12:39 <Caroline_> +1
+1 ←
14:12:41 <Eric_Kauz> +1
14:12:42 <annette_g> +1
Annette Greiner: +1 ←
14:12:45 <laufer> +1
Carlos Laufer: +1 ←
14:12:59 <Caroline_> RESOLVED: approve the minutes http://www.w3.org/2014/10/31-dwbp-minutes.html
RESOLVED: approve the minutes http://www.w3.org/2014/10/31-dwbp-minutes.html ←
14:13:06 <ericstephan> There will be quite a few "eric"s to parse @phila
Eric Stephan: There will be quite a few "eric"s to parse @phila ←
14:13:30 <hadleybeeman> https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/raised
Hadley Beeman: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/raised ←
14:13:39 <Caroline_> hadleybeeman: let's start with https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/raised
Hadley Beeman: let's start with https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/raised ←
14:14:08 <phila> Open Issues http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/open
Phil Archer: Open Issues http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/open ←
14:14:09 <hadleybeeman> https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/open?sort=product
Hadley Beeman: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/open?sort=product ←
14:14:54 <Caroline_> hadleybeeman: we all should have an opinion on the issues and decide about them
Hadley Beeman: we all should have an opinion on the issues and decide about them ←
14:15:03 <hadleybeeman> issue-52?
14:15:03 <trackbot> issue-52 -- We keep having confusion around our terms. (glossary?) -- open
Trackbot IRC Bot: ISSUE-52 -- We keep having confusion around our terms. (glossary?) -- open ←
14:15:03 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/52
Trackbot IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/52 ←
14:15:05 <phila> issue-52?
14:15:05 <trackbot> issue-52 -- We keep having confusion around our terms. (glossary?) -- open
Trackbot IRC Bot: ISSUE-52 -- We keep having confusion around our terms. (glossary?) -- open ←
14:15:05 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/52
Trackbot IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/52 ←
14:15:18 <Caroline_> ... let's start with issue 52 https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/raised
... let's start with ISSUE-52 https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/raised ←
14:15:29 <MTCarrasco> q+
14:15:57 <Caroline_> ... we should start a wiki page for each of the issues and that could be discussions pages acumulating notes
... we should start a wiki page for each of the terms and that could be discussions pages acumulating notes ←
14:16:07 <Caroline_> ... we can define later if we will use them
... we can define later if we will use them ←
14:16:10 <phila> s/issues/terms/
14:16:16 <Caroline_> ... it would be useful to keep track of the discussions
... it would be useful to keep track of the discussions ←
14:16:30 <Caroline_> ... I propose that we start a wiki page for each of the words we need to define
... I propose that we start a wiki page for each of the words we need to define ←
14:17:06 <Caroline_> MTCarrasco: there is a section to put the definitions in the context of the text
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: there is a section to put the definitions in the context of the text ←
14:17:22 <Caroline_> ... the dangeur is that we might have a huge terminology specification
... the dangeur is that we might have a huge terminology specification ←
14:17:35 <Caroline_> hadleybeeman: I agree, but the definitions must be there for us
Hadley Beeman: I agree, but the definitions must be there for us ←
14:17:54 <Caroline_> ... we have some terms that we must define, and others that we are not sure about the definition
... we have some terms that we must define, and others that we are not sure about the definition ←
14:18:04 <phila> An example of an in-document definition can be seen in the intro to the primary XML spec http://www.w3.org/TR/xml/#sec-intro
Phil Archer: An example of an in-document definition can be seen in the intro to the primary XML spec http://www.w3.org/TR/xml/#sec-intro ←
14:18:07 <hadleybeeman> q?
Hadley Beeman: q? ←
14:18:12 <hadleybeeman> ack mt
Hadley Beeman: ack mt ←
14:18:13 <Caroline_> ... we should see that first and then define if we should put them or not
... we should see that first and then define if we should put them or not ←
14:18:37 <Caroline_> MTCarrasco: I have mix feelings about. If the term should be put as definition in a terminology session
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: I have mix feelings about. If the term should be put as definition in a terminology session ←
14:18:57 <Caroline_> hadleybeeman: a wiki page is temporary
Hadley Beeman: a wiki page is temporary ←
14:19:05 <Caroline_> ... it needs to get somewhere more permanent
... it needs to get somewhere more permanent ←
14:19:14 <Caroline_> ... each of the deliverables are in different stages
... each of the deliverables are in different stages ←
14:19:18 <phila> +1 to both Tomas and Hadley. Wiki is temporary place holder, but final place could well sensibly be in the doc
Phil Archer: +1 to both Tomas and Hadley. Wiki is temporary place holder, but final place could well sensibly be in the doc ←
14:19:26 <Caroline_> ... what do the rest of you think?
... what do the rest of you think? ←
14:19:48 <ericstephan> +1 Wiki page, if we are targetting it into a specific document we should specify this in the wiki page.
Eric Stephan: +1 Wiki page, if we are targetting it into a specific document we should specify this in the wiki page. ←
14:19:49 <Caroline_> phila: I am not sure if we will end up having the definitions in multiple places
Phil Archer: I am not sure if we will end up having the definitions in multiple places ←
14:19:50 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
14:20:06 <hadleybeeman> q?
Hadley Beeman: q? ←
14:20:07 <CarlosIglesias> zakim, [IPcaller] is me
Carlos Iglesias: zakim, [IPcaller] is me ←
14:20:08 <Zakim> +CarlosIglesias; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +CarlosIglesias; got it ←
14:20:16 <Caroline_> ... it is just easier to read if the definition is on the text
... it is just easier to read if the definition is on the text ←
14:20:24 <Caroline_> ... the wiki page might be useful
... the wiki page might be useful ←
14:20:29 <Caroline_> +1 to begin with the wiki page
+1 to begin with the wiki page ←
14:21:02 <Caroline_> phila: we should talk to each other and align the terms
Phil Archer: we should talk to each other and align the terms ←
14:21:37 <Caroline_> hadleybeeman: looking at the issues list we need to define the structure
Hadley Beeman: looking at the issues list we need to define the structure ←
14:21:49 <laufer> and datasets
Carlos Laufer: and datasets ←
14:21:54 <Caroline_> ... reference vocabularies
... reference vocabularies ←
14:21:59 <Caroline_> ... and datasets
... and datasets ←
14:22:06 <Caroline_> ... do we need to create a issue for that?
... do we need to create a issue for that? ←
14:22:10 <MTCarrasco> 1) Write specifications as oppose to wiki - 2) Define knew concepts in the proper section like XML - 3) When not in sections, into a terms section
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: 1) Write specifications as oppose to wiki - 2) Define knew concepts in the proper section like XML - 3) When not in sections, into a terms section ←
14:22:13 <annette_g> didn't we say DCAT?
Annette Greiner: didn't we say DCAT? ←
14:22:16 <phila> Structured, Reference Vocabulary, Real Time, datasets etc. all need definitions (or pointers to existing defns)
Phil Archer: Structured, Reference Vocabulary, Real Time, datasets etc. all need definitions (or pointers to existing defns) ←
14:22:19 <laufer> zakim, unmute me
Carlos Laufer: zakim, unmute me ←
14:22:19 <Zakim> laufer should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: laufer should no longer be muted ←
14:22:32 <phila> And yes, annette_g we said DCAT (or I get very grumpy!)
Phil Archer: And yes, annette_g we said DCAT (or I get very grumpy!) ←
14:22:42 <antoine> aren't other issues / terms related to this problem already? E.g. https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/55
Antoine Isaac: aren't other issues / terms related to this problem already? E.g. https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/55 ←
14:22:43 <Caroline_> laufer: I don't know if we must creat a issue for each term
Carlos Laufer: I don't know if we must creat a issue for each term ←
14:22:52 <Caroline_> ... I don't know if we will have a note
... I don't know if we will have a note ←
14:23:40 <Caroline_> ... we could put a note on the github
... we could put a note on the github ←
14:23:43 <MTCarrasco> Look at the XML style - http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: Look at the XML style - http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126 ←
14:23:47 <phila> Yes, antoine, there are lots of terms that need defining/clarifying
Phil Archer: Yes, antoine, there are lots of terms that need defining/clarifying ←
14:23:52 <ericstephan> Wiki pages do have a datetime stamp that can be referenced as well just in case there are at worst case one or more pages defining a term.
Eric Stephan: Wiki pages do have a datetime stamp that can be referenced as well just in case there are at worst case one or more pages defining a term. ←
14:24:17 <MTCarrasco> q+
14:24:36 <Caroline_> hadleybeeman: I am creating issues for things we need to discuss later
Hadley Beeman: I am creating issues for things we need to discuss later ←
14:24:53 <Caroline_> ... if we don't have an answer is a issue, if we do have a answer it should be a action
... if we don't have an answer is a issue, if we do have a answer it should be a action ←
14:25:00 <Caroline_> laufer: dataset should be discussed
Carlos Laufer: dataset should be discussed ←
14:25:07 <hadleybeeman> issue: we need a definition of "dataset"
ISSUE: we need a definition of "dataset" ←
14:25:07 <trackbot> Created ISSUE-80 - We need a definition of "dataset". Please complete additional details at <http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/80/edit>.
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ISSUE-80 - We need a definition of "dataset". Please complete additional details at <http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/80/edit>. ←
14:25:13 <hadleybeeman> rrsagent, pointer?
Hadley Beeman: rrsagent, pointer? ←
14:25:13 <RRSAgent> See http://www.w3.org/2014/11/07-dwbp-irc#T14-25-13
RRSAgent IRC Bot: See http://www.w3.org/2014/11/07-dwbp-irc#T14-25-13 ←
14:25:32 <Caroline_> MTCarrasco:on this http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126 inside the texts there are definitions
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: on this http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126 inside the texts there are definitions ←
14:25:39 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> We also had a glossary in GLD https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/glossary/index.html
Joao Almeida: We also had a glossary in GLD https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/glossary/index.html ←
14:25:41 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> as a note
Joao Almeida: as a note ←
14:25:50 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> Including the term Dataset https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/glossary/index.html#dataset-rdf
Joao Almeida: Including the term Dataset https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/glossary/index.html#dataset-rdf ←
14:25:54 <Caroline_> ... this is a good style as a example on how to write a specification
... this is a good style as a example on how to write a specification ←
14:26:08 <MakxDekkers> see dcat for definition of dataset http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat/#class-dataset
Makx Dekkers: see dcat for definition of dataset http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat/#class-dataset ←
14:26:11 <Caroline_> Zakim, who is speaking?
Zakim, who is speaking? ←
14:26:21 <Zakim> Caroline_, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Caroline_ (11%), MTCarrasco (10%), HadleyBeeman (9%), laufer (36%)
Zakim IRC Bot: Caroline_, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Caroline_ (11%), MTCarrasco (10%), HadleyBeeman (9%), laufer (36%) ←
14:26:32 <MTCarrasco> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/#sec-terminology - http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/#sec-well-formed
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/#sec-terminology - http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/#sec-well-formed ←
14:26:44 <antoine> MakxDekkers++
Antoine Isaac: MakxDekkers++ ←
14:27:18 <Caroline_> MTCarrasco: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/#sec-terminology - http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/#sec-well-forme along this document is possible to see the definitions
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/#sec-terminology - http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/#sec-well-forme along this document is possible to see the definitions ←
14:27:40 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
14:27:48 <MakxDekkers> zakim, iocaller is me
Makx Dekkers: zakim, iocaller is me ←
14:27:48 <Zakim> sorry, MakxDekkers, I do not recognize a party named 'iocaller'
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, MakxDekkers, I do not recognize a party named 'iocaller' ←
14:27:53 <Caroline_> hadleybeeman: what do we need to decide? How we are going to approach each term? Which terms we need to include? Or make it a open issue?
Hadley Beeman: what do we need to decide? How we are going to approach each term? Which terms we need to include? Or make it a open issue? ←
14:27:57 <MakxDekkers> zakim, ipcaller is me
Makx Dekkers: zakim, ipcaller is me ←
14:27:57 <Zakim> +MakxDekkers; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +MakxDekkers; got it ←
14:28:12 <Caroline_> MTCarrasco: the editors are responsible to define the concepts
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: the editors are responsible to define the concepts ←
14:28:29 <annette_g> q+
Annette Greiner: q+ ←
14:28:34 <Caroline_> hadleybeeman: we do need to have the WG to agree with them
Hadley Beeman: we do need to have the WG to agree with them ←
14:28:38 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> +1 to MTCarrasco and I think we should try and reuse or align with GLD glossary as well
Joao Almeida: +1 to MTCarrasco and I think we should try and reuse or align with GLD glossary as well ←
14:28:44 <MTCarrasco> q-
14:28:45 <hadleybeeman> ack mtc
Hadley Beeman: ack mtc ←
14:29:05 <Caroline_> annette_g: I propose that we take the definition from DCAT
Annette Greiner: I propose that we take the definition from DCAT ←
14:29:12 <phila> +1 annette_g
Phil Archer: +1 annette_g ←
14:29:13 <Caroline_> hadleybeeman: seems a starting point for me
Hadley Beeman: seems a starting point for me ←
14:29:17 <Caroline_> +1 annette_g
+1 annette_g ←
14:29:21 <MTCarrasco> Establised term *must* not be redefined
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: Establised term *must* not be redefined ←
14:29:23 <MakxDekkers> +1
Makx Dekkers: +1 ←
14:29:31 <Caroline_> hadleybeeman: the initial ideas might come from the editors
Hadley Beeman: the initial ideas might come from the editors ←
14:29:33 <Caroline_> +q
+q ←
14:29:41 <hadleybeeman> ack annet
Hadley Beeman: ack annet ←
14:29:49 <MakxDekkers> +1 annette
Makx Dekkers: +1 annette ←
14:30:00 <yaso> q?
Yaso Córdova: q? ←
14:30:03 <Zakim> -laufer
Zakim IRC Bot: -laufer ←
14:30:06 <yaso> scribe: yaso
(Scribe set to Yaso Córdova)
14:30:10 <hadleybeeman> ack caro
Hadley Beeman: ack caro ←
14:30:20 <phila> q+ to say that http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat/#class-dataset defines dataset as A collection of data, published or curated by a single agent, and available for access or download in one or more formats.
Phil Archer: q+ to say that http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat/#class-dataset defines dataset as A collection of data, published or curated by a single agent, and available for access or download in one or more formats. ←
14:30:24 <yaso> Caroline_: I would like to say that Newton, Bernadette and I discussed today
Caroline Burle: I would like to say that Newton, Bernadette and I discussed today ←
14:30:35 <yaso> … If you all agree we can do that
… If you all agree we can do that ←
14:30:50 <ericstephan> +1 for leaving it to the editors to make a first pass recommendation
Eric Stephan: +1 for leaving it to the editors to make a first pass recommendation ←
14:30:50 <yaso> hadleybeeman: I’m proposing that we can come with a propostal for that
Hadley Beeman: I’m proposing that we can come with a propostal for that ←
14:31:02 <yaso> Caroline_: we can make a proposal and then the group decides
Caroline Burle: we can make a proposal and then the group decides ←
14:31:22 <MTCarrasco> +1 for leaving it to the editors to make a first pass recommendation
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: +1 for leaving it to the editors to make a first pass recommendation ←
14:31:27 <MTCarrasco> Later one can comment
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: Later one can comment ←
14:31:31 <yaso> … it’s better to discuss with Newton and Bernadette before senting a proposal
… it’s better to discuss with Newton and Bernadette before senting a proposal ←
14:31:51 <yaso> hadleybeeman: we have the issues because people said that we have to discuss them
Hadley Beeman: we have the issues because people said that we have to discuss them ←
14:32:21 <yaso> Caroline_: since we understand that github is not easy for everyone
Caroline Burle: since we understand that github is not easy for everyone ←
14:32:28 <Caroline_> We put the content on https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Data_on_the_Web_Best_Practices and we will always do the same on the Github http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#intro
Caroline Burle: We put the content on https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Data_on_the_Web_Best_Practices and we will always do the same on the Github http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#intro ←
14:32:31 <yaso> … we decided that we’re gonna use the wiki
… we decided that we’re gonna use the wiki ←
14:33:00 <yaso> … we are going to work at the wiki
… we are going to work at the wiki ←
14:33:00 <Caroline_> Our proposal is to relate the issues with the themes so it is easier to organize
Caroline Burle: Our proposal is to relate the issues with the themes so it is easier to organize ←
14:33:27 <yaso> … this issues that we discussed, we are going to try to relate them with themes, if the group agrees
… this issues that we discussed, we are going to try to relate them with themes, if the group agrees ←
14:33:44 <yaso> phil: what goes on github and what goes on the wiki?
Phil Archer: what goes on github and what goes on the wiki? ←
14:34:07 <ericstephan> If its easier using wiki, its far better to make progress with content.
Eric Stephan: If its easier using wiki, its far better to make progress with content. ←
14:34:16 <annette_g> data best practice: keep your data in one place only
Annette Greiner: data best practice: keep your data in one place only ←
14:34:26 <Zakim> -MakxDekkers
Zakim IRC Bot: -MakxDekkers ←
14:34:28 <yaso> Caroline_: the same, we are going to work at the wiki, and then we are going to mirror at github
Caroline Burle: the same, we are going to work at the wiki, and then we are going to mirror at github ←
14:34:29 <newton> I think Wiki it's more content focused
Newton Calegari: I think Wiki it's more content focused ←
14:34:37 <yaso> I like github :-/
I like github :-/ ←
14:35:06 <yaso> Caroline_: since our main goal is to have the content, we understand that we should use the wiki
Caroline Burle: since our main goal is to have the content, we understand that we should use the wiki ←
14:35:21 <Zakim> +Makx_Dekkers
Zakim IRC Bot: +Makx_Dekkers ←
14:35:21 <phila> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html
Phil Archer: http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html ←
14:35:45 <yaso> :-/ I already lost the battle
:-/ I already lost the battle ←
14:35:45 <gatemezi> what means "in one place only" ? Is it physical ? URI? annette_g ?
Ghislain Atemezing: what means "in one place only" ? Is it physical ? URI? annette_g ? ←
14:35:57 <annette_g> q+
Annette Greiner: q+ ←
14:36:05 <phila> q- later
Phil Archer: q- later ←
14:36:11 <yaso> hadleybeeman: are you ok with the amount of work?
Hadley Beeman: are you ok with the amount of work? ←
14:37:02 <yaso> Caroline_: even Newtonn wants to use the wiki
Caroline Burle: even Newtonn wants to use the wiki ←
14:37:05 <ericstephan> sounds like a github consultant is needed to put in the content.
Eric Stephan: sounds like a github consultant is needed to put in the content. ←
14:37:26 <newton> Wiki is more productive to focus on content than github, I think
Newton Calegari: Wiki is more productive to focus on content than github, I think ←
14:37:36 <gatemezi> I also like Github ;)
Ghislain Atemezing: I also like Github ;) ←
14:37:43 <Caroline_> yaso: I don't have many contributors outside of the group
Yaso Córdova: I don't have many contributors outside of the group [ Scribe Assist by Caroline Burle ] ←
14:37:50 <ericstephan> +1 doesn't see the point in allowing external people to edit a group draft
Eric Stephan: +1 doesn't see the point in allowing external people to edit a group draft ←
14:37:51 <phila> I too am uneasy about non-WG members editing the doc.
Phil Archer: I too am uneasy about non-WG members editing the doc. ←
14:38:00 <antoine> +1
Antoine Isaac: +1 ←
14:38:07 <Caroline_> ... we could have if we use github is okay
Caroline Burle: ... we could have if we use github is okay ←
14:38:09 <gatemezi> +1
Ghislain Atemezing: +1 ←
14:38:17 <annette_g> q-
Annette Greiner: q- ←
14:38:19 <Caroline_> hadleybeeman: it is good that we keep coming back and check it
Hadley Beeman: it is good that we keep coming back and check it [ Scribe Assist by Caroline Burle ] ←
14:38:22 <phila> Mind you, only WG members have the credentials to accept merges on GitHub
Phil Archer: Mind you, only WG members have the credentials to accept merges on GitHub ←
14:38:45 <Caroline_> hadleybeeman: I am a bit confused by non WG member editing the document
Hadley Beeman: I am a bit confused by non WG member editing the document [ Scribe Assist by Caroline Burle ] ←
14:38:56 <yaso> We could use them both. I think that discussing at github it’s better. Better than emails, not for editing the document
We could use them both. I think that discussing at github it’s better. Better than emails, not for editing the document ←
14:39:17 <Caroline_> ... I have seen them contributing, but is is unsual them not being a part of the and edit the document
Caroline Burle: ... I have seen them contributing, but is is unsual them not being a part of the and edit the document ←
14:39:20 <Caroline_> q+
Caroline Burle: q+ ←
14:39:28 <phila> q- later
Phil Archer: q- later ←
14:39:37 <hadleybeeman> ACK CARO
Hadley Beeman: ACK CARO ←
14:39:55 <yaso> Caroline_: just to make a proposal: keep like this
Caroline Burle: just to make a proposal: keep like this ←
14:40:11 <yaso> … we do it on the wiki and mirror at github
… we do it on the wiki and mirror at github ←
14:40:27 <yaso> hadleybeeman: for the best practices, you are editor and you can do as you like
Hadley Beeman: for the best practices, you are editor and you can do as you like ←
14:40:44 <phila> q-
Phil Archer: q- ←
14:40:46 <phila> q+
Phil Archer: q+ ←
14:41:36 <Caroline_> hadleybeeman: I can think of the wiki in an way to prepare to document
Hadley Beeman: I can think of the wiki in an way to prepare to document [ Scribe Assist by Caroline Burle ] ←
14:42:17 <Caroline_> Caroline_: that is what the editors think should be done
Caroline Burle: that is what the editors think should be done [ Scribe Assist by Caroline Burle ] ←
14:42:58 <yaso> scribe: caroline
(Scribe set to Caroline Burle)
14:43:02 <Caroline_> hadleybeeman: Caroline_ and the other editors of the BP documents
Hadley Beeman: Caroline_ and the other editors of the BP documents ←
14:43:02 <gatemezi> zakim, who is speaking?
Ghislain Atemezing: zakim, who is speaking? ←
14:43:13 <Zakim> gatemezi, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Caroline_ (4%), phila (30%), Eric_Kauz (4%), MTCarrasco (4%), HadleyBeeman (17%)
Zakim IRC Bot: gatemezi, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Caroline_ (4%), phila (30%), Eric_Kauz (4%), MTCarrasco (4%), HadleyBeeman (17%) ←
14:43:17 <Caroline_> ... ask if the contributos mays write each of their sections on the wiki
... ask if the contributos mays write each of their sections on the wiki ←
14:43:30 <yaso> q?
Yaso Córdova: q? ←
14:43:30 <Caroline_> as teh place to get all the content
as teh place to get all the content ←
14:43:39 <Caroline_> phila: I am trying to use github
Phil Archer: I am trying to use github ←
14:43:47 <annette_g> q+
Annette Greiner: q+ ←
14:43:48 <ericstephan> q+
Eric Stephan: q+ ←
14:43:50 <Caroline_> ... I much prefer to write HTML
... I much prefer to write HTML ←
14:44:00 <Zakim> -JoaoPauloAlmeida
Zakim IRC Bot: -JoaoPauloAlmeida ←
14:44:10 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> I got to go, bye
Joao Almeida: I got to go, bye ←
14:44:11 <Caroline_> ... the document on Github is the on that will be translated
... the document on Github is the on that will be translated ←
14:44:32 <phila> ack me
Phil Archer: ack me ←
14:44:35 <Caroline_> ... Caroline_ is saying that if people prefer to write on the wiki it is okay
... Caroline_ is saying that if people prefer to write on the wiki it is okay ←
14:44:57 <Caroline_> phila: as a member of the group you have made a commitment that you are writing the group
Phil Archer: as a member of the group you have made a commitment that you are writing the group ←
14:45:21 <Caroline_> ... you cannot allow other people to write it for you because there is a legal process behind it
... you cannot allow other people to write it for you because there is a legal process behind it ←
14:45:21 <annette_g> q-
Annette Greiner: q- ←
14:45:44 <Caroline_> ... if there is anything on the document that the members do not agree they are able to say it
... if there is anything on the document that the members do not agree they are able to say it ←
14:45:57 <Caroline_> ... being members means that you made this commitments
... being members means that you made this commitments ←
14:46:19 <Caroline_> ... the person editing the document must be a member of the group
... the person editing the document must be a member of the group ←
14:46:23 <yaso> q+
Yaso Córdova: q+ ←
14:46:46 <Caroline_> ... so if you are editing the document you must be a member of the group
... so if you are editing the document you must be a member of the group ←
14:46:51 <hadleybeeman> ack eric
Hadley Beeman: ack eric ←
14:47:02 <Caroline_> ... of course you may receive contributions, but only members of the group may edit it
... of course you may receive contributions, but only members of the group may edit it ←
14:47:18 <Caroline_> ericstephan: I wonder if the editors mays provide a template
Eric Stephan: I wonder if the editors mays provide a template ←
14:47:19 <Caroline_> q+
q+ ←
14:47:39 <Caroline_> ... each of the writers may be not even in their styles
... each of the writers may be not even in their styles ←
14:47:47 <annette_g> +1 to eric
Annette Greiner: +1 to eric ←
14:48:00 <yaso> Caroline_: we are already working on that
Caroline Burle: we are already working on that [ Scribe Assist by Yaso Córdova ] ←
14:48:06 <Caroline_> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#intro
http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#intro ←
14:48:16 <newton> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bptemplate.html
Newton Calegari: http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bptemplate.html ←
14:48:18 <yaso> … I don’t know if you had a chance to take a look at phil’s work
Yaso Córdova: … I don’t know if you had a chance to take a look at phil’s work ←
14:48:33 <phila> See, for example, http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#licenses
Phil Archer: See, for example, http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#licenses ←
14:48:37 <yaso> … there’s a table that is a template there
Yaso Córdova: … there’s a table that is a template there ←
14:48:45 <phila> q+
Phil Archer: q+ ←
14:48:53 <Caroline_> scribe: Caroline_
14:48:57 <Caroline_> q-
q- ←
14:48:58 <hadleybeeman> ack yaso
Hadley Beeman: ack yaso ←
14:49:10 <annette_g> q+
Annette Greiner: q+ ←
14:49:17 <Caroline_> yaso: just to clarify that I did not want people from outsite of the group to contribute in the document
Yaso Córdova: just to clarify that I did not want people from outsite of the group to contribute in the document ←
14:49:32 <phila> ack me
Phil Archer: ack me ←
14:49:34 <Caroline_> ... I just wanted them to be part of the process and be able to see what the WG is doing
... I just wanted them to be part of the process and be able to see what the WG is doing ←
14:49:39 <Caroline_> phila: about the template
Phil Archer: about the template ←
14:50:00 <Caroline_> ... what I did was to put the strucuture we talked about a week ago
... what I did was to put the strucuture we talked about a week ago ←
14:50:16 <hadleybeeman> zakim, who is noisy?
Hadley Beeman: zakim, who is noisy? ←
14:50:20 <annette_g> q-
Annette Greiner: q- ←
14:50:26 <Zakim> hadleybeeman, listening for 10 seconds I could not identify any sounds
Zakim IRC Bot: hadleybeeman, listening for 10 seconds I could not identify any sounds ←
14:50:43 <Caroline_> ... the schema that I put together in guthub it was to mae a HTML version of what we discussed last week
... the schema that I put together in guthub it was to mae a HTML version of what we discussed last week ←
14:50:51 <hadleybeeman> zakim, who is here?
Hadley Beeman: zakim, who is here? ←
14:50:51 <Zakim> On the phone I see Caroline_, phila, Eric_Kauz, lewismc, annette_g, MTCarrasco, RiccardoAlbertoni, HadleyBeeman, Antoine, ericstephan, CarlosIglesias, Makx_Dekkers
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see Caroline_, phila, Eric_Kauz, lewismc, annette_g, MTCarrasco, RiccardoAlbertoni, HadleyBeeman, Antoine, ericstephan, CarlosIglesias, Makx_Dekkers ←
14:50:54 <Zakim> Caroline_ has newton
Zakim IRC Bot: Caroline_ has newton ←
14:50:54 <Zakim> On IRC I see gatemezi, MakxDekkers, CarlosIglesias, nathalia, yaso, antoine, newton, ericstephan, MTCarrasco, Eric_Kauz, lewismc, annette_g, RiccardoAlbertoni, Caroline_, RRSAgent,
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see gatemezi, MakxDekkers, CarlosIglesias, nathalia, yaso, antoine, newton, ericstephan, MTCarrasco, Eric_Kauz, lewismc, annette_g, RiccardoAlbertoni, Caroline_, RRSAgent, ←
14:50:54 <Zakim> ... Zakim, AdrianoC, phila, sandro, rhiaro_, hadleybeeman, trackbot
Zakim IRC Bot: ... Zakim, AdrianoC, phila, sandro, rhiaro_, hadleybeeman, trackbot ←
14:50:57 <Caroline_> .... there are 2 things that are hard to differentiate
.... there are 2 things that are hard to differentiate ←
14:51:03 <Caroline_> ... ???
... ??? ←
14:51:15 <nathalia> Zakim, Caroline has nathalia
Nathalia Sautchuk Patrício: Zakim, Caroline has nathalia ←
14:51:15 <Zakim> +nathalia; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +nathalia; got it ←
14:51:21 <Caroline_> ... as we start to populate it with actual content we may have to revise it
... as we start to populate it with actual content we may have to revise it ←
14:51:32 <hadleybeeman> q?
Hadley Beeman: q? ←
14:51:33 <Caroline_> ... I am also concerned of how big it is
... I am also concerned of how big it is ←
14:51:53 <ericstephan> good point @phila
Eric Stephan: good point @phila ←
14:52:03 <Caroline_> +1 to phila's concern
+1 to phila's concern ←
14:52:04 <hadleybeeman> issue: Is the Best practices template still right? http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html
ISSUE: Is the Best practices template still right? http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html ←
14:52:04 <trackbot> Created ISSUE-81 - Is the best practices template still right? http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html. Please complete additional details at <http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/81/edit>.
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ISSUE-81 - Is the best practices template still right? http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html. Please complete additional details at <http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/81/edit>. ←
14:52:10 <hadleybeeman> rrsagent, pointer?
Hadley Beeman: rrsagent, pointer? ←
14:52:10 <RRSAgent> See http://www.w3.org/2014/11/07-dwbp-irc#T14-52-10
RRSAgent IRC Bot: See http://www.w3.org/2014/11/07-dwbp-irc#T14-52-10 ←
14:52:21 <hadleybeeman> q?
Hadley Beeman: q? ←
14:52:31 <ericstephan> :-)
Eric Stephan: :-) ←
14:52:44 <Caroline_> hadleybeeman: we haven't followed the agenda but the session has been useful
Hadley Beeman: we haven't followed the agenda but the session has been useful ←
14:52:50 <Caroline_> ... let's go back to the agenda
... let's go back to the agenda ←
14:53:04 <Caroline_> ... open issue https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/56
... open issue https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/56 ←
14:53:29 <Caroline_> ... there are many issues we may talk about
... there are many issues we may talk about ←
14:54:06 <Caroline_> ... the issue https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/69 clearly we don't have a use case for that
... the issue https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/69 clearly we don't have a use case for that ←
14:54:08 <ericstephan> q+
Eric Stephan: q+ ←
14:54:17 <hadleybeeman> issue-69?
14:54:17 <trackbot> issue-69 -- Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it -- open
Trackbot IRC Bot: ISSUE-69 -- Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it -- open ←
14:54:17 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/69
Trackbot IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/69 ←
14:54:17 <Caroline_> ... does anyone want to write a use case about it?
... does anyone want to write a use case about it? ←
14:54:18 <annette_g> q+
Annette Greiner: q+ ←
14:54:29 <hadleybeeman> ack eric
Hadley Beeman: ack eric ←
14:54:30 <phila> ack ericstephan
Phil Archer: ack ericstephan ←
14:54:56 <hadleybeeman> ack annette
Hadley Beeman: ack annette ←
14:54:56 <phila> ericstephan: One of our use cases implies versioning but we didn't bring it out very clearly
Eric Stephan: One of our use cases implies versioning but we didn't bring it out very clearly [ Scribe Assist by Phil Archer ] ←
14:55:11 <Caroline_> ericstephan: I do have a use case that I need to follow up and bring it clearly
Eric Stephan: I do have a use case that I need to follow up and bring it clearly ←
14:55:14 <phila> annette_g: I have a use cases too but it's quite complex
Annette Greiner: I have a use cases too but it's quite complex [ Scribe Assist by Phil Archer ] ←
14:55:21 <Caroline_> hadleybeeman: having multiple using cases is not a bad thing
Hadley Beeman: having multiple using cases is not a bad thing ←
14:55:29 <Caroline_> ... it would be wonderful
... it would be wonderful ←
14:55:32 <hadleybeeman> action: eric stephan to bring out the versioning issues in his use case (ref issue 69)
ACTION: eric stephan to bring out the versioning issues in his use case (ref ISSUE-69) ←
14:55:32 <trackbot> 'eric' is an ambiguous username. Please try a different identifier, such as family name or username (e.g., ek1, estephan).
Trackbot IRC Bot: 'eric' is an ambiguous username. Please try a different identifier, such as family name or username (e.g., ek1, estephan). ←
14:55:43 <hadleybeeman> action: ericstephan to bring out the versioning issues in his use case (ref issue 69)
ACTION: ericstephan to bring out the versioning issues in his use case (ref ISSUE-69) ←
14:55:44 <trackbot> Created ACTION-128 - Bring out the versioning issues in his use case (ref issue 69) [on Eric Stephan - due 2014-11-14].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-128 - Bring out the versioning issues in his use case (ref ISSUE-69) [on Eric Stephan - due 2014-11-14]. ←
14:55:47 <Caroline_> ... annette_g I may focus on the versioning
... annette_g I may focus on the versioning ←
14:55:56 <hadleybeeman> action: annette to write a use case focusing on versioning (ref issue 69)
ACTION: annette to write a use case focusing on versioning (ref ISSUE-69) ←
14:55:56 <trackbot> Created ACTION-129 - Write a use case focusing on versioning (ref issue 69) [on Annette Greiner - due 2014-11-14].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-129 - Write a use case focusing on versioning (ref ISSUE-69) [on Annette Greiner - due 2014-11-14]. ←
14:56:06 <ericstephan> @annette_g did you see the second round use case wiki page I entered your mass spec use case?
Eric Stephan: @annette_g did you see the second round use case wiki page I entered your mass spec use case? ←
14:56:29 <annette_g> @eric yes thank you for putting that in!
Annette Greiner: @eric yes thank you for putting that in! ←
14:56:45 <Caroline_> ericstephan: to talk about the use cases
Eric Stephan: to talk about the use cases ←
14:56:55 <phila> The Mass Spectrometry Use case is at https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Second-Round_Use_Cases#Mass_Spectrometry_Imaging_.28MSI.29
Phil Archer: The Mass Spectrometry Use case is at https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Second-Round_Use_Cases#Mass_Spectrometry_Imaging_.28MSI.29 ←
14:56:59 <Caroline_> Zakim, who is speaking?
Zakim, who is speaking? ←
14:57:08 <ericstephan> @phila thank you
Eric Stephan: @phila thank you ←
14:57:09 <Zakim> Caroline_, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Eric_Kauz (4%), annette_g (75%), HadleyBeeman (20%), ericstephan (4%)
Zakim IRC Bot: Caroline_, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Eric_Kauz (4%), annette_g (75%), HadleyBeeman (20%), ericstephan (4%) ←
14:57:40 <Caroline_> hadleybeeman: how do we go about filling the requirments
Annette Greiner: how do we go about filling the requirments ←
14:57:47 <hadleybeeman> s/hadleybeeman/annette_g
14:58:02 <Caroline_> ericstephan: I will look at the requirments that are already tehre
Eric Stephan: I will look at the requirments that are already there ←
14:58:09 <Caroline_> s/tehre/there
14:58:17 <hadleybeeman> q?
Hadley Beeman: q? ←
14:58:40 <Zakim> -MTCarrasco
Zakim IRC Bot: -MTCarrasco ←
14:58:41 <Caroline_> bye!
bye! ←
14:58:44 <nathalia> bye
Nathalia Sautchuk Patrício: bye ←
14:58:45 <Zakim> -Eric_Kauz
Zakim IRC Bot: -Eric_Kauz ←
14:58:47 <CarlosIglesias> see you!
Carlos Iglesias: see you! ←
14:58:48 <RiccardoAlbertoni> bye
Riccardo Albertoni: bye ←
14:58:48 <Zakim> -Caroline_
Zakim IRC Bot: -Caroline_ ←
14:58:49 <Zakim> -Antoine
Zakim IRC Bot: -Antoine ←
14:58:49 <Zakim> -Makx_Dekkers
Zakim IRC Bot: -Makx_Dekkers ←
14:58:49 <Zakim> -ericstephan
Zakim IRC Bot: -ericstephan ←
14:58:52 <yaso> Bye all :-)
Yaso Córdova: Bye all :-) ←
14:58:52 <Zakim> -phila
Zakim IRC Bot: -phila ←
14:58:53 <Zakim> -HadleyBeeman
Zakim IRC Bot: -HadleyBeeman ←
14:58:53 <Zakim> -annette_g
Zakim IRC Bot: -annette_g ←
14:58:56 <Zakim> -CarlosIglesias
Zakim IRC Bot: -CarlosIglesias ←
14:58:58 <annette_g> bye
Annette Greiner: bye ←
14:58:58 <Zakim> -lewismc
Zakim IRC Bot: -lewismc ←
14:59:00 <AdrianoC> Bye
Adriano Pereira: Bye ←
14:59:00 <Zakim> -RiccardoAlbertoni
Zakim IRC Bot: -RiccardoAlbertoni ←
14:59:00 <Zakim> DATA_DWBP()9:00AM has ended
Zakim IRC Bot: DATA_DWBP()9:00AM has ended ←
14:59:00 <Zakim> Attendees were yaso, phila, JoaoPauloAlmeida, Eric_Kauz, lewismc, RiccardoAlbertoni, HadleyBeeman, MTCarrasco, laufer, Antoine, annette_g, newton, ericstephan, CarlosIglesias,
Zakim IRC Bot: Attendees were yaso, phila, JoaoPauloAlmeida, Eric_Kauz, lewismc, RiccardoAlbertoni, HadleyBeeman, MTCarrasco, laufer, Antoine, annette_g, newton, ericstephan, CarlosIglesias, ←
14:59:00 <Zakim> ... MakxDekkers, Makx_Dekkers, nathalia
Zakim IRC Bot: ... MakxDekkers, Makx_Dekkers, nathalia ←
Formatted by CommonScribe