W3C

- DRAFT -

SV_MEETING_TITLE

11 Dec 2012

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Janina, Judy, John_Foliot, Joshue
Regrets
Chair
judy
Scribe
janina

Contents


<scribe> scribe: janina

JB: Organizing to walk Bug Triage reported bugs

<Judy> bugwrangler: john

Agenda review; identify scribe.

Janina will scribe ...

Review and processing of non-alt-related pending text bugs

<Judy> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9215

jb: Asks for webcam example conformant with WCAG 2
... Noting that one of the HTML editors, Robin, looking at the Sec. 4.8 & WCAG report, finds 4.8 not reality
... Perhaps our comment is that this example, plus all examples, should go into the separate, SF edited, alt doc

<Judy> js: you don't know what's in the image coming via a webcam

<Judy> ...don't think that it fits in video

<JF> +1 to Janina's comment

<Judy> ...favor steve's document...

<Joshue108> http://www.davidmacd.com/WCAG/WAI/buggy.html

js: Suggesting SF's doc is best location

jf: Suggests "example" unclear, is it an update every X seconds/minutes? That would be img
... Or is it stream to video element?

jb: Still think WCAG related examples should be collected under Techniques TF that Joshue Co-Facilitates

js: Suggest defer to 5.1

agreement to defer to 5.1, but need update on how WG process works for that

We're marking "resolved," "later," "additional comments: Moving to SF's doc" What's that title??

<JF> http://dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/

<Judy> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9216

jb: This one is a "captcha" example

agreement to do the same with this bug

<Judy> there is already an example in Steve's doc: http://dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/#sec13

Ah, we see that this is already in the Alt Text doc ...

<Judy> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10642

No alt for Video key frame

<Judy> For bug 10642, we need a way to re-open and assign to the TF; seems blocked within bugzilla interface.

<Judy> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13461

jb: We are identifying a need for better bug processing -- one that allows us to assign bugs/issues to the TF and track them apart from HTML-WG timelines

<Judy> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13461

<Judy> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13651

For 13651 we'd like to defer to 5.1

<Judy> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13727

Thi is phrase or para with alternative graphical presentation

Discussed som, Dec 2011

For 13727 we like to defer to 5.1

<Judy> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13428

This is about removing authoring guidance in Sec 4.8

We have provided new information, is now in progress

Currently in discussion with editors

For 13428 we reopened and note it's in process

<Judy> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13728

Guidance for conformance checkers re alt

For 13728 we believe this is Meta Generator and need to verify that the agreed changes have been made

We need confirmation from Mike Smith

<Judy> ...that it has been implemented in the validator

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.137 (CVS log)
$Date: 2012/12/11 19:02:01 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.137  of Date: 2012/09/20 20:19:01  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found Scribe: janina
Inferring ScribeNick: janina
Default Present: Janina, Judy, John_Foliot, Joshue
Present: Janina Judy John_Foliot Joshue

WARNING: No meeting title found!
You should specify the meeting title like this:
<dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting

Got date from IRC log name: 11 Dec 2012
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2012/12/11-text-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]