ISSUE-60: Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party?

Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Compliance Next
Raised by:
Opened on:
2011-09-22
Description:
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. reminder: issue cleanup and closing issues (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-05-28)
  2. Agenda for May 22 call (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-05-21)
  3. issue and action cleanup proposals (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-05-15)
  4. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from rigo@w3.org on 2013-03-07)
  5. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from derhoermi@gmx.net on 2013-03-07)
  6. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from rigo@w3.org on 2013-03-06)
  7. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from derhoermi@gmx.net on 2013-03-03)
  8. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-03-01)
  9. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from justin@cdt.org on 2013-03-01)
  10. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from rigo@w3.org on 2013-03-01)
  11. RE: RE: RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-03-01)
  12. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from singer@apple.com on 2013-03-01)
  13. RE: RE: RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-03-01)
  14. Re: RE: RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from rigo@w3.org on 2013-02-28)
  15. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from derhoermi@gmx.net on 2013-02-28)
  16. RE: RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from a.hanff@think-privacy.com on 2013-02-27)
  17. Re: RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from rigo@w3.org on 2013-02-27)
  18. RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from a.hanff@think-privacy.com on 2013-02-27)
  19. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-02-27)
  20. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from justin@cdt.org on 2013-02-27)
  21. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2013-02-27)
  22. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from justin@cdt.org on 2013-02-27)
  23. RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from a.hanff@think-privacy.com on 2013-02-27)
  24. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from justin@cdt.org on 2013-02-27)
  25. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl on 2013-02-27)
  26. RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from a.hanff@think-privacy.com on 2013-02-27)
  27. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from justin@cdt.org on 2013-02-27)
  28. RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from a.hanff@think-privacy.com on 2013-02-27)
  29. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from heatherwest@google.com on 2013-02-27)
  30. RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from a.hanff@think-privacy.com on 2013-02-27)
  31. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from justin@cdt.org on 2013-02-27)
  32. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-02-27)
  33. RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from a.hanff@think-privacy.com on 2013-02-27)
  34. ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from justin@cdt.org on 2013-02-27)
  35. Re: Please reopen ISSUE-10 (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2013-01-23)
  36. Please reopen ISSUE-10 (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2013-01-22)
  37. Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from robsherman@fb.com on 2012-11-14)
  38. Re: Agenda for 14 November 2012 call (from tlr@w3.org on 2012-11-14)
  39. Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-11-13)
  40. RE: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2012-11-12)
  41. RE: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2012-11-12)
  42. Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-11-12)
  43. Re: issue-60 (first and third party) -- Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from tlr@w3.org on 2012-11-12)
  44. RE: issue-60 (first and third party) -- Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from CPedigo@online-publishers.org on 2012-11-12)
  45. issue-60 (first and third party) -- Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from tlr@w3.org on 2012-11-12)
  46. Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2012-11-12)
  47. Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from robsherman@fb.com on 2012-11-12)
  48. RE: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2012-11-10)
  49. RE: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2012-11-10)
  50. Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from david@networkadvertising.org on 2012-11-09)
  51. RE: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2012-11-09)
  52. Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from ifette@google.com on 2012-11-09)
  53. Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from vigoel@adobe.com on 2012-11-09)
  54. Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-11-09)
  55. RE: Proposed agenda for Amsterdam F2F on October 03-05, 2012 (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-09-23)
  56. Proposed agenda for Amsterdam F2F on October 03-05, 2012 (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2012-09-21)
  57. requirements on consistency of '1' response with actual use (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-08-23)
  58. Agenda for 22 August 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-08-21)
  59. RE: ISSUE-60: proposed to close (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-04-11)
  60. Re: ISSUE-60: proposed to close (from peter.eckersley@gmail.com on 2012-04-11)
  61. RE: ISSUE-60: proposed to close (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-04-11)
  62. Re: ISSUE-60: proposed to close (from heatherwest@google.com on 2012-04-11)
  63. ISSUE-60: proposed to close (from peter.eckersley@gmail.com on 2012-04-11)
  64. Issue-5 - Cross Tracking Definition Proposal (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-02-06)
  65. Agenda for 2012-1-3 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-01-03)
  66. Re: [ISSUE-5] What is the definition of tracking? (from CPedigo@online-publishers.org on 2011-12-10)
  67. Re: [ISSUE-5] What is the definition of tracking? (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2011-12-10)
  68. [ISSUE-5] What is the definition of tracking? (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2011-12-09)
  69. TPE removing first vs third-party issues (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-10-31)
  70. Re: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from tom@mozilla.com on 2011-10-27)
  71. Re: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from karld@opera.com on 2011-10-21)
  72. Re: Call for Experts: How can a site determine whether it is 1st or 3rd party? [ISSUE-60] (from karld@opera.com on 2011-10-21)
  73. Re: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from singer@apple.com on 2011-10-18)
  74. RE: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from jennifer.karan@doubleverify.com on 2011-10-16)
  75. Re: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from ktrilli@truste.com on 2011-10-16)
  76. Re: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from derhoermi@gmx.net on 2011-10-16)
  77. RE: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2011-10-15)
  78. RE: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-15)
  79. RE: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2011-10-15)
  80. RE: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2011-10-15)
  81. RE: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-15)
  82. Re: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-15)
  83. [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2011-10-14)
  84. Re: Call for Experts: How can a site determine whether it is 1st or 3rd party? [ISSUE-60] (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-14)
  85. Re: Call for Experts: How can a site determine whether it is 1st or 3rd party? [ISSUE-60] (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-13)
  86. RE: first parties (from brett@adobe.com on 2011-10-09)
  87. Re: first parties (from tien@eff.org on 2011-10-09)
  88. Re: first parties (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-09)
  89. RE: first parties (from brett@adobe.com on 2011-10-07)
  90. Re: first parties (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-07)
  91. RE: first parties (from mike@iab.net on 2011-10-07)
  92. RE: first parties (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-07)
  93. Re: first parties (from justin@cdt.org on 2011-10-07)
  94. RE: first parties (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-07)
  95. Re: first parties (from justin@cdt.org on 2011-10-06)
  96. RE: first parties (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-06)
  97. RE: first parties (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2011-10-06)
  98. first parties (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-10-06)
  99. ISSUE-60: Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-09-22)

Related notes:

This does not affect the protocol at this point. We therefore shifted it to the compliance doc.

Matthias Schunter, 1 Nov 2011, 00:57:23

See Action-25
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2011Nov/0018.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2011Nov/0051.html

Aleecia McDonald, 28 Nov 2011, 09:29:07

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2011Nov/0225.html

Aleecia McDonald, 28 Nov 2011, 10:35:56

Closed during issue cleanup.

Nick Doty, 15 Jun 2013, 22:25:17

Display change log ATOM feed


Matthias Schunter <matthias.schunter@intel.com>, Chair, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.325 2014-09-10 21:42:02 ted Exp $