ISSUE-60: Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party?
Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Compliance Next
- Raised by:
- Opened on:
- 2011-09-22
- Description:
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- reminder: issue cleanup and closing issues (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-05-28)
- Agenda for May 22 call (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-05-21)
- issue and action cleanup proposals (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-05-15)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from rigo@w3.org on 2013-03-07)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from derhoermi@gmx.net on 2013-03-07)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from rigo@w3.org on 2013-03-06)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from derhoermi@gmx.net on 2013-03-03)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-03-01)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from justin@cdt.org on 2013-03-01)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from rigo@w3.org on 2013-03-01)
- RE: RE: RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-03-01)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from singer@apple.com on 2013-03-01)
- RE: RE: RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-03-01)
- Re: RE: RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from rigo@w3.org on 2013-02-28)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from derhoermi@gmx.net on 2013-02-28)
- RE: RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from a.hanff@think-privacy.com on 2013-02-27)
- Re: RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from rigo@w3.org on 2013-02-27)
- RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from a.hanff@think-privacy.com on 2013-02-27)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-02-27)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from justin@cdt.org on 2013-02-27)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2013-02-27)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from justin@cdt.org on 2013-02-27)
- RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from a.hanff@think-privacy.com on 2013-02-27)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from justin@cdt.org on 2013-02-27)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl on 2013-02-27)
- RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from a.hanff@think-privacy.com on 2013-02-27)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from justin@cdt.org on 2013-02-27)
- RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from a.hanff@think-privacy.com on 2013-02-27)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from heatherwest@google.com on 2013-02-27)
- RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from a.hanff@think-privacy.com on 2013-02-27)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from justin@cdt.org on 2013-02-27)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-02-27)
- RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from a.hanff@think-privacy.com on 2013-02-27)
- ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from justin@cdt.org on 2013-02-27)
- Re: Please reopen ISSUE-10 (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2013-01-23)
- Please reopen ISSUE-10 (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2013-01-22)
- Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from robsherman@fb.com on 2012-11-14)
- Re: Agenda for 14 November 2012 call (from tlr@w3.org on 2012-11-14)
- Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-11-13)
- RE: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2012-11-12)
- RE: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2012-11-12)
- Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-11-12)
- Re: issue-60 (first and third party) -- Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from tlr@w3.org on 2012-11-12)
- RE: issue-60 (first and third party) -- Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from CPedigo@online-publishers.org on 2012-11-12)
- issue-60 (first and third party) -- Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from tlr@w3.org on 2012-11-12)
- Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2012-11-12)
- Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from robsherman@fb.com on 2012-11-12)
- RE: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2012-11-10)
- RE: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2012-11-10)
- Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from david@networkadvertising.org on 2012-11-09)
- RE: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2012-11-09)
- Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from ifette@google.com on 2012-11-09)
- Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from vigoel@adobe.com on 2012-11-09)
- Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-11-09)
- RE: Proposed agenda for Amsterdam F2F on October 03-05, 2012 (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-09-23)
- Proposed agenda for Amsterdam F2F on October 03-05, 2012 (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2012-09-21)
- requirements on consistency of '1' response with actual use (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-08-23)
- Agenda for 22 August 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-08-21)
- RE: ISSUE-60: proposed to close (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-04-11)
- Re: ISSUE-60: proposed to close (from peter.eckersley@gmail.com on 2012-04-11)
- RE: ISSUE-60: proposed to close (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-04-11)
- Re: ISSUE-60: proposed to close (from heatherwest@google.com on 2012-04-11)
- ISSUE-60: proposed to close (from peter.eckersley@gmail.com on 2012-04-11)
- Issue-5 - Cross Tracking Definition Proposal (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-02-06)
- Agenda for 2012-1-3 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-01-03)
- Re: [ISSUE-5] What is the definition of tracking? (from CPedigo@online-publishers.org on 2011-12-10)
- Re: [ISSUE-5] What is the definition of tracking? (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2011-12-10)
- [ISSUE-5] What is the definition of tracking? (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2011-12-09)
- TPE removing first vs third-party issues (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-10-31)
- Re: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from tom@mozilla.com on 2011-10-27)
- Re: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from karld@opera.com on 2011-10-21)
- Re: Call for Experts: How can a site determine whether it is 1st or 3rd party? [ISSUE-60] (from karld@opera.com on 2011-10-21)
- Re: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from singer@apple.com on 2011-10-18)
- RE: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from jennifer.karan@doubleverify.com on 2011-10-16)
- Re: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from ktrilli@truste.com on 2011-10-16)
- Re: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from derhoermi@gmx.net on 2011-10-16)
- RE: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2011-10-15)
- RE: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-15)
- RE: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2011-10-15)
- RE: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2011-10-15)
- RE: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-15)
- Re: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-15)
- [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2011-10-14)
- Re: Call for Experts: How can a site determine whether it is 1st or 3rd party? [ISSUE-60] (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-14)
- Re: Call for Experts: How can a site determine whether it is 1st or 3rd party? [ISSUE-60] (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-13)
- RE: first parties (from brett@adobe.com on 2011-10-09)
- Re: first parties (from tien@eff.org on 2011-10-09)
- Re: first parties (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-09)
- RE: first parties (from brett@adobe.com on 2011-10-07)
- Re: first parties (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-07)
- RE: first parties (from mike@iab.net on 2011-10-07)
- RE: first parties (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-07)
- Re: first parties (from justin@cdt.org on 2011-10-07)
- RE: first parties (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-07)
- Re: first parties (from justin@cdt.org on 2011-10-06)
- RE: first parties (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-06)
- RE: first parties (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2011-10-06)
- first parties (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-10-06)
- ISSUE-60: Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-09-22)
Related notes:
This does not affect the protocol at this point. We therefore shifted it to the compliance doc.
Matthias Schunter, 1 Nov 2011, 00:57:23See Action-25
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2011Nov/0018.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2011Nov/0051.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2011Nov/0225.html
Aleecia McDonald, 28 Nov 2011, 10:35:56Closed during issue cleanup.
Nick Doty, 15 Jun 2013, 22:25:17Display change log