ACTION-25: Sketch four approaches to 1p vs. 3p distinction due friday

Sketch four approaches to 1p vs. 3p distinction due friday

State:

closed

Person:

Jonathan Mayer

Due on:

November 2, 2011

Created on:

October 26, 2011

Related emails:

1. Re: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2011-11-11)
2. RE: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2011-11-11)
3. Re: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2011-11-04)
4. Re: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2011-11-04)
5. Re: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (from dwainberg@appnexus.com on 2011-11-03)
6. Re: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (from vp@iabeurope.eu on 2011-11-03)
7. Re: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (from dwainberg@appnexus.com on 2011-11-03)
8. Re: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (from rigo@w3.org on 2011-11-02)
9. Re: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2011-11-01)
10. Re: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (from rigo@w3.org on 2011-11-01)
11. Re: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2011-10-30)
12. Re: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-10-30)
13. RE: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2011-10-30)
14. Re: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (from ashkan.soltani@gmail.com on 2011-10-30)
15. Re: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (from mike@iab.net on 2011-10-30)
16. Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2011-10-28)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log.