ISSUE-49: Third party as first party - is a third party that collects data on behalf of the first party treated the same way as the first party?
service provider
Third party as first party - is a third party that collects data on behalf of the first party treated the same way as the first party?
- State:
- PENDING REVIEW
- Product:
- Compliance Next
- Raised by:
- Opened on:
- 2011-09-22
- Description:
- Related Actions Items:
- ACTION-161 on Shane Wiley to work on issue-49 - due 2012-09-05, pending review
ACTION-47 on Jonathan Mayer to Write discussion on best practices for 3.6.1.2.1 - due 2012-03-10, closedACTION-169 on Rigo Wenning to Create text describing "if your privacy policies don't match, don't claim an associated domain" - due 2012-05-09, closed- Related emails:
- Batch closing of old issues (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2015-03-24)
- Re: Agenda for June 11 TPWG call (from singer@apple.com on 2014-06-10)
- Agenda for June 11 TPWG call (from ninja@w3.org on 2014-06-09)
- Agenda for June 4 TPWG call (from ninja@w3.org on 2014-06-02)
- Re: Agenda for May 21 TPWG call (from sstamm@mozilla.com on 2014-05-21)
- RE: Agenda for May 21 TPWG call (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2014-05-21)
- ISSUE-170: Data Append and First Parties (from robsherman@fb.com on 2014-05-21)
- Re: Agenda for May 21 TPWG call (from singer@mac.com on 2014-05-20)
- Agenda for May 21 TPWG call (from ninja@w3.org on 2014-05-19)
- Re: Agenda for May 14 TPWG call (from jack@networkadvertising.org on 2014-05-14)
- Re: Agenda for May 14 TPWG call (from kulick@yahoo-inc.com on 2014-05-14)
- Re: Agenda for May 14 TPWG call - UPDATE (from ninja@w3.org on 2014-05-14)
- Re: Agenda for May 14 TPWG call (from singer@mac.com on 2014-05-13)
- Agenda for May 14 TPWG call (from ninja@w3.org on 2014-05-12)
- Re: June Change Proposal, service provider => implementation partner (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-06-26)
- Agenda for May 22 call (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-05-21)
- issue and action cleanup proposals (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-05-15)
- Re: Mapping the "framework" to ISSUEs (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-05-07)
- Mapping the "framework" to ISSUEs (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-05-07)
- Re: Please reopen ISSUE-10 (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2013-01-23)
- Please reopen ISSUE-10 (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2013-01-22)
- Agenda for 26 September 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-09-25)
- RE: Proposed agenda for Amsterdam F2F on October 03-05, 2012 (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-09-23)
- Proposed agenda for Amsterdam F2F on October 03-05, 2012 (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2012-09-21)
- ISSUE-49 and ISSUE-137 are related (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-09-19)
- Re: Agenda for 12 September 2012 call (from CPedigo@online-publishers.org on 2012-09-12)
- RE: ACTION-161: work on issue-49 (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-09-12)
- Re: ACTION-161: work on issue-49 (from vigoel@adobe.com on 2012-09-12)
- ACTION-161: work on issue-49 (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-09-11)
- Agenda for 12 September 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-09-11)
- Re: Agenda for 5 September 2012 call (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-09-04)
- Re: Agenda for 5 September 2012 call (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-09-04)
- Re: Agenda for 5 September 2012 call (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-09-04)
- Re: Agenda for 5 September 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-09-04)
- FW: Agenda for 5 September 2012 call (from Brooks.Dobbs@kbmg.com on 2012-09-04)
- Agenda for 5 September 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-09-04)
- Re: Service Provider Status (ISSUE-137) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-08-30)
- Agenda for 22 August 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-08-21)
- Re: agenda for 1 August 2012 call (from ifette@google.com on 2012-08-01)
- Re: agenda for 1 August 2012 call (from david@networkadvertising.org on 2012-08-01)
- agenda for 1 August 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-07-31)
- ISSUE-49: Third party as first party - is a third party that collects data on behalf of the first party treated the same way as the first party? (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-04-24)
- Updated response to Aleecia's Template, Issue-10, Issue-17, Issue-19, Issue-22, Issue-24, Issue-25, Issue-31, Issue-49, Issue-73 (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-04-07)
- deeper look at agenda items (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-04-07)
- Revised template for parties and business uses (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-03-28)
- Re: Best Practices for Outsourcing (ACTION-47, ISSUE-49) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-03-19)
- RE: Best Practices for Outsourcing (ACTION-47, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-03-18)
- Re: Best Practices for Outsourcing (ACTION-47, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-18)
- RE: Best Practices for Outsourcing (ACTION-47, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-03-18)
- Re: Best Practices for Outsourcing (ACTION-47, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-03-18)
- RE: Best Practices for Outsourcing (ACTION-47, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-03-18)
- Re: Best Practices for Outsourcing (ACTION-47, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-03-18)
- Re: Best Practices for Outsourcing (ACTION-47, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-18)
- RE: Best Practices for Outsourcing (ACTION-47, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-03-18)
- Re: Best Practices for Outsourcing (ACTION-47, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-16)
- Re: Best Practices for Outsourcing (ACTION-47, ISSUE-49) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-03-16)
- Re: Best Practices for Outsourcing (ACTION-47, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-16)
- Re: Best Practices for Outsourcing (ACTION-47, ISSUE-49) (from vigoel@adobe.com on 2012-03-16)
- Best Practices for Outsourcing (ACTION-47, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-14)
- RE: RE: FW: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-02-21)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-02-15)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from gelman@blurryedge.com on 2012-02-15)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-02-15)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-14)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from K.Joe@esomar.org on 2012-02-14)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2012-02-13)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-13)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from K.Joe@esomar.org on 2012-02-13)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-12)
- RE: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-12)
- Re: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track (from rob@blaeu.com on 2012-02-12)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from ggieron@adtruth.com on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mgroman@networkadvertising.org on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from ggieron@adtruth.com on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from justin@cdt.org on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from peter.eckersley@gmail.com on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from peter.eckersley@gmail.com on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from gelman@blurryedge.com on 2012-02-10)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from justin@cdt.org on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from peter.eckersley@gmail.com on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-02-10)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-10)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mike@iab.net on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2012-02-10)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from peter.eckersley@gmail.com on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from ed@felten.com on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2012-02-09)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-09)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-09)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from gelman@blurryedge.com on 2012-02-09)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-02-09)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from justin@cdt.org on 2012-02-09)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-09)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-09)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-02-09)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-09)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-09)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-09)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-02-09)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-09)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-02-09)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-09)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-08)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-02-08)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-08)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-08)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-08)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from nmarnau@datenschutzzentrum.de on 2012-02-08)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-02-08)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-08)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-08)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2012-02-07)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-07)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-07)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-07)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-07)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-07)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-02-07)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-06)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from ed@felten.com on 2012-02-06)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mike@iab.net on 2012-02-06)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from dwainberg@appnexus.com on 2012-02-06)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from sharvey@google.com on 2012-02-06)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-06)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-06)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-06)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-06)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-06)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-06)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-02-06)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-05)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-05)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-05)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from sharvey@google.com on 2012-02-05)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-05)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from blsaws@gmail.com on 2012-02-04)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-03)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-02-02)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-02-02)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-02-02)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-02)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-02)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-02)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-02)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from gelman@blurryedge.com on 2012-02-01)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from blsaws@gmail.com on 2012-02-01)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from gelman@blurryedge.com on 2012-02-01)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from blsaws@gmail.com on 2012-02-01)
- Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-01)
- Re: issues 23 and 34, happy new year's initial text for all... (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-01-10)
- Next steps on compliance issues (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-12-03)
- RE: first parties (from brett@adobe.com on 2011-10-09)
- Re: first parties (from tien@eff.org on 2011-10-09)
- Re: first parties (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-09)
- RE: first parties (from brett@adobe.com on 2011-10-07)
- Re: first parties (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-07)
- RE: first parties (from mike@iab.net on 2011-10-07)
- RE: first parties (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-07)
- Re: first parties (from justin@cdt.org on 2011-10-07)
- RE: first parties (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-07)
- Re: first parties (from justin@cdt.org on 2011-10-06)
- RE: first parties (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-06)
- RE: first parties (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2011-10-06)
- first parties (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-10-06)
- ISSUE-49: Third party as first party - is a third party that collects data on behalf of the first party treated the same way as the first party? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-09-22)
- More details for tomorrow AM (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-09-22)
Related notes:
See also, Issue-73
Aleecia McDonald, 28 Nov 2011, 07:39:16http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2011Oct/0009.html -- Proposed text from Shane, action-5
Aleecia McDonald, 28 Nov 2011, 10:44:28As per the call on 11 January (see http://www.w3.org/2012/01/11-dnt-minutes) we're moving text from a issue-23 and issue-34 into this more general issue. We decided the text is good, and responsive to a more general case.
The text is here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Jan/0007.html and the thread continues with email comments.
With this, we are closing issue-23 and issue-34, and moving issue-49 to pending review.
During issue cleanup, marked as Pending Review Stable. Editors' draft has two options here, not currently under active discussion.
Nick Doty, 29 May 2013, 01:59:38Display change log