ACTION-293: Draft non-normative examples illustrating graduated response
Draft non-normative examples illustrating graduated response
- State:
- pending review
- Person:
- Jonathan Mayer
- Due on:
- October 11, 2012
- Created on:
- October 4, 2012
- Associated Issue:
- ISSUE-24
- Related emails:
- action-409: gathering history on "graduated response" (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-06-05)
- Re: today's (24 October 2012) call: canceled (from ifette@google.com on 2012-10-24)
- Re: today's (24 October 2012) call: canceled (from david@networkadvertising.org on 2012-10-24)
- today's (24 October 2012) call: canceled (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-10-24)
- Re: Agenda for 16 October 2012 call (from tlr@w3.org on 2012-10-17)
- Re: Agenda for 16 October 2012 call (from bszoka@techfreedom.org on 2012-10-17)
- Re: Agenda for 16 October 2012 call (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-10-16)
- Agenda for 16 October 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-10-16)
- Agenda for 16 October 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-10-16)
Related notes:
Added a pair of fraud prevention examples to the compromise proposal at http://jonathanmayer.github.com/dnt-compromise/compromise-proposal.html.
Jonathan Mayer, 31 Oct 2012, 06:05:31Text from Mayer's proposal:
"A third party may receive and use protocol information for the detection and prevention of security breaches and fraudulent activity, subject to a six-month retention period and the restrictions imposed in the subsequent sections on security and fraud prevention."
Display change log.