ISSUE-24: Possible exemption for fraud detection and defense
Possible exemption for fraud detection and defense
- State:
- PENDING REVIEW
- Product:
- Compliance Current
- Raised by:
- Opened on:
- 2011-09-21
- Description:
- Note change proposals: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Security
- Related Actions Items:
- ACTION-279 on Ian Fette to Write an explanation of graduated response and a list of explanatory use cases - due 2012-10-10, pending review
- ACTION-293 on Jonathan Mayer to Draft non-normative examples illustrating graduated response - due 2012-10-11, pending review
- ACTION-339 on Walter van Holst to Propose a refinement to debugging permitted use - due 2012-11-21, pending review
ACTION-104 on Amy Colando to Draft text for issue-24 - due 2012-03-22, closed- ACTION-408 on David Wainberg to Review security/fraud text (with chris mejia and dan auerbach) - due 2013-05-29, open
- Related emails:
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-276: normativity of graduated response language [TCS Last Call] (from npdoty@w3.org on 2015-11-06)
- Batch closing of old issues (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2015-03-24)
- Consensus language on ISSUE-24, ISSUE-148 (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2014-11-19)
- Re: ISSUE-24 (fraud detection and defense) (from singer@apple.com on 2014-11-12)
- Re: ISSUE-24 (fraud detection and defense) (from npdoty@w3.org on 2014-11-11)
- Agenda for November 12 TPWG call (from npdoty@w3.org on 2014-11-11)
- Agenda for November 4 TPWG call (from npdoty@w3.org on 2014-11-04)
- Re: Agenda for October 22 TPWG call (from singer@apple.com on 2014-10-22)
- Agenda for October 22 TPWG call (from npdoty@w3.org on 2014-10-21)
- Re: ISSUE-24 (fraud detection and defense) (from npdoty@w3.org on 2014-10-14)
- Re: Issue-148 meaning of DNT:0 (from singer@apple.com on 2014-10-14)
- Agenda for October 15 TPWG call (from npdoty@w3.org on 2014-10-14)
- RE: ISSUE-24 (fraud detection and defense) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2014-10-09)
- Re: ISSUE-24 (fraud detection and defense) (from singer@apple.com on 2014-10-09)
- RE: ISSUE-24 (fraud detection and defense) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2014-10-09)
- Re: ISSUE-24 (fraud detection and defense) (from singer@apple.com on 2014-10-09)
- RE: ISSUE-24 (fraud detection and defense) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2014-10-09)
- Re: ISSUE-24 (fraud detection and defense) (from singer@apple.com on 2014-10-09)
- RE: ISSUE-24 (fraud detection and defense) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2014-10-09)
- ISSUE-24 (fraud detection and defense) (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2014-10-09)
- Issue-148 meaning of DNT:0 (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2014-10-08)
- Agenda for October 8 TPWG call (from npdoty@w3.org on 2014-10-07)
- Re: Issue 24 - Consensus (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-10-23)
- RE: Issue 24 - Consensus (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2013-10-23)
- Issue 24 - Consensus (from cargill@adobe.com on 2013-10-22)
- Re: ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-10-15)
- Re: issue-24 proposal 2 (from singer@apple.com on 2013-10-09)
- Re: issue-24 proposal 2 (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2013-10-09)
- TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V01) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-10-09)
- issue-24 proposal 2 (from singer@apple.com on 2013-10-09)
- Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-10-09)
- Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) (from jack@networkadvertising.org on 2013-10-08)
- Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-10-08)
- Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) (from singer@apple.com on 2013-10-07)
- Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) (from jack@networkadvertising.org on 2013-10-07)
- TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-10-07)
- Re: ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call (from robsherman@fb.com on 2013-10-07)
- Re: ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call (from robsherman@fb.com on 2013-10-07)
- ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call (from kathy@esomar.org on 2013-10-04)
- Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V03) (from jack@networkadvertising.org on 2013-10-03)
- TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V03) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-10-03)
- Re: ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call (from robsherman@fb.com on 2013-10-03)
- TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V02) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-10-02)
- ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call (from kathy@esomar.org on 2013-10-02)
- Agenda for the October 02 call (V01) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-10-01)
- Compliance document updates for review before next WD publication (was CVS WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts) (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-09-28)
- Re: updating Compliance doc with graduated response (from singer@apple.com on 2013-09-24)
- Re: updating Compliance doc with graduated response (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-09-24)
- Re: updating Compliance doc with graduated response (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-09-24)
- Agenda for the Sept 25 call (V01) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-09-24)
- Re: clarifying distinctions on ISSUE-24 (security/fraud) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2013-07-17)
- FW: clarifying distinctions on ISSUE-24 (security/fraud) (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-07-17)
- Re: clarifying distinctions on ISSUE-24 (security/fraud) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2013-07-17)
- Re: clarifying distinctions on ISSUE-24 (security/fraud) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-07-16)
- Re: clarifying distinctions on ISSUE-24 (security/fraud) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2013-07-16)
- RE: clarifying distinctions on ISSUE-24 (security/fraud) (from craigs@otalliance.org on 2013-07-16)
- Re: clarifying distinctions on ISSUE-24 (security/fraud) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2013-07-16)
- Re: clarifying distinctions on ISSUE-24 (security/fraud) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-07-16)
- Re: clarifying distinctions on ISSUE-24 (security/fraud) (from tien@eff.org on 2013-07-16)
- Re: clarifying distinctions on ISSUE-24 (security/fraud) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-07-16)
- Re: clarifying distinctions on ISSUE-24 (security/fraud) (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-07-16)
- Re: clarifying distinctions on ISSUE-24 (security/fraud) (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-07-16)
- clarifying distinctions on ISSUE-24 (security/fraud) (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-07-16)
- Re: Agenda for DNT Call July 17 -- amendment (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-07-16)
- Re: Agenda for DNT Call July 17 (from vigoel@adobe.com on 2013-07-16)
- Agenda for DNT Call July 17 (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-07-16)
- Re: DNT Agenda for Wednesday, July 10 (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-07-09)
- DNT Agenda for Wednesday, July 10 (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-07-09)
- Re: June Change Proposal: security and fraud exemption (Issue-24) (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-06-26)
- June Change Proposal: security and fraud exemption (Issue-24) (from tien@eff.org on 2013-06-25)
- Re: Change proposal -- Permitted Use Security and Fraud -- Issue-24 (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-06-21)
- change proposal Re: ACTION-408 - security & fraud proposed text - June Draft (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-06-21)
- RE: Change proposal -- Permitted Use Security and Fraud -- Issue-24 (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-06-21)
- RE: Change proposal -- Permitted Use Security and Fraud -- Issue-24 (from craigs@otalliance.org on 2013-06-21)
- Change proposal -- Permitted Use Security and Fraud -- Issue-24 (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-06-21)
- Re: issue and action cleanup proposals (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-05-21)
- Agenda for May 22 call (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-05-21)
- Re: issue and action cleanup proposals (from ylagos@futureofprivacy.org on 2013-05-21)
- Re: issue and action cleanup proposals (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-05-19)
- issue and action cleanup proposals (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-05-15)
- Re: Mapping the "framework" to ISSUEs (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-05-07)
- Mapping the "framework" to ISSUEs (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-05-07)
- RE: Proposed agenda for Amsterdam F2F on October 03-05, 2012 (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-09-23)
- Proposed agenda for Amsterdam F2F on October 03-05, 2012 (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2012-09-21)
- agenda: 18 April 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-04-18)
- Updated response to Aleecia's Template, Issue-10, Issue-17, Issue-19, Issue-22, Issue-24, Issue-25, Issue-31, Issue-49, Issue-73 (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-04-07)
- deeper look at agenda items (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-04-07)
- Revised template for parties and business uses (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-03-28)
- template for parties and business uses (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-03-28)
- Re: Proportionate Response for Fraud Prevention and Security (ISSUE-24) (from singer@apple.com on 2012-03-27)
- Re: Proportionate Response for Fraud Prevention and Security (ISSUE-24) (from haakonfb@opera.com on 2012-03-15)
- Re: Proportionate Response for Fraud Prevention and Security (ISSUE-24) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-03-15)
- Re: Proportionate Response for Fraud Prevention and Security (ISSUE-24) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-03-15)
- RE: Proportionate Response for Fraud Prevention and Security (ISSUE-24) (from craigs@otalliance.org on 2012-03-14)
- RE: Proportionate Response for Fraud Prevention and Security (ISSUE-24) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-03-14)
- Re: Proportionate Response for Fraud Prevention and Security (ISSUE-24) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-14)
- RE: Proportionate Response for Fraud Prevention and Security (ISSUE-24) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-03-14)
- Re: Proportionate Response for Fraud Prevention and Security (ISSUE-24) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-14)
- Re: Proportionate Response for Fraud Prevention and Security (ISSUE-24) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-03-14)
- Re: Proportionate Response for Fraud Prevention and Security (ISSUE-24) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-14)
- Re: Proportionate Response for Fraud Prevention and Security (ISSUE-24) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-03-14)
- Proportionate Response for Fraud Prevention and Security (ISSUE-24) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-13)
- Fraud Prevention (ISSUE-24) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-08)
- RE: RE: FW: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-02-21)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-02-15)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from gelman@blurryedge.com on 2012-02-15)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-02-15)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-14)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from K.Joe@esomar.org on 2012-02-14)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2012-02-13)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-13)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from K.Joe@esomar.org on 2012-02-13)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-12)
- RE: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-12)
- Re: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track (from rob@blaeu.com on 2012-02-12)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from ggieron@adtruth.com on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mgroman@networkadvertising.org on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from ggieron@adtruth.com on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from justin@cdt.org on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from peter.eckersley@gmail.com on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from peter.eckersley@gmail.com on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from gelman@blurryedge.com on 2012-02-10)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from justin@cdt.org on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from peter.eckersley@gmail.com on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-02-10)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-10)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mike@iab.net on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2012-02-10)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from peter.eckersley@gmail.com on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from ed@felten.com on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-02-10)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2012-02-09)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-09)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-09)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from gelman@blurryedge.com on 2012-02-09)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-02-09)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from justin@cdt.org on 2012-02-09)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-09)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-09)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-02-09)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-09)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-09)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-09)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-02-09)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-09)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-02-09)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-09)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-08)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-02-08)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-08)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-08)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-08)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from nmarnau@datenschutzzentrum.de on 2012-02-08)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-02-08)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-08)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-08)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2012-02-07)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-07)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-07)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-07)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-07)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-07)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-02-07)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-06)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from ed@felten.com on 2012-02-06)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mike@iab.net on 2012-02-06)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from dwainberg@appnexus.com on 2012-02-06)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from sharvey@google.com on 2012-02-06)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-06)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-06)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-06)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-06)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-06)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-06)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-02-06)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-05)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-05)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-05)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from sharvey@google.com on 2012-02-05)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-05)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from blsaws@gmail.com on 2012-02-04)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-03)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-02-02)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-02-02)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-02-02)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-02)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-02)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-02)
- RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-02)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from gelman@blurryedge.com on 2012-02-01)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from blsaws@gmail.com on 2012-02-01)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from gelman@blurryedge.com on 2012-02-01)
- Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from blsaws@gmail.com on 2012-02-01)
- Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-01)
- Re: Compliance issues (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2011-12-07)
- Compliance issues (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-12-06)
- Next steps on compliance issues (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-12-03)
- ISSUE-24: Possible exemption for fraud detection and defense (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-09-21)
Related notes:
Moving responsibility for a draft to Peter
Aleecia McDonald, 26 Jan 2012, 11:13:47Consensus on 2013-10-09 call to adopt change proposal 2 (from John and Roy): http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Security#Proposal_.282.29:_Add_retention_for_prosecution.2C_but_exclude_from_operational_use
Nick Doty, 23 Oct 2013, 00:00:03Display change log